« First « Previous Comments 48 - 87 of 87 Search these comments
indc saysWhat is common in all these conflicts - Abrahamic expansionism maybe.
Probably in Muslim vs Indian, in other cases not so much. Adolf liked old Germanic religions AFAIK. In any case, religion always was an additional excuse for looting. Agree though that monotheistic religions typically are more aggressive.
WRT to development, see Japan, S. Korea - they are not city states and were devastated as well. S. Korea is in state of war even now.
YouTube employees will soon start organizing pride parades.
India tried the socialist approach as it had to ride on Russia's coat tails. That was one of its major mistakes.
indc saysIndia tried the socialist approach as it had to ride on Russia's coat tails. That was one of its major mistakes.
That probably set India back another generation. That shitty economic system can screw up cultures and civilization.
Now you have American companies like the one I work for setting up shop in India employing software developers and doing some manufacturing.
Does that work for the original Indian ethos?
If it wasn't for the Brits we wouldn't have IPA!
But they dont need to lie that they brought "culture" to India. No need for white man's burden.
indc saysBut they dont need to lie that they brought "culture" to India. No need for white man's burden.
So glad to hear the Indians re-invented the Railroad and Antibiotics, refusing to use those objects of British Imperialism.
Youtube just demonetized one of my videos for no apparent reason. And I can't request a manual review because it doesn't have sufficient traffic. How convenient, since I assume they suppress non-monetized content. #StopBeingEvil pic.twitter.com/YipTf4Dx0W
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) June 7, 2019
really dude, you think railroads and antibiotics are culture? India gave vaccination to west are you going to stop using it?
indc saysreally dude, you think railroads and antibiotics are culture? India gave vaccination to west are you going to stop using it?
Yes, technology is downstream from culture. No doubt about it.
No wonder west is doomed with that attitude. You can see how many people go berserk with their depression.
European renaissance occurred after they robbed whole world of ideas, materials , technology... And with all that imagine how much they could have helped humanity, but instead they did 2 world wars and destroyed each other.
First of all, what does the term, Indo-Aryan mean?
Let's break it down ...
Indo-Aryan is Indo-{ Ancient Persian } or Indianized-{ White Foreign Invader }.
Yes, India was not just ruled by Turkic Moghuls and the British Empire starting from the renaissance times but also, the Maurya & the Kushan "Persians" during ancient times,, nevermind the original Aryan invasion prior to 1200 BCE.
With this many whites screwing around in South Asia, to call out the British, is being hypocritical. India was always to some extent, a white man's bitch even if the earlier whites were Buddhists or Zoroastrians.
Nothing is white or black. Everything is a mix of positive and negative. Did British exploit/oppress India to their own benefit? Yes. Did they try to enforce their ideas on India? Yes. Was the latter good or bad? Probably some of both. Railroads, antibiotics=good for sure, as was start to abolish caste system and widow burning. Did, at some point in distant past, India contribute a lot to what we currently know as civilization? Yes. Does India contribute now? Not so much lately. Are the current problems in India result of British or Indians? I think 95+% caused by Indians.
And a few more points:
1. Before the Europeans took over Western Indian ports, they were mostly controlled by Arab Imperialists. This is in addition to the Moghuls, I mean Arabs from the Gulf, not the Persians or Islamic Mongols.
2. The Europeans gained Western Indian Ports because they were first used by Indians as Mercenaries, trading port access to the Portugese to drive out the Muslims
3. Europeans played Indians against each other - easy because they were all petty kingdoms with the king's younger brother thinking he should be in charge - and ended up in control of small disconnected pieces of India.
4. One day in the late 1700s the British and French realized that instead of manipulating Indians, they might as well just rule directly.
None of the facts you listed are wrong. But all I am saying is your small brain can think of only 500yrs. Where as the history out there is much-much older.
You guys are complaining that all the problems India has is its own.
indc saysYou guys are complaining that all the problems India has is its own.
I'd argue that India hitching it's wagon to the USSR and flirting with Communism did far more harm to the people living today than the British colonial rule.
Why would chinese and japanese complain they were not occupied and looted by europeans of both materials and knowledge. Africa and India did.
None of the facts you listed are wrong. But all I am saying is your small brain can think of only 500yrs. Where as the history out there is much-much older.
Where did you get stupid idea that buddhists are outsiders to India.
Persians and Indians are pretty much the same.
indc saysWhere did you get stupid idea that buddhists are outsiders to India.
First of all, Buddhism spread beyond the modern day region of India, right after the so-called Gautama lived. So yes, you can say that the Vedic culture was India's monopoly but that wasn't the case for Buddhism.
The part of the eastern Persian Empire, Bactria, in the region which is today's Afghanistan, was a Buddhist nation-state in ancient times, long before the coming of Islam, as well as Alexander's conquests. Both Zoroastrianism and Buddhism existed in the Persian Empire.
indc saysPersians and Indians are pretty much the same.
Not really, because there are no South Indians (ppl of Tamil) in Persia.
Like I said wait for few more years, when we have our own history then we can debunk those racist theories.
Now you are saying that buddhism is owned by outsiders.
Or you mean buddhist outsiders attacked india back even though they are buddhists?
Do you even know that most of India was buddhist at one time
indc saysLike I said wait for few more years, when we have our own history then we can debunk those racist theories.
If you want to know how this 'racist' theory came to me, it wasn't from some Anglo-Saxon lecturer at Oxbridge. It was actually from a few Indians. In particular, a Brahmin, whose family came from New Delhi, and a Parsi, whose family once lived in Bombay/Mumbai.
It was their grandparents and relatives who'd told 'em that the so-called fair skin ppl were always coming into India, throughout history. And yes, these fellas were definitely whiter than any Indians I'd ever seen before. And conversely, Dravidians, which includes Tamil Nadu & neighboring regions never went the other way into Central Asia. If anything, South Indian migration went the other way towards the Malay peninsula. So that's their take on the whole enchilada.
As for true history, even a South India...
indc saysNow you are saying that buddhism is owned by outsiders.
Or you mean buddhist outsiders attacked india back even though they are buddhists?
Do you even know that most of India was buddhist at one time
Nope, the only "owners" are Zoroastrians because that's central to the identity of the Persian Empire.
Buddhism can exist anywhere and yes, I know about Ashoka in India though the Parsi guy says that he's also a Persian descended conqueror of India. So there you have it, even without the British, you have racist theories within your own borders.
.
The first picture you shared is from actress in bengal close to bangladesh.
Second picture is of a tamilian actress who later started working in bollywood. Stop commenting on things you dont even understand.
Is your friend from chennai a rice bag convert.
« First « Previous Comments 48 - 87 of 87 Search these comments
https://news.yahoo.com/youtube-ban-hateful-supremacist-videos-170733974.html
So if you make a video about veterans deserving superior treatment, that's hateful? Or elderly people?
Of course, I'll be shocked if they don't pull all the Praeger U. videos while leaving up the "Men should be castrated" "Whiteness is Toxic" and "Anti-Termite" videos will remain.
Regulators, mount up!