« First « Previous Comments 15 - 54 of 65 Next » Last » Search these comments
No one is allowing any personal attacks on errc.
Removing his "personal" button is effectively allowing personal attacks on him.
But you want to pinishim him
FP saysIf he is insulting people, his comments are flagged "personal" and deleted.
But you want to pinishim him additionally by allowing other people to insult him.
Are personal attacks on this site bad or only some of them?
No one is allowing any personal attacks on errc.
So you’re denying that A personal attack was levied against me as the first response in this mods thread, and allowed to stand for days, until I came back and did something about it, which led to a poster who isn’t even a mod having to mark it as personal.
Par for the course
errc saysSo you’re denying that A personal attack was levied against me as the first response in this mods thread, and allowed to stand for days, until I came back and did something about it, which led to a poster who isn’t even a mod having to mark it as personal.
Par for the course
Didn't see the post, glad someone took action. Now it's gone.
Where's the problem again?
How else do you explain all my posts being pre screened by moderators and my inability to mark a personal attack ad a personal attack?
errc saysHow else do you explain all my posts being pre screened by moderators and my inability to mark a personal attack ad a personal attack?
There's a bit in the code which downgrades a user's permissions after a certain number of comments get marked personal.
FP, not very smart engaging in personal insults. Especially not smart when doing it with a mod.
Knock it off.
I didn’t see any personal insults directed at anyone in particular.
“anyone with a brain got the point”.
FP, not very smart engaging in personal insults. Especially not smart when doing it with a mod.
Knock it off.
Patrick says@errc C'mon, you've been directly insulting other users directly over and over in this thread.
If he is insulting people, his comments are flagged "personal" and deleted.
But you want to pinishim him additionally by allowing other people to insult him.
Are personal attacks on this site bad or only some of them?
errc says“anyone with a brain got the point”.
Looks like he did't get the point and took it personal.
Sorry, Goran, I didn't mean to offend you. I wouldn't dare you being a moderator and all. Respest man!
Any new guns to the collection? Did you shoot anything live? Show us a picture.
Stupid liberals! Trump! Trump! Trump! Deport all illegals!
Are we good now? Drop a good word to Patrick for me pls.
I put it back.
Goran is right to ask you to knock off the personal attacks.
Patrick saysI put it back.
Goran is right to ask you to knock off the personal attacks.
He is asking by attacking me in turn. Clearly you approve personal attacks under certain circumstances. What are they?
And thanks for the entertainment, to both of you.
I didn’t see any personal insults directed at anyone in particular. He simply stated that “anyone with a brain got the point”.
Do mods get special treatment?
Like the ability to be offended by any post, even if generic and generally speaking?
errc saysI didn’t see any personal insults directed at anyone in particular. He simply stated that “anyone with a brain got the point”.
Do mods get special treatment?
Like the ability to be offended by any post, even if generic and generally speaking?
Look man. We're all fairly intelligent adults here.
If you're trying to be "sneaky" like say the kids in my nephew's elementary class where they're trying to test the limits of what you can say and get away with, go ahead. Just don't be surprised if posts start getting nuked.
We both know what's going on, just knock it off and behave or don't and get censored.
The first comment wasn't even a snarky remark, it was a friendly ribbing, with "I Kid, I Kid". Technically I suppose it was personal, but let's not act like somebody had a stream of virulent abuse directed at them.
So may i levy personal attacks, so long as i qualify them with “I kid, I kid”?
errc saysSo may i levy personal attacks, so long as i qualify them with “I kid, I kid”?
I think personal "attack" is stretching it. But i suppose it was "personal".
Something changed late 2016
We're all fairly intelligent adults here.
What about the third option that was exercised here in this thread?
Levy obvious and direct personal attacks without any repercussions other than the mods allowing it to stand, and giving it likes?
Or is that option reserved for Republicans/“Libertarians” only?
errc saysWhat about the third option that was exercised here in this thread?
Levy obvious and direct personal attacks without any repercussions other than the mods allowing it to stand, and giving it likes?
Or is that option reserved for Republicans/“Libertarians” only?
Like I said, I didn't see the comment, and honestly didn't even visit this thread until after it was all cleaned up. I think Silicon Valley is a great show, but yes, all of those guys come off as cucky, beta, faggots. That's part of the charm IMO.
I get that most people are lame, disinteresting halfwits, and they can’t participate in most discussions because they’re not on the level, so it explains why those jerk offs enjoy doing the only thing they are capable of, disrupting others. However, for intelligent Americans, Free Speech has value, and The Truth is axiomatic and at the core of Free Speech. Free Speech can be false and dishonest, however for it to have any value it must be open to being called for the bullshit it is, by honest people with integrity.
How else do you explain all my posts being pre screened by moderators and my inability to mark a personal attack ad a personal attack?
Something changed late 2016.
errc saysI get that most people are lame, disinteresting halfwits, and they can’t participate in most discussions because they’re not on the level, so it explains why those jerk offs enjoy doing the only thing they are capable of, disrupting others. However, for intelligent Americans, Free Speech has value, and The Truth is axiomatic and at the core of Free Speech. Free Speech can be false and dishonest, however for it to have any value it must be open to being called for the bullshit it is, by honest people with integrity.
You were right about the nigger comment, but I was right that patrick wiped out the account that levied that vile word. You also levied another equally vile racist comment not too long ago, and I think the mods were very lenient in their response to your vile racist comment, wouldn't you agree?
Also the supposed "personal attack" was wiped out, and I don't ...
That’s your problem, you make claims about things when you don’t know wtf you’re talking about, and then get all triggered when someone rightly calls you out on the lie.
errc saysHow else do you explain all my posts being pre screened by moderators and my inability to mark a personal attack ad a personal attack?
Other users mark those as personal, not the mods. Everything else was a follow-up determined by the logic in Patrick's code. It's not a perfect system, but it seems to work fairly well.
errc saysSomething changed late 2016.
Some people couldn't handle the election outcome without frequent (or even more than the usual) expletive-filled tirades and when the new system was established left on their own volition. Others then became more and more confrontational when their spokes-person left while the rest moved on.
Goran_K sayserrc...
My lord, there’s so much wrong here, I’m not sure where to start. I qualified that Free Speech only matters if you allow the lies to be spoken, so that honest people can speak truth to them. I had a thread about it recently I’ll bump it. The rest of what you posted may make sense in an alternate reality, but in the real world, it’s utter nonsense
mell saysSome people couldn't handle the election outcomeWe know who they were.
I don’t know of even one actual person who strongly supported Hillary. Almost everyone was actively rooting against her, so it just doesn’t jive with reality that anyone went off the deep end when she lost.
« First « Previous Comments 15 - 54 of 65 Next » Last » Search these comments
Cover of the Hollywood Reporter.
Celebrate Soy this Season, Sissies!