« First « Previous Comments 13 - 49 of 49 Search these comments
declining fertility is a sign of a weak group of people with a dark future
Oh, Reddit...
I'm a regular reader and contributor to TRP, but I find myself rather critical of some of the factions, namely race realism and some of the unsupported pseudoscience.
The above quote is patently ridiculous, and contains several incorrect presuppositions such as that political affiliation is deterministically passed on genetically. A simple napkin calculation shows that liberals would be vanishingly rare today if this was true.
and a declining fertility is a sign of a weak group of people with a dark future.
Funny, most demographers and sociologists find this a sign of prosperity ,education, and upward mobility. Another grossly wrong presuppostion. I can't take this essay seriously.
Christians at 2.6, Muslims at 2.9.
the conservative orthodox Jews have a fertility rate of 4.1... Mormons: 3.4
coupled with advances in Artificial Intelligence we are all screwed as a species.
The above quote is patently ridiculous, and contains several incorrect presuppositions such as that political affiliation is deterministically passed on genetically. A simple napkin calculation shows that liberals would be vanishingly rare today if this was true.
Funny, most demographers and sociologists find this a sign of prosperity ,education, and upward mobility. Another grossly wrong presuppostion. I can't take this essay seriously.
IF you go by the idea that evolution is on the side of the team that reproduces itself more effectively, then generic Left/Cosmopolitan types are losing
Ever since the introduction of mass birth control, and feminism, the liberal birthrate has tanked and is now far below replacement (reducing their population 30%-50% every generation, where as the conservative birthrate is stable, or in a surplus. When you compare liberal vs conservative states, you already see a difference in fertility rates. Given that most conservative states have liberals, and most liberal states have conservatives, one can assume that the divergence when isolating to genetic political bias is even greater.
But, but, but we've been told and told that the poor and immigrants are breeding like rabbits and overrunning america with new democrats. Funny how quickly conservatives can abandon arguments when they aren't convenient.
new generation should be more conservative than parents - and it is not)
To me, it says that when a person becomes older, he (or she) becomes more conservative - perhaps they earn more, or some other reasons.
But, but, but we've been told and told that the poor and immigrants are breeding like rabbits and overrunning america with new democrats. Funny how quickly conservatives can abandon arguments when they aren't convenient.
Poor countries in Africa and Asia are big winners then:
They are, Gen-Z is very conservative
People are reporting enclaves a Burka Jihadis in Rosecommon and Balinrobe. Not just Dublin or Cork, but little towns in Central and Western Ireland you'd never expect them. All in the past few years.
Ireland (like Poland and Argentina) has a very low birthrate despite the Catholicism. It's a Europe-wide phenomenon.
I thought they mostly have E. European immigration, where danger is from inebriated drivers and/or drunk fistfights, which might be not that much different from native Irish behavior.
I hear Poland recently started throwing tons of benefits and money to women just to have kids.
Funny, most demographers and sociologists find this a sign of prosperity ,education, and upward mobility.
insistence that making America less white will bring about the liberal utopia
Automan Empire saysOh, Reddit...
I'm a regular reader and contributor to TRP, but I find myself rather critical of some of the factions, namely race realism and some of the unsupported pseudoscience.
The above quote is patently ridiculous, and contains several incorrect presuppositions such as that political affiliation is deterministically passed on genetically. A simple napkin calculation shows that liberals would be vanishingly rare today if this was true.
It's not a given, but it's more likely to happen that way. Look at Gen-Z, they are staunchly conservative already.
Automan Empire saysand a declining fertility is a sign of a weak group of people with a dark future.
Funny, most demographers and sociologists find this a sign of prosperity ,education, and upward mo...
How are we defining liberal and conservative?
Does anybody know?
Another grossly wrong presuppostion. I can't take this essay seriously.
he sounds like a neo-nazi
That sounds like Left-speek using “Nazi” and “Hitler” and “racist” to shut down ideas that defy Leftist thought.
mell saysOf course the majority of Whites voting for it is necessary but they need to start breeding again at a high enough rate before they can push this through by themselves
Uh, you might want to scroll up and read the above about conservative white women fertility rates vs those of libtard women.
Yeah but many kids get indoctrinated in school (esp. womym who are easier manipulated and want to be part of the herd think) and become leftoids later. Generally the western world needs higher birth rates vs those of immigrant cultures that are incompatible and making up for those you lose in the indoctrination camps.
Yeah but many kids get indoctrinated in school (esp. womym who are easier manipulated and want to be part of the herd think) and become leftoids later. Generally the western world needs higher birth rates vs those of immigrant cultures that are incompatible and making up for those you lose in the indoctrination camps.
« First « Previous Comments 13 - 49 of 49 Search these comments
Ever since the introduction of mass birth control, and feminism, the liberal birthrate has tanked and is now far below replacement (reducing their population 30%-50% every generation, where as the conservative birthrate is stable, or in a surplus. When you compare liberal vs conservative states, you already see a difference in fertility rates. Given that most conservative states have liberals, and most liberal states have conservatives, one can assume that the divergence when isolating to genetic political bias is even greater.
When you compare traditionally liberal vs conservative groups of people, such as the religious vs the atheists, you see that atheists have sub-replacement fertility rates (thus slowly being eliminated), while the conservatives are a growing population across the board. Religiously unaffiliated sitting around 1.6 births per woman (2.1 as replacement). Christians at 2.6, Muslims at 2.9.
When solely isolating to Jews, and looking at the differences in behavior between Conservative vs Liberal Jews, you see the conservative ones are more likely to be married young, while the conservative orthodox Jews have a fertility rate of 4.1, and irreligious Jews have a fertility rate of 1.5, making them sub-replacement, evolutionary dead-ends.
When looking at the Mormons, we see that they are more likely to be married at a younger age, and have a fertility rate of 3.4, far higher than your average Christian.
Reality doesn't care about your ideology - whether you believe in Marxism, Feminism, Christianity, Islam, or the tenets of the Red Pill. All it cares about is results, and a declining fertility is a sign of a weak group of people with a dark future. If your ideology leads you a sub-replacement fertility rate, how can you argue your ideology is successful. It's successful at weeding out your degenerate genetics from humanity, because you can't critically identify which ideologies benefit your self-interests, and which don't.
What do you think the fertility rate is of these childless idiots I read comments from on this sub, that get vasectomy's and never marry. You'll be gone, and conservative, people with children will replace you. The future looks more like us, and less like you.
Every generation from now, moving forward, will be increasingly conservative. There are likely less liberal genetics in existence in the younger cohort of Americans in 2017, than there were in the young cohort of the 70's, as those childless, feminist, liberal women hit their 40's and see the end of their fertility window... And the liberal men that chose to tie their fate to them are childless alongside them. 25% of German women in their 40's are childless. 20% of American women born between 1962 and 1966 are childless. This childlessness most certainly disproportionately affects liberal parents who are promoting feminism, liberalism, and other degenerate anti-patriarchal ideologies to their children. We're experiencing one of the greatest evolutionary events in modern history, on par with WW2. We're seeing the weak, liberal genetics being completely obliterated from the gene pool, with only patriarchal conservatives being spared. In 3 generations time, you'll basically have everyone selfishly looking out for themselves, with strong in-group preferences. We'll have Conservative Europeans, competing with other Conservative ethnic groups, and an ever-decreasing minority of old, liberals in their 70's and 80's dying alone, with no children to give a fuck about them, in depressing facilities where the state will put sick, soon-to-be-dead, childless, old folks. Feminism has absolutely destroying Liberalism. It's fucking glorious, and worth eating popcorn while cheering from the sideline. The only thing conservatives need to do is prepare for the fall out from the liberals dying off, and inheriting their broken systems. We'll need to form new countries in a few generations time, and restructure society. It's just a matter of a time and a few generations at this point.
https://www.reddit.com/user/AmeriStasi
Links to stats in the original post.