« First        Comments 39 - 59 of 59        Search these comments

39   Tenpoundbass   2018 Sep 13, 6:30am  

Pass a Law declaring any Dog that kills or maims someone a Weapon. The owner's weapon, and prosecute the same as you would as if he randomly assulted someone with a knife, axe or gun.

Problem solved, after a few public hearings and death penalties these breeds will disappear within 5 years.
40   Shaman   2018 Sep 13, 7:17am  

I’m with AF. Civilians should just be armed and firing at dogs at all times. Chihuahua yaps at you? BLAM! Problem solved.
41   NuttBoxer   2018 Sep 13, 8:59am  

So many eugenicists on patnet these days. I wonder how many of you have South American's IP's?
42   RWSGFY   2018 Sep 13, 10:53am  

NuttBoxer says
So many eugenicists on patnet these days.


For the umpteens time: the term "eugenics" is only applicable to humans. With animals it's "selective breeding".
43   NuttBoxer   2018 Sep 14, 1:15pm  

DASKAA says
For the umpteens time: the term "eugenics" is only applicable to humans. With animals it's "selective breeding".


Thanks, because clearly the gist of the belief is VASTLY different when you say selective breeding.
44   curious2   2018 Sep 14, 1:35pm  

NuttBoxer says
selective breeding.


Either way, you are endorsing it when you choose fighting breeds such as the pit bulls. They were bred to fight. The weaker, less aggressive fighters were killed by the stronger, more aggressive fighters, which were then bred. Just as race horses are bred for racing, pit bull dogs were bred for fighting and killing. You brought the result into your home, creating an unnecessary risk. Other dogs, that have not been selectively bred for fighting and killing, do not pose nearly the same risk.
45   RWSGFY   2018 Sep 14, 3:05pm  

NuttBoxer says
DASKAA says
For the umpteens time: the term "eugenics" is only applicable to humans. With animals it's "selective breeding".


Thanks, because clearly the gist of the belief is VASTLY different when you say selective breeding.


Words have meaning for a reason.
46   curious2   2018 Oct 12, 5:30pm  

A recent comment reminded me of this thread. I had quoted empirical data proving that pit bull dogs are much more likely to kill or maim people, especially children, than any other type of dog. A pit bull lover reacted in his usual way, with profanity and falsely alleging racism. The data speak for themselves, and appear above as well as being linked in the comment below.

curious2 says
NuttBoxer says
Hitler.... you espouse eugenics....


Your bizarre exercise in projection, including invoking Hitler three times in one thread, shows cognitive dissonance on your part. You are the only one who defends a product of eugenics in this thread. You are the only one who invokes Hitler in this thread. You call yourself a "nuttboxer", but it is your own progeny who are endangered by your embrace of eugenics, and your efforts at trolling with your Hitler comments (three so far) only make you look worse. Your feeble attempt to point your eugenicist's finger at me shows only poor reasoning skills on your part, when the evidence is clear: you are the only one practicing eugenics, which you have literally bought and brought into your home.


curious2 says
NuttBoxer says
I guess you only need arguments that are skin deep.


The wounds on the hundreds of people mauled to death by pit bulls were much deeper than the skin. You espouse a product of eugenics that kills children and adults. The blood is on your hands, not mine. Your "arguments" are merely trolling, crying "Hitler" over and over again, and appealing to anecdotes and conjecture as if they could refute peer reviewed empirical data.
48   BayArea   2018 Oct 12, 10:36pm  

On average, people are far too irresponsible to own dogs as dangerous as Pit Bulls
49   rocketjoe79   2018 Oct 13, 1:54pm  

DASKAA says
Patrick says
I don't want to say bad things about dogs because so many people love them, but some dogs are really dangerous, essentially weapons. They were bred that way.


As a former owner of a large terrier (not the "bull & terrier" type though) I must say these beasts are awesome when properly trained, controlled by an experienced handler and used for intended purposes. Which is personal defense/attack kind of work (basically your typical "K9 officer") or hunting dangerous animals like European boar. Their fearlesness and high pain tolerance allow them to excel where even German Shepards can fail. But giving them out like candy to old ladies and families with small children is irresponsible to say it mildly.


In Great Britain, 4 breeds are banned. Pit Bulls are one of them. "Dangerous Dogs Act." We need a similar act in the USA, so this breed can simply die out. Too many other safe dog breeds are available. Pick something else!
50   RWSGFY   2018 Oct 13, 5:07pm  

rocketjoe79 says
DASKAA says
Patrick says
I don't want to say bad things about dogs because so many people love them, but some dogs are really dangerous, essentially weapons. They were bred that way.


As a former owner of a large terrier (not the "bull & terrier" type though) I must say these beasts are awesome when properly trained, controlled by an experienced handler and used for intended purposes. Which is personal defense/attack kind of work (basically your typical "K9 officer") or hunting dangerous animals like European boar. Their fearlesness and high pain tolerance allow them to excel where even German Shepards can fail. But giving them out like candy to old ladies and families with small children is irresponsible to say it mildly.


In Great Britain, 4 breeds are banned. Pit Bulls are one of them. "Dangerous Dogs...


As said above, I've never owned anything of "bull&terrier" type. Just a big terrier. It was trained to take down a full-sized man (and did at twice in RL) though.

As for following Britain's lead on anything they do in the name of "safety": the fuckers has banned glass pints in pubs and are about to ban kitchen knives with sharp points. Fuck that nation of fucking pussies. They should quietly drop the "Great" from their country's name.
51   curious2   2018 Oct 14, 12:35pm  

"Four years after his daughter was mauled, father also bitten in pit bull attack
***
The father of a Delaware girl who nearly lost her arm in a 2014 pit bull attack was bitten by two pit bulls himself on Saturday and is undergoing a series of rabies shots.

"I just turned around, and they just were on me," Todd Ruckle said in a video recorded from the hospital and posted on Facebook. "One was on my leg, and the other one came up to my face and got my lip, but that's not bad. My leg's the really bad one."

His daughter Emily Ruckle was mauled by a pit bull named Frank while at the family's home in Newark. It was four years ago, this month. At the time, she was 8 years old.
***
In the first 12 hours after the attack, Emily essentially bled out four times. She underwent more than two years of surgeries and rehab to restore function to her arm. After a final surgery in 2016, she regained some of the function in her right hand.
***
After his daughter was attacked in 2014, Ruckle advocated for stronger animal control laws such as mandatory insurance for dog owners. The family received letters from pit bull advocates, wife Maria told The News Journal. One wrote that her daughter should have been shot instead of the dog.
***
In March, Wilmington resident Diane Olin White also had a run in with a pit bull. She was walking her two dogs – Stella, a brown 50-pound boxer mix, and Darcy, a white 17-pound poodle and Jack Russell mix, when they were attacked by a stray.

Stella suffered puncture wounds and survived, but it was too late for Darcy.
"
53   BayArea   2018 Oct 14, 2:12pm  

Fuck Pit Bulls and their Owners!

« First        Comments 39 - 59 of 59        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions