3
0

Hillarys 22 mln in Pay-to-Play Speaking Fees Disqualify Her as Pres Candidate


 invite response                
2016 Sep 7, 9:42am   1,584 views  11 comments

by freespeechforever   ➕follow (2)   💰tip   ignore  

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/02/22/hillary-clintons-pay-play-speaking-fees-disqualify-her-presidential-candidate

Black’s Law Dictionary defines “recusal” as “removal of oneself as judge or policy-maker in a particular matter, esp. because of a conflict of interest.”

In the federal judiciary—a coequal branch with the executive—judges as well as Supreme Court justices are expected to recuse themselves, and do recuse themselves, from hearing cases with conflicts of interest that are less pronounced as Mrs. Clinton’s.

For example, Wikipedia observes that “in the Supreme Court of the United States, the Justices typically recuse themselves from participating in cases in which they have financial interests.”

In the same rough sense, shouldn’t a presidential candidate recuse herself from the presidency after accepting more than a million dollars of speaking fees from the country’s most powerful investment banks, given the obvious conflicts of interest as potentially the country’s next chief policymaker? If not as a matter of current law, then out of a commitment to political ethics and respect for the office of the presidency?

According to a recent report by CNN, Hillary Clinton was paid more than $21 million for making speeches to private concerns from April 2013 to March 2015, and thus a mere one month prior to her formal announcement as a candidate for president in April 2015.

Of the $21 million, she was paid $1.8 million by Goldman Sachs, UBS, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America/Merrill Lynch, and Deutsche Bank.

Her husband, Bill Clinton, according to CNN, was paid at least $5.9 million for at least 39 speeches to big banks, including Goldman Sachs and UBS.

This adds up to Clinton-household income of at least $7.7 million from “big banks” prior to Hillary Clinton’s 2015 announcement as a candidate for president.    

Furthermore, according to an online list of all Hillary Clinton speeches from 2013 to 2015, she was also paid $225,000 and upwards per speech by Fidelity Investments, Verizon Communications, Sanford C. Bernstein, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, CME Group, Boston Consulting Group, SAP Global Marketing, Accenture, General Electric, Xerox Corporation, Cisco, Qualcomm, Drug Chemical and Associated Technologies, California Medical Association, Healthcare Information and Management Association, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, National Association of Chain Drug Stores, and many others.

It is difficult to imagine no breach of ethics when a high-profile, presumptive candidate for president is paid more than $21 million in less than two years for almost no work from corporate, healthcare, investment banks and other concerns, only to announce one month after the speaking tour has ended that she is indeed running for president. 

It is very likely, given the tight chronology, that she was planning to run for president while taking the money for the speeches, contrary to her denial on that count to Anderson Cooper during a recent town  hall event.

Clinton has claimed no conflicts of interest in accepting speaking fees, for example, from Wall Street investment banks. However, on February 8, CNN reported that “Hillary Clinton won’t rule out appointing a Wall Street veteran to the top economic post in the White House.” CNN also noted that “when Clinton was pressed [on NBC’s Meet the Press] on whether she would appoint someone from Wall Street to be her Treasury Secretary, she refused to say no.”

Doesn’t this at least look like a pay-to-play arrangement orchestrated by a leading candidate for the presidency? With more of the same likely to follow if she’s elected?

Hillary Clinton took the money from all of the above. No law against it, currently. But she shouldn’t now be a candidate for president as a result.

_____

Here is the Bill and Hillary Clinton Speaking Fees Chart as Published in Full by CNN on February 5.

Total Bill and Hillary Clinton Speech Income:
February 2001 thru May 2015
Total: $153,669,691
Average: $210,795
Speeches: 729

Total Bill Clinton Speech Income, February 2001 thru May 2015:
Total: $132,021,691
Average: $207,255
Speeches: 637

Total Hillary Clinton Speech Income, April 2013 thru March 2015:
Total: $21,648,000
Average: $235,304
Speeches: 92

Bill and Hillary Speech Income from “Big Banks”: At Least $7.7 Million for at Least 39 Speeches

Hillary Speech Income from “Big Banks”: At Least $1.8 Million for at Least 8 Speeches

[WJC = William Jefferson Clinton; HRC = Hillary Rodham Clinton]

Bill and Hillary Paid Speeches to Goldman Sachs
Total:               $2,225,000 (12 Speeches Total: 9 Bill, 3 Hillary)
12/3/2004            $125,000    WJC    New York, New York
4/20/2005           $125,000    WJC    Kiawah Island, South Carolina
6/6/2005              $250,000   WJC    Paris, France
6/13/2005            $150,000    WJC    Greensboro, Georgia
3/1/2007               $150,000    WJC    Miami, Florida
3/8/2007              $150,000    WJC    Phoenix, Arizona
4/11/2011              $200,000   WJC    New York, New York
10/23/2012          $200,000   WJC    Newport Beach, California
6/6/2013               $200,000   WJC    New York, New York
6/4/2013               $225,000   HRC   Palmetto Bluffs, South Carolina
10/24/2013          $225,000   HRC   New York, New York
10/29/2013          $225,000   HRC   Tucson, Arizona

Bill and Hillary Paid Speeches to UBS
Total                 $1,915,000 (10 Speeches: 9 Bill, 1 Hillary)

8/1/2011                $165,000    WJC    Dallas, Texas
10/17/2011            $150,000    WJC    Los Angeles, California
2/21/2012             $175,000    WJC    Miami, Florida
4/17/2012             $175,000     WJC    Chicago, Illinois
10/18/2012          $175,000     WJC    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
5/9/2013               $175,000     WJC    San Francisco, California
5/19/2014             $225,000    WJC    Washington, D.C,
10/14/2014           $225,000    WJC    Boston, Massachusetts
2/9/2015               $225,000    WJC    Nashville, Tennessee
7/11/2013              $225,000    HRC   New York, New York

Bill and Hillary Paid Speeches to Morgan Stanley
Total                 $350,000 (2 Speeches: 1 Bill; 1 Hillary)

2/5/2001                $125,000  WJC    New York, New York
4/18/2013              $225,000 HRC    Washington, D.C.

Bill and Hillary Paid Speeches to Bank of America/Merrill Lynch
Total                  $1,300,000 (5 Speeches: 4 Bill, 1 Hillary)

11/30/2007            $175,000  WJC    New York, New York
12/1/2011                $200,000 WJC    Orlando, Florida
11/13/2012              $200,000 WJC    Palm Beach, Florida
3/6/2014                 $500,000 WJC    London, England
11/13/2013              $225,000  HRC    Bluffton, South Carolina

Bill and Hillary Paid Speeches to Deutsche Bank
Total                      $1,255,000 (6 Speeches: 4 Bill, 2 Hillary)

5/4/2005                  $150,000  WJC    Baltimore, Maryland
8/11/2005                 $150,000  WJC    New York, New York
10/10/2012               $200,000 WJC    Scottsdale, Arizona
8/27/2014                 $270,000  WJC    Boston, Maryland
4/24/2013                  225,000    HRC    Washington, D.C.
10/7/2014                  $260,000  HRC    New York, New York

Bill Paid Speeches to Citigroup
Total                     $700,000 – (4 Speeches: all Bill, No Hillary)

3/12/2004                  $250,000  WJC    Paris, France
9/13/2006                  $150,000   WJC    New York, New York
11/15/2006                 $150,000   WJC    New York, New York
5/3/2007                     $150,000   WJC    New York, New York

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

#StarWarsIItheNJTurdgobblerStrike

Comments 1 - 11 of 11        Search these comments

1   HydroCabron   2016 Sep 7, 9:50am  

We need to get rid of these politicians beholden to the oligarchy, and elect an oligarch instead.

3   HEY YOU   2016 Sep 7, 9:56am  

freespeechforever says

Black’s Law Dictionary defines “recusal” as “removal of oneself as judge or policy-maker in a particular matter, esp. because of a conflict of interest.”

Clinton & Trump won't have to recuse themselves. All the Democratic & Republican Presidents have been bought & paid for retards.They should fit right in as intended by retarded D & R voters.
Redundancy has always been a problem for me.
FUCK D & R SIMPLEMINDED,BAND WAGON RIDING VOTERS!

4   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2016 Sep 7, 10:03am  

Trump has received millions in speaking fees too. Where does that leave us. He has also received millions in forgiven loans. He's been the recipient of so much gov largess, banker cash, realtor cash, and mob money that he would be the biggest welfare queen ever elected if he could pull a victory out of his ass.

5   freespeechforever   2016 Sep 7, 10:11am  

Hillary used her position as Secretary of State to become high-price whore of Wall Street, as did Billy Bob, along with co mingling foreign government, corporation and individual favors with State Department & Clinton Foundation/Slush Fund business.

Bernie Sanders' fans just gotta love the BURN seeing Bill Clinton paid 17.8 million as an "Honorary Chancellor" (whatever that is) over five years by Laureate University (for-profit college that saddled mostly poor students with huge loan debt).

6   HydroCabron   2016 Sep 7, 10:26am  

Only a down-to-earth middle class citizen can represent the interests of ordinary Americans.

Vote Trump!

7   HydroCabron   2016 Sep 7, 10:28am  

I only support people who do not try to make as much money as they can.

That's why I'm pulling the lever for Trump!

8   freespeechforever   2016 Sep 7, 12:39pm  

Release your PHUCKING TRANSCRIPTS OF THAT WHICH YOU TOLD WALL STREET BANKS IN EXCHANGE FOR YOUR 22 MILLION IN SPEAKING FEES, HILLARY-WHORE-OF-WALL-STREET-RODHAM-CLINTON!

Bernie Sanders, Dona,d Trump, Jill Stein and Gary Johnson all have called on you to do so...

GLOBALIST TOOL AND WHORE OF WALL STREET!!!!!

9   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Sep 7, 12:52pm  

Those companies are just giving the Clintons 6 figures per speech so they don't end up like U.S. Grant. They expect nothing in return.

10   truth will find you   2016 Sep 7, 1:18pm  

Paid speeches in the past makes you unfit?

How about running a scam university, then announcing a platform to defund the department of education?

that is literally 1 out of 1000 things that would disqualify Trump, if his followers weren't so dog shit stupid as they show on threads like these and elsewhere everyday!

11   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2016 Sep 7, 1:33pm  

Trump's pay to play scandal is picking up shit and piss laced snow as it rolls downhill.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/trump-pam-bondi-scandal-227823

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste