« First « Previous Comments 21 - 60 of 79 Next » Last » Search these comments
I wonder where the "Hates Gays" shit comes from. That's a complete fucking mystery to me.
Can we at least suggest gang rape and lynching for the lying sacks of shit in the editorial rooms of The NY Times, Washington Post, and nasty propagandists like Rachel Maddox may possibly be proper recourse?
Oh and let's not forget the entirely false story about Trump making fun of a crippled reporter or making up that Muslims were celebrating the etc attacks on rooftops in Jersey. Wow does the media ever love to lie
If Brad Pitt had said that ten years ago
i think it was chris rock that had a bit on clarence thomas:
if clarence thomas looked like denzel washington, it would have "oh clarence, you devil you"
instead it was, "sexual harassment!!!"
Oh and let's not forget the entirely false story about Trump making fun of a crippled reporter or making up that Muslims were celebrating the etc attacks on rooftops in Jersey.
http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/11/trump_thousands_in_jersey_city_cheered_on_911.html
So who is the orange guy in the video saying he watched thousands of people in jersey city cheering the WTC coming down? He sure looks a lot like trump to me. I can't see people on rooftops in Jersey CIty from Manhatten. The whoever the fucker is he has some great set of eyes.
http://people.com/politics/trump-denies-mocking-journalist-disability-watch-video/
Is this the same trump look a like having an spastic moment just as he was talking about a crippled reporter? Epilepsy you think? What is this guys name that looks just like trump anyway?
So let me get this straight - If I grab them by the pussy before they object then it is not sexual assault?
here it is, chris rock monologue:
Sexual harrassment! What is sexual harassment?! What's the difference between sexual harrassment and just being an idiot? I mean, if my father didn't harrass my mother, I wouldn't be here! I mean, I understand some sexual harrassment.. if a man is your boss and says, "Hey, sleep with me, or you're fired." That's sexual harrassment. And that's the only thing that's sexual harrassment! Everything else falls under "Just trying to get laid." You can't put a man in jail for that! I don't care how hard he tries, that's all he was trying to do! Anita Hill started this whole thing. It's all about looks, you know? Because if Clarence Thomas looked like Denzel Washington, this would have never happened! She'd be all, "Oh, stop it, Clarence, you nasty! Your fine self!" So, what's sexual harrassment, when an ugly man wants some? "Oh, he ugly! Call the police! Call the authority!"
He's like the textbook snobby yet clueless rich fratboy dickhead from every other 80s movie.
Wait--are you talking about Billy Bush or Donald Trump?
Oh and let's not forget the entirely false story about Trump making fun of a crippled reporter or making up that Muslims were celebrating the etc attacks on rooftops in Jersey.
http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/11/trump_thousands_in_jersey_city_cheered_on_911.html
So who is the orange guy in the video saying he watched thousands of people in jersey city cheering the WTC coming down? He sure looks a lot like trump to me. I can't see people on rooftops in Jersey CIty from Manhatten. The whoever the fucker is he has some great set of eyes.
http://people.com/politics/trump-denies-mocking-journalist-disabilit...
Here you go Bob. I challenge you to be the fact based person you claim to be.
https://www.catholics4trump.com/the-true-story-donald-trump-did-not-mock-a-reporters-disability/
And here you go as far as Trumps statements on cheering Muslims in New Jersey on 911. The fact is it was reported and now the actual reporter of those incidents attempts to revise history. https://www.factcheck.org/2015/11/trump-carson-on-911-celebrations/
Politifact, WaPo, etc are propaganda arms of the democrat party who lie left and right, yet most democrats seem willing to bury their heads in the sand. Congrats to left leaning individuals like Patrick, TL, and others willing to take a more objective look at things.
It's just very refreshing to see all you great Americans, having done extensive cost-benefits analysis, honed in on the most important issues of the day. What America is all about
If you have got a lot going for yourself, and are wealthy or on the track to a great career and income, there are women who will not only let you grab their pussy, but let you fuck them as well. They may even suck your toes, and other things, too.
What is wrong about saying that?
If you have got a lot going for yourself, and are wealthy or on the track to a great career and income, there are women who will not only let you grab their pussy, but let you fuck them as well. They may even suck your toes, and other things, too.
What is wrong about saying that?
What is wrong about saying that is the exposure of female hypocrisy. Women say one thing, but then do something else, because that's their best strategy by far.
Women say they never want a man to grab their pussy, but they are lying. They do want acceptably high-status rich attractive unattached men to grab their pussy, but also the power to classify the exact same action as assault if the man is unacceptable or unlikely to commit. They even want the power to revise history and go back and claim assault even years later if the pussy grab was desired and enjoyed but the man then fails to commit.
Women have a dilemma: how much pussy to give up without commitment? If they do give up a lot and don't get commitment, they have devalued themselves. If they don't give up any, the man may lose interest.
Men also have a dilemma: how far to push things? If they push a lot and grab pussy, they risk assault charges. If they are fearful and never bust a move, they never get laid. The feminist advice (and now law in CA) to get "affirmative consent" is the worst possible advice. Women hate hate hate men who comply with that law and sincerely supplicate. So pretty much all sex with women is now technically rape. What a shitty law, passed by spineless legislators.
http://time.com/3222176/campus-rape-the-problem-with-yes-means-yes/
Women say they never want a man to grab their pussy, but they are lying. They do want acceptably high-status rich attractive unattached men to grab their pussy, but also the power to classify the exact same action as assault if the man is unacceptable or unlikely to commit.
Evolutionary psychology of women summed up perfectly.
Here you go Bob. I challenge you to be the fact based person you claim to be.
https://www.catholics4trump.com/the-true-story-donald-trump-did-not-mock-a-reporters-disability/
What facts exactly? Do you know what a fact is? Trump says he doesn't remember the reporter and wasn't mocking his disability. Which may or may not be true. That is a fact somehow? That is a claim, not a fact. No amount of blathering by catholics 4 trump turns it into a fact.
And here you go as far as Trumps statements on cheering Muslims in New Jersey on 911. The fact is it was reported and now the actual reporter of those incidents attempts to revise history. https://www.factcheck.org/2015/11/trump-carson-on-911-celebrations/
So trump claiming twice in his speech that he watched thousands of people celebrating, watched not read about, when there is no film showing it ever happened is fact based how exactly? What a joke. You are pathetic.
It's just very refreshing to see all you great Americans, having done extensive cost-benefits analysis, honed in on the most important issues of the day. What America is all about
yes, we forgot - you are having an existential crisis because the new administration opposes drug abuse/addiction.
if you would simply be honest with yourself, you could realize that what you are doing with marijuana is drug abuse/addiction. no one should be taking any drugs if their body is functioning normally.
Women say they never want a man to grab their pussy, but they are lying. They do want acceptably high-status rich attractive unattached men to grab their pussy, but also the power to classify the exact same action as assault if the man is unacceptable or unlikely to commit.
Evolutionary psychology of women summed up perfectly.
You guys don't get a lot of dates do you.
if you would simply be honest with yourself, you could realize that what you are doing with marijuana is drug abuse/addiction. no one should be taking any drugs if their body is functioning normally.
Why do you care? Nothing better to do?
You guys don't get a lot of dates do you.
@bob2356 Read the sidebar material at https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/ especially the "Theory Reading" section.
So trump claiming twice in his speech that he watched thousands of people celebrating, watched not read about, when there is no film showing it ever happened is fact based how exactly? What a joke. You are pathetic.
I know it's hard to remember back before everyone had a smartphone in their pocket with high resolution camera built in, but video cameras used to be clunky things, kind of special circumstance equipment. Certainly the average person didn't carry one about. In our current age of digital accessibility, photos and videos of every conceivable action are recorded each day by perfectly average people who happen to observe something they find interesting. That wasn't the case in 2001.
You guys don't get a lot of dates do you.
You got it backwards. Understanding how women think increases your success in romantic encounters. Idealizing women and foolishly thinking they are more noble than they are is a guaranteed path to celibacy. Wake up and take the red pill.
Or stay ignorant. Your choice. Just don't hate the player.
You guys don't get a lot of dates do you.
@bob2356 Read the sidebar material at https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/ especially the "Theory Reading" section.
@patrick I have much better things to do with my time thank you very much. Feel free to believe that you are gaining dating enlightenment from a bunch of people who are spending their time posting about dating women rather than actually doing it. The phrase that comes to mind is navel gazing.
People that have to spend a lot of time telling you how good they are at something aren't.
As a friend of mine (an Olympic bronze medallist in downhill) says, let the skis do the talking.
APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says
ALL PUSSIES CAN REPORT TO THE SOUTH LAWN TO BE GRABBED BY YOUR NEW OWNER, TRUMPLIGULA!
I take it you'll be first in line
So trump claiming twice in his speech that he watched thousands of people celebrating, watched not read about, when there is no film showing it ever happened is fact based how exactly? What a joke. You are pathetic.
I know it's hard to remember back before everyone had a smartphone in their pocket with high resolution camera built in, but video cameras used to be clunky things, kind of special circumstance equipment. Certainly the average person didn't carry one about. In our current age of digital accessibility, photos and videos of every conceivable action are recorded each day by perfectly average people who happen to observe something they find interesting. That wasn't the case in 2001.
How hard is it to believe when 1/4 of people of a certain religion believe that bombs are at least sometimes justified? If the issue is that Trump himself saw it with his own eyes, that has to be taken with grain of salt, but NJ does has the second largest population of muslims outside of Michigan and there are eyewitness accts from that time. Not really stretching imagination there
They even want the power to revise history and go back and claim assault even years later if the pussy grab was desired and enjoyed but the man then fails to commit.
Bill Cosby comes to mind here.
Idealizing women and foolishly thinking they are more noble than they are is a guaranteed path to celibacy. Wake up and take the red pill.
In fairness to Bob, he is probably stably married for a long time.
I have much better things to do with my time thank you very much
If there are things that you do not want to know, OK, that's your choice.
But I'm entirely convinced that Red Pill theory is actually correct, because it's coherent, logical, and testable.
People that have to spend a lot of time telling you how good they are at something aren't.
That's not what the manual does. The fact is that the mating market has changed considerably as a result of men using the Internet to spread knowledge. Gone are the days when women were a mystery. Their behavior is entirely explained by evolutionary psychology, as are men's behavior. The application of evolutionary psychology is Pickup Artistry or PUA. Like it or not, it works.
The Mystery Method particularly works. However, don't think it's an easy way to get laid as it does require time and effort on your part. Basically, it's all mind games, but mind games are just what biologists call mating rituals. You can play them and have sex or act too good to play the game and remain celebrate. Unless you've actually tried these methods, you have no basis to refute them.
Personally, I think the Mystery Method and other PUA techniques are deplorable, but they work. Not 100%, but at least a third of the time, and that's much better than not playing the games. The bottom line is that women still follow Stone Age instinct when it comes to selecting mates, and quite frankly, it's that instinct that is responsible for all the deplorableness in PUA techniques.
Quite frankly, there is nothing in the Mystery Method that hasn't been known for decades. Things like playing hard to get and imposing a false sense of scarcity. However, these techniques weren't all brought together in a nice neat package until after social media took off and men started to look at getting laid as a science instead of an art.
But hey, if you want to poo-poo the red pill and PUA techniques, more pussy for the rest of us.
But I'm entirely convinced that Red Pill theory is actually correct, because it's coherent, logical, and testable.
It's evolutionary psychology. The entire red pill genre came out after two key things: formal research in human evolutionary psychology particularly in the field of sex and the rise of information sharing on forums and social media sites including YouTube. Science advanced and the common man took an interest and had the means to discuss practical applications of it that are important to men. It's not a coincident that red pill came about around 2010.
here it is, chris rock monologue:
Sexual harrassment! What is sexual harassment?! What's the difference between sexual harrassment and just being an idiot? I mean, if my father didn't harrass my mother, I wouldn't be here! I mean, I understand some sexual harrassment.. if a man is your boss and says, "Hey, sleep with me, or you're fired." That's sexual harrassment. And that's the only thing that's sexual harrassment! Everything else falls under "Just trying to get laid." You can't put a man in jail for that! I don't care how hard he tries, that's all he was trying to do! Anita Hill started this whole thing. It's all about looks, you know? Because if Clarence Thomas looked like Denzel Washington, this would have never happened! She'd be all, "Oh, stop it, Clarence, you nasty! Your fine self!" So, what's sexual harrassment, when an ugly man wants some? "Oh, he ugly! Call the police! Call the authority!"
bwahahaha so true
@bob2356 Read the sidebar material at https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/ especially the "Theory Reading" section.
I'd never even been on Reddit, but a bit over 2 years ago someone here on Patrick.net mentioned TheRedPill. Long story short it matched my own experiences and observations; I'm now very involved with that community, so thank you whoever brought it up. Obviously biased at this point but I totally second the recommendation.
As for Trump... I think there's going to be a lot of buyer's remorse among his supporters. The people who say "Grab 'em by the pussy" is Trump at his worst are wrong. The real problem is, this is pretty much Trump at his BEST!
I'd never even been on Reddit, but a bit over 2 years ago someone here on Patrick.net mentioned TheRedPill. Long story short it matched my own experiences and observations; I'm now very involved with that community, so thank you whoever brought it up. Obviously biased at this point but I totally second the recommendation.
Thanks for the support.
The Red Pill explanation of women's actions seems to simply be factual, not good or bad.
Of course what you decide to do with that knowledge might be good or bad.
I have much better things to do with my time thank you very much
If there are things that you do not want to know, OK, that's your choice.
I've read the red pill crap. Seems like a lot of whiners and clueless metrosexuals to me. But I'm never trolled bars trying out pickup lines so I may have just not been in the correct crowd of women to appreciate it.
Quite frankly, there is nothing in the Mystery Method that hasn't been known for decades. Things like playing hard to get and imposing a false sense of scarcity. However, these techniques weren't all brought together in a nice neat package until after social media took off and men started to look at getting laid as a science instead of an art.
If people weren't looking to get laid as a science then there would be no need for red pill/Mystery Method. You don't think women are bright enough to pick up on who is looking to get laid as a science and who is looking to be someone to meet them as equals who appreciate each other?
You guys have your head up the wrong end of the horse.
metrosexuals
WTF is wrong with being metrosexual? That means you have good hygiene, smell good, look good, and can dress yourself and not look like a slob.
I'm totally metrosexual.
Yeah, you can totally overdo it, like everything else. But it's a plus to have good grooming habits, know how to dress like a successful adult, and smell nice.
In fairness to Bob, he is probably stably married for a long time.
My condolences.
I go to bed each night with a great looking women 14 years younger who puts md after her name and is a top level skier,sailor, squash player. You go to bed reading a book on how to pick up women by someone who calls himself mystery .
quod erat demonstrandum
« First « Previous Comments 21 - 60 of 79 Next » Last » Search these comments
Today I had this conversation:
Ex-boss: Trump said he could assault women and they couldn't do anything about it.
Me: No, that's not true. Trump said women would consent to whatever advances he makes, because he's rich and famous.
Ex-boss: No, Trump said "they couldn't do anything about it".
Me: Let me look up the quote.
So here it is:
Note that he said they let you do it. This means he says that they consent if you are a star.
It is a lie to say that Trump said "they can't do anything about it". That would be a false quote and totally changes the meaning to imply no consent.
#trump #politics