« First « Previous Comments 19 - 58 of 101 Next » Last » Search these comments
errc saysNobody can waste more time, money, and resources accomplishing less than Republicans.
Don't agree. Keeping State Officials from intimidating witnesses and cooperative reporters regarding an issue over which they have no Legal Authority, is an important step to maintaining the Rule of Law and a Republican Form of Government.
State Officials cannot give themselves powers expressly delegated to the Federal Government, nor actively interfere with those powers.
It's not merely 'non-cooperation'.
A state that says you'll be fined $10,000 for voluntarily cooperating with Federal Authorities on a Federal-only matter is the state is actively interfering aka obstructing.
Not to mention a threat to the rule of law from States punishing the right of individuals to cooperate with Authorities and overstepping their bounds into a field they have no jurisdiction.
There are states that don't allow any employee records to be released to any law enforcement agency without a warrant. Where is the outrage about that obstructing of law enforcement?
Nobody can waste more time, money, and resources accomplishing less than Republicans.
Oh So Love going out and seeing Bikers, Aryan Brotherhood, Skinheads, followers of Richard Spence, Methheads, druggies of every description, wannabes etc. in the locker room and on the streets covered with gang tats and knife/bullet scars. It makes me feel that my government is doing all it can to protect my safety.
.
Hanging around the Aryan Brotherhood are we ?
Or just your run of the mill Bikers - chapters all over the country and they come in multiple colors, ethnicities etc. but predominately white so you won't ever have to feel left out - isn't that swell ?
Funny the AG isn't going after these groups
Why is it the right wingnuts are huge advocates of states rights except when they aren't? Nothing like having a firm set of principles.
errc saysNobody can waste more time, money, and resources accomplishing less than Republicans.
Don't agree. Keeping State Officials from intimidating witnesses and cooperative reporters regarding an issue over which they have no Legal Authority, is an important step to maintaining the Rule of Law and a Republican Form of Government.
State Officials cannot give themselves powers expressly delegated to the Federal Government, nor actively interfere with those powers.
Or just your run of the mill Bikers - chapters all over the country and they come in multiple colors, ethnicities etc. but predominately white so you won't ever have to feel left out - isn't that swell ?
I see so we should waste money on a lawsuit that won't be won?
What right is that? Where is that right established?
This will be a nothing cheeseburger until some mayors and sheriffs start getting arrested.
People are being <>Bcompelled to make sure the federal government is doing their job. No warrant no search.
There is no obstruction. Having procedures in place is not obstruction.
So we can assume you would be cool with individual states banning abortion? Of course you wouldn't. I don't see any Red States going against Federal abortion laws right now, so the State's rights hypocrisy is firmly with the Democrats right now.
Bob, think about your position. You are saying a State Government can compel people through fines NOT to cooperate with the Federal Government.
Ca has procedures in place. Its called ab 450. So there is not obstruction. Glad you agree.
The feds just need to get a warrant or court order for employment records
States can require through fines that a business require the federal government get a judge to sign off on a warrant if they want to see employment records.
You can't have it both ways.
What law are they being compelled to break? The federal government should know not to try and violate citizens rights now Californians will be fined if they allow the federal government to violate citizens rights.
The federal government should know not to try and violate citizens rights now Californians will be fined if they allow the federal government to violate citizens rights.
haven't heard of civil rights? It's now ok to not have laws to make sure the federal government follows citizens civil rights?
haven't heard of civil rights? It's now ok to not have laws to make sure the federal government follows citizens civil rights?
I see so we should waste money on a lawsuit that won't be won?
Employers must retain Form I-9 for a designated period and make it available for inspection by authorized government officers.
I would have to read about w-4 form. Not going to do it. No poo ga ga.
Which is? What law is this in violation of? Please reference if possible.
It sure will be interesting to see how it turns out first trial in Sacramento and if they can't win there, maybe all the way to the supreme Court. Might be another tremendous waste of money. Why can't the federal government just change the law? Who are the protecting by not doing so? Differently not the citizens.
But this isn't an immigration issue. It's a privacy issue.
But this isn't an immigration issue. It's a privacy issue.
I already presented above what ICE legally has to do to get I-9 info.
Unfortunately that is how the law is written it has nothing to do with what the state thinks. I provided what ICE must do above to properly obtain I-9 information. What is wrong with asking ICE to do its job and not blame others for their inabilities in performance
untrue, the law is that ICE must have a warrant, US LAW will fully be complied with if ICE has a warrant like the law says they are required to have.
Please enlighten us of the outcome of Calhoun.
It's pretty clear cut what ice must do ... This is federal law. If Congress doesn't like it then they should change it, not complain that CA isn't doing their job for them.
Wouldn't fixing immigration law be a better use of time and resources? Is it not obvious why this is not done?
Except as otherwise required by federal law, an employer, or a person acting on behalf of the employer, shall not provide voluntary consent to an immigration enforcement agent to enter any nonpublic areas of a place of labor.
« First « Previous Comments 19 - 58 of 101 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://www.sfgate.com/nation/article/Sessions-to-make-major-sanctuary-jurisdiction-12731976.php