patrick.net

CDon says

I mean, if you ever wonder why your "say what you pay" housebuying or "why wont a venturecapitalist talk to me" or why your competitive wine bar business ideas go to shit, look no further than this site. Michael Jordan was once asked why he didn't do more to publicly support Barrack Obama - his answer? "Because republicans buy shoes too". Think about it.

There's some truth to that but you're drawing the wrong conclusions. If Patrick's aim would be to maximize his monetary support by any means, then he probably would be more tight-lipped, two-faced politically correct.

The conclusion to draw is not that the site is shit, or that Patrick is crazy because he actually says what he thinks in one thread instead of hiding behind today''s shit-show of platitudes, regurgitated and white-washed out-of-context quotes from business "influencers" to the Dalai Lama, which is pretty much what most social media and their forums have become. It is a wake-up call for you that political correctness is the biggest scourge of the 21st century, and all of the -isms it endorses or fights.

You may be happy now because you think yourself as included in those who are "sane", but one day it may be you who is dissenting with the masses, or one of your kids (if you have any), and when the character assassination is completed you may re-think and come to the conclusion that "crazies" like RBES don't sound so crazy anymore ;)

Do you guys really have to REPEAT that photo of Janet Yellen every 2 pages? Come on, just refer to the text not the image.

It's not too late to edit.

justme says

Do you guys really have to REPEAT that photo of Janet Yellen every 2 pages?

Yes.

We want a four-some sex tape of Janet Yellen, Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan and Barack Obama.

justme says

Peter P says

FortWayne says

Can a man opt out to be a stay home dad? No.

Why not? Of course a man can choose to stay home.

That way it will also be much easier for the man to be served with the divorce papers that will soon be hand-delivered on his doorstep. It's a win-win situation, I tell you.

You guys are exaggerating. Men's pride tend to be more hurt by staying at home than women's. :-)

* stay away from my 401K

Peter P says

Men's pride tend to be more hurt by staying at home than women's. :-)

Of course.

Because deep inside nobody in society respects and accepts a man as a househusband or a stay at home dad.

He is considered a bum, lazy, mooch, parasite and inferior.

Women are accepted to be housewives and stay at home moms.

It doesn't take a Sigmund Freud to understand why men's' pride is hurt more than women's'

You imply men have a big ego and that's why their pride is hurt.

Men don't have as big egos as compared to women.

Women are the ones with the ego problems in America and other western "modern" cultures.

Robber Baron Elite Scum says

Heraclitusstudent says

Someone had to throw a bucket of cold water on Dan.

You could tell she was very much fuckable in her 20's...

You mean she was fuckable in the 20's.

And I still disagree.

dodgerfanjohn says

You mean she was fuckable in the 20's.

No IN her 20's.

Not "The" 20's.

I'd still fuck her today though.

bgamall4 says

We aren't smart enough. Nor do we care enough. Women care, men want jobs outdoors with less book learning. That is fact. Live with it, Patrick. :)

Than explain why the greatest scientists, inventors, innovators, creations, constructions, engineering and all productive work to create modern technology has all been done by mostly 99.99% men?

Explain Einstein.

Robber Baron Elite Scum says

Men don't have as big egos as compared to women.

Women are the ones with the ego problems in America and other western "modern" cultures.

Yep.

On a related note, who remembers that claptrap condescending phrase "not wanting to hurt his 'male ego'" (and variations thereof) which was so popular among women for a while, in the 1990s or so.

It took me a while to figure out, but I think that the whole purpose of that expression was (a) to serve as a generic back-handed put-down and (b) to try and establish as truth that men could not have any sort of valid feelings (if said feelings were disagreeable to the woman in question or in general). It was all "ego", and therefore not valid.

Quite clever, really.

bgamall4 says

Anyway here are women who are inventors, plenty of them

But those women have a cockeyed arm. Therefore they must not be women and men in disguise.

bgamall4 says

But most men don't do that line of work. You know that. Most men would rather be forest rangers.

Most men are forced off these days to give room to incompetent women due to government mandated quotas and affirmative action bullshit.

Bgamall4, I understand you were adopted and probably have mommy issues...

But for fuck sakes... Wake the fuck up and finally see all the hirsute feminist lesbians fucking you in the ass with a strap-on.

bgamall4 says

Bullcrap. Most women are smarter than you are. Get the Fook over it.

Damn, that felt good.

You are a mangina who gets boners from feeling inferior to a female.

You're a little BDSM punk pervert.

bgamall4 says

Would you like to retract your statement?

Would I like to retract my crimes against the poor? No!

So what makes you think I would retract a statement to a little shit like you?

bgamall4 says

Jill Zwicky was the rec center monitor when I was a kid. I went in thinking I was something, and she kicked my ass at ping pong, pool and who knows what else. I learned right away that women are competent individuals. Perhaps you have first through 4th grade issues when women shine as little girls, kicking your ass and mine all over the place. They did, they did, rock you.

Holy shit....

You are a fucking disgrace and an embarrassment to the male gender.

Please have a sex change promptly and turn into the most lovely little sissy you can.

bgamall4 says

Did you really think about this?

Yes.

And we are right and you are wrong.

What else is new? Did you really think about that?

bgamall4 says

That is because the union legally is between man and wife.

The contract of the union is automatically voided based upon the oath both parties have sworn to be faithful once the whore in the union takes another man's bigger black cock deep inside her tight wet pussy and has nigger semen ejaculated inside of her...

Causing her to pop a nigglet 9 months later...

Furthermore, we don't even need that reasoning to prove you are a dumb stupid shit who is wrong.

The union is between the man and wife. Not between the man and the child which is not biologically his.

The whore created another union unofficially with her secret affair.

The bastard child is the third party of that other union.

Can I ask you bgamall4, something?

Are you a cuckold little faggot?

bgamall4 says

Sticks and stones, idiot.

You like them in your mouth?

bgamall4 says

I don't care.

Of course not. You are a faggot.

bgamall4 says

I like women, I don't want to be one. See that is your problem. You don't like women. You are losing out. You are a pathetic figure. And it is obvious to all who read your cries and screams of pain.

Get help. You need to call someone.

Same old coward lines used by americunts and their slave manginas.

Men don't lose out on women. We can do without them. Women have created, built and maintained nothing.

bgamall4 says

Alimony can go both ways.

But it doesn't.

bgamall4 says

But I don't want women in my bathroom. Personal preference.

Why because they'll laugh at your micro-penis and think it's a clit?

bgamall4 says

I won't be responding to this thread again because it is starting to be a profile in your sickness

Somebody made bgamall4 shut up??? That deserves a Nobel prize!!!!!!!!!!!!

bgamall4 says

No, there was a prophet in the OT that took his wife back two or three times and I won't argue with God, although you could try.

God doesn't exist. He is a worthless little shit who gets fucked in the ass by Satan.

bgamall4 says

Speak for yourself.

I already did the entire time.

bgamall4 says

I don't have time for your hatred, buddy.

Than log-off.

bgamall4 says

I won't be responding to this thread again because it is starting to be a profile in your sickness.

I won't miss your responses. They are worthless moans of a faggot getting fucked by strap-on dildos in his ass by immense hirsute lesbians.

bgamall4 says

You really should seek help.

What help? The same help you get from having your asshole torn?

bgamall4 says

If you are a troll that is another reason to dispense with your rants.

Everybody is a troll here.

bgamall4 says

I am watching women's golf.

Are they using your testicles as the golf balls?

bgamall4 says

They would beat your sorry ass.

Call them and ask them to come over and do it.

lostand confused says

Somebody made bgamall4 shut up??? That deserves a Nobel prize!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thanks...

But I prefer monetary prizes... I'm materialistic.

bgamall4 says

http://www.newcovenanttheology.com/2013/05/predestined-to-hell.html

But it is also that same Apostle Paul who told the truth in Romans chapter 9, that some vessels were created for special use, like fancy kitchenware, and others were created for menial use, to be thrown away

Didn't you say you'd stop responding?

bgamall4 says

I won't be responding to this thread again because it is starting to be a profile in your sickness.

Maybe the immense hirsute lesbians are still fucking you in the ass with strap-on dildos?

Causing you to uncontrollably respond here with your moans of gay butt-play orgasms?

Okay...

We can excuse this from you. You have a health condition causing this termed as "Faggot".

bgamall4 says

It's "then", not "than". I am out of here, but I have other threads so.... I can't log off.

It's "Patrick.net"...

Not "College English Class Essay Assignment"...

No, you can't log off because you need outlet for your moans while immense hirsute lesbians fuck in the ass with a strap-on dildo.

* All child custody after a divorce should always be 50-50.

Living equally at two homes is unfair to the children. If the parents cannot agree on who should be the primary parent, the court should have some matrix to follow on who should be the primary based that is non gender biased. If one parent has to pay child support, it would be fair if it was deposited into an account of which they had access to or if they paid bills directly.

I think your underlying issue is that men tend to make more money than women and so they tend to be the ones to keep working when the children are born. Thus the mother is the natural person to keep primary custody having already been the primary caretaker. Men have the power to change this...

Patrick, how long have you thought that you are equal to a female? :-/

http://www.ibtimes.com/us-navy-opens-submarine-service-enlisted-women-1790752

This should be interesting.

lostand confused says

Half of basic necesseties-for the child.

Like a flat rate? I kind of like that idea. A flat rate determined by the cost of living in the city. I suppose income would have to be considered then if the non custodial parent's income wasn't high enough. But it still works.

jvolstad says

Patrick, how long have you thought that you are equal to a female? :-/

define "equal".

i am not a woman, and women are not men.

the essential problem is the refusal by feminists to acknowledge that women and might might be (gasp!) different.