by Tenpoundbass ➕follow (7) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 38 - 77 of 77 Search these comments
anon_cf6c6 saysBecause they can.
Go do a Google search regarding LA Cop Chris Dorner and how a single guy handcuffed a complete county of cops trying to get him.
Now multiply that by a few million, what happens?
The government wouldn't send the local donut eating cops after you. It would be the military.
The government wouldn't send the local donut eating cops after you. It would be the military.
What socialists are coming for your guns in your very strange version of reality?
The government wouldn't send the local donut eating cops after you.
So why do they escape all blame?
Why are people looking to them to save us from “the liberals”?
You believe the military or the national guard will be attacking the American citizens who own firearms?
So why did TPTB decide to abandon simply calling them what they are, Democrats, and replace with the word Liberal?
Why did libbies take a perfectly good word, "gay", indicating joy, and turn it into some kind of fagfest.
Liberals have annihilated the english language far more than the r'necks...
Reflexive copycatting.
Why did libbies take a perfectly good word, "gay", indicating joy, and turn it into some kind of fagfest.
Liberals have annihilated the english language far more than the r'necks...
errc saysSo why did TPTB decide to abandon simply calling them what they are, Democrats, and replace with the word Liberal?
bob2356 says
Oh I get it Citizens have AR-15 = Government can't massacre Citizens lack AR-15 = Government can massacre. Hell of a gun that AR-15 being able to stop tanks and artillary if the government wanted to really massacre the citizens.
To that I say...
BlueSardine saysWhy did libbies take a perfectly good word, "gay", indicating joy, and turn it into some kind of fagfest.
Liberals have annihilated the english language far more than the r'necks...
Except this is, of course, another lie brought to you by the right wing. The word gay started changing meaning in the 17th century, and started referencing homosexual men in the 1920s
What were the Republicans doing the past 50 years?
Too busy having gay sex with little boys at church to be bothered?
Most Catholics are Democrats. They are also for open borders, and unlimited population growth especially with the poor, they sound like democrats to.
I love that picture of the peasant with the Yugoslavian SKS. That gun shoots the 7.62x39 and it is more accurate/precise than the AK pattern rifles.
Harry Belafonte in 1957 still used the it as a synonym for happy. It was never exclusively a negative slur. But if you neurotically talk enough about it you can ruin any party (specialty of the left).
anon_cf6c6 saysYou believe the military or the national guard will be attacking the American citizens who own firearms?
No, but I'm not one of the guys who believes that I need a gun to protect against my government.
Ya'll remember that time Putin made me vote for Trump?
Lefties are too soft and coddled today to be a legitimate threat.
A civil war type conflict between the current left and everyone else (independents, right wingers) would end up with a huge stinky mass grave full of lefty SJWs who thought the 2nd amendment was totally pointless and useless in preserving freedom.
We are all entitled to our own opinions.
Wish Trump supporters believed it.
To that I say...
That is utterly absurd. You left out 55 NVA battalions formed into 19 divisions and 16 VC battalions. All well equiped by the chinese and russians. Whoops, just a tiny little oversight. No more than 20% of the US military was committed to vietnam at any time. But hey facts are strictly optional for some posters here on patnet.
Sorry you weren't aware that tanks were useless in heavy jungle and played a very minor role in Vietnam.
When Trump supporters are walking out in the millions protesting a Democratically elected president, blocking traffic, and walking out of school/work/etc, let me know.
To that I say...
Isn't that free speech? So, you're not in favor of the 1st Amendment?
These guys think your point is absurd and would like to disagree.
patrick odd, says I'm logged in but posting me as anon
These guys could have been easily defeated if the US wasn't trying to run a weasel deal war. Again. . They have been defeated now.
AFAIK, the 1st amendment doesn't allow you to stand on a freeway causing potentially dangerous traffic conditions.
Pretty absurd. You left out 59 nva batallions and 19 vc battalions. All well equipped by china and russia. Just a tiny small oversight. Plus no more than 20% of the us military was ever committed to vietnam at one time. Welcome to fact free patnet.
And AFAIK, nobody stood on a freeway causing potentially disruptive traffic over Trump being elected.
The protests during which Flores was injured began shortly after Donald Trump was announced the projected winner of the 2016 election. Students living in all six colleges gathered on Library Walk and spread throughout campus, chanting criticisms of the president-elect as they moved. The protest then spilled off-campus near the freeway, where demonstrators walked onto the interstate.
It's mostly ambushes with small arms, grenades, and encountering booby traps.
« First « Previous Comments 38 - 77 of 77 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,194,771 comments by 13,933 users - DudeAbides, HeadSet, RayAmerica, Timweber1 online now