patrick.net

The video you're watching finishes, then without refreshing the page a new video starts, and you have no idea what it is or who it is by.
The URL and the description is all still the content of the video you clicked on.
Who ever is in charge of marketing there should be fired and given a bad review the next potential employer. I don't mind advertisements if they are relevant and are unobtrusive. More often than not, the video will just be an image with a 30 second counter, and a skip ad never shows up on those ads. But they sometimes do for video ads. The rub is, more often than not, the snippet video I'm trying to watch. Is much shorter than the erection medication static image they show for 30 seconds.

I have gotten to where I just paste the Rumble link into Brave which I have to keep open.
I browse on Opera I just like it's speed and design better than Bravo. I go to Bravo when a website is forcefully trying to eye fuck me and demands I consume a page full of 80% adverts and 20% content.

What ever happened to Bit Chute, I liked that one, it didn't have as much content, but it didn't look like a CIA honey trap. Which is exactly what I think Bravo is. They wont show any copywrite content, even though YouTube seems to have some obscure educational license to do so. So that means Bravo could if they wanted to. I suspect they are honey trap to tip off the DOJ and J6 persecutors into the wrong speak and their viewers. After they got your number, they aren't interested in keeping you there. You even have to log in to see comments. I can just imagine them sending the list commenters over to the DOJ on a weekly dump.

I also liked Live Leak. But none of those seem to have a creative commons license privilege that Google and YouTube enjoys. What's up with that?