by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 79,199 - 79,238 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Gosh if only there was some way for us to be sure Trump wasn't in Russia's pocket?
Why not ask him to disprove that he is not in the martian's pocket??
Hilalry is the one that gave away 20% of our uranium to Russian interests. You do know what they use uranium for?????
You ask this question after Obozo caught on a Mic saying hey I am just pretending to be tough till the elctions-I will be freer after the election and Medvedev saying hey I will convey to Putin.betweent eh Russian reset, the 20% sale to Russia and Obama cowering to Putin-the dems are the ones that need to prove they are not in cahoots with Putin.
Why not ask him to disprove that he is not in the martian's pocket??
Only one way to know that for sure too! Yes, let's. There is obviously something to hide, besides pee-pee play, right?
You know what the difference between Obama on his birth cert. and Trump on his taxes is? Obama didn't respond initially because it's bull-shit, and then finally produced. Trump will respond immediately, because it has substance, and he will never produce his taxes.
the 20% sale to Russia and Obama cowering to Putin-the dems are the ones that need to prove they are not in cahoots with Putin.
Puntin's choice exonerates Hillary, pretty clearly. The chess master has hand picked his opponent in the US: a doofus who doesn't know shit about nuclear deterrents, the military, NATO, and welcomes nationalism and weaker coalitions in Europe. Brilliant!
Trump's administration forming has strong oil dealings with Russia, is going to back away from sanctions against the country, and is looking to switch sides in Syria and start bombing "state terrorists" ... who we were just supporting. Meanwhile, Russia continues to give seed money to small nationalist movements in countri
Obozo caught on a Mic saying hey I am just pretending to be tough
The fact that you interpret the President saying "I have more flexibility" after the election, as "playing tough" is crap. It means he can do things that are not possible at this time, due to politics today.
Meanwhile, Trump is fawning at every praise Putin passes his way, "it's an asset", is referring to himself in the third person ... at a press event where he stocked the front seats to cheer and clap for him. Lunacy.
Go to your local car dealer today and look interested. Watch how they 'fawn' over you as they set you up for the kill.
Basic negotiating tactics...
Surprised you don't recognize this...
Meanwhile, Trump is fawning at every praise Putin passes his way, "it's an asset", is referring to himself in the third person ... at a press event where he stocked the front seats to cheer and clap for him. Lunacy.
Putin's choice exonerates Hillary, pretty clearly. The chess master has hand picked his opponent in the US: a doofus who doesn't know shit about nuclear deterrents, the military, NATO, and welcomes nationalism and weaker coalitions in Europe. Brilliant!
Garbage. With Hilalry and a fawning OBama who both could be bribed through their foundations-that was his choice. Trump is an unknown -besides except for the wilfully ignorant, it does nto matter who is in power-going to war against Russia and risking nuclear holocaust is not an option. Both countries have enough to destroy others several times over.
Putin already got what he wanted-Crimea, part of Georgia, full influence in Syria and now Turkey drawing closer. Obama/Hilalry allowed 20% of our uranium reserves to go into Russian hands. Keep reading buzzfeed.-that would be choice. By the dems/Clapper doing this unprecedented hearing -they have succeeded in riling up lefties like you to make you think Russia is far more powerful than they are. But you think beating and bloodying people who attend a Trump rally is understandable-so nothing will change your mind. Lefties loved Russia, until it became a scapegoat. The inept clown OBama and the stupid reset button HIlalry is what they want. 20%
Do you just go around screaming like an SJW? Muslims have wrecked havoc in Europe, countries are pulling out of EUro or threatening to leave, Turkey a NATO ally drifting closer to Russia, syria under Russian influence and so is Iran which is very rich now -all this happened under Trump-oh wait Obama!!!!!!! Now why would he want Trump-8 more years of Obama/Clinton-the guy grovels to Putin, will give up another 30-40% of our uranium reserves and will not bat an eyelid if Putin invades eastern Ukraine- it was Obama in the Romeny debate who said the 80s foreign policy called. That clearly shows his agenda-LOL!!
The fact that you interpret the President saying "I have more flexibility" after the election, as "playing tough" is crap. It means he can do things that are not possible at this time, due to politics today.
He is not being tough. he is grovelling-oh please tell daddy Putin I am pretending to be tough -just give me some time till the election is over and I will worship your feet.
Meanwhile, Trump is fawning at every praise Putin passes his way, "it's an asset", is referring to himself in the third person ... at a press event where he stocked the front seats to cheer and clap for him. Lunacy.
Why. If you have a competetor and a major player in the world, it is best that you get along and they respect you. It is definitely an asset when you can get along with soemone and stand your ground-America first. You don't have to go grovel like Obama and say please pretty please don't blow my cover. Hey here is where our interests converge, here is where we can't agree-lets at least try and work together in some areas. Both world wars-Russia always managed to be on the right side of history-no way we would ahve won if the Russians didn't join us. Today lefties will not acknowledge-but radical Islam is our greatest threat-which the Russians share in Chechnya. That si an area we can cooperate -we have to-one jihadi with a dirty bomb can do a lot of damage to entire cities. That si what trump is saying, lets co-operate in fighting ISIS etc.
But obozo and his voters feelings got hurt, because hey we would have to acknowledge the dangers posed by radical Islam.
Lunancy is watching your side of the aisle grovelling to Russia and pressing reset buttons, giving up 20% or our uranium to Russia , accepting bribes to the charity to the tunes of millions from the Russians, blaming trump.
Could you point me to where Clapper says it's false and fictitious?
Yep, what I figured you'd say. Because once again you lied. Here's what Clapper actually said:
"But, Clapper said, the intelligence community hadn’t made any judgment on whether the claims within the document were reliable."
That image forgets that first Obama tried to import Ebola then when that failed he allowed Brazil along with Globalist Liberals the WHO to spread Zika beyond the Olympics.
Had that been Socci a few years earlier some government body would have called off the Olympics.
Thanks for the Zika Obama!
If you like your baby with a small head you can keep it, Planned Parenthood can't sell damaged goods.
He lost a Billion during the election then dumped another billion trying to create worldwide pandemonium and racewars.
He deserves an Obama enemy of the State send off. He belongs on the bottom of the Ocean with half his head blown off by Seal Team 7(because fucking Disney owns Seal Team 6 now)
Yeah, that's how shitty this motherfucker Obama has been.
"See joeydickbag, it WASN'T a US Intelligence document..."
So what? Who claimed it was? The point was that your title of this idiotic thread is:
"James Clapper said the Russian Intel Report was false and fictitious"
And that is a complete lie. Clapper said nothing of the sort and, in fact, said they were still investigating.
See joeydickbag, it WASN'T a US Intelligence document...
I said that two days ago when the lie broke, no Intelligence community would write a Gossip dossier based on hearsay and accusations.
They usually have dates, names addresses, if you can all remember correctly that's the biggest gripe against WikiLeaks is all of the blood and guts gets disclosed along with those leaks. If Assange was leaking tabloid bullshit like this, he would have been our official White House press secretary under Obama.
Anyone that even bought into that bogus Intel report has lost any seat at the debate with me, on Trumps transition team or Trump's past.
I would rather watch a Cancer PSA marathon than to listen to that moron for one second.
What is with the handkerchief sobbing or was it a napkin? Did meryl Streep give him acting lessons??
After eight years of his bullshit we all are sick of him. Time for MAGA
And you really love Trump or hate Obama to the core.
I dont know if Repubs are as vicious as Dems. I dont hate Hillary at all. I would prefer:
- That if she took an easy route to her server that she would not at first deny sending classified, and then state that she has hired a professional IT firm to fix it.
- That she would be more truthful.
- I am upset that Bill Clinton has not manned up to some of the economic job loss with NAFTA. Verily I say that if Bill would have came out and said that NAFTA needed some adjustments - that Hillary would be getting coronated next week.
And two "I thought the media was concentrated, the CIA liars, and neocons were full of shit - until Trump came along, now they're all my allies." types have had their say.
Not my allies. The truth is my ally.
For example-what was inaccurate in CNN's reporting? What was "fake" to use your leader's word?
For example-what was inaccurate in CNN's reporting? What was "fake" to use your leader's word?
The Document is utterly unverified and key facts are outright fabrications right off the bat (ie Cohen in Prague). Any asshole can write up a 35-page report in Word and send it on.
Therefore, it's as fake as if some redneck in a trailer faked up a Kenyan Birth Certificate and sent it to CNN or Buzzfeed.
PS You've had a year with every intel agency and Media Outlet with armies of employees desperately searching for some Russia-Trump connection. Not an ounce of evidence has been shown.
"The Document is utterly unverified. Any asshole can write up a 35-page report in Word and send it on. Therefore, it's as fake as if some redneck in a trailer faked up a Kenyan Birth Certificate and sent it to CNN or Buzzfeed."
And did CNN reference the document or release it? I'm asking what CNN reported that was fake?
And did CNN reference the document or release it? I'm asking what CNN reported that was fake?
CNN did reference the document and the Buzzfeed story. Saying it was "Unverified" was not enough - it shouldn't have been reported in the first place.
"Therefore, it's as fake as if some redneck in a trailer faked up a Kenyan Birth Certificate and sent it to CNN or Buzzfeed."
Great point. So, where was the outrage from you and bass and Ironman when CNN reported on Sheriff Arpaio or Trump's claims about Obama's birth certificate?
Great point. So, where was the outrage from you and bass and Ironman when CNN reported on Sheriff Arpaio or Trump's claims about Obama's birth certificate?
Never a birther, thanks!
Read my posts over the past few years - I'm not a party loyalist and never have been.
"CNN did reference the document and the Buzzfeed story. Saying it was "Unverified" was not enough - it shouldn't have been reported in the first place"
Nope. CNN reported that intelligence agencies briefing included discussion about Trump potentially being compromised. In light of previous stories about Trump's ties to Russia, that certainly seems newsworthy.
"Never a birther, thanks! Read my posts over the past few years - I'm not a party loyalist and never have been."
OK--please point to the posts where you call such stories "fake" news and are outraged like now.
OK--please point to the ones where you call such stories "fake" news and are outraged like now.
CHRIS CUOMO, CNN: Remember, it is illegal to possess these stolen documents. It is different from the media. So everything you learn about this, you are learning from us.
1. Documents not stolen by Wikileaks, they were LEAKED to Wikileaks
2. It's not illegal for CNN but not "ordinary people" to read leaked documents obtained from the internet.
Nope. CNN reported that intelligence agencies briefing included discussion about Trump potentially being compromised. In light of previous stories about Trump's ties to Russia, that certainly seems newsworthy.
Intel Officials (illegally) leaking the information around the PDB to the Press is news. But that's not what's at issue.
The mention of a dodgy Dossier Word Document is the issue.
Trump is a lying sac of propaganda. Most of the country knows this. Hopefully the rest aren't irreversibly lobotomized at this point.
Ah, so now you show your true colors. Putin is fighting against us in Syria, Ukraine and hacking our election and now he is your best friend. Well said Russian.
If Putin is fighting ISIS in Syria in support of their legitimate secular citizen-supported government, and you say that's fighting against "us," that means you consider yourself allied with ISIS! Talk about showing your islamofascist true black colors! You, sir, claim to be on the side of murderers, rapists, and genocide on a large scale! That's utterly despicable, @Tim Aurora! You suck! And anyone who agrees with you also sucks! We Americans don't cotton to genocidal Muslims like you!
"1. Documents not stolen by Wikileaks, they were LEAKED to Wikileaks
2. It's not illegal for CNN but not "ordinary people" to read leaked documents obtained from the internet."
Uh, wtf are you talking about? I'm asking when you posted outrage at the fake news stories circulating about Obama's birth certificate
« First « Previous Comments 79,199 - 79,238 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,248,983 comments by 14,895 users - AmericanKulak, HANrongli online now