Comments 1 - 11 of 11        Search these comments

1   Dan8267   2014 Apr 21, 10:33am  

That is so fucking cool. And it looks like a giant vacuum cleaner. It's only a question of time before some guy comes into the ER after accidentally falling penis first into this machine.

2   Tenpoundbass   2014 Apr 21, 10:56am  

Well I don't like it! It's Frack-reteing.

It'll make my water orange, and the toilet singe my backside when I do a courtesy flush.

3   Strategist   2014 Apr 21, 11:09am  

Brilliant!
Innovation at its best.

4   New Renter   2014 Apr 21, 7:19pm  

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says

What's wrong with using tactical nukes?

Stupid EPA, that's what!

5   bob2356   2014 Apr 21, 9:51pm  

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says

What's wrong with using tactical nukes?

What's wrong with strategic nukes? GO BIG!

7   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2014 Apr 21, 11:51pm  

Considering that concrete undergoes an exothermic chemical reaction when it cures, it is hard to imagine that the cement that comes out of this hypothetical separator will be ready for mixing up the next batch. It's a neat idea thought if it is at all practical, even if the cement portion has to be hauled away.

8   bob2356   2014 Apr 22, 12:58am  

Why do thet say concrete has a life of 40-60 years? The stuff can last forever with some minimal care. There's plenty of Roman concrete structures still around. Do they think all the big dams need to be replaced every 50 years. Most demolition has nothing to do with the concrete problems.

9   New Renter   2014 Apr 22, 1:48am  

bob2356 says

Why do thet say concrete has a life of 40-60 years? The stuff can last forever with some minimal care. There's plenty of Roman concrete structures still around. Do they think all the big dams need to be replaced every 50 years. Most demolition has nothing to do with the concrete problems.

Perhaps the author meant to say structures built of concrete tend to be replaced every 40-60 years. That would make more sense as you are correct, even ancient Roman concrete is tough stuff.

Concrete in other applications however may not last as long. In a roadway 40 years is about right:

http://www.brighthubengineering.com/concrete-technology/45858-concrete-roads-vs-asphalt-roads/

10   curious2   2014 Apr 22, 3:37am  

New Renter says

structures built of concrete tend to be replaced every 40-60 years.

That's what I understood it to mean. Also, the Roman technique of mixing ash into the concrete was lost until the 1980s, and there are many types of concrete now, so useful lifespans vary depending on (a) design/location/obsolescence, (b) era of installation, and (c) quality. Prototype 3D house printers use a proprietary concrete that includes plastic, and if the technology takes off there will probably be many options. The structure below didn't even last 40 years, though I don't blame that on the concrete per se:

11   Tenpoundbass   2014 Apr 22, 12:31pm  

bob2356 says

Why do thet say concrete has a life of 40-60 years? The stuff can last forever with some minimal care. There's plenty of Roman concrete structures still around. Do they think all the big dams need to be replaced every 50 years. Most demolition has nothing to do with the concrete problems.

It last 60 years because every sixty years, Developers tear down structures that were built to last an eternity, to rebuild with particle board, and Chinese drywall. The concrete slabs on those homes can't make it to closing before the foundation cracks.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste