patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,263,400 comments by 15,096 users - Patrick, PeopleUnited online now
invite response« First « Previous Comments 61 - 64 of 64 Search these comments
curious2
2014 May 27, 7:29am
I suspect most of those inaccuracies result from industry-driven PR.
Vicente
2014 May 27, 8:02am
Corporate influence on science? Say it ain't so!
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/04/cosmos-neil-tyson-lead-industry-science-denial
HydroCabron
2014 May 27, 8:06am
Relax: Corporate-funded science is sound science.
That's why I read only research funded by the tobacco, pharmaceutical, or coal industries.
curious2
2016 Sep 10, 5:28pm
Time to bump this thread, since another Wikipedia problem became evident today: pages can be too speedily deleted, particularly if they lack the support of a PR team or religious zealots defending them. It becomes a race against an unspecified deadline, to meet unspecified criteria, rather than working towards a defined goal on a reasonable schedule.
« First « Previous Comments 61 - 64 of 64 Search these comments
Has anyone ever found any errors in Wikipedia, small or large? Which articles or facts were they? Were these later corrected?
I have only occasionally found any errors myself and those were in low-rank articles.
#wikipedia