patrick.net

Part 3

You defended Fox News by attacking The Daily Show and The Colbert Report as comedies that have no factually accurate information.

CBOEtrader says

Dan8267 says

Fox's lies are well documented on other news programs and were exposed quite humorously on The Daily Show and The Colbert Report.

LOL Daily show and colbert report are both jokes. Literally, jokes. Their purpose is to make you laugh.

The manipulative nature of those shows has been well documented by psychiatrists, but should also be quite apparent to any reasonably minded viewer. Regardless, no talking head news show anchor is worth listening to. The experts they have on their shows may perhaps be worthwhile. Listen to the expert, skip the editorializing of the talking head.

Do I need to teach you guys how to find facts through a narrative? Lol

Part 4

I refuted your false accusations with an example showing The Daily Show exposing the hypocrisy and outright lies of Fox News with indisputable, verifiable evidence.

Dan8267 says

CBOEtrader says

LOL Daily show and colbert report are both jokes. Literally, jokes. Their purpose is to make you laugh.

Laughing at the stupidity of people dumb enough to believe Fox News is not mutually exclusive with evidence. Example follows.
www.youtube.com/embed/0i8-ZNLEeag

Just because it's a comedy show doesn't mean any of the things in the above video aren't true. What The Daily Show claimed is true and verifiable. The Daily Show cites real evidence unlike any conservative medial including Fox News and Breitbart. What Fox News says is an outright lie and verifiable true. Tell me exactly how Fox News is right on this story and The Daily Show is wrong. Go on, grow a pair and show that. You can't.

This is exactly why people who watch only The Daily Show score highest on domestic and international knowledge w...

Dan8267 says

You defended Fox News

I would no sooner defend fox news than CNN. If CNN had an expert making a public statement that I agreed with, I would post the CNN video just the same. Even a garbage propaganda network can at times have guests on who make sense.

So, keep arguing w yourself Dan. The forum is laughing at you...

Part 6

You then doubled down on your false counter-attack by citing a video that does not even say what you thought it said because you were too dumb to actually watch a video instead of just doing a cherry-pick search and posting any video whose title sounded like what you wanted.

CBOEtrader says

www.youtube.com/embed/72UPxDFPKDs

Part 7

I completely refuted your stupid move.

Dan8267 says

squi

Dan8267 says

CBOEtrader is truly a moron. He did a YouTube search for any video condemning The Daily Show. He found a video titled "The Degeneration of the Daily Show" and immediately thought it would prove his point and posted it without even watching the video -- yes, it's obvious that this is what has just happened. However, the video is completely mistitled because the actual content of the video, although it uses tiny fractions of a segment, does not address any arguments against The Daily Show itself. The only thing that it argues is

Part 8

Now you are trying to back out of the entire issue, but without the honesty of admitting that you were completely wrong to
1. Post the Fox New's propaganda that ISIS was behind the Las Vegas shooting.
2. Try to equate The Daily Show and The Colbert Report to Fox News.
3. Admit that ISIS had nothing to do with the Las Vegas shooting.

In short, not only do you tell unconvincing lies, but you aren't even man enough to admit it when caught with your pants down.

PCGyver says

CBOEtrader says

Yet again Dan, try to address the Lt Col Shaffer source or what he said

Lt Col Shaffer was in the daily show clip. He is a talking head.

We all know that CBOEtrader did not watch that video any more than he watched the video he posted. Evidence is irrelevant to him. The truth is irrelevant to him. It's all about identity politics to him.

Lol, look how easy it is to get dan to dedicate his lunch hour to arguing himself.

Comedy shows arent supposed to be unbiased or informative. They are supposed to make you laugh and perhaps get you started down a path wherein you go do research for yourself. In fact, Jon Stewart agrees with me. Do you remember when he told his MSM talking head guest that "You work for CBS, my show comes on after a puppet show" Or whatever the exact quote was.

Listen to Jon. Dont take the daily show too serious.

I've noticed you still havent address what Lt Col Shaffer said. Its almost like you cant, so you are distracting from the point, and bumping up the trollish nature of your retorts every time I point this out.

Any honest debate would have awarded me the winner 25 posts ago. Try staying on topic, while leaving strawmen and ad hominems out fo it.

So, tell us your thoughts on Lt Col Shaffers statement

CBOEtrader says

Lol, look how easy it is to get dan to dedicate his lunch hour to arguing himself.

Whine all you like, I exposed you as a liar and and idiot. If I saved one person from following your stupid path, it's time well spent. You are simply now trying to distract from the fact that you were exposed as a liar. It's not going to work. The audience isn't that dumb.

CBOEtrader says

Listen to Jon. Dont take the daily show too serious.

People should certainly take the fact that The Daily Show viewers are more informed than Fox News viewers. They should also take some pieces from The Daily Show seriously because, although it's a comedy show, comedy often reveals hard truths. For example, the Republicans blocked 9/11 responders from getting essential health care and many of them died until The Daily Show publicly shamed the Republicans into letting the responders get emergency health care. Was that a joke issue simply because it was on The Daily Show?

Now let's get back to the original issue. You are completely full of shit when you say that the Las Vegas shooter was an ISIS operative. The FBI has denounced the false rumor you have repeated many times on this thread. You should recant that statement and everything else you have said in support of it on this thread. Of course, you aren't man enough to do that either.

This guy is a total schemer and con artist.

After days of exposure on the internet, there are only 4 pics from this guy's entire adult life, and one is post-mortem. Not normal.

me123 says

Too bad that doesn't happen more often. @Patrick should also bring back comment limit.

He should bring back your ban and delete all your posts from all your alts, piggy.

TwoScoopsMcGee says

This guy is a total schemer and con artist.

After days of exposure on the internet, there are only 4 pics from this guy's entire adult life, and one is post-mortem. Not normal.

Either a CIA mind control experiment or on the witness protection program.

Dan8267 says

you just threw away everything I just wrote in a post and did not even let me use the back button to get it back. This is the worst thing a forum can do. Change that!

What do you mean? The post was too large for the database field?

Sorry it caused you trouble, but I don't understand why the back button wouldn't show you the text of your post again.

Also, if you know javascript, let me know if you can find the problem in the source code: https://github.com/killelea/node.patrick.net

Patrick says

What do you mean? The post was too large for the database field?

I don't know how to reproduce the bug. It wasn't a large post, but it did have several quotes that included embedded videos.

Upon hitting submit, the post read "please edit this and post just one video at a time, thanks" but the back button was disabled, so there was no way to get the original text.

Moving discussion on bug to https://patrick.net/post/1302130?offset=160#comment-1447603

Dan8267 says

I exposed you as a liar and and idiot.

You exposed yourself as these things. Just another day on pat.net.

Yet again I win the debate.

CBOE said "yet again I win the debate"

You have proven that this man is a well known leftist activist and the MSM is actively trying to cover this up?

For starters: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/isis-vegas-shooting-stephen-paddock-repeat-claim-islamic-state-responsibility-police-gunman-motive-a7986161.html

CBOE said "for starters"

Ok - so so far, we have a statement from a group which has a long history of taking credit and little credibility to back it up. What else do you have to support your claim?

Incidentally CBOE, your claim at its core consists of 3 components:

1. well known
2. leftist activist
3. MSM cover up

Your link is very tenuous support for item #2. Please continue to substantiate your claim.

CBOEtrader says

For starters: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/isis-vegas-shooting-stephen-paddock-repeat-claim-islamic-state-responsibility-police-gunman-motive-a7986161.html

It's true because ISIS says its true. Now CBOE is a true defender of ISIS. Now that's funny. Who says right winguts have no sense of humor.

bob2356 says

CBOEtrader says

For starters: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/isis-vegas-shooting-stephen-paddock-repeat-claim-islamic-state-responsibility-police-gunman-motive-a7986161.html

It's true because ISIS says its true. Now CBOE is a true defender of ISIS. Now that's funny. Who says right winguts have no sense of humor.

Evidence does not equal guaranteed truth. You tards are all changing the topic, just to be difficult.

The evidence suggests this guy is suffering from TDS. Do you have evidence that contradicts this?

jazz_music says

a preemptive strike measure to combat the right wing.

Its a legit theory, obviously nowhere close to definitive.

The problem is the rampant righteousness of today's left. Convincing people that Trump is hitler and his supporters are nazi's give TDS sufferers the righteous delusion that violence is justified.

So keep arguing about Fox news (lolz) or nitpicking on what level of TDS sufferer this guy was. The point is that the MSM is whipping up a violent frenzy. Expect attacks like this to become more common, most likely from both sides, as soft brained fools on both sides continue to buy into the narrative of hate.

CBOE said "you tards are all changing the subject"

I agree. After you are done shooting the bull with the others, please continue to substantiate your claim:

1. Well known
2. Leftist activist
3. MSM cover up

You offered up your isis article "for starters" as to item#2. Please continue.

CBOEtrader says

Evidence does not equal guaranteed truth. You tards are all changing the topic, just to be difficult.

The evidence suggests this guy is suffering from TDS. Do you have evidence that contradicts this?

Airline tickets to Syria would be evidence. Pictures of paddock praying in a mosque with a known ISIS operative would be evidence. It's true because isis says it's true doesn't constitute evidence of any kind. Why do the right wingnuts have so much trouble with the concept of evidence?

You changed the narrative from far left terrorist to ISIS operative. Trump was never mentioned, only ISIS. That would be evidence that makes you the tard that is changing the topic.

Shaffer

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/353518-terror-experts-puzzled-by-isis-claim-in-las-vegas-attack
"Experts who track the group [ISIS] closely say that when it comes to attacks in the West, if ISIS is claiming responsibility, there typically was some kind of connection between the perpetrator and the group."

Nothing to see here. Just an angry old white guy. Move along. Case closed.

Oh wait, perp doesn't fit the profile of a typical psychologically broken mass shooter? He doesn't fit the convenient theory of aggravated gambling loser either? Mass security camera footage and media recovered from the scene yet to be disclosed to the public? Possibility of perp having accomplice(s)? Possibility of radicalization?

Nothing to see here, move on sheep.

FortWayne says

He's either Muslim or leftist. Those are the crazy once constantly hating America for it's freedoms.

careful. The TDS sufferers will point out your lack of verbal qualifiers, take this as a definitive statement and pedantically accuse you of being a liar.

Watch...

CBOE said "I don't deal in absolutes"

Yes you do. Here are some examples:

1. The sky is blue
2 "This man is a well known leftist activist"
3. 1+1=2

anonymous says

CBOE said "I don't deal in absolutes"

Yes you do. Here are some examples:

1. The sky is blue
2 "This man is a well known leftist activist"
3. 1+1=2

Correction. YOU HEAR in absolutes. Thats not my fault.

I've been crystal clear that I am merely pointing out the only evidence we have, and the best theory from that evidence.

Ahh great your back. So please point out evidence that he is

1. Well known

CBOEtrader says

We have evidence suggesting a most likely theory.

So your evidence is Schafer. That is all you offered. By his account all 65 year olds are Trump haters.

What Shafer says is completely and utter diarrhea. What is he an expert of? Going on Fox and saying what they want him to say? He can't even look into the camera because he knows he is just making shit up. So any other "evidence" .

CBOEtrader says

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/353518-terror-experts-puzzled-by-isis-claim-in-las-vegas-attack
"Experts who track the group [ISIS] closely say that when it comes to attacks in the West, if ISIS is claiming responsibility, there typically was some kind of connection between the perpetrator and the group."

Next paragraph.
"The group does often claim responsibility for attacks that may have been merely inspired by the group’s ideology — not directed or funded by ISIS leadership. In either case, the group will credit “a soldier of the Caliphate.”"

http://nypost.com/2017/10/06/vegas-shooter-showed-off-his-gun-room-to-houseguest/
Le Fevre said Paddock became very defensive when asked about the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms.

“I raised that question with Steve and it’s something that he came back at me with an incredible degree of vigor,” he said.

“He was very strict and very firm on the fact that it’s a right. It’s the freedom of every American to participate, to own a gun and use it … when need be. I was shocked. There was no compassion in regard to my question.”

CBOEtrader says

Yet again I win the debate.

It's amazing how the biggest idiots always think they are the greatest geniuses. But hey, double down yet again on the nonsense that the shooter was an ISIS operative. After all you heard it on Fox News and The Hill. Just more evidence that the conservative right is batshit crazy and dumb as shit.

CBOEtrader says

A theory that is 50% accurate would still be the most likely theory we have.

Donald Trump is a man who works for ISIS. That's 50% accurate. After all, Trump is a man and that's half the statement.

CBOEtrader says

FortWayne says

He's either Muslim or leftist. Those are the crazy once constantly hating America for it's freedoms.

careful. The TDS sufferers will point out your lack of verbal qualifiers, take this as a definitive statement and pedantically accuse you of being a liar.

You're not a liar for being a dumb ass who believed stupid shit. You're a liar for telling lies. That's how being a liar works.

Pee Wee Herman called. He wants his insults back, piggy. The petting farm also called. They want their goats back.

piggy needs to be banned from the site again and all his alts deleted.