Thread for orphaned comments
invite response
2005 Apr 11, 5:00pm 154,217 views 117,730 comments
by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 41,076 - 41,115 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
indigenous
2013 Dec 31, 11:23pm
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
Come on, Mr Dan,
We're a family oriented website!
Yes, I often confuse you with Mr Rodgers
"being white trash poor farmer working with black farmers in the fields
hoeing cotton."
Ya, po whiiiiiite trash, but with a scholarship to LSU. And a master's and bachelor's degree. If that ain't white priveledge, then what is?
Robertson received a bachelor's degree in physical education and a master's in education.[15
As an athlete in high school, Robertson was all-state in football, baseball, and track, which afforded him the opportunity to attend Louisiana Tech University in Ruston on a football scholarship in the late 1960s.[8] There he played first-string quarterback for the Bulldogs, ahead of Pro Football Hall of Famer Terry Bradshaw,[9][10] the first overall pick in the 1970 NFL Draft. When he arrived at Tech in 1966, Bradshaw caused a media frenzy on account of his reputation of being a football sensation from nearby Shreveport.[11][12] Robertson was a year ahead of Bradshaw, and was the starter for two seasons in 1966 and 1967, and chose not to play in 1968.[13]
What bothers me more than what Mr Robertson said was the reaction from some on the right to almost immediately turn this into yet another "Liberals Versus Conservatives" pissing contest, with little if any of their arguments or points having anything to do with what was said. Some of the comments being made are outright disgusting. Some people need to seriously grow up and act with an IQ beyond their shoe size
Racism- no matter what political allegiances one might have- is NOT acceptable. I grew up in the South, and while racism exists everywhere, to suggest that things were all peachy-keen back then in the South- or frankly anywhere else in the country- is a bunch of bullshit. I am in my 30's but even as a teenager I heard some utter trash coming out of people's mouths in regards to other races.
Lucky for us, those who make racist remarks are in the minority: They do not represent the ideals of what this country and its constitution stands for.
Lucky for us, those who make racist remarks are in the minority: They do not represent the ideals of what this country and its constitution stands for.
All the people who wrote the US constitution did so with the understanding that the USA was created by Whites for the benefit of Whites only. US citizens before the 1960's believed this fact. To try to change this made you a traitor.
There was no nonwhite immigration before the 1960's. US citizens were proud to live in a racially homogenous country before the 1960's.
What you consider 'racism' was accepted as a universal fact that all people have a right to live in a racially homogenous land. The USA is this land for western European whites.
Many studies have shown that racially homogenous countries are happier and have a higher level of trust among citizens. Forced diversity destroyed the natural trust between citizens previously white countries had.
Diversity is only pushed in white countries. Non white countries do not practice diversity.
All the people who wrote the constitution did so with the understanding that the USA was created by Whites for the benefit of Whites only. US citizens before the 1960's believed this fact. To try to change this made you a traitor.
The constitution is a written document with guaranteed rights which are spelled out very clearly. There is nowhere in that document that claims any intent from its authors. As such, your argument is not an argument, but rather an assertion based on personal opinion instead of facts, and hence the remainder of your commentary is nonsense.
The constitution is a written document with guaranteed rights which are spelled out very clearly. There is nowhere in that document that claims any intent from its authors. As such, your argument is not an argument, but rather an assertion based on personal opinion instead of facts, and hence the remainder of your commentary is nonsense.
Actions speak louder than words. It is a fact that there was no nonwhite immigration before the 1960's.
Racial homogeneity was such a basic part of life that it did not need to be spelled out. The founding fathers could not fathom a world where Whites gave up their lives and prosperity so that nonwhites can attempt to create something that they failed to create in their own country.
What bothers me more than what Mr Robertson said was the reaction from some on
the right to almost immediately turn this into yet another "Liberals Versus
Conservatives" pissing contest, with little if any of their arguments or points
having anything to do with what was said. Some of the comments being made are
outright disgusting.
Yeah, I had 3 extreme conservative(not quite tepublicans)relatives(wife's) that I argued with recently about what Robertson said and how offensive it was, along with his BS implications. Of those 3, NONE of them had ever seen the show and 2 of them have neither cable nor a satelite dish to even get A&E, and not only were they defending him, but were actually giddy about what he said and it kind of gave them the pathetic courage to expand upon his rants with rants of their own.
Not only did they see nothing at all wrong with their thoughts and words, they felt that they were entitled to feel that way and say similar or worse things without any consequences.
The loudest and most obnoxious of the 3 has an adult son with his kids on welfare of every type too, not to mention that all 3 with 1 more than most people, are VERY religous.
I pointed out their hypocrisy and the irony of it and they didn't even get that.
It is a fact that there was no nonwhite immigration before the 1960's.
Now you're just proving your stupidity and the fact that you're full of shit.
Asians? Mexicans? Africans?
Actions speak louder than words. It is a fact that there was no nonwhite immigration before the 1960's.
The foundation of your argument is totally wrong. There's no sense in trying to continue a conversation when your side of it is nowhere near being attached to reality. You are wrong. Plain and simple. That's all I have to say about it because I'm not going to waste my time by even entertaining the notion that what you have to say deserves the privilege of further attention.
The question is, have YOU ever watched the show??
Yes, and I couldn't stand it enough to watch it to the end of the show, or about 10-20 minutes. Too much of the scripted stupidity by stupid people, to try and act MORE stupidly.
As I have said before, that show is neither arts OR entertainment.
Now you're just proving your stupidity and the fact that you're full of shit.
Asians? Mexicans? Africans?
Demographic records show that I'm speaking fact.
http://www.flowofhistory.org/themes/movement_settlement/uspolicytimeline.php
This is more fact supporting my argument that there was very little nonwhite immigration into the US before the 1960's.
The USA was not built on diversity. No country has excelled with or survived a racially diverse population.
Y
2014 Jan 1, 12:53am
Quite correct.
It is required Liberal Indoctrination.
The question is, have YOU ever watched the show??
Yes, and I couldn't stand it enough to watch it to the end of the show, or about 10-20 minutes. Too much of the scripted stupidity by stupid people, to try and act MORE stupidly.
As I have said before, that show is neither arts OR entertainment.
FortWayne
2014 Jan 1, 2:00am
Jesse makes his money by telling poor blacks that white man is out to get them. This is sort of expected from him. There is a lot of competition for the attention of low IQ population.
How about a little "Sympathy For The Devil".
http://www.elyrics.net/read/r/rolling-stones-lyrics/sympathy-for-the-devil-lyrics.html
FUCK YOU LUCIFER!
"Killed the Czar and his ministers", but you didn't kill ALL the money changing bank STOCK HOLDERS & lay their "soul to waste"
The DEVIL is an ABJECT FAILURE!
Y
2014 Jan 1, 3:18am
Why do you hate institutions that safeguard your hard earned credits?
Sure, they may get a little greedy here and there, but doesn't it beat 'the mattress'??
Please stop calling it "Bank of America"; the correct usage is "Skank of America."
HydroCabron
2014 Jan 1, 3:37am
Why do you hate institutions that safeguard your hard earned credits?
Sure, they may get a little greedy here and there, but doesn't it beat 'the mattress'??
Please stop calling it "Bank of America"; the correct usage is "Skank of America."
I'm not sure: I think it's because I hate freedom and wish abortion upon all our unborns, as well as deaths for all the ladies.
I should show more gratitude for institutions which keep all that taxpayer money safe in the hands of their executives and shareholders.
Ceffer
2014 Jan 1, 4:12am
I like Wells Fargo. They gave me a free toaster oven once, and as many refrigerator magnets as my refrigerator will carry.
Y
2014 Jan 1, 4:20am
Well, blame it on your ancestors. They are the ones who decided to 'import' hundreds of thousands of Africans and enslave them.
We have a self imposed racially diverse population. The african did not come of their own free will.
Therefore, we owe it to them to expose them to the teachings and honed thought processes that have enabled the white man to achieve a higher IQ.
As I've stated before, time will make us all equal in intelligence and the racial dividers on all sides of the kaleidoscope will be the ones left behind.
http://www.flowofhistory.org/themes/movement_settlement/uspolicytimeline.php
This is more fact supporting my argument that there was very little nonwhite immigration into the US before the 1960's.
The USA was not built on diversity. No country has excelled with or survived a racially diverse population.
Dan8267
2014 Jan 1, 4:20am
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
DEATH TO BANK OF FUCK AMERICA IN THE ASS AND WELLS FARGO IN 2014!
Dude, what took you so long? The first day of the year was like 16 minutes over when you posted this. I expected such an important post to be sent out as soon as the ball in NYC hit the ground.
There's no better way to start a new year than by skull-fucking a banker.
Dan8267
2014 Jan 1, 4:22am
I like Wells Fargo. They gave me a free toaster oven once, and as many refrigerator magnets as my refrigerator will carry.
You know they do that so that you're refrigerator will topple over from the weight of all the magnets and pin you to the ground where you will slowly die of internal bleeding all while they foreclose on your house.
Never trust a bank.
Y
2014 Jan 1, 4:22am
He's a racial divider.
His type will be around exploiting for the next 4-5 generations...
Jesse makes his money by telling poor blacks that white man is out to get them. This is sort of expected from him. There is a lot of competition for the attention of low IQ population.
Y
2014 Jan 1, 4:27am
Well that's your hard earned tax dollars at work, not bank notes!
Cut BofA some slack, I've been with them for 30 years...
Why do you hate institutions that safeguard your hard earned credits?
Sure, they may get a little greedy here and there, but doesn't it beat 'the mattress'??
Please stop calling it "Bank of America"; the correct usage is "Skank of America."
I'm not sure: I think it's because I hate freedom and wish abortion upon all our unborns, as well as deaths for all the ladies.
Therefore, we owe it to them to expose them to the teachings and honed thought processes that have enabled the white man to achieve a higher IQ.
As I've stated before, time will make us all equal in intelligence and the racial dividers on all sides of the kaleidoscope will be the ones left behind.
Whites owe blacks nothing.
The difference between white and black intelligence is significant and genetic. This intelligence gap is the root cause of all black problems. There is no fixing it.
drudometkin
2014 Jan 1, 1:43pm
A lot of these dual citizens in congress and other high levels of public office are double agents that actively work against US interest. Kick them all out, or have them renounce their foreign citizenship. I wonder if the chinese are dumb enough to have isrealeis running their country.
One of the reasons why I am Republican when they are'nt perfect is the propensity of my Democrat school chums to steal and use drugs.
Dan8267
2014 Jan 1, 4:05pm
Jail survey: 7 in 10 felons register as Democrats
Well, that was the whole point of the War on Drugs, wasn't it? It was to remove registered Democrats from the voting booth. Think about it, why the fuck shouldn't convicts have the right to vote? What legal justification is there for that? Hell, if they don't have the right to vote, then voting isn't a right, by definition. It's a privilege. A right cannot be taken away.
Let's look at the facts.
1. The prison population increased 700% from 1970 to 2005.
2. Half of the people in prison are there for drug crimes.
3. Drug possession is very selectively enforced with blacks, Hispanics, and generally democrats prosecuted far more than WASP republicans even though both groups use the drugs at the same rate.
Black Americans were nearly four times as likely as whites to be arrested on charges of marijuana possession in 2010, even though the two groups used the drug at similar rates, according to new federal data.
That's right! Four times as many convictions despite the exact same drug usage. When you compensate for that math, the 7 out of 10 become 7 out of 13, or about 50%. Damn, don't you hate it when the facts don't support your conclusion.
And by the way, most crime today is financial (white collar) crime, which isn't prosecuted at all. Just look at all the bankers and financial manipulators who got away with causing the Second Great Depression and massive financial fraud. No one went to jail.
If we actually prosecuted financial crimes, 9 out of 10 felons would be Republicans. And if we legalized drugs, like they should be, it would be more like 95 out of 100 felons are Wall Street Republicans.
There is, however, one group of people who, per capita, are statistically make up way less of the prison population than any other group save those with political connections. This group is, of course, atheists. Yep. If you're going to judge the morality of a group by what percentage of its population is in prison, then atheists win hands down.
The Republican campaign to suppress votes has found new fertile ground. They can claim Democrats as criminals and ban them from voting. It's bad enough to be female or old or poor or a minority. Now all you have to be is a Democrat and BOOM you're a criminal and shouldn't be able to vote.
Many are in prison, because Clinton dismantled the interdiction of drugs into the
USA.. had the prior Reagan/Bush policies continued, far far less drugs would
hit the street and therefore fewer people would have become pushers and users...
AND BINGO, you would not be complaining about the millions in prison today...
But go ahead and thank your chummy boy Billy Bob Clinton on that one...
How the Clinton Administration is Abandoning the War Against Drugs
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/1994/06/bg989nbsp-how-the-clinton-administration
Before Columbia, Clinton Abandoned U.S. War on Drugs
https://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg49780.html
Here are a few highlights as noted by the FRC:
"President Clinton has overseen the wholesale dismantling of
government agencies that are at least partly responsible for the
successes of the 1980s. The Clinton Administration has:
"Dropped the drug war as one of the National Security Council's
top priorities. It is now number 29 of 29.
"Cut the drug czar's office by 80 percent from 146 to 25
personnel. It was partially restored by Congressional mandate.
"Folded the State Department's Office of International Narcotics
Matters into a potpourri organization that handles issues like
labor, environment and population concerns.
"Cut military anti-drug efforts by signing an executive order
drastically reducing the Pentagon's interdiction efforts. These
cuts included 1,000 military positions devoted to anti-drug
activities, a move Rep. Charles Schumer (D-NY) called "a terrible
mistake."
"Former Drug Enforcement Administration director Robert Bonner
stated, 'I believe that there has been a near total absence of
presidential leadership by President Clinton in the fight to turn
back illegal drug use in this country...It [the Administration]
clearly fails to promote an increased awareness of the dangers of
drug abuse, arguably encourages it...The Clinton Administration's
national drug strategy has failed miserably, and indeed it is a
tragedy. The President must reverse this trend and start leading
our nation's anti-drug efforts.'
"Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) said, 'I've been in Congress for
over two decades, and I have never, never, never seen a president
who cares less about this issue.'
"Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) told Lee Brown during the (former)
drug czar's confirmation hearings, 'Either the president is with
you, or he has just given you a chair at the cabinet level...If
it is the latter, you are getting ready to be the biggest fall
guy in the Clinton Administration...We might as well close [the
drug office] down and stop the pretense.'
3. Drug possession is very selectively enforced with blacks, Hispanics, and generally democrats prosecuted far more than WASP republicans even though both groups use the drugs at the same rate.
Thank Clinton on that...
You progressive Liberals.... should pick up where Monica left off ...
Rimming Clintons ass clean every morning...
"Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) said, 'I've been in Congress for
over two decades, and I have never, never, never seen a president
who cares less about this issue.'
Financial centers like SF tend to keep their value. It could crash but only if the financial sector crashes. That could happen, but who has a crystal ball over 30 years?
To call your statement "naive"... would be an understatement...
A Closer Look at 'Bubble Areas' (2Q2002)
www.fhfa.gov/webfiles/1065/Focus2Q02.pdf‎
Real housing prices in San Francisco and San Jose
In the past (especially the late 1980s and early 1990s) we witnessed bubble phenomena in certain areas along the coasts where supply tends to be slow to respond to changes in demand.
This quarter, we take a closer look at some of the metropolitan areas that have exhibited bubbles in the past and examine their current status. A few of the most well recognized bubble areas (historically) are San Jose, San Francisco, Boston, and Honolulu.
Silicon Valley:
Real housing prices in San Francisco and San Jose (Figures 1 and 2) exhibited bubble behavior in the late 1980s and early 1990s1. Housing values rose by around 80 percent in both areas between the start of 1984 (late 1983) and the fourth quarter of 1989. Housing values in San Francisco then proceeded to drop by 37 percent over the next six years. In San Jose, housing values bottomed out in early 1995, also declining by 37 percent....By the fourth quarter of 1990, one year after the 1989 peak, housing in San Francisco and San Jose had already lost around 10 percent (give or take a few percentage points) of its value.
Honolulu:
Honolulu is the only major metropolitan area with significant house price declines in the late 1990s, so it is an interesting case to examine (see Figure 3). Between the second quarter of 1991 and the first quarter of 2001, real housing values in Honolulu dropped by about 30 percent.
Boston:
Boston experienced the largest cycle of the 1980s, with 110 percent real house price growth between third quarter 1982 and second quarter 1988 (see Figure 4). Subsequent declines were about 28 percent over the next 7 years.
http://www.flowofhistory.org/themes/movement_settlement/uspolicytimeline.php
This is more fact supporting my argument that there was very little nonwhite immigration into the US before the 1960's.
The USA was not built on diversity. No country has excelled with or survived a racially diverse population.
that would be the Immigration act of 1965 Ted Kennedy pet project, which in turn
he was not to happy with after 10 years...
DECEMBER 11, 2008
NPR asks Ted Kennedy why he was so wrong in 1965 about immigration, Kennedy is evasive
In 1965, during the Senate floor debate over the Immigration Act, Ted Kennedy stated that:
"First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually...Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset."
These statements have turned out to be totally false, and it should have become apparent to Kennedy that this was the case way back in the mid to late 1970's. It would have been honorable of him to have come to the Senate floor and stated something like: "We goofed big time on this bill, terribly sorry, and here's a new bill to cut back on our immigration levels, and I urge its passage."
Now you're just proving your stupidity and the fact that you're full of shit.
Asians? Mexicans? Africans?
all thanks to the ... Ted Kennedy back in 1965 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965#Long-term_results
He is very much correct... SoftShell says
t's called 'global warming'
In 10 generations there will be no white people.
Just mahogony blacks and washington redskins.
actually at the rate of Chinese population growth... there wont be any Whites, Blacks, Africans, and non-Chinese Asians left around... and frankly no one
left will even know who the Washington Redskins were all about....
Ya, po whiiiiiite trash, but with a scholarship to LSU. And a master's and bachelor's degree. If that ain't white priveledge, then what is?
Robertson received a bachelor's degree in physical education and a master's in education.[15
yes... college scholarships being used to better poor Americans ... now we are importing the poor and giving them an education at US tax payer expenses... as for the poor white or black American... no one is thinking about them.
Racism- no matter what political allegiances one might have- is NOT acceptable. I grew up in the South, and while racism exists everywhere, to suggest that things were all peachy-keen back then in the South- or frankly anywhere else in the country- is a bunch of bullshit. I am in my 30's but even as a teenager I heard some utter trash coming out of people's mouths in regards to other races.
You paint a wide brush stroke regarding the south.. Robertson was speaking about his own small town in Louisiana... not the South overall or Mobile Alabama or Little Rock Arkansas .... perhaps even in his small town of poor farmers.. in his his town blacks were not mistreated but respected as godly.
and no this is not what the Liberal media wants people to see... to even think there were blacks and whites who worked together free of racism in the South back in the 50-60s was liberal blasphemy..
Frankly I can relate to how the Liberal media twists facts here.. I find many people coming to California, little dinky East Coast educated 30 year olds who have delusions that Hispanics were mistreated in by them Big Bad White Folks for decades... Yet they cant get past all the native Californian (Hispanics) who have done extremely well for over over a century. They completely miss the point here... they been brain washed by the east coast liberal nonsense.
3. Drug possession is very selectively enforced with blacks, Hispanics, and generally democrats prosecuted far more than WASP republicans even though both groups use the drugs at the same rate.
An often repeated lie of the left is that simple drug possession will get you a long prison sentence. This is not the case, even though there are long prison sentences with the only conviction or guilty plea being drug possession or intent to distribute.
When a drug dealer is arrested, there are multiple charges. These charges are usually parole violation, assault and battery, robbery, breaking and entering, possession of a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance with
the intent to distribute, felon in possession of a firearm, firearm used in commission of a felony, felonious assault(pointing the weapon), attempted murder(using the weapon) and the list goes on and on.
The drug dealer is then offered a plea deal: Plead guilty to only the drug charges, receive a stiff sentence and all the other charges will be dropped OR go to trial for all of it and once convicted they're pretty much done for life. They always take the plea deal because the evidence is usually overwhelming and they know they were caught red handed.
This means that all the violent charges are simply dropped and forgotten about. Murder is the only charge that can't be brushed under the rug, although many rightful murders are officially classified as manslaughter pleas. The anti white US DOJ then gets to claim that violence is going down because there are no firearm or violent crime convictions even though the violent acts did occur.
Blacks are caught more often for dealing drugs because they do not hide their illegal activities as well as other races. Blacks more often drive in possession of large quantities of drugs in cars with improper equipment, on suspended licenses, expired tags and countless moving violations. Blacks are more flagrant in selling their product while loitering and often under the influence. White, Latino and Asian drug dealers simply do these flagrant acts less.
« First « Previous Comments 41,076 - 41,115 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,233,801 comments by 14,747 users - Misc online now