by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 44,706 - 44,745 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
So far, what H.S. has shown us, is that he's exceptional at whining and passing blame.... Is there a job for that???
... Says the guy who started a whining thread blaming Millennials.
Yours apparently!
You don't have to take all the blame.
Just take your share of it.
Which I have yet to see one boomer do.
Huh? I'm no more or less guilty than my father was to me. Here is your world, warts and all, do your best, that is all I ask. Quit whining (which was another lesson hammered home), it is what it is, what can you do with it? Life isn't a bowl of cherries, it's mostly the pits, figure it out. You want to live in CA? Well, maybe you can't afford it. You have a choice, figure out a place that you can live on your salary or whine about the fact that your life in CA sucks. I'm no more or less guilty than you. Because I took up the challenge, got slapped back (several times) by life and got back up again - I've got nothing to apologize for. I don't owe you a thing. You don't owe me a thing. I brought my kids up but once they were grown ... I didn't own them a thing. I couldn't afford college for my kids, they both (both girls) went into the Army. They now have the GI bill and Veterans loan (when they decide to buy a house). Oh, I'm sure you have a ton of reasons why you would NEVER join the military, and that's fine - but yeah, I have no blame to take and it sounds like you'd do well to look at ALL options and follow another path.
@call it crazy, I'm in agreement but the millenials also have had a disadvantage because their professors are much more clueless than boomer's instructors.
I feel slightly sorry but not very sorry for the millenials. They better fuckin wise up.
If you are at UCSC and your instructor is Angela Davis, you may need to consider getting another major and dropping that class. If you don't know who Angela Davis is, then you are not a boomer. We also know who Bill Ayers is.
I don't know many millenials but the ones I know have been straight up pussified beyond recognition, it's amazing. I don't blame them but rather the crap they were inculcated with in schools.
Shit, there are people out there telling you to feel guilty for driving a truck for fuck's sake, how is a kid supposed to survive this abuse to grow a set of balls?
Hey... I wasn't at SF summer of love. I can't say for sure, but I'm pretty sure a lot of these hippies just stank.
First, unless you were there (and I'm not quite that old) then you really can't talk. Second, I said mmmarvel says
and certainly those who got hired didn't stink,
Read everything, quite cherry picking.
Shit, there are people out there telling you to feel guilty for driving a truck for fuck's sake
And yet there are truck drivers working in North Dakota that are making six figures.
Isn't Jojo a Millennial? or is he the next older category? It would seem that he would be all over this.
I agree with Mr. Shostakovich:
"MLS should be open sourced.
Maybe $2 a year to join and look at stuff.
NAR should be disbanded as a terrorist organization."
Maybe $2 a year to join and look at stuff.
Why should it costs $2 a year to look at ads? If I have to put up with all the damn ads constantly thrown at me from T.V., radio, billboards, bulletin boards, junk mail, junk email, web pages, tablet apps, bumper stickers, teenagers throwing signs in the air on street corners, at the movie theater after I paid $10 to $15 for a ticket, at concerts, and everywhere else, then the damn ads I actually want to see had better be free.
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
So far 100% agree wholeheartedly with the factual assertion that Listing with a REALTOR is Exactly Like Hiring Jeffrey Dahmer to Babysit Your Kids.
Who among us is shocked?
Dahmer got his start in realty.
Everyone knows that!
There are exceptions everywhere, hope you're an exception and make it big.
So far, what H.S. has shown us, is that he's exceptional at whining and passing blame.... Is there a job for that???
Politics.
No worries Jazz, most people would like to live in denial and only read comforting articles by people who failed junior high science about how it's all just natural normal warming. Did you know that every inconceivable horror in human history also never happened? Isn't that easier to deal with? The holocaust, serial murders, krakatoa, extinctions - you name it! If it's too horrible it can be invalidated to set your nerves to rest. A guy who works at Fox said so! Now everyone just calm down and be as irresponsible as you need to get through your day. Validate all bad behavior! The new bad is good! Don't bother educating them Jazz; ignorance is bliss.
Koch Industry/Georgia-Pacific Products:
Angel Soft toilet paper
Brawny paper towels
Dixie plates, bowls, napkins and cups
Mardi Gras napkins and towels
Quilted Northern toilet paper
Soft ‘n Gentle toilet paper
Sparkle napkins
Vanity fair napkins
Zee napkins
I'd like to see the them outlaw bulk paper goods, like they have in most countries. You get the equivalent of half a Kleenex with your meal. We American's are the only Pigs that seem to ask for gobs and gobs more of napkins, until the table looks like a wing sauce stained snow scene diorama.
More than half the people wrap their hand with enough toilet paper to pull a Sunday roast out of 375 degree oven with out getting burned.
Again, other countries when the house runs out of toilet paper they return with a single, single ply roll. We come carting in a cube as big as a refrigerator, of multi ply, quilted extra strength, scented "does a bear shit in the woods?" stuff.
But I guess like everything else, it's easier to bitch about it, a find new ways to tax everyone for it. Rather than just outlawing massive waste of paper.
Now restaurants have these napkins that are essentially made out out of the same material as a baby wipe towelette, yes the same stuff those "Green Bags" are made out of, the same stuff those plain old regular grocery plastic bags that were supposed to be bad for the landfills. Now they've extruded it into fine micro fibers, then spin them into sheets of paper like plastic fabric.
Now we've got Wing Joints tossing about 20 of those sheets on the table along with 20 wings, 2 orders of fries, and Pitcher of Amber Bock. Where the melinials sit and ponder about those evil bastards the Koch brothers... "Miss more napkins please!"
Well wait a minute... (counting fingers and toes) if we're paying more, and the doctors and hospitals are getting less... (and carry the zillion)
Then were is the money going! HUH! Where's the Money Barry!!!
Where's my fucking money!? What Act, you said it would be affordable, you thieving fuck, where's the money?!? We'll then call Nancy, get her ass over here, tell her to bring that fascist prick Reid.
Where's the money!?!?
Damn the Big Labowski movie would be so much Cooler if Obama played the Dude.
It's humorous how the oil companies are raping us financially selling us our own damn oil.
ha ha ha!
I don't have kids, and if you're reading this in 2100AD and things do indeed suck thanks to AGW, well, sorry I didn't fight for you hard enough.
Too many fucking idiots here, I can tell you that.
Actually the problem of backing up over toddlers happens almost exclusively to SUV drivers, but the requirement will apply to all vehicles. SUVs became the most popular category of new vehicle in 1998, after they were exempted from federal efficiency standards, and accelerated during the W/Cheney years, when SUVs over 3 tons got a tax incentive. (If you don't buy a gas-guzzling three ton SUV and drive up the price of oil, the terrorists have won. Somehow. Because the oil money goes to the terrorists, and they need more money so there can be more, wait, how does that work again?) In addition to wasting fuel and driving up emissions and the price of oil, SUVs also killed a lot of people, including toddlers.
I don't have kids, and if you're reading this in 2100AD and things do indeed suck thanks to AGW, well, sorry I didn't fight for you hard enough.
Too many fucking idiots here, I can tell you that.
Sad but true. I try to fight for the future too, but it's like Bill said.
Why wait for 2018? Why not now? How can an omniscient and omnipotent Government-God tolerate 4 more years of cars backing up and running over toddlers? Is it less than omniscient/omnipotent or is it evil?
IMHO, by 2018, the debate of the day will be whether the Government-God should outlaw human drivers as the leading cause of fatal accidents, as self-driving cars will prove to be much safer than human-driven cars by then. 35,000 deaths per year due to human driven cars is approximately 34,940 more deaths than the 60 or so toddlers run over by backing up cars every year.
BTW, $1Billion for 60 lives saved (assuming the often distracted driver doesn't run over the kids anyway despite the camera, just as all the windows have not stopped millions of car accidents), that's close to $20 million each; you may wish the government death panel will authorize even 1/10, heck even 1/100, as much for you.
Well, look on the bright side, people can use the cameras to zero in on the targets.
Perhaps they should be equipped with gunnery sights.
Cameras should be installed on all cars to record conversations and searches by police at their unwarranted license check points.
Brakes and seatbelts alone cost consumers $44 billion per year, in terms of added price to the car, ongoing maintenance, and added fuel costs due to extra weight.
A government strong enough to require brakes and seatbelts is also strong enough to ban them.
I never use my brakes anyway.
Whining aside, has anyone else noticed how much easier parallel parking is with a backup camera?
It increases the number of spots you can easily slide into by around 30-40%: spots which used to look hopeless are a breeze.
You can back to within 2.2 inches of the bumper behind you - no contact, that's the whole game.
Backup cameras have revolutionized parallel parking in the same way Benghazi revolutionized our whole concept of outrage.
It won't make your Dodge Ram park like a '74 Honda CVCC, but you will now see creative possibilities in parking that you never believed possible.
Life-changing!
SUVs became the most popular category of new vehicle in 1998, after they were exempted from federal efficiency standards
They were even pretty popular before that because they were exempted from certain safety standards, as they were considered trucks.
Big and cheap: Americans just couldn't say no.
I was convinced by 1994 that the SUV fad was on the way out.
I was definitively, absolutely, resoundingly, galactically wrong.
Good Lord - it's 1800 square feet and has 5 bedrooms and 2 baths. Some place they are scrimping for space; and it was built in 1956. In Texas it sells for under $150K and it's barely worth that.
Plus, it makes it a dream backing up and hooking up my boat, I can see the hitch all of the way in...
The rear camera seriously saves me 5-15 seconds each time I leave a parking space.
I never imagined what a joy it would be to know exactly where my rear bumper is, and who is near it.
I want one on the front. Then I'd be a warrior, a king, a god!
Plus, it makes it a dream backing up and hooking up my boat, I can see the hitch all of the way in...
The rear camera seriously saves me 5-15 seconds each time I leave a parking space.
I never imagined what a joy it would be to know exactly where my rear bumper is, and who is near it.
I want one on the front. Then I'd be a warrior, a king, a god!
Just because you having the driving skills of an aged chinese woman with new jersey plates, don't go projecting that on to the rest of us.
I wish there was a way to disable the back up cam, its just yet another distraction in my line of sight when backing up. It makes those goofy noises too, like I didn't know there's a car behind me
"Roi would rather pay the penalty, which is $95 the first year or one percent of a person’s taxable income, whichever is greater. In his case, it comes out to $350 for 2014."
Roi sure know show to under report his income if $350 is 1% of his annual income. Either way being forced into insurance sold by private sector is a raw deal for a lot of folks. This is a bad idea.
Right sells us to military, left sells us to health insurance. What is wrong with our nation!
Isn't the program designed to be dependent and supported by the majority of working people enrolling? Who will make up these lost enrollments?
Surely this program is a disaster.
It will collapse of its own weight. What a travesty of socialism and blind bureaucratic stupidity.
Surely this program is a disaster.
It will collapse of its own weight. What a travesty of socialism and blind bureaucratic stupidity.
Somehow the government gets a pass when they screw something up. The idea was fine, in the private industry a great idea has to be followed up by execution. They go hand in hand..........
Maybe $2 a year to join and look at stuff.
Why should it costs $2 a year to look at ads? If I have to put up with all the damn ads constantly thrown at me from T.V., radio, billboards, bulletin boards, junk mail, junk email, web pages, tablet apps, bumper stickers, teenagers throwing signs in the air on street corners, at the movie theater after I paid $10 to $15 for a ticket, at concerts, and everywhere else, then the damn ads I actually want to see had better be free.
Good point. It could easily be free and paid for by advertising.
Good Lord - it's 1800 square feet and has 5 bedrooms and 2 baths. Some place they are scrimping for space; and it was built in 1956. In Texas it sells for under $150K and it's barely worth that.
Built in 1956... a nice old gem...
Plus, where's the pool??? Paying around 1M and no pool in CA???
That house would be at best $250K around here in NJ...
Pools are a wash price wise here in CA. The electricity and water bills'll kill ya!
A fool and his money are soon parted (if you live in CA that is!!)
Ha ha ha
The last "fool" purchased it for $925,000 7 months ago.
Easy $200,000+ profit.
Wish I was that fool - don't you?
It feels like we are all too busy trying to keep up with the bills to address non-immediate concerns no matter how important the impact.
Let us pretend sociopaths are in power for a moment. With that in mind, is it possible that the average citizen is too busy to do what they know is right on purpose?
This is a good one.
It's pretty dangerous for toddlers and children out there. Cars are very large these days, trucks, vans, suv's... you name it. But there is no way a driver can see a child in their rear view without a camera.
We have kids get hit all the time when someone is backing up right into them. I've never seen a fatality, it's always just hurt feelings and a few bruises. But I'm sure worse happens.
Is this article suggesting price would stabilize? IMHO, is a good thing. The "ceiling" cited by the article is more like "floor" since if prices fall below, Blackstone Group would buy.
Well wait a minute... (counting fingers and toes) if we're paying more, and
the doctors and hospitals are getting less... (and carry the zillion)
Then were is the money going! HUH! Where's the Money Barry!!!
This is an excellent point.
One must assume either:
1. The money is stolen by Obama (in the form of commissions of buying through the exchange)
OR:
2. Premiums have not increased for 75%.
OR:
3. Doctors and hospitals are not getting less.
Lets assume that 1. is not true. There will be audits, and any swipe by the government will be known. If even the possibility of this existed, Fox news would have been all over it years ago.
That means hospitals and health insurance companies are lying about either 2. or 3. The law mandated that 80/85 percent of premiums must go to care. That leaves 15/20% for overhead and profit. If overhead/proft exceed 15/20%, the balance must be returned to the premium payer.
If a hosital collects x now for care provided - and due to this law they now get y=.95x as he says - and the insurance company cannot keep this as profit as required by law, then premiums will fall too. Premiums can be no more than 1.25y. If x falls 5%, premiums fall to 1.1875x, by math.
Therefore, 2. and 3. cannot both be true. Shocking that a hospital CEO is lying about revenue for services or health insurance premiums.
Yes cameras in the back, can't see out the 13 inch by 28 inch back window, and the windshield posts are so thick from the side curtain airbags, that they obscure about 25 yards, of T-Bone intersection traffic, but HEY!! the cars have side curtain airbags, adding about 4 grand to the cost of the vehicle, and because of the MPG requirements cars bodies are constructed of plastic and syrofoan, the trunk lining is no thicker than the plastic security wrap, that retail items are encased in. And sitting right under that, is a Gas tank.
BUT HEY!!!!
More distracting screens in the car to take your eyes off the road, when you're backing out of the drive way so you can be broadsided in your plastic polyurethane tomb.
« First « Previous Comments 44,706 - 44,745 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,250,312 comments by 14,912 users - gabbar, stereotomy online now