patrick.net

WE all understand the point of a protest vote. It is certainly a legitmate point of view. But Troy's point is valid too.
Troy says

What I was getting at was there was certainly 547 Nader voters who preferred Gore over Bush but were too stupid to vote strategically in a state where every vote for Gore was needed.

Yes Gore would have been a corporate tool too. But Gore is not = to Bush. That's what the disagreement comes down to. You say they are the same. Tell that the families of hundreds of thousands killed in Iraq (I'm not even saying whether it was right or wrong, or worth it or not - only that it's it's pretty hard to argue that it's no different).

Tenouncetrout says

How in the hell can we clean house, if your just going to bitch at every one with the broom, mop and bucket?

the way I see it, we have defective politicians because we have defective voters. Take a look up in Wisconsin -- the topic of this thread -- where the voters booted out Feingold and replaced him with some Republican teaparty cock who got rich making medical devices that Medicare patients used.

The Republican smeared Feingold for the Democratic move to start defunding Medicare Part C -- Medicare Advantage, something created by Republicans back in the 1990s that was an industry boondoggle just like their Medicare Part D, so they booted the Dem that would save Medicare as single-payer and put in a guy who would turn it into a voucher program if not worse.

"Cleaning house" means changing the mindsets of voters so they don't fall for this shit.

I don't think it's really possible.

We go to Iraq with or with out Bush.

If BP's actions in the last 2 years doesn't prove who's in charge, then nothing does.

Pollute the Gulf,
Cry Poor mouth,
Cost of Oil Production rises(supposedly)
Oil Comps post record Profits.

And we're still going after Oil countries for minor offenses, while we give resource poor countries a pass on humanities greatest atrocities. And you do remember who is president now right?

Tenouncetrout says

We go to Iraq with or with out Bush.

Perhaps, perhaps not. But the morons Bush sent to Baghdad -- Paul Bremer and all the Heritage Foundation interns etc. -- were the bigger mistake. The Marines were building election booths in 2003 for local elections when the brass in Baghdad told them things weren't going to go that way.

And you do remember who is president now right?

This nation is split 40-40-20. The president has very very little power and very little runroom to be liberal these days. The current occupant has to win Virginia, or Colorado, Iowa, NH, MN, PA, NV, WI, NM, and NJ.

40% of this country hates Obama, hates liberals, and wants a return to the 19th century. It's not our politicians that are the problem, it is the people.

Troy says

where the voters booted out Feingold and replaced him with some Republican teaparty cock who got rich making medical devices that Medicare patients used.

Well that proves my point, the Tea Party was trying to break the mold, to get away from the two parties.
It was the Democrats that villainized them, as racist monsters, because it just might have been possible they could have gained momentum, giving other options to the voters. I'm sure there were backroom Bipartisan meetings in Washington on how they could squash the movement and render them ineffective.
Liberals will hit the teaparty with a smear barrage assault, with doctored photoshop pics on the internet, or just random racist people and say they were from a teaparty rally.
While the Republicans will infiltrate the teaparty and marginalize them as the Republican status quo.
At this point I think Liberals will deserve every bit of collateral damage they may have created by meddling with party making process.

Tea party is synonymous with racists and anyone that disagrees with the Liberal educated elite.

Much like the tone of chastising Nader voters for the Democrat party's failings, people don't like it when condescending pricks try to make them yield to their bidding with skulduggery.

Tenouncetrout says

We go to Iraq with or with out Bush.

So you are saying that you know that Gore was beholden to the oil companies and the neocons in exactly the same way Bush was?

You are familiar with the neoconservatives right ? Cheney was a charter member.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

So all the raicst Tea Party signs were photoshopped? Come on now.

HousingWatcher says

So all the raicst Tea Party signs were photoshopped? Come on now.

Yes, and somehow even if the republicans can benefit by the racist vote (via the tea party) lets deny that racism exists or that racists if they do exist might be attracted to the group that is showing some pretty strong hatred toward Obama. Also let's hold that racists don't convince themselves that they aren't racist, and they don't ever have political opinions outside of their denied racism.

So TOT when you abandoned your liberal views, did you by any chance also coincidentally become an evangelical Christian? Did you find Jesus?

No I found Bejesus,

as in "The Democrats annoy the Bejesus out of me!"

Tenouncetrout says

the Tea Party was trying to break the mold, to get away from the two parties.

a ha ahaaha aha hah ahaha. Not after it was coopted by DeMint, Palin, etc. The Tea Party is just the GOP extremist vote in drag. They were the Birchers in the 1950s and the Goldwaterites in the the 1960s.

The racists in the Tea PArty are not racists because they all have "black friends" and they have a great relationship with "the blacks."

To imply that the Tea Party is somehow independent of the 2 parties is laughable. Look at the special election in NY. There is a Democrat, a Republican, and a 3rd party Tea PArty candidate? Who is the Tea Party endorsing? The Republican. It's also common knowledge that many Tea PArty heads are Republican operatives, such as Mark Meckler, the head of the Tea PArty Patriots:

Tea party strategist a longtime GOP operative

http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/mobile/?type=story&id=2011426936

Aside from the racist thing, which is really neither here nor there, the Tea Party is also like the Perot vote in 1992.

Clinton: 44,909,806
Bush: 39,104,550
Perot: 19,743,821

Democrats thank you, Perot voters! Clinton wouldn't have taken California if 2 out 3 Perot voters had held their nose and voted for Bush.

HousingWatcher says

So all the raicst Tea Party signs were photoshopped? Come on now.

You are very bigoted and don't even realize it. Just because a few racist types showed up at the tea party rally does not mean every tea partier is a bigot. The fact that you generalize people into groups and think all tea party members are racist says a lot about your character.

There are plenty of racists out there and they are in every party.

Yo Chris. It's clear that nobody said that all tea party members are racists, nobody even said or implied that most are.

But I think someone suggested that no Tea Party members are racist (i.e. photoshopped racist signs).

ChrisLA says

You are very bigoted

ChrisLA says

The fact that you generalize people into groups and think all tea party members are racist says a lot about your character.

HW referred to "the racists in the Tea Party," which only implies that there are racists in the Tea Party, nothing more.

I know you aren't even embarrassed, and are unlikely to apologize. What does that say about you?

marcus says

Yo Chris. It’s clear that nobody said that all tea party members are racists, nobody even said or implied that most are.

But I think someone suggested that no Tea Party members are racist (i.e. photoshopped racist signs).

You're "double talking out your ass" style Kungfu is no match for my "Bullshit proof" Kungfu style.

Remember grasshopper, all things do not fit into either back or white. There exists an in between which the relativists refer to as "grey."

marcus says

Remember grasshopper, all things do not fit into either back or white. There exists an in between which the relativists refer to as “grey.”

you are still double talking.

ok, your right Chris. Not all tea partiers are racist. Just 52%:

"Fifty-two percent believe too much has been made of the problems facing black people."

"But one in four believe the administration favors blacks over whites, an opinion shared by just 11 percent of Americans overall and seven percent of non-Tea Party whites."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20002529-503544.html#ixzz1MX0fQqrn

And only 1% of the Tea Party is black.

Hahahahaha!

I remember when the left staged rediculous signs at tea party rallies or said racists things, carefully videotaped themselves as "right wingers", and then posted them on blogs as evidence of stupid, racist people in the tea party.

Boo hoo! Life is so unfair when it's fair.

In the meantime, good luck with getting "poor" people (illegals) to be able to conduct voter fraud. If only the left could admit that they don't mind illegals driving down wages because it means them being able to win more elections.

Tee hee, kiss this Party benefit goodbye, Comrades!

Those commies at the rally are Republican plants meant to discredit unions. IN fact, I don't think the sign says "Fight for Communism." Sarah Palin personally Photoshopped it onto the sign to discredit the unions.

PolishKnight says

If only the left could admit that they don’t mind illegals driving down wages because it means them being able to win more elections.

Hmmm. Or it could be that the right can't admit they don't mind illegals driving down wages because it's more profits for the CEOs...