Aah -Russian collusion evidence finally?
« prev   random   next »

Comments 1 - 40 of 67     Next »     Last »

1   HEYYOU   ignore (6)   2018 Feb 10, 9:09am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Mueller will give us more?
2   Quigley   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 10, 12:16pm   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

So this dossier was compiled out of passed-along rumor mill flotsam, served up with a steaming pile of grade A bullshit!
Precisely what you’d expect from opposition research.

What isn’t to spec is our highest law agencies using such flimsy dirt to waive Constitutional protections, spy on a Presidential campaign, and give regular reports to the opposition.

It’s a freaking miracle that Trump won with all the rampant blatant cheating against him.
3   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 10, 1:45pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Quigley says
What isn’t to spec is our highest law agencies using such flimsy dirt to waive Constitutional protections, spy on a Presidential campaign, and give regular reports to the opposition.


The biggest irony here was the FISA court wa set up after Nixon to prevent the government spying on people and now is used by the government to spy on the opposition party and derail an election. Dems have now lost their mind-I cannot believe any sane dem -why is this ok??
4   Sniper   ignore (10)   2018 Feb 10, 2:22pm   ↑ like (5)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

This just has to be fake news.

After all, Don Jr. had a 15 minute meeting with a Russian attorney looking to get an adoption policy changed, and Pres. Trump once put Russian dressing on his salad.

That's the TRUE Russian collusion, right?
5   jazz_music   ignore (2)   2018 Feb 10, 2:39pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (3)     quote      

People stop flocking to these fucking liar sites that dish out the daily red meat.

You are going to get all sorts of crazy ideas.

Fox news was bad enough 24/7 straight up GOP mind control, FREE as long as the carriers promise 24/7 use, but the others I see just tell the most stinking lie they can possibly think of hoping by time the truth get publicized no one will care, because they are on to the next UFO citing for y'all in an hour or so.

This is how you get to be ridiculous as a group. Trump makes it a [point to lie to numb the audience to lies. His lying is unparalleled in his office. But you don't care. You want more red meat. This is about the memo below, but every day there will be more red meat built up on lies because people will click on it and advertisers will keep paying.

This is actually quite black and white. There’s no evidence of politicized intelligence or law enforcement or counter-intelligence work at all. Actually not any. All the evidence is based on false claims, logical fallacies or intentionally misleading representations of how standard law enforcement procedures work. There’s also a high brow version of this which redirects the conversation toward longstanding and legitimate concerns about whether the FISA system is consistent with the rule of law in the first place. This is a grave error which only confuses the situation and makes general considerations about the rule of law into a tool of someone trying to trample on it.

The FBI and its counter-intelligence branch is and long has been a generally conservative institution. That doesn’t mean it’s “biased.” The possibility that people can remain professional in spite of personal political beliefs is a cornerstone premise of democratic government. But the notion of anti-Republican or anti-Trump bias is really preposterous on its face.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-gop-and-big-lie-politics
I mean come on, at a minimum you can start caring about whether something you rant on is true at all or not.

Do you really expect responsible people to keep on talking to you?
6   anon_4460e   ignore (2)   2018 Feb 10, 2:52pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Quigley says
what you’d expect from opposition research.

Says Breitbart, since the Nunes memo turned out to be lies. It doesn't matter by the time the truth comes out, people moved on believing the party line as usual.

AND GOP has a long proven tradition of being the consummate liars. Telling far more than democrats. Who cares?
http://www.nationalmemo.com/republicans-lie-more-than-democrats-study-finds/
7   anon_cb975   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 10, 3:26pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

And Obama who said he guaranteed he wouldn't be involved in the hillary investigation was getting daily briefings.
8   Tim Aurora   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 10, 3:58pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

anon_cb975 says
And Obama who said he guaranteed he wouldn't be involved in the hillary investigation was getting daily briefings.

Except that those briefings were about Russian Intervention and Trump got the same briefing after he was President-Elect
9   anon_20fca   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 10, 4:05pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

jazz_music says
People stop flocking to these fucking liar sites that dish out the daily red meat.


jazz_music says

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-gop-and-big-lie-politics
I mean come on, at a minimum you can start caring about whether something you rant on is true at all or not.


yes, talkingpointsmemo, such a more news worthy and factual site!
11   jazz_music   ignore (2)   2018 Feb 10, 5:06pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

anon_20fca says
news worthy and factual site!

No issue was raised about what was commented here.
12   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 10, 5:17pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

anon_4460e says
Says Breitbart, since the Nunes memo turned out to be lies. It doesn't matter by the time the truth comes out, people moved on believing the party line as usual.

AND GOP has a long proven tradition of being the consummate liars. Telling far more than democrats. Who cares?
http://www.nationalmemo.com/republicans-lie-more-than-democrats-study-finds/

LOL-source?
At some point liberals have to stop thinking dem, dem, and care about the country-oh wait they hate this country-makes sense now.
13   HappyGilmore   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 10, 5:23pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

lostand confused says
At some point liberals have to stop thinking dem, dem, and care about the country-oh wait they hate this country-makes sense now.


Yep--they do. They don't want budget busting tax reforms that reward 1%ers. They don't want repealing regulations like net neutrality, environmental protections, financial protections. They don't want Presidents that blatantly lie to the US public. They don't want Presidents that use the office to enrich themselves and their family.

Those things are important for the country.
14   jazz_music   ignore (2)   2018 Feb 10, 5:27pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (3)     quote      

@HappyGilmore that was beautiful.

You restored my faith in humankind.
15   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 10, 5:38pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

HappyGilmore says
Yep--they do. They don't want budget busting tax reforms that reward 1%ers. They don't want repealing regulations like net neutrality, environmental protections, financial protections. They don't want Presidents that blatantly lie to the US public. They don't want Presidents that use the office to enrich themselves and their family.

Then you must hate Hilalry Clinton and Obama.
Who gutted Glass Steagal .
Who signed NAFTA and pushed heavily for free trade.
Who came and lied multiple times that if you like your doctor/plan you can keep it.
Which traitor colluded with the Russians toi subvert democracy in our country.
Obozo the lying clown ran against NSA and free trade-what did he do in office-spy on an opposing candidate-and you still support the treasonous dog.
Trump is doing what he ran on.
Oh and tax cuts and 1% -please stop with that nonsense-you liberal America haters need to come up with a new line-.
16   anon_dd91d   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 10, 6:40pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Tim Aurora says
anon_cb975 says
And Obama who said he guaranteed he wouldn't be involved in the hillary investigation was getting daily briefings.

Except that those briefings were about Russian Intervention and Trump got the same briefing after he was President-Elect


Was Trump sending them to Hillary's unsecure home server too?
17   HappyGilmore   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 10, 6:40pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

lostand confused says
Then you must hate Hilalry Clinton and Obama.
Who gutted Glass Steagal .
Who signed NAFTA and pushed heavily for free trade.
Who came and lied multiple times that if you like your doctor/plan you can keep it.
Which traitor colluded with the Russians toi subvert democracy in our country.
Obozo the lying clown ran against NSA and free trade-what did he do in office-spy on an opposing candidate-and you still support the treasonous dog.
Trump is doing what he ran on.
Oh and tax cuts and 1% -please stop with that nonsense-you liberal America haters need to come up with a new line-.


lol--see here's the part that Trump fanboys can't understand. Liberals have no problem admitting when Dem politicians let them down. Bill Clinton was a DINO and promoted many Republican policies like deregulation and free trade as well as welfare reform. Those are not liberal policies and that is evidenced by the fact that Dem Congressmen overwhelmingly voted against those measures while Republican Congressmen voted overwhelmingly in favor of them.

Obama didn't spy on anyone--you sound like the real liar Devin Nunes.

And what's nonsense about the tax plan that is a gift from heaven for the 1%? That's a fact. The only nonsense is the conservative BS about liberals hating America because they want to improve it.
18   anon_dd91d   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 10, 6:40pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

HappyGilmore says
lostand confused says
At some point liberals have to stop thinking dem, dem, and care about the country-oh wait they hate this country-makes sense now.


Yep--they do. They don't want budget busting tax reforms that reward 1%ers. They don't want repealing regulations like net neutrality, environmental protections, financial protections. They don't want Presidents that blatantly lie to the US public. They don't want Presidents that use the office to enrich themselves and their family.


anon_20fca says
talkingpointsmemo


perfect parrot narrative of the liberal media.
19   anon_dd91d   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 10, 7:11pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

HappyGilmore says
lol--see here's the part that Trump fanboys can't understand. Liberals have no problem admitting when Dem politicians let them down.


Ha Ha ha, that's really funny.

Can you please provide the video links where Reid, Pelosi, Schumer, Feinstein, etc. admitting where their party let them down? I must have missed those clips on Fox News. That would have made national news.

Just provide a few links please, I'm sure there are tons to choose from, right?
20   anon_dd91d   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 10, 7:31pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

HappyGilmore says
Obama didn't spy on anyone


Does the name, Evelyn Farkas, ring any bells??

"EVELYN FARKAS: …“I was urging my former colleagues and, frankly speaking, people on the Hill…[to] get as much information as you can, as much intelligence as you can, before President Obama leaves the administration.”

Farkas admitted that she “had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior people [from the Obama administration] who left.” She feared that it would disappear into the abyss of “the bureaucracy,” and “that the Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about…the Trump staff’s dealing with Russia, that they would try to compromise those sources and methods.”.

There are several telling insights to glean from Farkas’ remarks.

First, Farkas here acknowledges that the Obama administration, essentially, had indeed been gathering intelligence, or spying, on private citizens.

https://townhall.com/columnists/jackkerwick/2017/04/02/evelyn-farkass-six-revelations-about-obama-trump-and-the-deep-state-n2307464
21   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 10, 7:35pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

HappyGilmore says
lol--see here's the part that Trump fanboys can't understand. Liberals have no problem admitting when Dem politicians let them down. Bill Clinton was a DINO and promoted many Republican policies like deregulation and free trade as well as welfare reform. Those are not liberal policies and that is evidenced by the fact that Dem Congressmen overwhelmingly voted against those measures while Republican Congressmen voted overwhelmingly in favor of them.

Obama didn't spy on anyone--you sound like the real liar Devin Nunes.

And what's nonsense about the tax plan that is a gift from heaven for the 1%? That's a fact. The only nonsense is the conservative BS about liberals hating America because they want to improve it.


LOL Obama did not spy on anyone-LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHy don't you post some facts on your claim on !%
22   anon_3b28c   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 10, 7:39pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

She acknowledges that the FBI and DOJ were doing their jobs and investigating criminal behavior.
23   anon_a1631   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 10, 9:22pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

anon_3b28c says
She acknowledges that the FBI and DOJ were doing their jobs and investigating criminal behavior.


What criminal behavior would that be?
24   BlueSardine   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 11, 7:04am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

I've always maintained the only difference between trump and clinton is trump doesn't try to hide his lies.
The appeal of Trump is that his lies are blatant and out in the open. He could not give a flying fuck if you believe him or not.
Hillary and the vast majority of politicians mask their lies with deception, which translates to a double slap in the face to the masses.
Bottom line, how many times do you want your face slapped for any given comment?

lostand confused says
Then you must hate Hilalry Clinton and Obama.
Who gutted Glass Steagal .
Who signed NAFTA and pushed heavily for free trade.
Who came and lied multiple times that if you like your doctor/plan you can keep it.
Which traitor colluded with the Russians toi subvert democracy in our country.
Obozo the lying clown ran against NSA and free trade-what did he do in office-spy on an opposing candidate-and you still support the treasonous dog.
25   HappyGilmore   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 11, 7:13am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

lostand confused says
LOL Obama did not spy on anyone-LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHy don't you post some facts on your claim on !%


Pretty sure Obama was never slinking around in a trench coat surreptitiously watching anyone during his term.

On the 1%--it's pretty simple. Just google Trump tax plan helps the 1% and you'll get 10,000 hits. Here are a few you can start with:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-tax-plan-boon-1-percent-new-analysis-finds-n806056

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/sep/29/trump-tax-plan-benefit-richest-1-percent

https://www.forbes.com/sites/janetnovack/2017/09/29/trump-plan-delivers-massive-tax-cuts-to-the-1-and-sharp-kick-to-upper-middle-class/#151d388e1099
That last one from Forbes--a real liberal rag...
26   HappyGilmore   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 11, 7:34am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

anon_a1631 says

What criminal behavior would that be?


Money Laundering, fraud, working as a foreign agent.

Don't worry, it will likely all come out when Mueller announces his findings.
27   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 11, 7:51am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

HappyGilmore says
Pretty sure Obama was never slinking around in a trench coat surreptitiously watching anyone during his term.

He is the commander in chief when all this happened and now we have texts that he wanted to know everything-all roads lead to him. The Justice DEpt, FBI all report to him-the treasonous unconstitutional dog who was a constitutional scholar-LOL.

As for your sources-that is typical MSM. To me evidence is putting out facts of 300 million + people in each bracket and analyzing the befits for all. I come out better and now way am I 1% . I don't think I am even 10%. But hey who cares-liberals, this is what they believe-despite it being established that Hilalry colluded with the Russians. Like I said dems need to put country first-can't do that if you hate this country and everything it stands for.



HappyGilmore says
Money Laundering, fraud, working as a foreign agent.

Don't worry, it will likely all come out when Mueller announces his findings.
28   Sniper   ignore (10)   2018 Feb 11, 9:21am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

HappyGilmore says
anon_a1631 says

What criminal behavior would that be?


Money Laundering, fraud, working as a foreign agent.

Don't worry, it will likely all come out when Mueller announces his findings.


That sounds awesome, let me get my popcorn, I can hardly wait for those facts.

29   anon_3b28c   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 11, 9:27am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

lostand confused says
As for your sources-that is typical MSM


It must be nice when one can simply dismiss anything that is counter to ones viewpoint as MSM. There are no facts. No truth. Only what one chooses to believe, right?

lostand confused says
I come out better and now way am I 1% . I don't think I am even 10%


Yep--Trump made it so most people do have small gains. But the vast majority of the borrowed money is going to the 1%.

The only problem is if that borrowed money ever gets repaid--then that small gain you got will look miniscule compared to the bill you get.
30   Onvacation   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 11, 9:30am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

HappyGilmore says
They don't want Presidents that use the office to enrich themselves and their family.

Good thing we didn't elect Hill. The Clintons made half a billion while "serving the public". Imagine how wealthy they would be if we put them back in office.
31   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 11, 9:38am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

anon_3b28c says
It must be nice when one can simply dismiss anything that is counter to ones viewpoint as MSM. There are no facts. No truth. Only what one chooses to believe, right?

Facts are facts-opinion articles froma group that consistently supports are not facts-unless backed by exact figures.MSM has beebn screaming trump Russia and now it looks increasingly like Hilalry colluded witht eh Russians-the shameless pigs won't cover and still scream nonsense-a broken clock can still be right twice a day-but is wrong the rest of the time.

anon_3b28c says
Yep--Trump made it so most people do have small gains. But the vast majority of the borrowed money is going to the 1%.

The only problem is if that borrowed money ever gets repaid--then that small gain you got will look miniscule compared to the bill you get.


Please. This like multimillionare nancy Pelosi talking crumbs-you folks are so out of touch. Pelosi You people think the small gains are a joke-keep pushing that line. The billionares always have all kind sof trusts and foundations and such-Clinton got 200 million plus and she didn't pay a cent in taxes-because she calls it a foundation.
The tax cut added 1 trillion in ten years and gave all of us working people a break and some rich people a nice break.
Obama the treasonous dog raised taxes, destroyed healthcare for middle class and added 10 trillion the deficit-what did anyone egt out of that 10 trillion in debt???
32   anon_3b28c   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 11, 9:39am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Sniper says

That sounds awesome, let me get my popcorn, I can hardly wait for those facts.


You probably have a bit of time. Mueller is still doing interviews gathering evidence.
33   Onvacation   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 11, 9:42am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

anon_3b28c says

Yep--Trump made it so most people do have small gains. But the vast majority of the borrowed money is going to the 1%.

The only problem is if that borrowed money ever gets repaid--then that small gain you got will look miniscule compared to the bill you get.

Tax cuts. The gov is not giving the rich money, they are taking less. Tax cuts, not giving the rich
anon_3b28c says
borrowed money
34   Sniper   ignore (10)   2018 Feb 11, 2:16pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

anon_3b28c says
It must be nice when one can simply dismiss anything that is counter to ones viewpoint as MSM. There are no facts. No truth. Only what one chooses to believe, right?


Yep, that's SOP for WaPo, NYT, MSNBC, et al.

anon_3b28c says
But the vast majority of the borrowed money is going to the 1%.


Why is this still being chanted when it's been proven over and over to be untrue?


anon_3b28c says
The only problem is if that borrowed money ever gets repaid--then that small gain you got will look miniscule compared to the bill you get.


The Dems should have worried about that when they let Obama add $10 TRILLION to the debt over 8 years. Why wasn't that a problem circa 2008 - 2016, but is an issue in 2017?
35   Sniper   ignore (10)   2018 Feb 11, 2:16pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

anon_3b28c says
Sniper says

That sounds awesome, let me get my popcorn, I can hardly wait for those facts.


You probably have a bit of time. Mueller is still doing interviews gathering evidence.


Yes, those 17 intelligence agencies with access to EVERY piece of evidence just need a little bit more time to find....... nothing......
36   HeadSet   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 11, 3:19pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

anon_3b28c says
Sniper says

That sounds awesome, let me get my popcorn, I can hardly wait for those facts.


You probably have a bit of time. Mueller is still doing interviews gathering evidence.


I sense that the "bit of time" is just an attempt to keep this alive and running through the mid-terms.
37   anon_3b28c   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 11, 7:55pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Sniper says
Yes, those 17 intelligence agencies with access to EVERY piece of evidence just need a little bit more time to find....... nothing...


If nothing = 4 indictments and counting...
38   Sniper   ignore (10)   2018 Feb 11, 9:35pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

anon_3b28c says
Sniper says
Yes, those 17 intelligence agencies with access to EVERY piece of evidence just need a little bit more time to find....... nothing...


If nothing = 4 indictments and counting...


The broken record again.

Please list what those 4 indictments are and how they are directly related to Trump's 2016 campaign.

I'll be waiting.
39   anon_8f378   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 12, 6:38am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Sniper says
The broken record again.

Please list what those 4 indictments are and how they are directly related to Trump's 2016 campaign.

I'll be waiting.


If it's a broken record, then I'm sure you already know. One typically doesn't lie to an investigator unless he/she has something to hide...
40   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (26)   2018 Feb 12, 6:41am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

anon_8f378 says
If it's a broken record, then I'm sure you already know. One typically doesn't lie to an investigator unless he/she has something to hide...


That works until the SAC leading the case reads them the charges and reviews the evidence, drops the copy of BRIDES magazine on the table and asks them to pick something out.

Comments 1 - 40 of 67     Next »     Last »


Comment as anon_5c69f or log in at top of page: