by Rew ➕follow (0) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 260 - 299 of 763 Next » Last » Search these comments
just_passing_irredeemable says
They had better not pull any more shit in Florida.
Investigate Brenda Snipes. And Wasserman Schultz.
I may have to fake a sad face tomorrow morning at work. I screwed around with a few women who sit around me by sending them screen shots at 5PM Pacific Time showing Don +20 and Hellary +3. Then when they freaked I assured them that side of the map would be blue by 7PM and not-to-worry.
Doh!
NYT predicts Trump winning PA right now.
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/forecast/president/pennsylvania
That means, he won FL OH and NC... What he had to win to have a path.
Lead in NH has widened and held in WI, MI. Esp. WI looks surprisingly strong now. What an erection night!
New Hampshire AND Wisconsin are very likely Trump wins now.
EVEN PENNSYLVANIA COULD GO TRUMP'S WAY AT THIS POINT.
I HOPE GEORGE SOROS HANGS HIMSELF FROM THE NEAREST LAMP POST AFTER LOSING BILLIONS.
Holy shit, looks like PA is swinging hard to Trump.
Also: Marijuana now legal in FL!!!
NYT predicts Trump winning PA right now.
================
No fucking way. If that happens, she's done, right?
New Hampshire AND Wisconsin are very likely Trump wins now.
EVEN PENNSYLVANIA COULD GO TRUMP'S WAY AT THIS POINT.
ERECTION INTENSIFYING
HEY HILLARY, HEY KRISTOL!!!
www.youtube.com/embed/h9RwYPsVpfM
The State Anthem of the Russian Federation, performed by various singers at the Russia Day jubilee in Sevastopol, Crimea, Russia on 12 June 2015.
Looks like we have some celebrities to say Au Revoir to.
Lets start a gofundme
Gofuckaway failed losers
Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says
Also: Marijuana now legal in FL!!!
71% Yeah, baby!
Love it! More civil liberties.
NY Times just called CA for Hillary with 0% reporting. Still, that's a good call. NYT still unsure about FL with only 99% of results in.
NY Times just called CA for Hillary with 0% reporting. Still, that's a good call. NYT still unsure about FL with only 99% of results in.
========
LOL
Nate Silver's site still gives Hillary a 71% chance of winning. Just thought you should know.
Oregon called for Hillary
Idaho called for Trump.
I would not be surprised if those and CA were called with zero % of the votes in.
I would not be surprised if those and CA were called with zero % of the votes in.
They were.
Nate Silver's site still gives Hillary a 71% chance of winning. Just thought you should know.
Wrong. THey had Hillary at 50% long ago, and have TRump at 61% now.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/2016-election-results-coverage/?ref=patrick.net
Just thought you should know.
California has a good amount of votes in on that call ... and overwhelming for Clinton.
Just thought you should know.
I was just at his site. Maybe I was looking at an old page? I don't know. I swear, it said 71%.
On the plus side I don't have to quit my job and move to a Red State. Even if my coworkers has assured me for the last 18 months that Trump was going to lose.
How pathetic is Hillary that she couldn't defeat Trump with all the money, media, and power backing her up? I mean Trump was a joke candidate and yet he is crushing her. Imagine if the Republicans actually had a good candidate that half the population didn't despise.
Image if the Democrats had a good candidate that half the population didn't despise. Maybe the DNC will learn its lesson and go for a Bernie or Stein type in 2020. Hopefully they'll realize that Hillary has now blown two elections and doesn't deserve a third opportunity when far more qualified and ethical people are around.
« First « Previous Comments 260 - 299 of 763 Next » Last » Search these comments
Who has some fun sources to watch?
538:
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-night-forecast-2016/
https://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/2016-election-results-coverage/
Google:
https://www.google.com/#q=election+results&eob=enn/o//////////////
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/i/live/790686278350102528
#TrumpIsPresident