1
0

Anyone here feel cheated?


 invite response                
2012 Apr 30, 6:35am   64,423 views  192 comments

by Goran_K   ➕follow (4)   💰tip   ignore  

If you don't want to live in an apartment for 20 years, you're forced to participate in a ponzi scheme and overpay for a home. You want to live in an area without gang fights in a dirty alley behind your house every night, and have your children go to schools without metal detectors at every entrance, better be a dual income earning couple who is willing to teeter on the edge of foreclosure every month while eating ramen noodles, and going out to Jack in the Box for fine dining.

Be a saver? The FED makes your money worth less and less. The market starts to correct? Home inventory "magically" disappears just in time to create a false bottom.

How do you win? Any tips appreciated.

#housing

« First        Comments 53 - 92 of 192       Last »     Search these comments

53   1sfrenter   2012 May 1, 7:04am  

PockyClipsNow says

If you dont have a pension or a gigantic net worth you might be eating out of garbage cans when retired.

It's the unions who fought hard for pensions (and the weekend and minimum wage and the 8-hour work day and safe working conditions).

Getting rid of unions (now only 12% of the US workforce is unionized) will not insure anyone's quality of life. The idea that unions are the problem is a smokescreen and the powers that be are helping us all race to the bottom and won't be satisfied until we are all working in 3rd world conditions.

54   tatupu70   2012 May 1, 7:15am  

Hey--I'm the first to argue that there are some reforms needed in public sector pension plans. And if you want to complain about salaries and waste, you should be pointing the finger at administrators, not the rank and file teachers.

But, regardless, unions are NOT the problem. I wish we had stronger unions fighting for the average Joe. Like Buffet said--there is class warfare, and the 1% is winning. By a LOT.

55   rooemoore   2012 May 1, 7:20am  

1sfrenter says

PockyClipsNow says

If you dont have a pension or a gigantic net worth you might be eating out of garbage cans when retired.

It's the unions who fought hard for pensions (and the weekend and minimum wage and the 8-hour work day and safe working conditions).

Getting rid of unions (now only 12% of the US workforce is unionized) will not insure anyone's quality of life. The idea that unions are the problem is a smokescreen and the powers that be are helping us all race to the bottom and won't be satisfied until we are all working in 3rd world conditions.

My brother is very conservative - not quite tea party or libertarian conservative, but close. He is 57 and retired last year with 2 pensions from larger CA cities. One city he worked for about 20 years and took an early buyout so he could head the dept (civil engineering) in the other city. He makes more money now than he ever did and has gone back to work part -time(w/o) benefits to city #1. BTW, he is not in a union.

If he lives as long as our father did, he will collect >$200k for the next 38years (with cost of living increases) And although he understands how this may be perceived as not fair you'd never get him to give up a penny of it.

So for all those conservatives here who want to point to government pensions as a big problem our country faces, you are right. But don't try to demonize the folks who are getting these because many of them are just like you. Hypocrite comes to mind, but human is more accurate.

56   bmwman91   2012 May 1, 7:32am  

DukeLaw says

Why do you keep on harping on this? Have you traveled much? Do you know how much real estate costs in NYC, Tokyo, London, HK, Buenos Aires, Syndney, Melbourne, Paris, Vancouver, Taipei, Singapore? Do you realize that no US city ranks in the top 10 of most expensive cities in the world?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/16/most-expensive-city_n_1281845.html#s701687&title=Tied_for_3rd

Do you think SF compares more to a Frankfurt or to Oklahoma City? "Reason" would dictate that a more attractive city is more expensive than an unattractive city. Just because you don't find the Bay Area worth the cost doesn't mean the rest of us moving here don't. Perhaps you're the kind of person that's more comforable in Raleigh, NC than San Francisco. Good for you. Just stop with the bitching about other equally smart people wanting to pay a premium for the leaning left politics (try moving your fiancee out to NC and see how some of the locals treat her), the great weather/outdoors, and the high tech opportunities here.

Of course there are way more expensive places to live. I have been to many of them. It makes sense why they are expensive...the population densities are immense there, many of those places already built UP and there really isn't anywhere left to go. They are also fun places and damn near anything you need is within walking distance. If a busy area isn't something that bothers someone, then it is a great place for them and the exorbitant cost can be justifiable.

In contrast, the BA is mostly a dull splattering of concrete & strip malls, and outside of SF proper, you basically need a car. My interests happen to be in the outdoors, so there are obvious reasons why the lack of weather here makes the BA appealing. I have spent enough summers & winters in the northeast, and summers in the south, to know that they aren't on top of my list of places to go!

It isn't all bad here, by any means, and most things about the region are quite good. My beef isn't even with the high prices here, but with WHY prices are what they are here. It is perverse to knowingly buy into a system that is blatantly rigged to take you for most of what you are worth. I grew up here and have 80% of my family in the area, and would like to stick around them (and the really awesome hills/mountains). The prices on houses here are still stupid for what you get IMO. I don't mind renting at all, but the recent hikes are also upsetting what was a happy balance for us. Yeah, I know that reality dictates, "put up or shut up" but this thread happened to start out as a complaint-fest anyway (so I guess that you complaining about me complaining is OK after all).

57   PockyClipsNow   2012 May 1, 8:14am  

Hey i dont blame the pensioners for being smart enuf to get in on the looting.

I'm the only one in my family not to get a check from the govt - brother, sister, both parents all get either gov salary or pension+ss. 'govt employees are rich people' is fooked up IMO, complaining doesnt help.

58   Goran_K   2012 May 1, 8:44am  

tiny tina says

I'm not sure why you want to believe something that you know or should know is not true.

Because "tiny tina" is not an authoritative source for me, and didn't even cover underemployment which can be just as big a drag as unemployment. There is a high amount of both. But if you can find a source (BLS or otherwise) that shows the BA has low unemployment for people with degrees, and they are fully employed, then maybe you have a point, and housing in the BA just has lots of demand from local educated buyers flush with cash. So far that point hasn't been proven to be the case, just some here say and opinion.

tiny tina says

Because the ones who are buying houses are not high school dropouts working construction jobs. It doesn't matter if 50% of those making minimum wage are unemployed. They aren't buying $800k houses (anymore).

That's not the point. If someone who graduated from Harvard has to take a $50,000 job because the $250,000 jobs simply don't exist anymore, are they going to buy an $800,000 home either? You are trying to make it out like the only people who can't afford homes in nice areas are gardeners and janitors. Tell that to someone who works at Apple and wants to buy in Cupertino on a $120,000 salary.

59   dublin hillz   2012 May 1, 9:04am  

Goran_K says

It is perverse to knowingly buy into a system that is blatantly rigged to take you for most of what you are worth

I was fortunate enough to be in a living situation where I had very negligible housing expenses for about 3 years after college. Then I rented with my fiance and later wife for about 5 years. Last year, we purchased a place. We are paying ahead towards principle and the goal is to be done with mortgage in the 2019-2025 range. I am very motivated to get as close as possible to having financial housing costs that resemble those first 3 years. Of course, there will be property tax and HOA, but that is negligible compared to renting or mortgage in this area. It's like chasing that first high lol.

60   rooemoore   2012 May 1, 9:10am  

Goran_K says

Tell that to someone who works at Apple and wants to buy in Cupertino on a $120,000 salary.

I have a friend who has worked at apple since college - about 12 years. Not sure how much she makes - a lot is commission - but not a ton. And yet she bought a very expensive home last year. Thank you stock options.

My point is Apple may not be your best example.

61   bmwman91   2012 May 1, 9:19am  

Friends that went to Apple, all with 3-5 years of EE experience, are pulling a base salary of around $125k, and stocks and bonuses bring the annual gross compensation to more around $160k. Google is a similar story. Given FHA loan limits of $726k on 3.5% down, you bet that a number of people CAN finance an expensive house. I do not know how many actually DO, but they certainly CAN. Get a professional DINK couple pulling salaries like that and a few years of saving, and they CAN pull a jumbo loan (again, not sure how many DO).

62   tiny tina   2012 May 1, 9:19am  

Goran_K says

Because "tiny tina" is not an authoritative source for me, and didn't even cover underemployment which can be just as big a drag as unemployment. There is a high amount of both. But if you can find a source (BLS or otherwise) that shows the BA has low unemployment for people with degrees, and they are fully employed, then maybe you have a point, and housing in the BA just has lots of demand from local educated buyers flush with cash. So far that point hasn't been proven to be the case, just some here say and opinion.

You received 2 sets of data that said nationwide unemployment for the college educated is ~4%. That is not my opinion. The fact that I read an article that said the same thing several months ago specific to the BA also is not my opinion. Again, if you don't want to believe me, that's fine. I would think someone would put 2 and 2 together though that the 4% unemployment is real for the educated in the BA, not just some made up number.

As for the underemployment stuff, I doubt there's a breakdown of that. Kind of like the specifics of the "shadow inventory." Maybe it's a factor, maybe it's not.
Goran_K says

That's not the point. If someone who graduated from Harvard has to take a $50,000 job because the $250,000 jobs simply don't exist anymore, are they going to buy an $800,000 home either? You are trying to make it out like the only people who can't afford homes in nice areas are gardeners and janitors. Tell that to someone who works at Apple and wants to buy in Cupertino on a $120,000 salary.

You seem to be misunderstanding my point. I never said prices were perfectly affordable in all parts of the BA for anyone who has a job. You tried to say I said that. Again, the point is that unemployment for the college educated is around 4% in the BA, maybe slightly higher if you throw in underemployment. Saying high unemployment is a reason why housing is in trouble is simply not true.

All I ask is for you to go to an open house in Cupertino this weekend. Let me know how many people you see there. Then tell me the supposed "high unemployment" is keeping housing down.

63   hanera   2012 May 1, 9:31am  

clambo says

buy AAPL because money gives you the flexibility that complaining doesn't.

Second that. Anyone who have rented and invested the would-be downpayment (say, $20,000) since 1997, can now pay cash for a SFH with remaining AAPL worth similar.

64   russell   2012 May 1, 9:41am  

Hi Goran,

My advice to you is to stay positive, be grateful for all you have and play the cards you've been dealt. That's basically what all of us have to do. Every generation faces unfairness, best just to deal with it and not dwell on it. Trust me - you have little to gain by allowing yourself to 'feel cheated' and much to lose as you will not be grateful for all that you have. I have no doubt that if you stay positive and play your hand to the best of your abilities you will accomplish your goals. Good luck!

65   Patrick   2012 May 1, 10:01am  

hanera says

Anyone who have rented and invested the would-be downpayment (say, $20,000) since 1997, can now pay cash for a SFH with remaining AAPL worth similar.

But anyone who put it into Netscape or 100 other hot companies would have lost it all.

Just sayin it's not so easy to pick the AAPLs.

66   xenogear3   2012 May 1, 10:05am  

tiny tina says

All I ask is for you to go to an open house in Cupertino this weekend. Let me know how many people you see there.

That confirms lots unemployed people :)

Back in 1999, you don't see a lot people, because they have jobs and are busy to flip stock.

67   Goran_K   2012 May 1, 10:17am  

russell says

Hi Goran,

My advice to you is to stay positive, be grateful for all you have and play the cards you've been dealt. That's basically what all of us have to do. Every generation faces unfairness, best just to deal with it and not dwell on it. Trust me - you have little to gain by allowing yourself to 'feel cheated' and much to lose as you will not be grateful for all that you have. I have no doubt that if you stay positive and play your hand to the best of your abilities you will accomplish your goals. Good luck!

Russell, thanks for the post and kind words.

68   Goran_K   2012 May 1, 10:19am  

tiny tina says

All I ask is for you to go to an open house in Cupertino this weekend. Let me know how many people you see there. Then tell me the supposed "high unemployment" is keeping housing down.

What is that supposed to prove? How many of them work 9-5? How many of them are investors? How many are "foreign"?

Sorry tiny tina, I know your'e trying to prove a point, but too much anecdotal conclusions and not enough data. I'm not trying to be difficult, but I don't know who you are from anyone else, and your opinion though important, is not proof that unemployment and underemployment are not problems in the BA housing market.

69   rooemoore   2012 May 1, 10:43am  

Goran_K says

Sorry tiny tina, I know your'e trying to prove a point, but too much anecdotal conclusions and not enough data. I'm not trying to be difficult, but I don't know who you are from anyone else, and your opinion though important, is not proof that unemployment and underemployment are not problems in the BA housing market

Right now things are hot in the fortresses. REALLY hot as in 15 offers over asking and homes going 10 -30% over asking.

Now this may not last as the buyers dry up and the sellers start listing in earnest, but to say it's not happening is incorrect.

70   Goran_K   2012 May 1, 10:51am  

That's abnormal behavior based on a manipulated market.

We've seen this before, remember 2006?

71   RentingForHalfTheCost   2012 May 1, 10:58am  

tiny tina says

All I ask is for you to go to an open house in Cupertino this weekend. Let me know how many people you see there. Then tell me the supposed "high unemployment" is keeping housing down.

That is not a good metric. I have gone to many in Cupertina/Saratoga/etc. with absolutely no intention of buying. I eat the cookies and talk crap to the realtard. The fact that I am there should not be reason for people to buy. Please don't add me to your stat cause I am there for free cookies only and the watch realtors start to shake when I ask how much I should overbid to win the bidding war.

72   RentingForHalfTheCost   2012 May 1, 11:02am  

tiny tina says

It was from an article I read a few months ago. In a brief search, I found a national number which is 4.2%.

COSTELLO: I want to talk about the unemployment rate in America.

ABBOTT: Good Subject. Terrible Times. It's about 8 percent.

COSTELLO: That many people are out of work?

ABBOTT: No, that's 16 percent.

COSTELLO: You just said 8 percent.

ABBOTT: 8 percent unemployed.

COSTELLO: Right 8 percent out of work.

ABBOTT: No, that's 16 percent.

COSTELLO: Okay, so it's 16 percent unemployed.

ABBOTT: No, that's around 8 percent...

COSTELLO: Waits a minute. Is it 8 percent or 16 percent?

ABBOTT: 8 percent are unemployed. 16 percent are out of work.

COSTELLO: If you are out of work aren't you unemployed?

ABBOTT: No, you can't count the "Out of Work" as unemployed. You have to look for work to be unemployed.

COSTELLO: But they are out of work!!!

ABBOTT: No, you miss my point.

COSTELLO: What point?

ABBOTT: Someone who doesn't look for work, can't be counted with those who look for work. It wouldn't be fair.

COSTELLO: To who?

ABBOTT: The unemployed.

COSTELLO: But they are all out of work.

ABBOTT:No, the unemployed are actively looking for work ... Those who are out of work stopped looking. They gave up. And, if you give up, you are no longer in the ranks of the unemployed.

COSTELLO: So if you're off the unemployment roles, that would count as less unemployment?

ABBOTT: Unemployment would go down. Absolutely!

COSTELLO: The unemployment just goes down because you don't look for work?

ABBOTT:

Absolutely it goes down. That's how you get to 8 percent. Otherwise it would be 16 percent. You don't want to read about 16 percent unemployment do ya?

COSTELLO: That would be frightening.

ABBOTT: Absolutely.

COSTELLO: Wait, I got a question for you. That means ther're two ways to bring down the unemployment number?

ABBOTT: Two ways is correct.

COSTELLO: Unemployment can go down if someone gets a job?

ABBOTT:Correct.

COSTELLO:And unemployment can also go down if you stop looking for a job?

ABBOTT: Bingo.

COSTELLO: So there are two ways to bring unemployment down, and the easier of the two is to just stop looking for work.

ABBOTT: Now you're thinking like an economist.

COSTELLO: I don't even know what the hell I just said!

73   PockyClipsNow   2012 May 1, 11:26am  

Unemployment numbers are way high since they now pay for 2 years vs used to be 6 months.

THUS these numbers can only be compared to the 'since it was raised to 2 years' which was what 08?

74   FortWayne   2012 May 1, 11:35am  

rowemoore says

My brother is very conservative - not quite tea party or libertarian conservative, but close. He is 57 and retired last year with 2 pensions from larger CA cities. One city he worked for about 20 years and took an early buyout so he could head the dept (civil engineering) in the other city. He makes more money now than he ever did and has gone back to work part -time(w/o) benefits to city #1. BTW, he is not in a union.

If he lives as long as our father did, he will collect >$200k for the next 38years (with cost of living increases) And although he understands how this may be perceived as not fair you'd never get him to give up a penny of it.

So for all those conservatives here who want to point to government pensions as a big problem our country faces, you are right. But don't try to demonize the folks who are getting these because many of them are just like you. Hypocrite comes to mind, but human is more accurate.

There is no demonization of folks, its disdain for the system that has been destroying and looting the private sector.

75   rooemoore   2012 May 1, 11:57am  

FortWayne says

There is no demonization of folks, its disdain for the system that has been destroying and looting the private sector.

There are boatloads of demonizing folks - plenty for everybody.RentingForHalfTheCost says

tiny tina says

All I ask is for you to go to an open house in Cupertino this weekend. Let me know how many people you see there. Then tell me the supposed "high unemployment" is keeping housing down.

That is not a good metric. I have gone to many in Cupertina/Saratoga/etc. with absolutely no intention of buying. I eat the cookies and talk crap to the realtard. The fact that I am there should not be reason for people to buy. Please don't add me to your stat cause I am there for free cookies only and the watch realtors start to shake when I ask how much I should overbid to win the bidding war.

Are you really that bored, or are you, like many here, secretly dying to buy a home?

Of course I'm kidding. Or am I?

76   CashWillCrash   2012 May 1, 11:58am  

Bravo, bravo ABBOTT and COSTELLO, well said!

77   drtor   2012 May 1, 2:43pm  

1sfrenter says

Another $600 month goes straight out of my paycheck into the State Teacher's Retirement System.

The key problem with the pensions is that they assume the fund will get some 8.5% return every year. If that happens, great.

If it doesn't then either the recepients or the taxpayers or both will have to be screwed. It is happening all over the country right now.

Pensions need to be converted to defined contribution, or at the very least get a transparent mechanism for what they will do if returns are lower than wished for.

78   thomas.wong1986   2012 May 1, 3:08pm  

bmwman91 says

Friends that went to Apple, all with 3-5 years of EE experience, are pulling a base salary of around $125k, and stocks and bonuses bring the annual gross compensation to more around $160k. Google is a similar story.

By who ? A hiring manager who took nearly 20 years getting up to 100K himself. And now all of sudden little Tommy with 3-5 years gets the same amount or more ($125k)... for doing what?
not likely... LOL! sorry the payroll records dont show salaries being that high.

It wasnt that long ago, Google itself admitted they were infact underpaying their people...thus get a catch-up increase.

79   Goran_K   2012 May 1, 3:28pm  

RentingForHalfTheCost says

COSTELLO: So there are two ways to bring unemployment down, and the easier of the two is to just stop looking for work.

LOL

I think the point has been made. Bravo RentingForHalfTheCost.

80   ArtimusMaxtor   2012 May 1, 8:39pm  

Goran_K says

Anyone here feel cheated?

Uhuh I don't. Cheat'em back Goran. I don't find any solace in Socialism cause well they own that to. Or anytime they promote or give attention to anything for any length of time look out, cause their in it in some way. Take a grocery store. They own the paper. They own the goods in the store. They also own the labor that produced the goods, picked it, boxed it, warehoused it, trucked it, shelved it, checks it out.

Socialism don't mean anything but sport to these guys. Now if say in France (which I adore by the way). If they own the only legal means of trade (Euro). Whats the difference? Same as here. See they have to keep labor working or workers, working. That builds assets and keep the food rolling in to feed there workers. So now they own the paper, assets, goods and labor. Could lending? Could usury snowball into something like what you have today? They can get away with just about anything so I would say so.

Your thing is your lost in the system. Your a nice guy Goran I can tell. Your staring at the empire saying WTF? Its all so confusing and HUGE. Don't let them scare you with the basics. People know how to get food without using paper. Or being very clever with it. I'm not here to argue but to help. Don't ever look or wish for nirvana in their systems. Let them scare you with the basics your going to wind up in Wal-mart at 8 bucks an hour.

Goran I have seen so many guys like you say fuck them and wind up on top. You can't count them. You have to hate them. You have to hate having a boss. You have to hate the for all their fixed prices and owning the only legal means of trade. Goran when you see someone living in a 400k house with a 27k car. With a swift job. Don't ever think hey hes got it made. Think that nitwits up to his hairline in debt. Not only that they can take his jobbie and he's lost everything. Rather think that ain't the way to go. If I go to a university. I'll wind up being trained for them and they lose their jobs Goran. Don't forget that. Thats the real world. Now plot your course. I will help.

Goran guys like me hate these MF's so bad. You don't even know. See we get it. Guys like me that understand what their complicated swindels are about. We look at guy like you and say yea he's for equity and likes people. He's not out to run the world or screw the guy next door. He's not some cheese eating guy thats going to rat us out. I'm like you. But I got smart. The shear magnitude of their empire means they have so much. It has to be managed. However they put everything in compartments with Corporations. They don't even know who's who or everything they have. Thats where you get them Goran. When its gone they don't miss it or ever know its gone. Would I take from them? Do trees grow in the woods? Yep I sure do.

So some very simple thought. Don't ever believe what they say. Don't believe in government its a bear trap. If you don't believe in religion and that its a fucking waste of time that goes triple for the governement. Fractional reserve. Your whole fucking monetary system is lending. The entire thing. That adds up to beaucoup assets. Assets that are also being repossesed for non-payment on a daily basis. Forget the GD paper. Thats a trap also. You can't eat it, drink it, live in it or drive it. You understand those things. You won't waste your time in useless endevor's. Add to that the basics are very easy and obtainable. Your starting to get the idea.

81   been right all along   2012 May 1, 11:40pm  

FortWayne says

If he lives as long as our father did, he will collect >$200k for the next 38years (with cost of living increases) And although he understands how this may be perceived as not fair you'd never get him to give up a penny of it.

he has at most 2-4 yrs before his pension is dramtically reduced. fair, probably not, but thats where we are headed. and his SS, means testing will stop him from ever getting anything out of that by the time he is 67

82   the cave dweller   2012 May 1, 11:50pm  

Those who can grow a tomato or butcher a chicken are the new rich. The police & military will not contain the masses as the fabled institutions collapse. Think self reliance. Good Luck!

83   mjfhorsey   2012 May 1, 11:56pm  

Supply and demand and feeling cheated -> Because of super low inventory, prices are crazy.

Because of the trailing information that the market is bad for sellers (ie you won't get a good price) then sellers hold off on selling if they can.

...which...contributes to low inventory. Lagging indicators are a bitch when humans react according to those lagging indicators. Risk takers jump in or out ahead of herd...just like the stock market.

I recall a few years ago asking this board about what are we going to do when the market dips low enough, and all the people who have been sitting on the sidelines with money to put down on a house all want to jump in at the same time? They will create a flurry of demand at the same time. Maybe that is what is happening with nice properties in some markets.

84   moon   2012 May 2, 1:09am  

My parents are friends with Mayors, doctors, attorneys, CEO's of corporations but the richest friend they have is a retired math teacher who coached sports...

85   tiny tina   2012 May 2, 1:10am  

RentingForHalfTheCost says

That is not a good metric. I have gone to many in Cupertina/Saratoga/etc. with absolutely no intention of buying. I eat the cookies and talk crap to the realtard. The fact that I am there should not be reason for people to buy. Please don't add me to your stat cause I am there for free cookies only and the watch realtors start to shake when I ask how much I should overbid to win the bidding war.

I think someone else said this on a different thread: you need to get a hobby. Didn't you also say you have a baby? What are you doing eating cookies with people you hate instead of spending time with your child? I mean this in the nicest possible way - I think you are full of a lot of crap.

86   freak80   2012 May 2, 1:28am  


* Own a bank, and own a few senators too, to protect your bank from any possibility of losing money due to free market forces. If you own the government, the free market doesn't apply to you.

That's by-far the best strategy. If you can pull it off...

87   FortWayne   2012 May 2, 1:30am  

1sfrenter says

FortWayne says

In a private sector folks are stretched out to pay for healthcare costs

Uh, sorry, no.

I pay $700 month for health insurance, which increases yearly.

Another $600 month goes straight out of my paycheck into the State Teacher's Retirement System.

In CA, teachers do not pay into nor do we receive Social Security.

We spend more of our tax dollars PER PRISONER than we do PER STUDENT and the United States currently incarcerates a higher percentage of its population than any other civilization in history (including during Stalin's reign in the Soviet Union).

You aren't paying the $700/month for health insurance. This is paid to you by the taxpayers, you are merely aware of the amount. If the number is that high it proves the point that tax payers are paying your entire premium for a Cadillac healthcare plan in a high risk pool.

$600 Retirement system, darling what do you think everyone else does? And if you are a small business or in a private sector taxpayers do not guarantee and often do not provide any kind of match. Especially when the widespread practice is to goose the pensions with overtime pay and saved up vacation.

The only way CA will get back on track where perks and benefits it promised to the public sector can be sustained is with health job growth in the private sector and a modest pension reform to eliminate spiking and fraud. We don't have that. What we have is a growing welfare state pretend and extend system. You as a working bee are like to be getting some sort of pay cuts in near future with more students per classroom because the state is broke and is moving in a wrong direction both socially and financially. Without any sort of bold change in direction there will be exodus of businesses out of CA. Even AAPL started moving to Texas, an Iconic CA entity.

88   freak80   2012 May 2, 1:33am  

bmwman91 says

Just keep in mind how marketing works. It operates by making you UNhappy with your life as it is now by promising greater happiness via whatever they are trying to sell. Think about all the fantasies that most of us have in our heads about how great a house will be. When emotions get put down and we actually THINK about it, it only looks like a pile of trade-offs. In some cases it is worth it, and in others it isn't. Just remember, the way things get sold is by spurring discontent in the consumers so that they come seek happiness in your product, with open wallets. Most stuff is shrouded in a disguise of why you "need" it, but a moment of rational thought will quickly show that there is in fact zero NEED involved, just want, usually driven by emotions. Keep those particular emotions under control!

We really are living in a toxic culture, aren't we?

89   clambo   2012 May 2, 1:34am  

Are we now talking about the goldbricks who work for public entities and make a fortune?
My old friend is retired from a guard at the Q and he also sold his Berkeley house around 2007. Bailed out with his pockets very full. He is probably the wealthiest guy I know who never graduated from college. He's a nice guy so I can't hate him.
Another guy I know worked in San Diego and was able to "buy" 10 years of pension for about $40,000 in cash. I don't know how they even allowed this. So, in due time, San Diego was considering bankruptcy and they "retired" him. He is getting a nice pension and health care and he's about 56. His pension should never end, so he's essentially a millionaire several times over also.
I can't prepay a pension so I had to shove some more dough into AAPL recently.
Save dough, invest it in a true investment, wait till it's giant then decide later.
The other reason I love AAPL and stocks in general is they are focused on making profits.

90   freak80   2012 May 2, 1:45am  


Reducing the amount of mortgage lending would be hard to pull off though, since that means all house prices would fall a lot, and there are huge political and powerful consituencies that DO NOT want falling prices:
* everyone who indebted himself at current prices
* old people who want to sell and downsize
* banks, because high prices are the main assets on their balance sheets

Pretty much.

Old people vote. And we all know that the Big Banks own the federal government.

91   Goran_K   2012 May 2, 1:56am  

ArtimusMaxtor says

Uhuh I don't. Cheat'em back Goran.

I see what you're saying Artimus. I hate the current system and the way it's been rigged to destroy the middle class in a little over a decade. Your post is a good read, I suggest others read it.

But I don't want to get put into prison, or ruin my credit. I'm just not sure how else to cheat them besides possibly doing harm to myself.

92   ArtimusMaxtor   2012 May 2, 2:02am  

Ok Goran you don't want to go to prison. I understand that. Its not a formula. Ok. Nor anything specific. Look closer at what was written. The bad guy always gets caught Goran. The empire is far to flung not to have it any other way. Asset managment is laughble. Its called a homeowner with a mortgage. Want a job in asset managment that get a mortgage and a home. Thats even more-so for a commerical building. You might think your a big deal to the thug department. However the guys that own the assets are the really big deal. Guess who's side they are taking first. That gives you the scope of things. Don't start small. See. I have given with all my writtings a really good description of the situation. It's seamless for the most part and I won't back down. Ask Frodo up there. You want to learn how to really steal give him a call.

« First        Comments 53 - 92 of 192       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions