patrick.net

Those Union bastards had it good. They could have been as shitty as shitty fucks can be, their Commie States made these poor employees whether Unionized or NOT pay these Commie fucks money for WHAT? Jack Fucking Squat! That's what.

Socialist retards rent seeking from hard working Americans, finally we have a SCOTUS that cares about America more than Commie hell bent on driving America to its ruination.

Obligatory:

It's a delicious irony that the free shit unions are going to learn the meaning of free shit the hard way aka from their so-called members.

www.youtube.com/embed/uOqSKXRnTlk

>>The Supreme Court dealt labor unions a sharp defeat Wednesday, ruling that teachers, police officers and other public employees cannot be forced to pay dues or fees to support their unions.

When will the Supreme Court finally rule that employers should not have to pay wages? That's what the founding fathers intended. Everybody knows that.

TrumpingTits says

"I'm going to drain you of so much free shit, even black conservatives will look white!"

The guy interviewing her called the new Voice of the Party. She couldn't stop swooning the rest of the interview.
Though I tell ya, she's not strong on conviction. She said we need to stand up and PUSH BACK... a little bit, and resist. But work with people because people should always work together. But we're not going to take no crap, because we're in no position to challenger their majority.
She's going to make people's head hurt listening to her self idolized rants.

The guy interviewing her called the new Voice of the Party.

Maybe her rant on "guaranteed jobs" means the end of welfare. All who cannot find a job would instead of the dole be hired by the gov to pick up trash, sort recycling, or work as general labor for digging old water pipes or other structural improvements. Pause................ HA HA HA HA HA!

HeadSet says

Maybe her rant on "guaranteed jobs" means the end of welfare.

It will eventually end up as guaranteed welfare for all.

The Supreme Court dealt labor unions a sharp defeat

Please keep in mind we are talking about government unions. Unions have there place in the private sector, but gov employees do not need both civil service and union protections. Leaving out the "government" part is like those who leave out "illegal" from illegal immigrants, and purposely misdirect with phrases like "undocumented" or "migrants."

Although I am right wing, I always look for made in USA and "Union Made" when making purchases. For example, I recently replaced two garage doors on an old rental property. I bought doors made at a Union plant and had them installed by a local dealer's actual employees. I could have saved money by buying them at a big box store and use the big box "contract" labor for install. Not my cup of tea. However, I would like to see the Unions be more helpful to American workers by taking a stance against illegal immigrants, as it would seem natural for them to do. I believe it is the Public Union influence that steers Unions overall toward being pro-illegal immigration, as Public Unions are just an auxiliary of the Democrat Party, and the Party wants mass illegal immigration.

You bring up a good point (and also what I might refer to as the "elephant in the room"): why are labor unions/Democrats supporting illegal immigration now? Traditionally they have not, and were against it, as recently as a few years ago, as immigrant labor tends to suppress blue collar wages. If anything, Republicans (as typified by business owners) tended to support immigrant labor, as it supplied cheap labor to their businesses and diluted union labor's bargaining power. So, politically we are upside down now.

Could it really be as simple as "Democrats want the votes" of the flood of illegals? I tend to say yes.

No.
The reason is democrats want the wedge issue. Any cast illegal votes are miniscule and unimpactful
However, the wedge issue of supporting illegal immigration brings in legal immigrant votes as they want their illegal family members and friends to come to the USA and be with them.

Bullshit says

You bring up a good point (and also what I might refer to as the "elephant in the room"): why are labor unions/Democrats supporting illegal immigration now? Traditionally they have not, and were against it, as recently as a few years ago, as immigrant labor tends to suppress blue collar wages. If anything, Republicans (as typified by business owners) tended to support immigrant labor, as it supplied cheap labor to their businesses and diluted union labor's bargaining power. So, politically we are upside down now.

Could it really be as simple as "Democrats want the votes" of the flood of illegals? I tend to say yes.