by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 76,076 - 76,115 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
They don't care it's really up to the Americans now. Hopefully there will be more Black people and Hispanic people that will step up and want to get out of the Democrat ghetto shadows and do the right thing for their family. That's the best we can hope for. I find American minorities like American Blacks and Latinos that have been here more than 12 years. Knows more about what's at stake than most Hillary supporters.
People that are Hillary supporters at this point, don't care about nothing else but party politics. She could decapitate a baby on stage and they would bash a typo in one of Trump's late night Tweets.
Poor hookers. Bill Gates makes me want to beat him up with a royal lift thrown in.
DieBankOfAmericaPhukkingDie says
Apparently, he'd show up shitfaced and try to get the hookers to grab his gonads without intending to pay for a blow job
He could have just dressed up as a woman and let Trumpigula grab his pussy. Same effect and no one gets pissed off.
DieBankOfAmericaPhukkingDie says
Fuckface Ballmer is a billionaire because he kept hookers in Bay Village from beating up Bill Gates when they were loser undergrads at Harvard who couldn't get sucked off by Radcliffe chicks like normal guys in their class. Daddy Gates appreciated Steve's menacing size and the utility it had in scaring away vicious prostitutes and their marauding pimps who would harm their darling Billy.
For a minute there,I was believing this! lol
Both parties are co-opted by corporations and foreign actors (globalists).
Trump, regardless as to what one thinks of him, is a genuine threat to the order and predictability that corporations and globalists invested in heavily, and depend on.
He's the 1st genuine outsider to have a shot at becoming president of the U.S. since Barry Goldwater or Robert Kennedy (though RFK was assassinated before he could announce his intention to run and mount a campaign that he likely would have won).
If Ballmer weren't a billionaire, he could get work playing fat, vicious psychopaths on TV and in movies. He's a shoo-in for Criminal Minds. Bill could play his wimpering gimp.
Right...Trump is essentially an independent, with an interesting mix of social & economic ideas, who used the Republican Party as a springboard to get to one of the two slots for a shot at being elected as POTUS.
Ross Perot was effectively boxed out by the GOP & forced into a very weakened position of having to run as an independent once he came out against NAFTA and proposed major cuts to entitlement spending (at least slowing increases to such programs), and disfavoring American military adventurism unless real, core American interests were truly at stake.
Trump leans right to independent on social issues, is truly independent economically (leans left on foreign trade but is nearly libertarian on gov't regulations/strangling of small and mid size businesses), and co-opted the idiotic establishment GOP platform to get to where he's at.
This is why the establishment wing of both major parties hate him, and why Jill Stein actually prefers him to Hillary; he's the closest thing to an anti-establishment candidate to have a shot at winning the position of POTUS in the modern era.
In other news, DieBankOfAmericaPhukkingDie LOVES HILLARY CLINTON BECAUSE SHE SUCKS WALL STREET'S ASS, AND TAKES HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS TO FINANCE HER CAMPAIGN FROM BANKS AND WALL STREET, INCLUDING ...
...BANK OF AMERICA !!!
(DBOAPD is a pro-Hillary twat-eating troll)
Beginner!
Logan. It seems like demographics (working age workers/consumers) alone were not sufficient to turn the great depression around. How do you reconcile that with your emphasis on demographics ?
"New comment by marcus in Time Stamp your 2016 Recession Call Now:
Logan. It seems like demographics (working age workers/consumers) alone were not sufficient to turn the great depression around. How do you reconcile that with your emphasis on demographics ?"
Hmm good point. Do you have demographic data from that time period?
Am I reading that last chart correctly?
We're all too stupid and uneducated to understand it.
Where is the demographic data?
There is No demographic data that matters because we have 155 Million plus working people now
1929 had 121,000,000 people in general, women weren't even working in mass then
This is a Sick Mad scientist thesis
The economy of the roaring 20's and post Depression cycle is not the country we live in
I know why you need a Great Depression II thesis
It will never happen, M's are 90 Million plus alone, let a lone peak earnings years are ages 45-54
This is a crazy man thesis...
Basically humans won't buy gas or food in 2017-2020 ....
That's the only hope you have for the Black Swan thesis
Run and hide. That's all Logan can do.
Why don't you compare wealth disparity--1929 vs. 2016? Then get back with me about how nothing is similar.
-1929 vs. 2016?
Left wing Liberal non sense the great low velocity thesis leading to a 1929 crash... cry baby nation
Highest nominal debt owners have highest nominal financial assets
Home owners which isn't going to collapse 60%
Cry all you want on this site
Beg and hate America all you want...
You will lose ....
and I promise you in the next 20 years I will smash your Great 2nd Depression thesis
Piece by Piece
Americans don't beg or cry like this
Go to Chile ... leave before the storm happens, don't come back
But you dare think you will be part of this Great Country in the next recession/recovery cycle when you pile this Mickey Mouse economic theory
There is always a lot of talk about the causes of the Great Depression.
I recall you mentioning somewhere that demographics had something to do with it.
I don't believe there was a black swan back then or in 2008.
My obligatory statement is that it was the Fed in both cases.
You don't agree...
Any economic collapse has to come from a over investment cycle
This is what I am going to tell David Stockman and all the Anti American Bears who this we are in a bubbl
You can't even have a mass bubble cycle without a prime age labor force boom which would lead into an over investment cycle
Tech 2000 and Housing 2007
Demographics where good 1996-2007... speculation happened..
We had the Great Recession and we got out of it in 18 months
This isn't 1929
This is 2016
So, you've posted multiple times now without ever addressing the one topic I raised--wealth disparity.
All you can do is run.
I have no doubt.
I don't think demographics are the main reason for over-investment.
I raised--wealth disparity.
Why does wealth assets have to do with consumption
The extreme left wing radicals in this country who hate wealthy people.. fine
Believe that net asset wealth or the $ hording by 1% somehow means the system is going to collapse because people don't spend
Yet the Middle class in this country from 1967 -2015 shrunk more due to more Americans making 100K
"Why does wealth assets have to do with consumption"
Nominated.
It's hard to buy stuff without assets. If you go to the store, they usually expect you to, you know, pay for anything you want to bring home.
No wealth = no demand. Doesn't matter if one is "prime working age" or not.
Now if the country's middle class were high school drop outs and 2nd wage earners.. then you could have a thesis that would make sense, and yet 70 years of data would disagree with that
Anti American left ... now that women are working and making money, always forget the college educated dual income power we have
I don't hate America. Logan sure seems to be anti-American
I don't cry or whine, either. I'm open to the possibility, that the next economic shitstorm, won't be your standard recession. People like Logan can't see it coming, because they are stuck inside of a box.
People like Logan can't see it coming,
I am going to bury all of you left wing people on this site just as I did the right wing people the last few years
You are all trapped in this
Great Depression II thesis
You picked the wrong country to bet against...
I will never let any of you Left Wing people off the hook
Peddling Fiction ..... President Obama ....
You seem confused
Not blinded or confused
The radial left wing people .... all use Great Depression II thesis to show the great corrupted American economy
This is all a trap... to get all the left wing people on line in one theme
You hide behind fake names for a reason
You use fake photos for a reason
Men don't hide behind fake names... Men don't build walls
Men... lead...
Don't use pathetic crash theories to push economic ideological
All you left wing people on this site ...
Next 20 years... get use to it... It is going to be my honor smoking you all out piece by piece
Our educated women alone destroys your radical anti American agenda
Straw man is the wrong word. I can't even figure what it is you've constructed here.
There's no agenda, just observations and exchange of ideas.
You're posting all these charts, about where we've been. We're over here talking about where we're going
Why not take your charts, and plot out the future. How you expect them to behave over the next decade or two
OK Logan--
Let me try to open your mind. Can you consider the possibility that money has been flowing up to the top 0.1% for the last 30+ years as shown by the wealth disparity charts? And that this wealth concentration is what's causing interest rates to go lower and lower as there is more and more money sitting around looking for investments?
Once you understand that mechanism, then you can realize that at some point, the 0.1% will have bled the economy dry. The Federal Reserve is doing everything it can to keep that from happening, but at some point they may run out of grease and the shit will hit the fan. It won't be tomorrow, it may not be in 2 years, but we're on a path that leads to trouble.
And flag waving, chest bumping won't stop it.
I am going to bury all of you left wing people on this site just as I did the right wing people the last few years
This must be good for your ratings?
Straw man
Straw Man
Straw Man
My thesis is simply
No Great Depression going to happen and in the next decade the America cycle will be fine...
TIME STAMP THIS Now
Your Great Depression II thesis in the next recession will never happen
All of you have to apologize to your readers for such a worthless economic theory
That's what I want your readers to know
How terrible you all are
realize that at some point, the 0.1% will have bled the economy dry.
clearly
U.S. consumption is at all time highs
155 Million plus working
Real wages are at all time highs
Net Asset worth is at all time highs
Highest Job openings int he history of the world
Amanda Perry Tatu or whatever you call yourself today
We are the baddest country on the planet and that's why you don't move your family away
Roberto was here and he wasn't playing the Pat.net game
He would agree that your Great Depression II thesis in the next few years is worthless
So basically your thesis is
No Great Depression going to happen and in the next decade the America cycle will be fine...
That's some great insight there, bub. Quite prescient
He would agree that your Great Depression II thesis in the next few years is worthless
and beyond?
Just wait until after the elections, the DNC has some serious law suits it's going to bankrupt them.
The Democrats are trying not to beat the class action law suit. But their case will only strengthen our case.
« First « Previous Comments 76,076 - 76,115 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,249,309 comments by 14,901 users - Ceffer, goofus, HANrongli, HeadSet, The_Deplorable online now