« First « Previous Comments 8 - 36 of 36 Search these comments
All those in favor of abortion can simply boycott all Republican businesses.
Just the beginning. Next: Bring back Criminal Conversation, lawsuits for monetary damages from Adultery and ban No Fault (good term: Unilateral) Divorce when there are children in the household. The latter alone will save hundreds of billions in Social programs at the Local, State, and Federal Level.
Its their body and they could do what they want
willywonka saysIts their body and they could do what they want
So women should be free to be hookers and sell a kidney if they want. It is their body, after all.
So women should be free to be hookers and sell a kidney if they want. It is their body, after all.
that's why 3/4 of divorces are initiated by women
Its their body and they could do what they want.
God's hand has moved ALABAMA! to remind humanity that:
RAPE!
IS!
A!
SACRAMENT!
Sure, Left is much less reasonable - but the right should try to be somewhat consistent. I get the abortion issue - it is debatable and absolutely better if there are no abortions - but the Right is fucking stupid with respect to gambling, prostitution, and drugs, e.i. they try to legislate morality. Just make sure no tax money used.
Gambling produces large debts and ruined lives as well as broke-ass elderly parents whom their children must support.
Prostitution produces abuse and abandonment of families, which costs must be born by tax payers and the innocents involved.
Drug use produces indigent individuals, sociopathy, crime to pay for more drugs, and abandonment of families.
All these have real costs to society, so it is in society’s interest to regulate them as best as possible.
Are you saying regulate everything? Or nothing?
Incarceration of people for minor drug offenses is extremely costly as well, and somehow this is deemed OK by many.
d6rB saysIncarceration of people for minor drug offenses is extremely costly as well, and somehow this is deemed OK by many.
Well - just look at San Francisco and Seattle these days. The vast majority of the homelessness, shit on the streets, syringes, and crime are being driven by drug addicts who can use drugs on the streets with no fear of arrest.
Not saying that we should lock every drug user up either..........but I think the pendulum swung too far into a Liberal/Libertarian position on drugs in those cities causing them to become shitholes.
Well - just look at San Francisco and Seattle these days. The vast majority of the homelessness, shit on the streets, syringes, and crime are being driven by drug addicts who can use drugs on the streets with no fear of arrest.
Not saying that we should lock every drug user up either..........but I think the pendulum swung too far into a Liberal/Libertarian position on drugs in those cities causing them to become shitholes.
Why regulate one, and not the other?
Arrest for making city a shithole and littering, not because someone is using drugs. In some European countries, semi-legalization of drugs and giving out FREE! drugs to addicts decreased crime rate, panhandling, and general public nuisances. If my memory is right, Basel or Basel canton saw 60% property crime drop after this type of program was instituted.
So why isn't it working in Seattle, Los Angeles and San Francisco? Crime and shithole conditions have dramatically increased since these cities started handing out free needles and being lax with drug enforcement.
socal2 saysSo why isn't it working in Seattle, Los Angeles and San Francisco? Crime and shithole conditions have dramatically increased since these cities started handing out free needles and being lax with drug enforcement.
Perhaps because they do not incarcerate for public nuisances? Enforcement is lax because they can not arrest homeless people because they are afraid of being called racist/whatever?
“The reasoning is the same reasoning, Roe v. Wade was decided that the baby in the womb was not a person,” she continued. “So this bill bases its reasoning that the baby in the womb is a person. And we based it on the fact that in Alabama law, we currently consider the baby in the womb a person. If you were a drunk driver and you killed a pregnant woman, you have a double homicide on your hands. We voted as a state to be a pro-life state.”
If such exception were added, it would undermine that argument, Collins explained.
“The biggest thing to attack it with is to say, ‘What, you’re not going to include rape and incest?’” she said. “Well, how do we say, ‘The baby inside is a person unless they’re conceived in rape or incest’?”
SOURCE: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/14/alabama-senate-passes-nations-strictest-abortion-ban-by-25-6-vote-bill-heads-to-governors-desk/