0
0

Coldwell Banker becomes first Realtor of "Virtual Real Estate"


 invite response                
2007 Mar 24, 7:43am   26,751 views  194 comments

by Randy H   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

WTF!
COLDWELL BANKER® ENTRANCE INTO SECOND LIFE® MAKES VIRTUAL HOMEOWNERSHIP EASIER FOR MILLIONS OF RESIDENTS

Company Leads Real Estate Industry Into Virtual Future

(link)

This is in the give me a f*#!ng break category. All the zaniness in the "virtual worlds" space is a subject I've purposefully kept separate from Patrick.net until now. But this crosses the line for me. As if we don't have a big enough headache with the *real* real estate bubble, along with all its hype, mania, collusion, greed, corruption and now economic fallout, now we get to legitimize a whole *pretend* real estate bubble. And in case you think this is some irrelevant, minor fringe element bear in mind this particular virtual world claims over 4,000,000 current residents and is growing at over 30% per month.

For anyone lucky enough to have not been exposed, the short version is:

  • Second Life is a huge online computer game.
  • The game has no goal, purpose or point, but is just a big virtual reality simulator.
  • They call that a virtual world and get pissed off if you call it a game, even though it's made by a game company.
  • All kinds of pundits, academics and over-budgeted corporate marketers are falling all over each other to get in on this.
  • People are spending all kinds of real money inside of the Second Life computerized cartoon world. The biggest thing they're spending money on is ... you guessed it ... Virtual Real Estate! Complete with flippers, "land" developers, brokers, and now apparently, bona fide realtors.

Ok, so I took this whole issue on, called out what I saw as a type of Ponzi pyramid scheme, and roundly got ripped up by cult Second Life's love hype machine. You can find my articles here (main one that started it all), here, here, and here. There is also a lawsuit (the real kind, not the pretend computer cartoon kind), Bragg v Linden in which my first two articles above have been submitted to the court in a revised complain[t] statement. The case is a dispute over -- you guessed again -- Virtual Real Estate!

If nothing else, I thought this might make a nice weekend distraction for everyone before we get back to the *real* RE bubble next week.

--Randy H

PS. If you really want to ruffle some academic and fanbois feathers, you can go join the discussion on the "Ivory Tower" blog that covers virtual worlds stuff here.

#housing

« First        Comments 123 - 162 of 194       Last »     Search these comments

123   DinOR   2007 Mar 26, 6:23am  

"The logic typically goes like this:"

Yes it certainly does. Right out of the Realtwhore (TM) rookie playbook! Yet another "rigid and false" misconception that refuses to die.

124   DinOR   2007 Mar 26, 6:31am  

"Maybe there are deals out there"

Exactly Spaceman! And all you have to do is consistently show the Mrs. an even BETTER deal on a regular basis so there's this welling sense of increased buying power! It's the only way "I" can keep my sanity. Just have a set amount you know you won't pay over and then sit back and watch as a condo becomes a SFH then a BIGGER SFH (w/a decent yard) and ultimately w/a pool! (If that's your bag).

While OR's median isn't as jaw dropping a number as CA, study after study has shown that we're one of the least affordable mkts. in the country.

125   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 26, 6:58am  

I hadn't meant to imply we wouldn't look, I was just asessing when I figured the market would be in enough trouble for us to be able to get a good deal without having slapfights with the other bottom feeders.

We're seeing foreclosures pop up here and there in the area. Once the real pain of resets from later this year kick in, it'll still be six months before those hit the market as REOs, bringing the comps down towards a more historic norm.

I don't mind overpaying to live in the Bay Area. I don't even mind overpaying a little more to get a 'perfect' house. I believe, however, that houses are still WAY overpriced. Buying now isn't overpaying a little in an already expensive area.

126   DinOR   2007 Mar 26, 7:23am  

SFBB,

I hear ya'. Even though "bubble fatigue" can be acute (particularly so in the BA) I happen to believe it would be a mistake to do a total disconnect "wake me when it's over" attitude!

Markets don't typically work around our schedule and what we might find convenient to get around to. While I agree w/most that we'll likely bump and drag along the bottom for the better part of a decade, what if it *doesn't unfold like that? What if the correction is swift and severe, support is formed and appreciation resumes? What then?

Thus far predictions have played out w/dizzying speed.

127   e   2007 Mar 26, 7:29am  

Fantastic news! Spring Bounce has finally appeared!

http://www.housingtracker.net/askingprices/California/SanJose-Sunnyvale-SantaClara/

Trend 03/26/2007 1 month 3 month 6 month 9 month
Median Price $695,000 -0.6% +0.7% -2.0% -5.9%
Inventory 4,985 +13.7% +15.5% -18.4% -12.7%

Date Inventory
(SFH + Condo) 25th Percentile 50th Percentile
(Median) 75th Percentile
03/26/2007 4,985 $584,750 $695,000 $928,888
03/19/2007 3,663 $650,000 $749,950 $1,098,000
03/12/2007 4,577 $585,000 $695,000 $924,800
03/05/2007 4,412 $589,000 $695,000 $925,000

128   Peter P   2007 Mar 26, 7:44am  

eburbed, can they explain the inventory/price roller coaster?

129   Randy H   2007 Mar 26, 7:51am  

Notice to Realtors:

If you're gonna draw graphs, refer to underlying math (well, statistics which you mistakenly call math), then you might want to take the time to spiffy things up a bit. Otherwise people who use real financial math (as opposed to NAR-approved-math, you know, the type that yields their chief economist calling the bottom of the housing correction every month) might just come by and comment.

:)

130   DinOR   2007 Mar 26, 7:53am  

1998, yeah... right. How convenient.

Interesting.

WRONG!!!

But... interesting.

131   DinOR   2007 Mar 26, 7:56am  

Oh and who the f@ck is Greg Swann anyway?

That's right, he's the "Phoenix is special" realtwhore! Whatever.

132   Randy H   2007 Mar 26, 8:03am  

DinOR

I think the term "choad" is apropos.

133   RaiderJeff   2007 Mar 26, 8:08am  

Sorry to hijack this thread, but I had to post this story I found on another blog. The story takes place in the city where I live. Once again, I apologize to Randy, and others, but this story just sums up the stupidity and deceit that goes on in today's RE market.

Bitter Buyers say William’s Lyin’
Mar 24th.

"Today was a beautiful, blue-sky kind of day, the kind of day that reminds me why I love Irvine so much. My little boy and I played for quite a while at “Bob the Builder Park” (aka, Colonel Bill Barber) as well as a small pocket park in Westpark. But first, on our way over to Bob the Builder park, I couldn’t resist making a short detour. I pulled into Columbus Grove and saw the line-up of protest signs along the main thoroughfare, Sweet Shade. I pulled up to the curb, put on my blinkers, gave my boy his Clifford Reading game on his Leapster, and chatted for a few minutes with homeowner Bob Spillar. He was sitting in a beach chair with, at the time I was there, two other men whom he identified as neighbors. I told Bob I was a blogger, writing for a blog on the local housing bubble, and Bob didn’t quite seem to get what I was referring to. (First clue, right? Too bad Bob hadn’t spent some time here, or over on
Ben’s housing bubble blog or on Rich’s site…) Bob was very eager to share his story with me. Here it is:

This is their second weekend protesting William Lyons Homes, Inc. He and 17 other buyers of Phase I Lantana homes plan on sticking it out for the foreseeable future, until Lyons makes appropriate restitution. They have clearance from the Irvine police to hold this protest; they are on public land and Lyons has no recourse to remove them. Bob said that Lyons has not tried to make them leave.

Mid-2005 Bob decided to buy one of the homes in Phase I. He closed in May 2006. He received lots of assurances from the salespeople that prices would not drop in future phases. He said that he feels “coerced, manipulated.” Bob acknowledges that he should not have signed the contract without reading it in its entirety (no kidding!), however he said the sales team promised him he didn’t have to do so. After the purchase, he and his 17 neighbors read “Addendum G” in their contracts which apparently states the standard legalese stuff about this written contract being the only legal agreement, that any verbal agreements not included in the contract would not be considered valid, etc.

So now, Lyons has dropped asking prices significantly in newer phases, and he and the neighbors are hoppin’ mad. Bob told me that he put 20% down when he purchased this home - he said that it was a requirement and you couldn’t buy the house from Lyons unless you put 20% down. (I don’t quite believe this could be true, however this is what he told me). He further told me that he took out a 100k second mortgage to pay for landscaping, etc., and that its rate is going to adjust in August and he is going to be forced to refinance in order to afford his payments. He believes that most of his neighbors also took out seconds that will be adjusting and they are all in the same boat. The whole “I put 20% down but took out a 100k second” just didn’t quite sit right with me, but I didn’t push it since my boy was itching to get going to the park!

He handed me a copy of the protest letter he and his neighbors wrote, letter to Lyons (new information: here’s the back of the petition)as well as a one-page flyer they are apparently giving to would-be new homebuyers who come to check out the models. Take a look: Experience the Lies

In their letter to Patrick McCabe, Project Manager for Lyons Homes in Newport Beach, the neighbors have this to say, “The undersigned phase I residents in the Lantana neighborhood are writing to you today to ask for your consideration to make things right…During the selling process, given the real estate market uncertainties, we had numerous conversations with the sale staff (Nancy, Jennifer, etc) about prices and we were reassured that the home purchase prices would remain stable throughout the development of our community. We believed in the community and you. We understand fluctuations and economics, but a $75,000-$200,000 price reduction? What does that say to your phase I buyers?…Given all the startup problems we endured through the first phase of development, we are asking for William Lyons to consider some type of compensation to all of us. Afterall, when we think of the sub-contractors and laborers that completed work; the quality was average at best. We trusted in you and now feel like we were misled and betrayed…”

So I asked Bob what exactly he wanted from Lyons. He stated that he does NOT want a “refund.” He wants Lyons to refinance the Phase I owners into lower-rate loans; he wants a “small stipend” and he wants free upgrades, retroactively. He said Lyons had already met with the protestors and informed them that the contracts they signed were completely legal and they had no intention of giving the homeowners anything they were asking for now.

So I thanked him and drove away, not having the heart to tell this poor, sweet guy that the carnage had just begun and his equity evaporation was just going to get worse over the coming several years. Best of luck to you and your Lantana Phase I neighbors, Bob."

134   e   2007 Mar 26, 8:14am  

>eburbed, can they explain the inventory/price roller coaster?

Nope.

It looks like he pulls data from realtor.com - maybe they had a hiccup?

135   e   2007 Mar 26, 8:24am  

Still, 4,985 homes on the market seems kind of low...

136   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 26, 8:49am  

eburbed,

Low inventory with low sales suggests sellers who are holding out until the market stops being 'soft.'

Some people who don't have to sell their homes would rather wait until their house is worth whatever it was at the 'peak' before they sell because they have already mentally accepted the peak price as what their house is 'worth', and so selling now means 'losing' that money that was never really there in the first place. If they really don't need to sell, but were thinking about it to 'change houses' or something, they will represent the 'sticky' side of pricing. The houses that would have been on the market if it hadn't turned soft.

Any above water seller that really needs to sell their place, but is holding out for peak prices is really playing chicken with the buyers. Hoping the market will improve soon enough for him to unload the house, he'll hold out until 'panic' sets in for the whole market or until he absolutely cannot avoid selling anymore. These people include job transfers, estates, etc. These are the 'slow lister' types. They may be on the market, but overpriced, and many will 'chase the prices down,' at least for awhile.

Now... the FBs are going to hit the market with forclosures. If they sell, they'll realize their horrible losses. Sooner or later they're going to be in pain.

137   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 26, 8:52am  

I sure hope he did not buy many investment properties with I/O loans.

I hope he did. Live by the sword, die by the sword. I'd be more disgusted with a Realtor who knew it was a bubble and happily sold people down the stream, saving up their commission checks to get in on the foreclosure action in the next 5 years.

138   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 26, 9:06am  

Newsfreak,

I agree that holdouts that NEED to sell are doing the wrong thing right now. I'm just speculating as to why there hasn't been a lot of 'spring listings' and what might be motivating some sellers right now.

139   astrid   2007 Mar 26, 9:14am  

Best Buy's return policy sucks.

140   Different Sean   2007 Mar 26, 9:25am  

FAB says:
What I can’t figure out is how people who were not able to save a penny while renting think they can somehow afford to buy a home with no money down paying more each month than they were paying while renting…

That's silly. Obviously, they managed to make regular, reliable weekly payments while they were renting to keep a landlord happy. I don't see they have to prove they can scrape together a 20% deposit just to keep the banks happy. I don't see why housing can't be brought into line so that it is affordable at the same rates that people are currently paying for rents. a la 'rent to buy' or shared equity schemes.

141   Different Sean   2007 Mar 26, 9:32am  

I still don’t see any right to home “ownership”. I can understand a right to housing, so people have a roof over their head, though I don’t even like that kind of government intrusion into the market place.

hmmm, spoken like a true progressive liberal... markets are still god, even if they double the price of entry overnight...

142   Peter P   2007 Mar 26, 9:35am  

DS, you are still invited to join our club of small-L libertarians. :)

143   Different Sean   2007 Mar 26, 9:40am  

FAB says:
Most people that have not been hard working and responsible enough to save up a down payment are not hard working and responsible enough to own a home…

I still don't agree. If a median priced home is $500K, the banks now expect you to have saved $100K deposit to cover the BANK's ass. A decade ago, the requirement would have been half relative to earnings.

Not many Gen Y's I know can save that sort of money, particularly if they are in the rent trap, where much of their income is going into rent, leaving very little for savings. Besides, the cost of serving a loan twice as large as their parents had will be the next hurdle. The best off people under these circumstances are southern Europeans and similar who group together as a family to pay off a place before sending their kids into the harsh wide world, unlike the north-west European neolocal settlement small nuclear family model...

Travelling (and enrolling) are English spellings, as any well-travelled person would know. England is not just the home of Morgans and Aston-Martins you know...

144   Different Sean   2007 Mar 26, 9:43am  

the lowliest peasant in Vietnam can afford their own dwelling, by the way. of course, it may be a relatively humble abode...

145   Peter P   2007 Mar 26, 9:43am  

England is not just the home of Morgans and Aston-Martins you know…

How about cucumber sandwiches, scones, and devonshire cream?

146   Different Sean   2007 Mar 26, 9:47am  

my family used to own a scone mine in the yorkshire dales, with a cream well nearby...

147   Peter P   2007 Mar 26, 9:49am  

A scone mine?

I love Yorksire Pudding. Can't resist lard! :)

148   Different Sean   2007 Mar 26, 9:51am  

yes, scones are mined mostly in the yorkshire dales (like welsh slate comes from wales) and geologically, where there are scones in the ground, huge underground cream reserves are usually found nearby...

149   Different Sean   2007 Mar 26, 9:55am  

Peter P Says:
DS, you are still invited to join our club of small-L libertarians.

hmm, OK, I haven't been to a satan-worshipping orgy in a while... altho they just deprogrammed me out of scientology, and my head still buzzes occasionally...

150   skibum   2007 Mar 26, 10:00am  

Still, 4,985 homes on the market seems kind of low…

Maybe, but at least compared to this time last year according the the same site, there were only 4,381 homes inventory on 4/2/06 (a week later into the "Spring Season" yet).

151   Peter P   2007 Mar 26, 10:01am  

hmm, OK, I haven’t been to a satan-worshipping orgy in a while… altho they just deprogrammed me out of scientology, and my head still buzzes occasionally…

Libertarians are very passionate people.

152   skibum   2007 Mar 26, 10:02am  

Sen Christopher Dodd seems to have gotten the message about the idiocy of bailing out the subprime FBs:

http://money.cnn.com/2007/03/26/real_estate/Dodd/index.htm?postversion=2007032618

Maybe our emails to him (along with others) actually made a difference!!??!!

153   Different Sean   2007 Mar 26, 10:06am  

newsfreak Says:
I did want to mention, I saw a t-shirt–
THINK
It is still legal

Isn't it THINKâ„¢ -- and it's only legal with the written agreement of IBM -- you implicitly obtain the right after you buy one of their fine products...

154   e   2007 Mar 26, 10:25am  

the lowliest peasant in Vietnam can afford their own dwelling, by the way. of course, it may be a relatively humble abode…

Would it look like this?

http://www.burbed.com/2007/03/26/affordable-starter-home-or-fallujah-replica-in-the-bay-area-you-decide/

155   Different Sean   2007 Mar 26, 10:58am  

Would it look like this?

funnily enough, very similar...

however, that house has a superior 6-panel door at the side (which might be the front).

156   astrid   2007 Mar 26, 11:14am  

DS,

The day when American Progressives decide to ask your opinion about the definition of progressivism, will be the day that I join the Satan worshipping party of something that falls short of DS's definition of progressive liberalism.

That's my last word on this matter.

157   astrid   2007 Mar 26, 11:16am  

(Don't lose hope, I haven't tried my sour dough bread yet)

158   Different Sean   2007 Mar 26, 11:18am  

I can sell you shares in a scone mine, astrid...

159   astrid   2007 Mar 26, 11:38am  

DS,

LOL! Thank you very much for the offer, but I'm investigating renewable alternative to mined scone. However, I am very interested in the cream well.

160   astrid   2007 Mar 26, 11:38am  

DS,

LOL! Thank you very much for the offer, but I'm investigating renewable alternative to mined scone. However, I am very interested in the cream well.

161   Brand165   2007 Mar 26, 11:48am  

DS says: the lowliest peasant in Vietnam can afford their own dwelling, by the way. of course, it may be a relatively humble abode…

And the lowliest American can afford a home in Flint, Michigan or Upper Left Buttcheek, Texas. Don't extrapolate the Bay Area to the vast rest of the United States. The lowliest peasant in Vietnam is not equivalent to an Electrical Engineer with a Master's degree working in Silicon Valley.

162   Different Sean   2007 Mar 26, 12:03pm  

hmm, very Freudian...

My family also hoped to find a rich seam of jam on the property and brought in a jam dowser, but alas, to no avail.

« First        Comments 123 - 162 of 194       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions