11
0

Truths you will never see in the US press


 invite response                
2017 Jun 25, 6:01am   10,243 views  47 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

Diversity destroys communities. Every academic study shows that diversity lowers mutual trust and civic engagement.

Feminism has made women significantly less happy and less likely to find men willing to marry them.

Islam teaches contempt for non-Muslims and is the direct cause of almost all terrorism in the world. More specifically, Saudi/Wahhabi/Sunni Islam is the cause of almost all terrorism.

Saudi Arabia funds terrorist-training Madrassas around the world, but all Western governments are too corrupted by petrodollar baksheesh to ever say anything about it.

Identical twin studies show that homosexuality is learned behavior, not genetic. I didn't say people don't have the right to be gay, only that it is a choice. Gays were not, for the most part, "born that way".

Most racism in America is blacks deliberately targeting whites for violence, not the other way around. Blacks commit violent crime at about 20 times the rates that whites do, and this is independent of income level. To be fair, Asians commit violent crime at less than half the rate that whites do.

White people on average are the least racist group on earth, by various measures, such as willingness to have neighbors of a different race, or to allow minority immigration.

Asians show that being a minority is not a significant impediment to success in America, contradicting the narrative about blacks and Hispanics which we are supposed to believe.

Smallpox and other diseases killed around 90% of the Indians soon after the Spanish first arrived. The US never distributed smallpox blankets. That story is fraudulent.

Anything else that you will never ever see in the NY Times?

I don't want to offend, but it is important to put truth above feelz.

« First        Comments 41 - 47 of 47        Search these comments

41   NuttBoxer   2017 Jun 26, 2:47pm  

Dan8267 says

I referenced a Science Magazine article that summarized a very well-know, peer reviewed scientific study. Science Magazine is a publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, a well reputed scientific organization with a esteemed history.

So everything they put out is infallible? I read the article, and they make it very clear they are guessing at the cause and effect, nothing substantiated.

42   NuttBoxer   2017 Jun 26, 2:51pm  

Dan8267 says

Every paper and speech in the south during the Civil War stated explicitly that the Civil War was about preserving slavery. Every Confederate flag stated that the very existence of the Confederacy was about slavery and white supremacy.

Link to Civil War thread where I provide facts and quotes(including Lincoln), showing Dan for the revisionist propagandist that he is:

https://patrick.net/1306089/2017-05-14-so-why-is-the-south-quietly-removing-these-monuments-in-the-dead-of-night-oh-that-s-why

43   NuttBoxer   2017 Jun 26, 2:53pm  

Dan8267 says

If my aunt had a dick, she'd be my uncle.

The only confused person here is you.

Classic Dan, non-sequitur's and ad-hominem.

44   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2017 Jun 26, 2:57pm  

curious2 says

Fucking White Male says

They are now fighting for B....

I agree with A.

Regarding B, the first part (prohibiting various businesses from discrimination), that's been law in many states for many years. Regarding the second part of B, I haven't seen anyone trying to compel religious organizations to perform marriage ceremonies. The nearest I've seen to that was a case in NJ where a church made so much money that it started buying up other properties to rent them out, while still not wanting to pay any taxes. The church made a deal with the town, allowing the church to buy a beach pavilion and not pay any taxes, on condition that the pavilion would operate on a non-discriminatory basis. The church rented out the pavalion for various purposes, including Jewish weddings, then objected suddenly to a gay wedding. The church had no involvement in the wedding, other than owning and ren...

Fair enough.

45   Dan8267   2017 Jun 26, 3:06pm  

NuttBoxer says

Classic Dan, non-sequitur's and ad-hominem.

You clearly don't know what either or those terms mean.

46   Dan8267   2017 Jun 26, 3:08pm  

NuttBoxer says

So everything they put out is infallible?

Straw man argument.

Nonetheless, the peer review study cited carries weight. Compared that to what? Your assertions?

Read the original post. Patrick did not even cite a study. He just alluded to them.

If you contributed anything to this site other than just trolling, you wouldn't have been banned from my threads. There's a difference between debating someone and trolling. Learn that difference if you want to be taken seriously.

47   MisdemeanorRebel   2017 Jun 26, 5:23pm  

Patrick says

Diversity destroys communities. Every academic study shows that diversity lowers mutual trust and civic engagement.

This is one of the few classic Sociological Studies to stand the test of time, and is repeatable worldwide across cultures.

« First        Comments 41 - 47 of 47        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions