by tovarichpeter ➕follow (7) 💰tip ignore
Comments 1 - 35 of 35 Search these comments
So Wyoming has less than 1% of the US population. But they round that up for representation in the House because each state is guaranteed at least one Rep.
...
1% of $200 billion is: $2 billion
The same people promised Obamacare would lower prices.
Which means that keeping your cash in a mattress would be better than a savings account in a lot of cases.
This is on net worth over one million,
Rent-seeking is a concept in public choice theory as well as in economics, that involves seeking to increase one's share of existing wealth without creating new wealth. Rent-seeking results in reduced economic efficiency through misallocation of resources, reduced wealth-creation, lost government revenue, heightened income inequality,[1] and potential national decline.
Attempts at capture of regulatory agencies to gain a coercive monopoly can result in advantages for the rent seeker in a market while imposing disadvantages on their incorrupt competitors.
Solution: do not introduce new taxes...
This is on net worth over one million, so it's probably not affecting you,
The idea is that you would save more on reduced or eliminated health care insurance than the increase in taxes.
So we're not talking nearly the increase in taxes compared to the decrease in health insurance expenditures.
You mean like that $2500/year annual savings that Obama promised that we never got?
Booger saysWhich means that keeping your cash in a mattress would be better than a savings account in a lot of cases.
This is on net worth over one million, so it's probably not affecting you, unless,...you aren't,...no it couldn't be,...one of Trump's sons ?
Also, do you know what .38 percent means ?
If we had free college for all
Today $1M, tomorrow $100K. Today, 0.38%; tomorrow, 3.8%. Money obtained from taxes is NEVER enough, and once introduced, taxes almost always go up. Solution: do not introduce new taxes...
:
If we had free college for all,
So, yup: the 0.38% is just the camel's nose under the tent.
:
If we had free college for all.
...
Were talking a good investment by the government in a very competitive world.
Hard for me really to think of a better use of tax dollars.
("but waaaaah, I didn't get it. No fair")
Anyone that can't pay cash for healthcare is a loser,dependent on insurance socialism to make up for their failure to be wealthy as a great American entrepreneur. This is America where anyone can be a success.Why do they choose failure?
if we didn't bring in H2Bs
If we had free college for all, it wouldn't really be for all. Obviously you would have to earn (academemically) the right.
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,195,264 comments by 14,009 users - Blue, GNL, richwicks, RWSGFY, SnuckDort online now