0
0

Thread for orphaned comments


 invite response                
2005 Apr 11, 5:00pm   197,015 views  117,730 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (61)   💰tip   ignore  

Thread for comments whose parent thread has been deleted

« First        Comments 44,364 - 44,403 of 117,730       Last »     Search these comments

44364   Vicente   2014 Mar 21, 7:24am  

CL says

Kind of like Reagan was a simpleton mastermind.

Ah but Reagan WAS a mastermind.

http://screen.yahoo.com/president-reagan-mastermind-000000075.html

He just acted the simpleton.

RIP Phil Hartman

44365   FortWayne   2014 Mar 21, 8:42am  

Straw Man says

Iosef V HydroCabron says

The toppling of the pro-Russian regime was a consequence of CIA and other U.S. government backing for the opposition and the protesters.

What a steaming pile of crap.

Someone had to finance that operation, it was not a cheap job. Don't know if it was us or someone else, but we do have a history of doing that with other countries.

We did the same thing in Egypt recently after elections didn't go the way we wanted them to.

44366   FortWayne   2014 Mar 21, 8:44am  

Vicente says

Ah but Reagan WAS a mastermind.

Yes he was, and he was damn good at it too!

44367   dublin hillz   2014 Mar 21, 9:01am  

Yeah if a doctor has membership at 40 wineries and lives "check to check" then they are poor by choice.

44368   Heraclitusstudent   2014 Mar 21, 9:15am  

sbh says

What is "recent" is scalable, and recency bias or normalcy bias is easily used by those who oppose trend.

The recency bias from the past 1200 yrs is that we are 'recovering' from the fall of the Roman Empire.

When SHTF, and cannibal barbarians arrive, this will be revealed as one big illusion.

44369   ttsmyf   2014 Mar 21, 9:23am  

WOW! The UNtrustworthy are certainly in control of what information is apparent to the people!

Say hey! This was in the Wall Street Journal on March 30, 1999. Note "... how much it will buy."

Holy cow/interesting/compelling ...!

And where is it up to date??? Right here ... see the first chart shown in this thread.
Recent Dow day is Friday, March 21, 2014 __ Level is 103.8

WOW! It is hideous that this is hidden! Is there any such "Homes, Inflation Adjusted"? Yes! This was in the New York Times on August 27, 2006:

And up to date (by me) is here:
http://patrick.net/?p=1219038&c=999083#comment-999083

WOW! The UNtrustworthy are certainly in control of what information is apparent to the people!

And http://patrick.net/?p=1230886

44370   HydroCabron   2014 Mar 21, 10:00am  

I'm not sure whether or not this is an outrage, as I don't know whether the kid was black.

I'm not racist.

44371   HydroCabron   2014 Mar 21, 10:02am  

Why waste taxpayer cash on this?

If Malaysian Airlines continues to crash planes, people will stop buying tickets.

Let the free market take care of it.

44372   humanity   2014 Mar 21, 10:22am  

Well, I guess this is pretty close to the last we will be hearing from the troll who calls himself "jojo."

That guy is going to be using a different identity soon.

44373   Heraclitusstudent   2014 Mar 21, 10:50am  

Call it Crazy says

Two-thirds of those who live paycheck to paycheck aren't poor

If you don't have 6-12 months of living expenses in front of you: you're poor.

44374   Facebooksux   2014 Mar 21, 10:51am  

jojo says

Ok. I will look for an escrow service.

Patrick should be trustworthy.

44375   Tenpoundbass   2014 Mar 21, 11:00am  

Carter wasn't a baaaaad President, he just didn't know how to be a good President. His brother was an embarrassment, and by time the failed Iran hostage rescue, the Elitist Democrats distanced them as far as they could from Carter. In contrast to Obama ever fuck up is obscured in unaccountable secrecy shrouded in unsubpenable misinformation.
Had Carter had the spin team Obama has, or even Regan for that matter, history would blamed Nixon and Ford.

44376   Tenpoundbass   2014 Mar 21, 11:05am  

Call it Crazy says

The study, released at a Brookings Institution event, found that these so-called wealthy-hand-to-mouth are older than their poor paycheck-to-paycheck counterparts, have higher incomes (about $50,000) and hold substantial illiquid assets (also around $50,000 on average), like real estate. The poor who live paycheck to paycheck have median incomes around $20,000.

Hey they've got more LET'S GITTEM!!!!
YEAH!!!

44377   hrhjuliet   2014 Mar 21, 11:12am  

This is fun. :-)

44378   Strategist   2014 Mar 21, 11:21am  

Call it Crazy says

The study, released at a Brookings Institution event, found that these so-called wealthy-hand-to-mouth are older than their poor paycheck-to-paycheck counterparts, have higher incomes (about $50,000) and hold substantial illiquid assets (also around $50,000 on average), like real estate. The poor who live paycheck to paycheck have median incomes around $20,000.

Making $50,000 is not wealthy. It's below average.
Affluent is described as having $1 million to invest.

44379   hrhjuliet   2014 Mar 21, 11:22am  

I would still like to see a comparison between Carter's record and the Presidents after him. I doubt I will.

And really? Making fun of his work for Habitat for Humanity? The other presidents retire in elitist splendor, and Carter lives a modest life, while he and his family donate their money and time to extremely wonderful charity groups, and that's a reason to make fun of him?

I'm still waiting.

44380   Tenpoundbass   2014 Mar 21, 11:39am  

In the 80's you could have retired with just 100K in the bank.
And lived off the interest.

A million today wouldn't last very long in the bank.

44382   hrhjuliet   2014 Mar 21, 11:51am  

I don't have anything to measure, so I get to just sit back and enjoy the show. Maybe I should host a digital game party? Popcorn for Patrick, taco salad for corntrollio, CIC some Wild Turkey, wine for Logan, home brew for Dan, and face for Mr. Shostakovich.

Everyone is invited, but the Baron, unless he promises to behave. Turtledove can bring her brownies, and I will make some crazy farm to table Alice Waters recipe and leave it out where Mr. Shostakovich can find it, but not in a place where he has to admit that is his real food of choice; face free.

There is my virtual game party. Feel free to bring anything you like. ;-)

44383   casandra   2014 Mar 21, 12:21pm  

If one has to work for a living then they are considered poor! Rich don't work, they sit on one side of a table and make deals over lunch. Only the poor work for others, even if your a doctor. If you had the money why would you work. Even those with higher incomes are slaves to the lifestyle they have gotten trapped in. That's my take, but I am sure there are some examples. And don't bring up Hollywood, they are slaves to the media and must to what and support what they want or else they get hit...hard!

44384   John Bailo   2014 Mar 21, 12:32pm  

Heraclitusstudent says

If you don't have 6-12 months of living expenses in front of you: you're poor.

The rule I've heard is more like 2 years. That's probably right given the hiring environment.

44385   John Bailo   2014 Mar 21, 12:35pm  

CaptainShuddup says

A million today wouldn't last very long in the bank.

Yes absolutely. For example, I hit rock bottom around 2004, and by very frugal living managed to dig myself out of debt and into plus savings. Almost zero extravagances, living like an immigrant/outsourcing worker.

But what is the result of that decade long savings? Today if I pulled together each and every cent I own, I could maybe swing half of a really good house, but then I would also have zero savings from that point on and would still have a mortgage.

And I have what many might term a well paying job and I have worked many extra hours. Also, I feel like I can't make a single wrong move, or I'll end up right back where I started from, like almost everything is a trap or a swindle designed to relieve me of my cash.

44386   Tenpoundbass   2014 Mar 21, 12:52pm  

casandra says

Rich don't work, they sit on one side of a table and make deals over lunch.

I know plenty of people who aren't rich, but make money by sitting at a table all day and making deals.

44387   Strategist   2014 Mar 21, 12:56pm  

Call it Crazy says

Strategist says

Making $50,000 is not wealthy. It's below average.

Go look up median income in the US...

Strategist says

Affluent is described as having $1 million to invest.

I don't recall reading about the affluent in the article above living hand to mouth....

Different article.
http://money.cnn.com/2013/07/24/investing/wealthy-investors/

44389   Y   2014 Mar 21, 12:59pm  

Not in the bank.
But you could buy four 250k shacks and live off the rental income..
CaptainShuddup says

In the 80's you could have retired with just 100K in the bank.

And lived off the interest.

A million today wouldn't last very long in the bank.

44390   Strategist   2014 Mar 21, 1:01pm  

Call it Crazy says

Strategist says

Different article.

http://money.cnn.com/2013/07/24/investing/wealthy-investors/

Don't hyjack my thread with a different topic, start your own!!!

I promise I wont.
$50,000 in annual income is no where close to wealthy. That's my point.

44391   Ceffer   2014 Mar 21, 1:12pm  

Obviously, the tobacco industry is really going to try to keep vaping from catching on. Hard for me to imagine that vaping isn't way safer than conventional cigarettes for getting a nicotine fix.

However, the tobacco lobby and their dial-a-whore doctors are already alleging it is worse.

The touchy legal question: is it Constitutionally protected to attach tubing with an inhaler to one's ass with a battery powered spark plug, and is it addictive?

44392   Bubbabeefcake   2014 Mar 21, 1:16pm  

If my books were in red I'd be scrutinizing this volatile market at this most dire and crucial time ...you'd think!

44393   Strategist   2014 Mar 21, 1:52pm  

Call it Crazy says

Strategist says

I promise I wont.

$50,000 in annual income is no where close to wealthy. That's my point.

Not to a high roller like you, but..

If you make $20K a year, you think $50K IS wealthy...

Call it Crazy says

The poor who live paycheck to paycheck have median incomes around $20,000.

Most people who make $50,000 will not be able to afford an entry level home in most states, especially California.
That is not being wealthy. The definition of wealthy in this article is screwed up.

44394   hrhjuliet   2014 Mar 21, 2:06pm  

sbh says

hrhjuliet says

I don't have anything to measure, so I get to just sit back and enjoy the show. Maybe I should host a digital game party? Popcorn for Patrick, taco salad for corntrollio, CIC some Wild Turkey, wine for Logan, home brew for Dan, and face for Mr. Shostakovich.

If you can't get me a premier cru Pauillac I will settle for a slightly peaty single malt. Caol Ila 18 year is a good value.

Good choice sir. I will provide duck and dog hats. I'm neutral, so I'll just wear my tiara.

44395   hrhjuliet   2014 Mar 21, 2:24pm  

No, no CIC, I always wear my tutu with my tiara. ;-)

44396   Heraclitusstudent   2014 Mar 21, 2:38pm  

sbh says

Digital dick measuring between a duck and a dachshund.

I almost lost my job today by googling 'duck penis' and clicking on the first youtube link.

Apparently, playing that game with a duck is stupid.

44397   Vicente   2014 Mar 21, 2:39pm  

Boeinghazi!

44398   hrhjuliet   2014 Mar 21, 3:21pm  

sbh says

hrhjuliet says

I always wear my tutu with my tiara. ;-)

Soooooo hrh= her royal highness?

But of course. :-)

44399   bg   2014 Mar 21, 4:43pm  

jojo says

You've been here a lot longer than me. So it's understandable that you know Patrick and trust him more than I do.

He is a trustworthy guy.

44400   hanera   2014 Mar 21, 8:44pm  

smaulgld says

Its more lack of demand than lack of inventory.

True in most parts of the countries except where cities with tech dominated economy i.e. SFBA, Seattle, Portland, Austin, Boston, etc.

44401   epitaph   2014 Mar 21, 9:17pm  

John Bailo says

I feel like I can't make a single wrong move, or I'll end up right back where I started from, like almost everything is a trap or a swindle designed to relieve me of my cash

Be liquid. This cannot be stressed enough. I know some people get rich leveraging themselves in the right way at the right time, but for most people it doesn't work like that. Most of them go broke.

44402   theoakman   2014 Mar 21, 11:07pm  

John Bailo says

Unless you have a lot of self-control, it's easy to let the spending go way, way up. I know because I used to be there and it took some personal Shock Doctrine to ratchet down my needs.

However, it's oh so easy to get sucked down the drain. Case in point, my son visiting from college. I usually take him shopping for clothes when he periodically visits. However, while I myself shop at Wal*Mart, he wants stuff from the department stores. Last time, he gathered up a few multicolored shirts (not far from t-shirts) at Macy's and with a few other things, cologne, it ended up being $600. That's an extrodinary sum for me. I just bought my years wardrobe of t-shirts and sweatpants for under $100.

$600 at Macy's? lol. Take him to Kohls. You get the same crap for $100.

44403   Tenpoundbass   2014 Mar 21, 11:49pm  

I never figured out how people are willing(me included) to sit in a vapor cloud of their own flatulence, unphased. But will break priceless things to get out of nose shot, of someone else flatulence. They can even be the exact same smell.

« First        Comments 44,364 - 44,403 of 117,730       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste