Comments 1 - 40 of 83 Next » Last » Search these comments
Well, the rich use the poor as flotation devices, so you could say that the tide elevates everybody per se.
And yet the typical American wage earner is no better off today than in 1980
They are clearly worse off, because of the "rents" you describe. And those rents are mostly going in to the pockets of the 1%.
You're talking about the total pie growing. If you are correct, then that's all the more reason that what the typical person (say median income - for example) should be getting more in exchange for their work, rather than less, than what they got 50 years ago.
That is false. The middle class are way better off today than they were 50 years ago. Just looking at income, even adjusting for inflation is very deceptive. The middle class and the poor have:
Better healthcare, and life span.
Better and safer cars.
Better homes.
Better communication gadgets.
Healthier food if they so choose.
More air travel and vacations.
Access to education.
And yet the typical American wage earner is no better off today than in 1980
They are clearly worse off, because of the "rents" you describe. And those rents are mostly going in to the pockets of the 1%.
That is false too. Rents are exploding in some high demand areas, and still very low in others, like Mid West.
A rising tide only lifts rich people's yachts
Even mother nature despises you useless slaves and peasants.
DIE ALREADY!
That is false too. Rents are exploding in some high demand areas, and still very low in others, like Mid West.
...rustbelt areas where there are no jobs.
So why does the majority put up with it?
Cheap toys?
Calvinism?
Prosperity Gospel?
EST/Self-Help?
Biofeedback Fallacy/Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace?
And nobody knows what to do about it, and there are no other power centers besides Corporatism (no Unions, no Grange of Middling Independent Farmers, less Small Businesses, etc.),
Separated in the 80s, GDP growth and Household Income are now officially divorced.
Remember that bit about a far, far, far more educated workforce and lots of technology?
"Deserve ain't got nothin' to do with it."
The middle class are way better off today than they were 50 years ago.
Better off financially, no doubt.
And yet the polls show zero increase in life satisfaction.
Richer…..no happier.
Progress!
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
If someone refuses to buy a yacht, what the fuck?, they're just an ASSHOLE
Not just an ASSHOLE but an impoverished servant who couldn't buy one even if they wanted too.
So why does the majority put up with it?
Toys. And nobody knows what to do about it, including myself.
Internet porn. That must be it.
The middle class are way better off today than they were 50 years ago.
Better off financially, no doubt.
And yet the polls show zero increase in life satisfaction.
Richer…..no happier.
Progress!
The polls showing that is an indication of how needlessly pessimistic we have become. Recent polls could also be a reflection of the great recession we have endured. The poor, the middle class, and the rich, all have a better standard of living than our grand parents.
Could be.
I went to watch "Fix: The Ministry Movie" and it was preceded by an ad.
"If you like late 80s/early 90s Heroin Addicted Industrial Rock Pioneer who sucked dick at bus stops to survive, and whose Father Figures were William Burroughs and Timothy Leary, then you'll love the latest version of Tiffany/Hanah Montana named Keiza or Kei$sha or whatever".
Yeah, sure, all knowing Systems Philosophy Biofeedback Self-Correcting Feedback Algo. More Loopy than Loop.
Some other hits included getting pampers ads before watching Set Control for the Heart of the Sun, and Tampax before Catholic School Girls Rule.
I once got that smartTV for my wife. It thought I was a gay nazi because I would record the History channel, while my wife recorded Bridezillas.
"If you loved Secret Weapons of WW2, and My Big Fat Greek Wedding 2, then you'll love Berlin Bathhouse: Twinks with Tanks".
Google thinks I'm a school principal since I just ran some research into Education Software providers for an outreach campaign and was logged into to my gmail account.
Those Machines of Loving Grace are pretty dumb.
Duckduckgo.com
Yep - it's great - though I still use image search on Google. It's default on my browser.
Next thing I'd like is a non-ARM open source laptop.
The fact that you give Salon a second thought is indicative of your economic literacy.
What happened to your own Pikketty who was even endorsed by Krugman. Even he said inequality was caused by inflation.
Notice the graph below posted by Thunderlips, the inflection point was 1971
Or this one:
1971 inflation was more possible because of the dollar being taken off of Bretton Woods.
Interesting graph.
Notice the steady rise all the way to the first oil crisis of 1973. The high inflation and high interest rates that followed kept the male real wages from rising. We see a sizable spurt during Clintons second term when inflation and interest rates fell, and almost every other economic indicator turned positive. After 911 male wages have had a hard time recovering, because so much of our wealth went towards fighting the post 911 wars.
My guess, even with wars, we will see a sharp rise in wages in the next 10 years.
Wars and inflation go hand in hand. The reason we went off of Bretton Woods in the first place was LBJ and Vietnam.
Wages are a reflection of productivity, productivity is a reflection of investment in producer goods. That is the problem there has been no investment in producer goods. Assuming the US can become competitive through productivity then the wages will go up.
One of the reasons for loosing the production was because of the Chinese devaluing the Yuan over the past few decades. Now that they have to revalue the Yuan some of that work could potentially come back.
Wars and inflation go hand in hand. The reason we went off of Bretton Woods in the first place was LBJ and Vietnam.
Wages are a reflection of productivity, productivity is a reflection of investment in producer goods. That is the problem there has been no investment in producer goods. Assuming the US can become competitive through productivity then the wages will go up.
One of the reasons for loosing the production was because of the Chinese devaluing the Yuan over the past few decades. Now that they have to revalue the Yuan some of that work could potentially come back.
One way of reversing our high taste for imports is through state of the art technology, and robotization in our factories to increase our productivity. Ofcourse, the unions will fight you all the way.
One way of reversing our high taste for imports is through state of the art technology, and robotization in our factories to increase our productivity. Ofcourse, the unions will fight you all the way.
Actually it is though investment in producer goods. If a guy digs ditches for a living he can increase his production by investing in a tractor.
The values of a culture are very much determined by the money supply controlled by state and through mercantilism. E.G. Parts of China and Germany were known for their lavish spending in the past. Currently that is different because in China when the Yuan's value was lowered the purchasing power was lowered which forced the people into more austere spending.
One way of reversing our high taste for imports is through state of the art technology, and robotization in our factories to increase our productivity.
The endgame any way you look at it, is greater unemployment and masses of peasants scrambling for crumbs. And thus we become the Third World countries we set out to take advantage of.
One way of reversing our high taste for imports is through state of the art technology, and robotization in our factories to increase our productivity.
The endgame any way you look at it, is greater unemployment and masses of peasants scrambling for crumbs. And thus we become the Third World countries we set out to take advantage of.
Trust me, it's a myth. I remember taking a class during my undergraduate years - Economics of Technology and Innovation. One of the first things we learnt was "technology creates more jobs than it loses." If you think about it, if technology did cost us more jobs than it creates, by now we would all be unemployed because the last 100 years has seen 99% of all inventions ever made.
Damn liberal! (high 5 me bubba!)
he he he. you can kiss my ass.
We have to get the status quo out of office and keep at the government pressuring them to get a healthy fear into our newly elected that if they keep managing self-enrichment from cultivating conflicts of interest--which is essentially all they EVER do--that they will be not only kicked out of office, but their illegitimate gains will be clawed back via prosecution and they might even do time in prison.
You talk too much. Why don't you do something about it, instead of asking everyone else to.
By the way, your long speeches are so boring, you may have the cure for insomnia. Record your speeches and sell it on E-Bay as an insomnia cure. You will rich in no time.
pologies if I begin to sound like a broken record
At least you recognize that... Now, get back into your cage!
If he gets back in the cage we have to feed him. Let him lose.
More toys than ever before are available to the poorest members of our society.
More toys than ever before are available to the poorest members of our society.
Obligatory:
Why does she need a cell phone? It's obvious she aint a hooker.
inanely points all the wrong fingers in effect trolling the world to irritate, disinform and inflame.
Ambiguous and esoteric, spoken like an artist, an economically illiterate artist...
final goods are not the long pole in the tent here. We've just taken our consumer surplus here and applied it to boosting the costs of housing and health care.
There's no reason the same damn house my parents rented in Salinas CA for $400/mo in the late 70s rents for 5X -- TWICE the rise of what "inflation" says it should be -- that now, other than that's what the housing market has been constructed to yield, through accumulated effects of policy, essentially not building enough housing to oversupply the local market with quality options.
A market not in oversupply is where the rents live!
But if you read about housing in the paper, they refer to a rising cost of living in housing as a "recovering" market!
Housing recovery hitting speed bumps in Fresno, statewide
BY BONHIA LEE
The Fresno BeeS eptember 19, 2014
FacebookTwitterGoogle PlusRedditE-mailPrint
LESLIE APPLETON-YOUNG
Leslie Appleton-Young is vice president and chief economist for the California Association of Realtors.
HDO
A couple years of fast-rising home prices and sales in Fresno and other California cities is showing signs of slowing down and hitting a plateau in 2015, a real estate economist said Friday.
Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/2014/09/19/4134072_housing-recovery-hitting-speed.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy
Of course they pay bloggers and armies of trolls too.
I wonder about that. Financially, the pay off for poisoning the discourse is pretty good, but people are so fucked up now they'll catapult the propaganda on their own time I guess.
The endgame any way you look at it, is greater unemployment and masses of peasants scrambling for crumbs. And thus we become the Third World countries we set out to take advantage of.
Absolutely. The BRICs and others are gaining power, and they're too large and organized with their own interests to be easily coup'd or annexed or bribed into compliance like in the 19th or 20th Century.
A desperate exploiter turns on his own kind.
More toys than ever before are available to the poorest members of our society.
Obligatory:
One trip to the doctor for a bad case of the gout is a lot more than $20.
Of course they pay bloggers and armies of trolls too.
I wonder about that. Financially, the pay off for poisoning the discourse is pretty good, but people are so fucked up now they'll catapult the propaganda on their own time I guess.
Can you guys put in a good word for me? I'm looking for a raise this Xmas.
My fellow colleagues on Patnet too. Appreciate it, thanks. :)
One trip to the doctor for a bad case of the gout is a lot more than $20.
Don't think she will be the one paying.
Trust me, it's a myth. I remember taking a class during my undergraduate years - Economics of Technology and Innovation. One of the first things we learnt was "technology creates more jobs than it loses." If you think about it, if technology did cost us more jobs than it creates, by now we would all be unemployed because the last 100 years has seen 99% of all inventions ever made.
Ah and who taught you that?
People who are invested in that being true.
Look it's very simple.
You eventually automate everything from farms to factories to fast food. Production through the roof, labor costs nearly zero. Robots build the robots.
What's left?
A few technology jobs, only for highly skilled, designing new robots to build the robots. And a huge mass of service jobs for cleaning each other's toilets and marketing each other shit we don't need.
There's a limit to how much anyone can "consume". I only have so many hours in the day in which to sit with eyes glued to Home Shopping Network and be surrounded by all my STUFF, piled to the ceiling. Great you've got a factory that can finally turn out 10 billion F-150's in 30 minutes for $1,000 each. Well I only need one, but I've got no job so I can't buy even the one.
Technologists of your era live in a bubble, look only at the past and don't see what the endgame is. Under unregulated capitalism, technology is for enriching capitalists. Since 2000 all technology advances have only made Richie Rich richer, not anyone else.
Trust me, it's a myth. I remember taking a class during my undergraduate years - Economics of Technology and Innovation. One of the first things we learnt was "technology creates more jobs than it loses." If you think about it, if technology did cost us more jobs than it creates, by now we would all be unemployed because the last 100 years has seen 99% of all inventions ever made.
Ah and who taught you that?
People who are invested in that being true.
These principles have been around for a long time. Most Professors and Economists being extremely liberal with no stake in the matter, would immediately dispel these theories and principles. Don't forget, we would have more unemployment than lets say Bangladesh, if technology cost us jobs.
Ah and who taught you that?
90%+ were farmers 100 years ago, today there are what 2%.
Most occupation today never existed 100 years ago.
No NASA, no planes, no pharmaceuticals, no travel, no computers, no iphone 6.
All we had was farming. Do you know why schools have long summer breaks? So the children could go work on the farms during harvest time. Today they go on vacations, summer camps and play video games.
"by now we would all be unemployed because the last 100 years has seen 99% of all inventions ever made."
real per-capita (age 15-54) government spending.
gov't is spending $26,000 per person now, twice what it was not too long ago.
Back that out, cut it down to what the GOP says it wants -- "drown in a bathtub" -- and you'll get a truer picture of how unbalanced our economy really is now.
the issue is not one of productivity, it is one of distribution, and the issuance of a colossal sea of debt to keep the system going.
Comments 1 - 40 of 83 Next » Last » Search these comments
http://www.salon.com/2014/10/04/income_inequalitys_sick_joke_a_rising_tide_only_lifts_luxury_yachts/