by Goran_K ➕follow (4) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 43 - 54 of 54 Search these comments
Is there evidence you were planning on presenting? So far nothing is very persuasive.
No mueller was not appointed to look for trump collusion. That's just made up by the trumptards. He was appointed to ensure a full investigation into Russian interference into the election. Read the appointment letter some time.
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department appointed Robert S. Mueller III, a former F.B.I. director, as special counsel on Wednesday to oversee the investigation into ties between President Trump’s campaign and Russian officials, dramatically raising the legal and political stakes in an affair that has threatened to engulf Mr. Trump’s four-month-old presidency.
The Department of Justice has appointed the former FBI director Robert Mueller as special counsel to investigate alleged ties between the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump and Russian operatives. Mueller will also investigate questions of Russian intervention in the election generally.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller to serve as special counsel to oversee the previously confirmed FBI investigation of Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election and related matters.
"I have determined that a Special Counsel is necessary in order for the American people to have full confidence in the outcome," Rosenstein said in a statement.
The letter announcing the appointment says that Mueller is authorized to investigate "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and...any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation."
Yeah dude. When the FBI fires you, and then recommends a criminal investigation against you on top of the sacking............it might point to some "evidence" of wrong doing.
I asked you some questions. If Strzok and Page and McCabe dindu nuttin' wrong, why aren't they employed at their old jobs?
Mueller sure as shit was: May 17th, 2017.
And, please, don't try to argue that the Trump Campaign doesn't include Trump, and note that "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation" are authorized to be investigated, which would certainly include Russian "collusion" personally by Trump.
I asked you some questions. If Strzok and Page and McCabe dindu nuttin' wrong, why aren't they employed at their old jobs?
Read the first paragraph, that's the appointment of the scope of the investigation. Where is the word collusion in the letter? It's not..
Why is that? Collusion don't have any legal meaning in a campaign. The only place collusion has any legal meaning is in anti trust law. So collusion is just made up shit. Coordination isn't a crime either.
Is today the day it gets "real"??!!?
I'm on the edge of my seat!!!!
I don't think anybody is going to be convinced that "coordination" and "collusion" have radically different meanings. Is it misleading to write "Franco and Ciparelli coordinated a bank robbery", instead of "Franco and Ciparelli colluded in a bank robbery"?
Yet Mueller is pointedly directed to investigate it. You can report on something that isn't a crime, yes?
What has the Left been masturbating to for over a year now? Proof of "Russian Collusion", that's what. The Media has been breathless in it's reporting of any and every potential meeting. Every few weeks they revisit the Trump Tower meeting.
Is today the day it gets "real"??!!?
I'm on the edge of my seat!!!!
« First « Previous Comments 43 - 54 of 54 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,197,055 comments by 14,096 users - anniecoyote, gabbar, GNL, Tenpoundbass online now