« First « Previous Comments 41 - 80 of 80 Search these comments
right wing
You want to imply that the lies I gave you, ones people identified as his biggest lies don't stand up to scrutiny,
I did a google search (or perhaps it was bing) of Patrick.net, and two highlighted member lists of posts were those of Rin and Sniper.
This site has gone to hell.
This Trump=liar meme has no credibility. This is proof propaganda works
Maybe pick a neutral site, that might have some credibility with others here, otherwise it's just more TDS.
@Marcus that's the 3rd time you've gone to ad hom instead of discuss the topic.
Exactly as the forum expected.
Try it on bing
The one owned by the Left wing, radical, Lefty, newspaper, The Tampa Bay Times?
Everyone of the links you posted above are known for their regular Hit Pieces on Trump and lean heavily to the radical left.
Apparently neither can anyone who thinks Trump is a liar
YOu can call the Washington post or the NYT liberal rags that write hit pieces on Trump, becasue they focus on his lies.
Try it on bing
CBOEtrader says
Exactly as the forum expected.
That someone from the Drumpf camp
Sniper saysThe one owned by the Left wing, radical, Lefty, newspaper, The Tampa Bay Times?
Back up the allegations with something substantial....other than offering a personal assesment
Any examples of those regular "hit pieces" ?
What is the "radical left" ? Any examples ?
This is a fun game isn't it ?
This is a fun game isn't it ?
Someone is challenged
Nah, they just write hit pieces because they're a liberal rag that hates Trump. Why not call it like it is?
The forum is waiting.
No. It's sad that the people who scream Trump is a liar, can't get behind one lie. Not one single lie? Use your words and post one quote you feel is a huge Trump lie our of 3200 in the list I gave you? (this is actually a statement and does not require a question mark)
The forum is waiting.
Go to each of those links, why must I spell this out for the Liberals?
Like this?
Damn, those Pesky facts again....
See - this is a fun game.
Lets reboot - refute beyond a shawdow of a doubt the False 183 (32%) and Pants on Fire 84 (15%) statements/lies from Poltifact source or is that too much to ask.
Not how it works. Those making the assertion - that somebody is guilty of lying - are responsible for providing evidence.
(that were totally 100% lies).
There is plenty of evidence given with each pants on fire level lie.
Then you should have no problem choosing one and discussing it.
Trump estimating his inauguration had the largest audience in history is legit
Even if the one photo is a little early or something. The other from the other perspective is quite clear. Trumps wasn't the biggest.
Twitter had a bigger news feed for the 2017 inauguration live streaming than the 2009 one ?
The disagreement was about the crowd size, not the audience.
A Libertarian
Spicer very clearly goes over the online stats when responding to the "total audience" question. Spicer "I didnt say in-person. I said BOTH IN PERSON AND AROUND THE GLOBE." He answered the question with no uncertain terms that day.
CBOEtrader saysSpicer very clearly goes over the online stats when responding to the "total audience" question. Spicer "I didnt say in-person. I said BOTH IN PERSON AND AROUND THE GLOBE." He answered the question with no uncertain terms that day.
Wtf ?
What do you think both in person and around the globe means ?
That means he had the biggest audience in person, and that he also had the biggest audience around the globe (whatever that means).
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 80 of 80 Search these comments
I am genuinely interested if we can examine Trump's actual quoted words and come to agreement on which are lies, and which are misinterpretations.
Please find his lies (3200 to choose from) and tell us how horrible he is -OR- find his words misinterpreted by WashPo, and tell us why they are fake news.
Discuss, but no flaming you wimps.