« First « Previous Comments 6 - 45 of 68 Next » Last » Search these comments
For me, they are pretty much the same.
If you're attacking the user rather than sticking to attacking his point, that's my definition of incivility.
Had to twist a shiv against the left in here ;)
Why?
To demonstrate what the new ‘civil’ Patnet is all about?
errc saysHad to twist a shiv against the left in here ;)
Why?
To demonstrate what the new ‘civil’ Patnet is all about?
Apparently.
If this were posted under anon, it would not make it through the filter.
2 up 4 down. Your question has been answered
Then Patrick flipped the script, and he wanted to squash any differing opinions and free thought, so that he could make this a Free Space for Trumpcucks to play in their own feces, and appointed a hard right moderator to chase off anyone who isn’t toeing the Trumpcuck narrative.
Look if you are ashamed about the shape of your families eyes
Eye shapes are usually within a millimeter or two of each other.HappyGilmore says
It's the eyelid exit ports that vary wildly amoungst species...
this comment has been jailed for incivility
All's I know is that it's true.
Look it up...
BlueSardine saysEye shapes are usually within a millimeter or two of each other.HappyGilmore says
It's the eyelid exit ports that vary wildly amoungst species...this comment has been jailed for incivility
For me, they are pretty much the same.
If you're attacking the user rather than sticking to attacking his point, that's my definition of incivility.
What are the complaints about the new system?
YesYNot saysI posted anon for a while to contribute without all of the past baggage attached.
Yes, we noticed that along with your past baggage.
Goran_K saysWhat are the complaints about the new system?
I posted an honest comment that did not attack any poster, and the poster formerly known as ironman posted this 5 minutes later.
Sniper saysYesYNot saysI posted anon for a while to contribute without all of the past baggage attached.
Yes, we noticed that along with your past baggage.
To be clear, the baggage that I was referring to is having this poster hanging about to insult me as soon as I post regardless of the content. That's not civil. Sadly, it is predictable behavior. It was bad enough when we could respond in kind. Now that there is 'moderation' it's unacceptable to me, because I'm not a masochist.
The funny thing is that I made a s...
Somehow it was decided that ironman's post was fine, but this response is trolling or otherwise unworthy.
I'm going to make a special rule completely banning Sniper from using the word "you".
Clearly uncivilized but not ad-hom. Is this acceptable, yes or no?
I'm going to make a special rule completely banning Sniper from using the word "you".
Patrick saysI'm going to make a special rule completely banning Sniper from using the word "you".
In fact, I'm losing it again with Sniper. Just blew away every comment he made that has "you" in it:
mysql> delete from comments where comment_content like '% you %' and comment_author=128155;
Query OK, 990 rows affected (3.45 sec)
Goran has been a good moderator.
The rule is simple and not arbitrary. Just don't deliberately personally attack the other users. Attack their points.
Patrick saysI'm going to make a special rule completely banning Sniper from using the word "you".
In fact, I'm losing it again with Sniper. Just blew away every comment he made that has "you" in it:
mysql> delete from comments where comment_content like '% you %' and comment_author=128155;
Query OK, 990 rows affected (3.45 sec)
« First « Previous Comments 6 - 45 of 68 Next » Last » Search these comments
Please any input appreciated from the membership.
Keep it clean and civil though. Thanks!
#PatNet