patrick.net

edvard says

Hey- thanks for posting the chart that helps prove my point: Your party is incredibly unpopular with millinials as seen by the chart.

Really, a drop below 50% for endorsing a generic Democrat over a generic Republican, with the biggest drops Males and Whites, is proving your point?

It's proving mine.

edvard says

The majority of us who do not support Trump will show just exactly what we think of you brainwashed heathens in a few short months and when its over don't whine and say that you wern't warned.

The chart does not show a majority of millennials for either party.

You might find this one interesting, North Carolina:

"Really, a drop below 50% for endorsing a generic Democrat over a generic Republican, with the biggest drops Males and Whites, is proving your point?"

Your chart shows only ONE demographic- white males, which if you haven't been paying attention are no longer really the majority in this country anymore. All other demographics do not support Trump.

Changing the subject and again I ask- Like how in the hell did this site turn into a little den of right wingers? Either way you guys are seemingly only talking to yourselves. In other words its a big echo chamber and that's likely giving you a really false sense of security as to whats happening in the real world. That's merely setting yourselves up for disappointment when all of the loonie articles you've posted and the high-fives you give one another for posting obnoxious horse manure turns out to be the laughable joke it is.

"Personally, I wouldn't mind some Handsmaid's tail."
Oh, so do please tell us all exactly what you like about that?

It seems you missed his joke. You wrote "tail" when you meant "tale." Since "getting tail" is a well known euphemism for sex, his phrase "Personally, I wouldn't mind some Handsmaid's tail" is a play on your misspelled word. That is, he would like to bang the Handmaid. And when it comes to "Handmaid's Tail," I suppose some are getting more "hand" than "tail."

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says

not expect Hispanics to be so pro-Democrat based on experience with other ethnic groups and due to huge amounts of intermarriage between Whites and Hispanics.

Fuck, everyone is marrying inter racially these days! Leftists like edvard probably never would even consider getting hitched to a woman who isn’t lily white. I have a friend from college who is a smart guy but went from engineering school to law school and went full retard along the way. Now he’s constantly posting Leftist shit and talking about how racist everyone is who disagrees with him. Dude is lily white. His wife is even whiter. Their kids are practically translucent. Put your life where your mouth is, Buddy!

I did.

edvard says

Your chart shows only ONE demographic- white males, which if you haven't been paying attention are no longer really the majority in this country anymore. All other demographics do not support Trump.

It shows WHITES and MALES, separately.

Quigley says

Fuck, everyone is marrying inter racially these days! Leftists like edvard probably never would even consider getting hitched to a woman who isn’t lily white. I have a friend from college who is a smart guy but went from engineering school to law school and went full retard along the way. Now he’s constantly posting Leftist shit and talking about how racist everyone is who disagrees with him. Dude is lily white. His wife is even whiter. Their kids are practically translucent. Put your life where your mouth is, Buddy!

Yep, my wife is Hispanic. Unfortunately, a graduate of a small liberal arts college. But babies are changing her perception of reality.

HeadSet says

"Personally, I wouldn't mind some Handsmaid's tail."
Oh, so do please tell us all exactly what you like about that?

It seems you missed his joke. You wrote "tail" when you meant "tale." Since "getting tail" is a well known euphemism for sex, his phrase "Personally, I wouldn't mind some Handsmaid's tail" is a play on your misspelled word. That is, he would like to bang the Handmaid. And when it comes to "Handmaid's Tail," I suppose some are getting more "hand" than "tail."

Based on this guy’s complete lack of humor, I will venture to say he’s both white collar and probably a lawyer or social worker or maybe HR. Definitely not anyone messing with science, engineering, and I’d bet a million bucks he isn’t a tradesman. Blue collar people know how to joke around without getting our jock straps in a knot. The kind of shit we flip each other daily would give the average HR rep a seizure. But lawyers are the worst for having zero sense of humor.

rdm says

It is a crime to conspire with agents of a foreign government to influence an election.

Are you saying, "Lock her up?"

"The lobby firm created by both Tony and John Podesta in 1988 receives $140,000 a month from the Saudi government, a government that beheads nonviolent dissidents, uses torture to extract forced confessions, doesn't allow women to drive, and bombs schools, hospitals and residential neighborhoods in neighboring Yemen.

The Podesta Group's March 2016 filing, required under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, shows that Tony Podesta himself oversees the Saudi account. At the same time, Tony Podesta is also a top campaign contributor and bundler for Hillary Clinton. So while one brother runs the campaign, the other brother funds it with earnings that come, in part, from the Saudis.
***
The brothers seem to have no problem mixing their roles into the same pot. Tony Podesta held a Clinton campaign fundraiser at his home featuring gourmet Italian food cooked by himself and his brother, the campaign chairman. The fundraiser, by the way, came just days after Tony Podesta filed his Saudi contract with the Justice Department, a contract that included an initial "project fee" payment of $200,000."

edvard says

Bigotry and racism that's been embraced by the right

Source? Or just making shit up. The D's are far more racist today than the R's. That's just a fact.

CBOEtrader says

The D's are far more racist today than the R's. That's just a fact.

So let's see the facts to back up the claim.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2016/09/07/health/millennials-conservative-generations/index.html

@CBOEtrader.

See the initials "CNN" in your link so not worth opening, CNN is a well known fake news source.

Question ? How come Turmp supporters like to cite CNN when it's convenient but other times it's fake news ? How does that work ?

Kakistocracy says

Question ?

I'm happy to teach you how to use the internet. In the example above, I used CNN to quote the study suggesting millennials are more conservative than recent generations. The fact quoted is easily verifiable. It is neither a biased political perspective or a purposeful misinterpretation, but rather a verifiable fact. When quoting a verifiable fact, I find it useful to use CNN so libtards will actually read the source. In your case, you refuse regardless of the source. Sorry, I can't help this level of TDS.

@CBOEtrader - is it really necessary to resort to personal attacks and name calling so early in the day ?

You cite one source "suggesting" something as opposed to serious data ?

Using CNN as a source is now a personal attack? Try discussing the topic rather than individuals.

Let's try again. 1) the concept of D's winning in the future by population default is a joke. The more the D's focus on racist identity politics while labeling all detractors as racist, the more young people will move away from the D's. As per the article, this is already happening.

2) the D's platform is itself racist, while the R's at least uphold individual responsibility.

Conclusion: the D's and their racist platform are dying on the vine.

curious2 says

rdm says

It is a crime to conspire with agents of a foreign government to influence an election.

Are you saying, "Lock her up?"

By this logic they should lock up whoever hired that UK professor spy to work on Trumps campaign. Can we all agree on this much?

Or is hypocrisy that thick?

Kakistocracy says

You cite one source "suggesting" something as opposed to serious data ?

Sorry. Predicting the future is an inexact science.

CBOEtrader says

Using CNN as a source is now a personal attack? Try discussing the topic rather than individuals.

CBOEtrader says

Sorry, I can't help this level of TDS.

CBOEtrader says

I'm happy to teach you how to use the internet

You were discussing the topic vs. an individual now were you ?

Here's a better source for your spy story

Four decades ago, Halper was responsible for a long-forgotten spying scandal involving the 1980 election, in which the Reagan campaign – using CIA officials managed by Halper, reportedly under the direction of former CIA Director and then-Vice-Presidential candidate George H.W. Bush – got caught running a spying operation from inside the Carter administration. The plot involved CIA operatives passing classified information about Carter’s foreign policy to Reagan campaign officials in order to ensure the Reagan campaign knew of any foreign policy decisions that Carter was considering.

https://theintercept.com/2018/05/19/the-fbi-informant-who-monitored-the-trump-campaign-stefan-halper-oversaw-a-cia-spying-operation-in-the-1980-presidential-election/

Kakistocracy says

Here's a better source for your spy story

If you have a point, please make it.

Kakistocracy says

See the initials "CNN" in your link so not worth opening, CNN is a well known fake news source.

But it's the bible for accurate reporting according to the Libbies.

Kakistocracy says

https://theintercept.com/

Ahhh, so we get The Intercept..... so much better than CNN (NOT)....

CBOEtrader says

Or is hypocrisy that thick?

Attention and enforcement seem highly selective. If people want to investigate foreign involvement in the 2016 elections, OK, that investigation should encompass all the foreign players and prioritize them in order of the scale of involvement. That would make KSA priority #1 (see also here), and Russia a distant second or third.

Kakistocracy says

Here's a better source for your spy story

Four decades ago, Halper was responsible for a long-forgotten spying scandal involving the 1980 election, in which the Reagan campaign – using CIA officials managed by Halper, reportedly under the direction of former CIA Director and then-Vice-Presidential candidate George H.W. Bush – got caught running a spying operation from inside the Carter administration. The plot involved CIA operatives passing classified information about Carter’s foreign policy to Reagan campaign officials in order to ensure the Reagan campaign knew of any foreign policy decisions that Carter was considering.

https://theintercept.com/2018/05/19/the-fbi-informant-who-monitored-the-trump-campaign-stefan-halper-oversaw-a-cia-spying-operation-in-the-1980-presidential-election/

This was enlightening. I didnt know that Halper worked to cuck the US 40 years ago in an almost identical way. How is this not proof of a deep state coup against Trump? Fucking Bush family is evil.

The Russia collusion story was an almost undeniable cover for the coup. Holy crap, heads are gonna roll.

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/05/20/nunes-if-informant-reporting-is-true-it-is-a-absolute-red-line-this-is-over/

1. The Deep State is gonna make Trump's Presidency very short. Insurance policy, heh.
2. The Deep State Didndu Nuttin' Wrong
2a. Nobody Spied on the Trump Campaign
2b. Okay, maybe this Halpern dude, but that was "information provision", not spying.
2c. And he was trying to Protect Trump from Russia by not warning him or his senior advisors.
2c1. Instead Halpern was REALLY interested in whether Trump had Hillary's Emails.
2c1aa. And Asked TWO Trump Associates about them.
2c1bb. And offered cash for a research paper as a means of having an excuse to chat them up.
2c1cc. And used a honeypot, a young gal working for him
2c2. Hillary's emails were totally innocuous anyway,
2c3. Even though they were stored on a poorly secured private server and we think the Ruskies (and everybody else, most likely) got 'em
2d. Nevermind the FBI Counter-Intelligence campaign was run by the Director and Dpty Director,
2d1. The director hated Trump and the former had ties to McAuliffe and the Clintons.
2d2. And wrote the absolution memo on Hillary, Comey just signed it but McCabe authored it.
2d3. While Strzonk and his Lovergirl at DOJ Lisa Page were texting thousands of times about hating on Trump and protecting McCabe.
2d4. And leaking to the Media.

This is worse and more far reaching than Watergate.

By the way, Kudos to the Daily Caller which broke this story almost two months ago

Papadopoulos now questions Halper’s motivation for contacting him, according to a source familiar with Papadopoulos’s thinking. That’s not just because of the randomness of the initial inquiry but because of questions Halper is said to have asked during their face-to-face meetings in London.

According to a source with knowledge of the meeting, Halper asked Papadopoulos: “George, you know about hacking the emails from Russia, right?”

http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/25/george-papadopoulos-london-emails/

Indictments to follow

Kakistocracy says

Four decades ago, Halper was responsible for a long-forgotten spying scandal involving the 1980 election, in which the Reagan campaign – using CIA officials managed by Halper, reportedly under the direction of former CIA Director and then-Vice-Presidential candidate George H.W. Bush – got caught running a spying operation from inside the Carter administration. The plot involved CIA operatives passing classified information about Carter’s foreign policy to Reagan campaign officials in order to ensure the Reagan campaign knew of any foreign policy decisions that Carter was considering.

So Halpern has done this type of shit before.

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says

So Halpern has done this type of shit before.

Yes for GB senior, the ultimate deep state douche.

It's no coincidence that Obama's deep state uses the same bad actors as GB. Bush, Obama, Clinton all on the same team.