Comments 1 - 29 of 29 Search these comments
So the battle is between Harris, Bernie, Warren, and Biden.
Tulsi attacked Harris’s record and is consequently shut out of the third debate. She has the donors and has 2% or better in 22 polls, but only has that much in ONE of the DNC-approved polls.
Makes you go hmmm.
Makes you go hmmm.
Clearly, Harris is preferred by the oligarchs.
Tulsi likes being on FOX.
If trump has proven anything it's that there are ways around the oligarchs...
Quigley saysClearly, Harris is preferred by the oligarchs.
Tulsi attacked Harris’s record and is consequently shut out of the third debate. She has the donors and has 2% or better in 22 polls, but only has that much in ONE of the DNC-approved polls.
Makes you go hmmm.
Clearly, Harris is preferred by the oligarchs.
Quigley saysTulsi attacked Harris’s record and is consequently shut out of the third debate. She has the donors and has 2% or better in 22 polls, but only has that much in ONE of the DNC-approved polls.
Makes you go hmmm.
Clearly, Harris is preferred by the oligarchs.
Tulsi could give Trump a run for his money. She speaks too many uncomfortable truths.
Either the powers that be prefer another 4 years of Trump or they are clueless.
Quigley saysDonald Trump's opponent next year has already been predetermined.Tulsi attacked Harris’s record and is consequently shut out of the third debate. She has the donors and has 2% or better in 22 polls, but only has that much in ONE of the DNC-approved polls.
Makes you go hmmm.
Clearly, Harris is preferred by the oligarchs.
Tulsi could give Trump a run for his money, but she speaks too many uncomfortable truths.
Either the powers that be prefer another 4 years of Trump or they are clueless.
It's Harris or Biden, agreed.I really think it's Biden and Gillibrand due to her deep party connections through her father. You can just call them Walter and Gerry.
Mark Penn said several weeks ago that higher ups understand what's wrong with the party but it will take time. This is cyclical, happened in the seventies.
I really think it's Biden and Gillibrand due to her deep party connections through her father. You can just call them Walter and Gerry.
Is it me or is every single one of the Democrats batshit crazy, with the possible exception of Kneepads Kamala?
Many of the candidates are just decoys for reasons stated above, purely to shape narrative and sentiment. They know they're fake, but say what they're told, earning woke points for being a team player, helping make another dem candidate look more reasonable, and focusing votes to them. I've always suspected these "decoys" exist in elections.
He's too centrist, even though his jettisoned most of his long held centrist stances to win the primary, the very same stances that make him remotely electable by Middle America, for the far left base.
Buttigieg, Booker, and O'Rourke have made no headway.
Kamala may rise, though she has problems with her time as SFC DA that hurt her among Progressives, they'll ignore it for Racial Purposes. A Black! Woman! President! Also, Kamala is far more preferable to Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Globalists and therefore will easily raise big money, than Bernie or Warren.
So the battle is between Harris, Bernie, Warren, and Biden.
Frankly, Warren and Bernie are so similar, one wonders if they magically combined to one person, or one dropped out, what the percentage would be.
If it was only Warren or Bernie without the other; I'd expect either would be matching or near matching Biden's number of about 30%.
So here's my prediction:
It'll be Biden vs. Harris, Bernie, or Warren on Super Tuesday; the others won't count. Of all of them, Harris is the strongest pretender to the Democratic Throne.
But no matter what happens, a huge chunk of the Democratic party will be disappointed.