« First « Previous Comments 16 - 45 of 45 Search these comments
I wrestle him down to the ground to stop him, while we're on the ground other cops show upand shoot you.
You don't see it that way then don't act surprised when these Sorry Bastards start going to jail. Hopefully some get the chair. It was Treason, get out of here with your obstruction bullshit.
Words such as treason might have been thrown around, but nobody really thought there was much chance of evidence coming out that was worthy of convicting Trump for direct involvement in Russias hacking of the election.
I get it that you want to paint the Mueller report as some kind of a victory for Trump. I dont see it that way at all
I get it that you want to paint the Mueller report as some kind of a victory for Trump. I dont see it that way at all, and I don't think the 2020 voters will either.
Zero evidence for Trump collussion isnt a victory?
The Dems don't get that all those bits that say "Harm to Ongoing Matter" are about investigations into DEM Crimes.
CBOEtrader says
Zero evidence for Trump collussion isnt a victory?
No, insufficient evidence to indict a sitting President for direct involvement in Russia's hacking of the election, is not a victory.
Democrats: Please send your apologies to President Trump at his current address:
— thebradfordfile™ (@thebradfordfile) April 18, 2019
White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500
Note: He will be accepting mail at this address for six more years.
And you know this becasue ?
They are off the rails at this point and cant reverse course. They have been feeding people bullshit nonstop 24/7 not like they are going to come out and say they are wrong at this point with how frenzied and brainwashed the left has become.
The Dems don't get that all those bits that say "Harm to Ongoing Matter" are about investigations into DEM Crimes.
That statement is so vaguely written as to be a deliberate Rorschach blot - "obstruction" is more a reflection of the bias of the one reading it than anything specific. The true statement would stop with "No evidence of criminal obstruction." It did not need the "but there might have been" inference.
Everything with Trump put aside. I cannot believe this was blown up as much as it has with the bullshit Russia attempting to influence our election. This crap has been going on between all would powers forever in one shape or another, probable the US is the largest perpetrators of such acts, the outrage is so rediculously overblown. Aipac probably has 100x more influence on our elections. Let's look all the foreign lobbies.
« First « Previous Comments 16 - 45 of 45 Search these comments
Did you see Rod Rosenstein smirk on that one, even he thought that was a hoot.