0
0

CME Housing Futures: disappointment or impatience?


 invite response                
2006 Jul 10, 3:58pm   26,875 views  248 comments

by Randy H   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

Housing Futures

We anticipated the Chicago Mercantile Exchange housing futures and options for months before the market launched. We theorized and debated what impact this market would have on everything from the housing market itself to home builders to mortgage lenders to home owners. We fantasized that someday home prices would be linked to the region's CSI housing index. We discussed ways we could become fabulously wealthy -- or at least a bit safer financially -- by using housing futures.

We even predicted that ETFs that would surely quickly follow in the wake of CME futures and options markets.

What happened? The market is fundamentally sound. It is technically sound. There should be enormous theoretical demand from hedgers and speculators alike. So, where are they?

--Randy H

(For those interested in deeper technical financial discussion, feel free to post here where I'm running a parallel discussion.)

#housing

« First        Comments 225 - 248 of 248        Search these comments

225   Mike/a.k.a.Sage   2006 Jul 12, 4:27pm  

I actually like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet. I think they are honorable men, as opposed to most congressmen who are dishonorable. That being said, I think it would be wise of them to spend some of their money on infomercials; educating the public about toxic mortgages and letting people know that it would be a good idea to save some cash money for a rainy day. You never know when or where the next Katrina will strike, or when the big one will hit California.

You may have to fend for yourselves for 6 months or a year without a paycheck. And, don't depend on FEMA to cover your ass. Can you imagine someone like them urging Americans to save money, as opposed to spending more than we make, like we do now. I know I'm dreaming, but what if someone used their wealth and influence in public service announcements and commercials to promote good public economic sense. Using just some of their money in this way would be for the greater good of society. I can think of a lot more better ways of helping society than spending it all on vaccines and computers. If the did things like this with their money, I could care less about the government getting one red cent of their money in taxes.

226   GallopingCheetah   2006 Jul 12, 4:29pm  

You guys (Glen and DS) missed one crucial point. Karl Marx made the same mistake. It's not about attaining to some level of material comfort or survival. It's about being ahead of the next guy. Humans, especially males, have an innate desire to get ahead of others, to be number one. In the chimp kingdom, the top chimp gets to mate. We are no different. Therefore, there will ALWAYS be fights for dominant positions.

227   GallopingCheetah   2006 Jul 12, 4:44pm  

Mike, billg and Buffet will never do that. They are business people. They are not over the top like that Soros guy.

GC's Rule Number One: You never, ever go against the status quo unless you want to lead a rebellion.

GC's Rule Number Two: You can never win by dissuading the public away from their bad habits; they will hate you. It's better to preserve yourself so that you can do good to others in your remaining years.

GC's Rule Number Three: The society is never logical. Therefore, what seems to be the logical way is always abandonded by the society. Machiavelli once said [in Prince] that the world consists nothing but the vulgar. You cannot persuade nor enlighten the vulgar.

That is why I do not like giving to the poor.

You should read Alexis de Tocqueville's "Ancient Regime and the Revolution." The horror of the French Revotion -- by the way, few textbooks mentioned the real horrors of the Revolution -- occured after France obtained half a century of good growth, prosperity and rise of living standards for all. When the aristocrats started to care about their people, they found themselves at the guillotine.

228   Glen   2006 Jul 12, 4:44pm  

That being said, I think it would be wise of them to spend some of their money on infomercials; educating the public about toxic mortgages and letting people know that it would be a good idea to save some cash money for a rainy day. You never know when or where the next Katrina will strike, or when the big one will hit California.

There is plenty of good, free (or cheap) prudent investment advice available to those who want it. You can read the shareholder letters of Warren Buffett and Marty Whitman, go to pennypincher websites, read prudentbear.com or even listen to Suze Orman (she tends to be pretty conservative, although I think she did buy into the HB a bit--haven't seen her show for a while). There is an entire industry (insurance) devoted to trying to get people to plan for disasters. Nobody wants to hear that they should spend less, pay down debt and save for a rainy day. They just want to learn how they can be as rich as Gates or Buffett overnight--without exerting any effort. That is why Robert Kiyosaki, David Bach, Jim Cramer, Robert Allen, etc. are so successful.

229   Peter P   2006 Jul 12, 4:45pm  

I actually like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet.

I do not know why many people do not like Bill. :(

In the chimp kingdom, the top chimp gets to mate. We are no different. Therefore, there will ALWAYS be fights for dominant positions.

Unless we all meditate and rise to the next level. ;)

Yes, I agree that human society is mostly about ranking. This is why I think our society is a zero-sum game.

230   Peter P   2006 Jul 12, 4:46pm  

They are not over the top like that Soros guy.

I also admire Soros for his success in speculation. But he is really over the top. What is he thinking?

231   Peter P   2006 Jul 12, 4:48pm  

GC, have you been going into my dreams and stealing my thoughts. :)

OMG, we should have sushi someday.

232   GallopingCheetah   2006 Jul 12, 4:52pm  

Peter,

Sounds good. When I visit BA, I'll let you know.

233   Mike/a.k.a.Sage   2006 Jul 12, 5:04pm  

In the end, vast numbers of people will get what they deserve, being that we reap what we sow. I am a firm believer in, what comes around goes around. My thought process is on a much higher plain of conscientiousness than that of the animal kingdom. When I contemplate that which separates humans from animals, I see that we are made in the image and likeness of God. In the beginning there was the Father and the Word, as it says in the Bible. I correspond these two entities to the subconsciousness and the consciousness of man. We are godlike beings, which is why we should be better.

234   GallopingCheetah   2006 Jul 12, 5:20pm  

Mike,

I have some thoughts similar to yours. But they are not cast in religious light.

We (men) all have the same yearning: To be Number One and procreate. But only a few can ascend, due to differences in natural abilities and circumstances. However, we are all human beings as far as our natural inclination is concerned. That's why US opted for equity, not equality.

235   GallopingCheetah   2006 Jul 12, 5:25pm  

In some sense, had humans stuck to the animalistic philosophy -- that brute might makes right -- we would never have evolved.

It is precisely because we allow for other forms of dominance and superiority, i.e., intelligence, creativity, etc., that humans are able to conquer the earth, despite the fact that we are physically weaker than many predators.

An author pointed out that the human society has a built-in neotenic tendency and that our adults are really the child-like version of the great chimp and that that is the reason we are more curious and creative than the chimps.

236   Different Sean   2006 Jul 12, 6:37pm  

But wants are what keep us going and aspiration is what makes the world a better and better place over time. I agree that acquisitiveness and consumer materialism can be taken to unseemly extremes. But I would rather live in a society full of people aspiring for a better life than in a society of people who are content to stagnate.

there's a whole other universe of thought on this out there, that you label you as absolutely blinkered, not aware of sustainability issues, as being mankind's own worst enemy. your definition of a 'better' life isn't necessarily everyone's. show me a large society of people content to 'stagnate' - that's a stupid straw man argument. however, my initial point is that homo sapiens sapiens lived in a similar mode for something of the order of 200,000 years without progressing significantly technologically at all, and it certainly didn't kill spell the end of the species... there are so many qualifications to what you say it just becomes meaningless -- when your PNAC neocon politicians use pretexts to claw more resources for one country, is that indicating a sustainable use of resources? is that progress? is that making the world a better place? is that a moral way for everyone to strive to do better? if you have to start stealing resources internationally to make ends meet, that suggests to me that the resource is starting to run out...

sometimes you just have to learn to want less, and realise that you actually have enough. needs and wants are quite different things.

237   Jimbo   2006 Jul 12, 6:39pm  

I was in the same room as Bill Gates once. He and Ballmer and some small intense woman came in behind me into the lobby at Wired, where I worked. I was buying a meal card from the receptionist. The small intense woman tried to cut in front of me, proclaiming in a very self-important manner "We are from *Microsoft*!"

I turned and looked at the three of them and shrugged and went back to buying my meal card. I remember thinking "Wow, that guy kind of looks like Bill Gates. Even funnier, he is wearing a Microsoft shirt!" Microsoft was having a convention at the time at the Moscone center just a block away, but I didn't know it at the time. Right after I got my meal card and started heading to the cafeteria, Andrew Anker, the President of Wired Digital went running by me. I was wondering what the heck he was doing, so I turned around and saw him run up to Bill and shake his hand. Then I realized that the person I had been eyeing in line really was Bill Gates.

At that moment I thought about running up and spitting in his face, but I didn't. I kind of regret that I did not, actually.

None of us in the Internet world had much use for Microsoft and I still don't today. I think Bill Gates set back modern computing by at least ten years by foisting a buggy, poorly designed and inherently insecure product on the public and killing all the decent competitors with unsavory and illegal buisiness practices. If I could point to one person who has caused more total economic hardship to humanity in the last 30 years, I think it would have to be him. The potential of computers is so great and he has set us back so far.

You know all the spam you get in your inbox? You know all the crashing, slow, pop-up and virus infested computers that cause people untold grief and lost productivity? You know all the computer crime facilitated by the army of hacked zombie boxes? You have Bill to thank for all of them. We knew how to build secure computing systems back in the 90s, Bill was just in too much of a rush to crush the competition to do things right.

At least he is trying to do something good with his wealth now. I actually don't dislike the guy anymore, I think he is a decent human being who is doing the best he can.

But I still think he set back the human species quite a bit with his crappy O/S.

238   HARM   2006 Jul 12, 6:45pm  

New thread: Police: Realtor® Murders Possibly Related

239   astrid   2006 Jul 12, 8:07pm  

GC,

Geesh, I didn't think I'd agree with you much on human nature, but I think you hit the spot on the human desire to be one up their neighbors. I guess it's how we manifest our desire to do better. We can't really think objectively about how well we're doing, so we gauge it by checking out our neighbors.

One of the problems with our runaway consumerist society is that lots of well paid ad-men are trying to convince us that luxuries and useless trinkets are the norm and that we should have them. And boy is it convenient that the house ATM is open and we're getting so many credit card offers!

Jimbo,

Windows is buggy, but I think MAC would be nearly as buggy if it was more prevalent. The solution is to built a more robust infrastructure and make spamming cost inefficient. Maybe start charging a small fee (1 or 2 cents per piece) for unasked for email.

240   astrid   2006 Jul 12, 8:16pm  

Jimbo,

I also don't use MSFT stuff much anymore, except my operating system (too lazy to install and learn Linux, bimonthly proclaimations to self notwithstanding). I do word processing on Open Office and most of my internet sites are either openware, labor of love, or google.

Still, I don't know if MSFT set back computing 10 years. (In fact, I had always posited the opposite, MSFT's stranglehold on OS and wordprocessing just lead creative people to focus on the internet, where hegemony was less likely and the cost of development was lower.) When did you think the lag time came?

241   astrid   2006 Jul 12, 8:42pm  

BTW, I have no problem with Soros. He always viewed making money as a way to fund his writings. I also have no problem with where he's spending money. Peter P, what's your beef with him?

Also, whatever the good and evil perpetrated by tech companies pales compared to the damage by McD, Coke, and Pepsi. Their high fat, high sugar, hormone filled gunk is creating fat kids who'll have lifetime health problems. Or oil/mining companies...

242   Peter P   2006 Jul 13, 3:47am  

BTW, I have no problem with Soros. He always viewed making money as a way to fund his writings. I also have no problem with where he’s spending money. Peter P, what’s your beef with him?

I admire him as a intellect, philosopher, and philanthropist. His books gave me a better understanding on bubbles.

However, I think philanthropy does not have to be mixed with partisan politics.

243   Peter P   2006 Jul 13, 3:51am  

At that moment I thought about running up and spitting in his face, but I didn’t. I kind of regret that I did not, actually.

Huh? He has been by idol since grade school. I always think he should perhaps run for the presidency.

244   astrid   2006 Jul 13, 9:50am  

Peter P,

I guess our politics just differ a bit. A lot of rich men are partisan zealots on the Republican side, and they're often hypocrites to boot. Soros's political ideology seems coherent and consist for me. I think the Republicans have painted him into a more polarizing figure than he actually is.

245   Peter P   2006 Jul 13, 10:08am  

Now, she hates me.

I have friends with multiple houses in CA and AZ. Now imagine.

246   Peter P   2006 Jul 13, 10:17am  

Peter
Did you suggest to your friends that perhaps it is not the best time to buy?
Did they buy recently?

They have made money in RE before. Why would they listen to a JBR like myself? I did tried.

Did they buy recently?

Yes, some are recent but some are not.

247   Peter P   2006 Jul 13, 10:19am  

But, because I wasn’t excited for her…just cautious…Blahhhhh!
I just can’t fake it!

I have learned to keep it real fake. :)

248   Peter P   2006 Jul 13, 10:25am  

Here’s the worst part.
She USED to be a realtor….so of course she knows everything…..
She said her loan broker said it was a great deal…

My friend does BOTH real estates AND loans. :)

Just don’t want to see bad things happen to good people.

They will survive. Waking up from a dream is no big deal.

« First        Comments 225 - 248 of 248        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions