patrick.net

Also courtesy of Roosh, this entertaining link for those of you like me who are having the Living in the Bay Area Blues:

http://www.returnofkings.com/178983/lynyrd-skynyrd-concert-footage-from-1977-showed-that-even-californias-women-were-once-beautiful

cmdrdataleak says

Daryush is really entertaining and is actually insightful when he's not talking about being a poon-hound.

Thanks for the reminder, amazon, I just bought Roosh's life's work collection, only $35. Streisand Effect is in force.

https://www.rooshvstore.com/special-offers/fsif

Most interested in reading "Free Speech Isn't Free".

What? I thought it was banned?? Or burned.

How on Earth were you able to buy it???

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

Roosh V...

is a jerk who exploits insecure and mostly unattractive males. Whatever the reason for some of his books no longer appearing on Amazon, it isn't censorship. Amazon sells Mein Kampf, for example. Maybe Muslim Roosh claims to be 'banned' to boost sales or divert them to his own site so he gets more of the sale proceeds for himself. He has actually said that his work popularizes a form of Islam, so perhaps he can rationalize lying as taqiya.

Bakery case was religious freedom based. You can’t force someone to worship Satan and give up their faith. It wasn’t the “we don’t like it” case, it was “religious freedom” case.

But book burning is based on political witch hunt. While liberals screamed injustice to baker they harassed, they decided to ban books for political reasons because they “don’t like it”. There’s your difference. Your team is hypocritical Nazis.

LeonDurham says

FortWayne says

Im just pointing out the hypocrisy of the left and their ties to Nazism.

Book burners are the left. Your team is team Nazi.

Who's burning books?

The only hypocrites are Trump cultists. The want private business to have all the rights of a person except when those businesses do things they don't like. Period.

Funny you had the exact opposite opinion when a gay person wanted a bakery to make them a wedding cake.


Trump cultists are always the hypocrites on every argument. Always.

FortWayne says

Bakery case was religious freedom based. You can’t force someone to worship Satan and give up their faith. It wasn’t the “we don’t like it” case, it was “religious freedom” case.

But book burning is based on political witch hunt. While liberals screamed injustice to baker they harassed, they decided to ban books for political reasons because they “don’t like it”. There’s your difference. Your team is hypocritical Nazis.

#1-- Nobody is burning books.
#2--Nobody is banning books. This is obvious because a poster said like 2 posts above that he just easily bought them.

So, this issue isn't burning/banning books. What Trump cultists advocate is the government FORCING private companies to do business with their preferred parties.

Completely hypocritical as is typical for Trump cultists.

Where did anyone or I said to force Amazons hand?

Quote please.

LeonDurham says

FortWayne says

Bakery case was religious freedom based. You can’t force someone to worship Satan and give up their faith. It wasn’t the “we don’t like it” case, it was “religious freedom” case.

But book burning is based on political witch hunt. While liberals screamed injustice to baker they harassed, they decided to ban books for political reasons because they “don’t like it”. There’s your difference. Your team is hypocritical Nazis.

#1-- Nobody is burning books.
#2--Nobody is banning books. This is obvious because a poster said like 2 posts above that he just easily bought them.

So, this issue isn't burning/banning books. What Trump cultists advocate is the government FORCING private companies to do business with their preferred parties.

Completely hypocritical as is typical for Trump cultists.

FortWayne says

Where did anyone or I said to force Amazons hand?

Quote please.

You complained about books being "burned" and "banned". All that happened was Amazon decided not to stock them.

If you weren't advocating that Amazon should be forced to sell them, what are you saying?

I wondered why my internet screen saver fireplace was full of books.

LeonDurham says

Huh? You are arguing FOR government interference in the private sector. And FOR socialism.

Since when do liberals encourage huge book sellers not to carry books?

This is an entirely new thing over the past few years.

Especially a monopolist of online sales and e-books.
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/amazon-has-basically-no-competition-among-online-booksellers/371917/

Remember the Dixie Chicks? I don't remember Liberals and Progressives screaming that "Radio Stations are Private Companies! Cox Media has a right to ban the Dixie Chicks, and it's capitalism in action!"


curious2 says

it isn't censorship. Amazon sells Mein Kampf, for example

if they carry Mein Kampf, why not books on picking up chicks? The latter can't be worse than the former.

I bet you if Salman Rushdie wrote "Satanic Verses" today, the Democratic base would be protesting stores that carried the title as "Encouraging Islamophobic hatred".

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

Since when do liberals encourage huge book sellers not to carry books?

This is an entirely new thing over the past few years.

Especially a monopolist of online sales and e-books.
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/amazon-has-basically-no-competition-among-online-booksellers/371917/

Remember the Dixie Chicks? I don't remember Liberals and Progressives screaming that "Radio Stations are Private Companies! Cox Media has a right to ban the Dixie Chicks, and it's capitalism in action!"

I don't recall the Democratic base doing any of the things you state. Amazon is not the Democratic party. Hell, Bernie Sanders just slammed Amazon recently.

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

If they carry Mein Kampf, why not books on picking up chicks?

That's why I suspect this is a marketing stunt by Roosh V. Maybe he was demanding a higher % of gross sales of the affected works than Amazon's standard terms, and so Amazon stopped selling the affected works instead.

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

I bet you if Salman Rushdie wrote "Satanic Verses" today, the Democratic base would be protesting stores that carried the title as "Encouraging Islamophobic hatred".

You would win that bet, at least there would be many examples.

curious2 says

That's why I suspect this is a marketing stunt by Roosh V. Maybe he was demanding a higher % of gross sales of the affected works than Amazon's standard terms, and so Amazon stopped selling the affected works instead.

Well, his stuff is back up.

Could have been a bad algo, which I think a lot of these kinds of calls are.

Amazing Atheist just got a video banned by Youtube for hate speech, on being brought in front of the school counselor after Columbine. hahaha
https://www.bitchute.com/video/j-7KqP-GNsg/

If you are incapable of understanding basic form of communication, dude you got problems I can’t help you with.

LeonDurham says

FortWayne says

Where did anyone or I said to force Amazons hand?

Quote please.

You complained about books being "burned" and "banned". All that happened was Amazon decided not to stock them.

If you weren't advocating that Amazon should be forced to sell them, what are you saying?

LeonDurham says

OK--so do you think private companies should have the decide what products to sell in their store or on their website?

If you are regulating and saying what gender/race a company should hire/treat, then you are discriminating on what thought someone expresses-can't have it both ways. if regualtions exist, it must extend to thought-if not egt rid of allr ace/gender laws.

lostand confused says

If you are regulating and saying what gender/race a company should hire/treat, then you are discriminating on what thought someone expresses-can't have it both ways. if regualtions exist, it must extend to thought-if not egt rid of allr ace/gender laws.

Huh? This makes no sense at all.

Let's start over. Do you think the government should decide which products a private company must sell in their store or on their website? Yes or no?

LeonDurham says

Huh? This makes no sense at all.

Of course it makes no sense to you. Nobody her eis asking the government to regulate anything. We are calling out the liberal madness of suppressing thought.
However the govt regulates a bunch of things-since you appear not to support govt regulation-why do you support govt regulating race/gender/orientation etc etc. If a company should eb free to ban boopks on ideology, a company should be free to ban gay books or gay employees or women wearing pants? It should eb totally upto the company?

Liberals.

lostand confused says

We are calling out the liberal madness of suppressing thought.

So a company deciding which products to stock is suppressing thought?? wtf?

I went to the grocery store today and they no longer stocked Braeburn apples. God damn conservatives burning apples again.

lostand confused says

If a company should eb free to ban boopks on ideology, a company should be free to ban gay books or gay employees or women wearing pants? It should eb totally upto the company?

Again--a company deciding not to stock a product is NOT banning that product for fuck's sake. A poster just bragged about buying said book earlier today. How can Trump cultists be so short sighted to confuse ONE store not stocking a product with said product being "banned"?

LeonDurham says

Again--a company deciding not to stock a product is NOT banning that product for fuck's sake

By your logic, a company not hiring a black person because theya re black si not racist. This is not one instance as you liberal propagandist want tos ell-this is a large pattern that is dangerous-and very evident in the soviets/communist model.

lostand confused says

By your logic, a company not hiring a black person because theya re black si not racist.

No--that would definitely NOT be my logic. Only a Trump cultist could make such an asinine analogy.

LeonDurham says

No--that would definitely NOT be my logic. Only a Trump cultist could make such an asinine analogy.

Yes that si your logic. Stop witht he insults-liberals can never have a decent conversation without acting like Trigglypuff.

lostand confused says

Yes that si your logic. Stop witht he insults-liberals can never have a decent conversation without acting like Trigglypuff.

lol--it's OK to insult liberals all day every day, but Trump cultist special snowflakes can't stand when someone dares insult their dear leader?

My logic is that private companies have the right to decide which products they will make/sell. It's their business model. My logic is also that a product is very different from an employee. My logic also is that companies must follow US law if they want to do business in the US.

LeonDurham says

lol--it's OK to insult liberals all day every day, but Trump cultist special snowflakes can't stand when someone dares insult their dear leader?

blah, blah, blah
LeonDurham says

My logic is that private companies have the right to decide which products they will make/sell. It's their business model. My logic is also that a product is very different from an employee. My logic also is that companies must follow US law if they want to do business in the US.

employee makes product and hence by your logic, amker of product is less than product. US law was slavery-it can change. You are trying to have your cake and eat it too. I like regualtions on things I like, nobody can question that, but hey they are banning things I don't like-woohooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

lostand confused says

employee makes product and hence by your logic, amker of product is less than product. US law was slavery-it can change. You are trying to have your cake and eat it too. I like regualtions on things I like, nobody can question that, but hey they are banning things I don't like-woohooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I've very patiently explained what my logic is. Why do you feel the need to keep misstating and lying about what I believe?

And perhaps you can finally answer my question--Do you think companies should be able to decide which products they can make/sell? Or do you think the government should make that decision for all companies?

LeonDurham says

and lying a

There your ammo-lying-you lie through your teeth and accuse everyone of lying.

LeonDurham says

And perhaps you can finally answer my question--Do you think companies should be able to decide which products they can make/sell? Or do you think the government should make that decision for all companies?

LOL and you speak about lying.

lostand confused says

There your ammo-lying-you lie through your teeth and accuse everyone of lying.

Please point some lies--I doubt it, but I'm open to evidence to the contrary.

lostand confused says

LOL and you speak about lying.

Only when people lie.

LeonDurham says

Only when people lie

oh please-LeonDurham says

Please point some lies

There that is a lie.

lostand confused says

Please point some lies

There that is a lie.

lol--I rest my case.

LeonDurham says

lostand confused says

Please point some lies

There that is a lie.

lol--I rest my case.

Good, because eyou lie, lie, lie, never see reason, talk garbage and go round and and round and round. You change your name so people won't look at your record, but the stupidity carries over username to username-LOL!

lostand confused says

Good, because eyou lie, lie, lie, never see reason, talk garbage and go round and and round and round. You change your name so people won't look at your record, but the stupidity carries over username to username-LOL!

I was going to flag this, but it's better to leave it. Liberals aren't the ones who post insults--it's always the Trump cultists. Remember this post the next time you pull the special snowflake act.

LeonDurham says

was going to flag this, but it's better to leave it. Liberals aren't the ones who post insults--it's always the Trump cultists. Remember this post the next time you pull the special snowflake act.

You get what you give. You insult, call people liars-post insults non stops then act oh so when people respond in kind. You act normal, others will act normal. Blah, blah, blah for the rest-jokers I don't ake seriously.

lostand confused says

You get what you give. You insult, call people liars-post insults non stops then act oh so when people respond in kind. You act normal, others will act normal. Blah, blah, blah for the rest-jokers I don't ake seriously.

Here are the only two personal attacks on this thread that I can find. Please correct me if I'm wrong.


FortWayne says

If you are incapable of understanding basic form of communication, dude you got problems I can’t help you with.

lostand confused says

Good, because eyou lie, lie, lie, never see reason, talk garbage and go round and and round and round. You change your name so people won't look at your record, but the stupidity carries over username to username-LOL!

LeonDurham says

Here are the only two personal attacks on this thread that I can find. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Another day, another lie. LOLz.

lostand confused says

Another day, another lie. LOLz.

Great--then please point out the lies. Just post all the other personal attacks. Should be simple to do.

(I won't hold my breath)

LeonDurham says

Great--then please point out the lies. Just post all the other personal attacks. Should be simple to do.

(I won't hold my breath)

I am not going to indulge in yoru tantrums. if you go up a few posts-your personal attack si right there. I am not playing your game. grow up.

This is what is happening in a larger context. Liberlas have ben acting like teenagers throwing tantrums-no solutiuons , no ideas-just screaming mess throwing insults. Theyw ere used to being coddled and thinking they were here to change the world. They had genteel people , bu along came Trump who calls them on their BS. I think this is a microcosm of our countyr. More of us need to be the strong, but firm adults and call the liberals on their BS. They need to be shown for the teenage fools they are. Hopefully soem of them grow up and start acting like adults and think with common sense.

Thank god for Trump. We need more and more like him-if this republic is to be saved.

Herdingcats says

nswered because 1 answer is that of wanting the government to control what companies make/sell also known as communism

LOlz -blah, blah, blah-perhaps one should read a thread before commenting about somehting not being answered-LOLZZZZZZZZZZ

Rocketmanjoe says

lostand confused says

I am not going to indulge in yoru tantrums.

LeonDurham says

Only a Trump cultist could make such an asinine analogy.

If this is what you believe is a personal attack I must agree with Leon, it is not. The statement is about all Trump cultists, not you in particular. Hope that clears things up.

No and no .