patrick.net

Indiana Jones says

Sorry chaps, women only get dressed up to impress each other

And slut shaming is mostly a female activity...
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html?pagewanted=all

[ This woman had been chosen by the researchers, Tracy Vaillancourt and Aanchal Sharma, because she “embodied qualities considered attractive from an evolutionary perspective,” meaning a “low waist-to-hip ratio, clear skin, large breasts.” Sometimes, she wore a T-shirt and jeans, other times a tightfitting, low-cut blouse and short skirt.

In jeans, she attracted little notice and no negative comments from the students, whose reactions were being secretly recorded during the encounter and after the woman left the room. But when she wore the other outfit, virtually all the students reacted with hostility.

They stared at her, looked her up and down, rolled their eyes and sometimes showed outright anger. One asked her in disgust, “What the [expletive] is that?”

Most of the aggression, though, happened after she left the room. Then the students laughed about her and impugned her motives. One student suggested that she dressed that way in order to have sex with a professor. Another said that her breasts “were about to pop out.” ]

But I guess this doesn't stop feminists from blaming the patriarchy.

Heraclitusstudent says

They just assume a guy is ugly until they know how much money he makes.

1.) Can he support me?
2.) Can he support future and/or existing children?
......
10.) Is he skilled in tickling Ms. Muffy?

It's not that women are more judgemental--it's that men are *less* judgmental. See here: we'll bang pretty much anything within very loose parameters (yes, pun bought and paid for). Oh, of course, we have minimal standards not to plow the ultra obese or smelly/hairy/manly ones, but, as my mama always said, "Bend 'em over and they all look the same."

Heraclitusstudent says

And slut shaming is mostly a female activity...

This one has always seemed weird. No matter how many partners a woman has had, she keeps a mental list of other women who have had more than she has, and are therefore somehow loose. I figured it was just a self-esteem boost, but it seemed weird that it was always limited to women.

But then I noticed all these middle-class guys seething at other members of the middle class, blaming them for society's problems. It's the same phenomenon: people police their own groups, often quite harshly.

"The vast majority of men were ranked as 0s, 1s, and 2s by Women"

And yet if I read this right 11% of those men rated zero still got messages from women where only 1% women rated at zero received messages.

Indiana Jones says

Women don't expect men to be beautiful, by and large.

This

Indiana Jones says

Sorry chaps, women only get dressed up to impress each other

Wrong.
www.youtube.com/embed/cDjZUmWI-A0

I wonder if the extreme disparity between the way men rate women and the way that women rate men could be because most men don’t take good care of their appearance?

When we are young we might, but once you settle down the beer gut happens and you neglect to shave or trim the facial hair, wear nice clothes, etc. And that’s before we get into the transformative power of makeup! Men don’t wear it, and it makes women look loads better! I’ve seen women go from a 3 to a 9 with the right application of makeup. What might be possible for a man? We don’t know, or rather we have only gay men for examples. No straight man wants to be confused with a gay man so we perhaps overcompensate with neglect on our appearance.
But some cultures do use male makeup, for instance Persians and some Indians. Does this make men more appealing to women?

Well, women constantly seem to be falling in love with gay men so there’s that data point.
I’d suggest that any man who is in the market for some booty do his best job on his appearance.

Chicks like tough guys who keep campaigning even after being stabbed by Leftist Radicals.

Even if they do dismiss rape and the pay gap, both.

Amaral is part of a growing number of women who opinion polls show have recently warmed to Bolsonaro, a divisive candidate whose comments belittling rape and defending the gender pay gap have long alienated many female voters.

If the trend continues, some of the women who previously balked at the former army captain could help propel him to the presidency, and possibly a first-round victory on Sunday, pollsters and analysts say.

That prospect cheers investors who fear a return of the PT’s state-run policies, but terrifies Bolsonaro’s critics, who say his views echo those of U.S. President Donald Trump or even hardline Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte.

Amaral said she was not thrilled by Bolsonaro’s pledge to loosen gun laws and disliked his homophobic statements, but ultimately she was willing to overlook those if he was able to beat PT candidate Fernando Haddad.

“In truth, my vote is a protest vote,” said Amaral, a 64-year-old retired civil servant in downtown Rio de Janeiro. “Right now, among the current crop of candidates, none of them would be my choice to govern the country.”

After ruling Brazil for 13 of the last 15 years, the PT is blamed by many for a crippling recession, rising violence and voracious corruption.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-election/brazil-far-right-candidate-bolsonaro-gains-women-voters-despite-sexist-remarks-idUSKCN1MD2KZ


Bolsonaro also famously told some Far Left Ex-Guerilla Politician he wouldn't rape her because she was too ugly.

just_dregalicious says

And yet if I read this right 11% of those men rated zero still got messages from women where only 1% women rated at zero received messages.

Don't underestimate the power of self-delusion in very horny males.

I am consistently impressed by the degree to which men assume that what they want is what women want, and vice versa.

Men think they need to be pretty. Not true! Ugly bastards get laid all the time. They just need the attitude and the money.

Women think they need to be "strong, independent women". Wrongo! Women desperately want strong independent men but really just need to be pretty themselves to gain commitment from some guy.

Men do not need looks to get women; women need looks to get men. Women therefore attach much more importance to this issue.

Men also see trying to improve their appearance as a chore in addition to all of the other things we must do in life, so it gets a lower priority.

Having OK looks is also useful of course; out of shape slobs don't look as successful as men who aren't slobs.

Women also like guys who are intelligent, funny, polite, considerate among other qualities. They also are attracted to assholes which seems paradoxical.

I look so different from 20 years ago I don't know what I look like anymore to the opposite sex.

just_dregalicious says

"The vast majority of men were ranked as 0s, 1s, and 2s by Women"

And yet if I read this right 11% of those men rated zero still got messages from women where only 1% women rated at zero received messages.

You sir are the winner of the statistical analysis contest.

This is more of a testament to male and female behavior difference. Men are ranking women on whether or not they'd smash them. Women are ranking men on whether or not they'd marry them. Thats a FAR tougher standard.

HOWEVER as Just-D pointed out women still message those men at the bottom of the distribution MORE by a WIDE MARGIN. I would suggest this means women are actually less judgemental of a men's looks than vice is versa. The rankings are simply measuring difference thresholds. Behavior of smashing is the empirical proof that ugly men w game can still smash

clambo says

Women also like guys who are intelligent, funny, polite, considerate among other qualities. They also are attracted to assholes which seems paradoxical.

Not at all.

Women dont like A$$holes. What they like is a man who knows who he is and what he's about. A$$holes tend to directly express what they are looking for as compared to male feminist, for example. While any woman would prefer the confident, direct communicating nice guy , theres simply not enough alphas to go around. A$$hole > Soyboy for a woman.

20% or so of men are too incompetent to get a woman, another 35% are soyboys. Women crave confident, aggressive, potentially violent, competitive leaders. That is maybe 5% of the population. If you can be that 5% of men, getting laid is far too easy. I could field a basketball team w the 9's i bang on any monthly basis, so could most of the guys i hang with.

Do the 4th like this and it's not hard. God bless america

clambo says

Women also like guys who are intelligent, funny, polite, considerate among other qualities. They also are attracted to assholes which seems paradoxical.

There's a lot of confusion about what women want, because it revolves around 2 opposite poles:
- the good father: kind, funny, considerate, intelligent.
- the alpha male: high status, strong, aggressive, but also assholes.
Themselves are sometimes confused about it. They tend to rationalize at an intellectual level that they really don't want the assholes, but given the opportunity they may not resist.

You can be rich all you want, if you are bald and short, it may not be enough....

Heraclitusstudent says

You can be rich all you want, if you are bald and short, it may not be enough....

He was married years ago when he was even more dorky. 2019 Besos is a stud compared to 1999 Besos.

Besos will marry a super model or anyone he fucking wants next

CBOEtrader says

Besos will marry a super model or anyone he fucking wants next

I have a whole thread, lambasting Bezo's and his dating choices.

http://patrick.net/post/1321430/2019-01-10-jeff-bezos-is-dating-former-news-anchor-lauren-sanchez