patrick.net

Don't have to get up tomorrow, and had too much coffee today, so I'm chilling on pnet.

Based on what I see in this forum and the general populace-Trump 2nd term it is.

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

[Uber] works but the guys who've driven me seem frightened to accept tips. Sad.

AF, if you insist on handing drivers the severed heads of your enemies, you have to expect they might seem frightened. Also, if the severed heads belonged to their close family or friends, you should anticipate they might feel sad.

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

REPLACE FUCKFACE!

No way, I'm really looking forward to 4 years of clusterfuck chaos. It's been great entertainment so far and it's just getting started.

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

Gosh, you know, it's only a few nukes. You're right!

www.youtube.com/embed/t039p6xqutU

Some Idiot told me on Disqus that Congress is just trying to set him up until they "feel" that they have enough to impeach him on.

Like Trump is some hunting range prey that will stay tethered to his feeding trough for a clean killshot. Those same bastards will be out of office and politically dead and will never hear their own killshot.

Trump will serve two terms if he doesn't develop Altimeters.

rando says

But they were so wrong about his odds in the election, it's hard to even take them seriously now.

How were the oddsmakers wrong on Trump?

I don't think you guys understand markets.

Wonder what the limits are on these bets, $500 lol?

Oddsmakers are in the business of making money. They make money by taking on action. They price events in order to take in the most money.

New England is -3 tomorrow

So when Atlanta wins outright, are you going to think that the oddsmakers were wrong?

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

raccoons for the last french fry in the dumpster.

Starring Jean-Claude van Damme with cameos by Chuck Norris, Sly Stallone, and Jesse Ventura.

Tenpoundbass says

Trump will serve two terms if he doesn't develop Altimeters.

You're in luck, I'm pretty sure they've already been developed.

We know when the bookies get involved, this is serious business. Are they the same ones that paid off all the bettors before the election results presuming IHLlary would win?

Bookies are so wise, why don't we tap their oracular powers more?

Voters don't always know what's best for this country. That's why we're not a pure democracy.

"I want slaves!" "I want free shit" Popular demand in no way means it's right.

Impeachment is due to crimes committed in office not because of opposition. It doesn't work like that without a serious Civil problem on our hands.

You can't have the half of the electorate who's party main candidate has been exposed with well documented proof as a Huckster and a cheat. Then depose the Guy who won with by a very loved constituency with reinterpreting the constitution and just allowing one single judge in a long line of appeals to be a Liberal Dickhole, and not expect a violent result.

Congress impeach Trump the Voters vote Congress out and reelect Trump. Then what?

Also lets not forget Clinton was impeached twice.

Don't you Believe these scientific, well-established Polls?

Don't you know that it's almost impossible for Trump to win the Presidency based on not one, but scores of datasets compiled by the smartest minds in the World?

Stop denying the Polls!

Holy shit. They 'oversampled' by 11% just like in the election polls. That must mean that the results could be off by 2% just like the elections. What liars.

CIC just likes to take it up the ass from Trump while fucking a goat from behind. So technically, the boner is for the goat.

#rechargeableBatteriesDumbass

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

THE! RAPTURE! which is his only objective.

If he's in such a hurry,he can commit suicide.
I got to GOD before you did!

One would have to read your post to have a reading comprehension issue. The bigger picture is that the samples are similar to the election samples, and that polling was pretty accurate. Your cherry picking of statistics to try to prove a point failed before as it fails here.

I can hardly wait to see Pence's thin purple lips snarl in cruel ecstasy as he releases the handle on the crocodile pit for Trumpligula.

Krokodiles for Khrist!

Concord has a much bigger chance of getting a 10.0 Earthquake

doubt it.

Trump won by a LANDSLIDE.

It's pretty sad that CIC has to deliberately misquote others. It's an admission that what they said about him is true.

Don't hold back lets us know how you really feel. You'll get stressed.

Stress is when the brain overrules the bodies natural desire to beat the shit out of some asshole who richly deserves it.

I'm finding it funny to no end that the same people that said Obama issuing 18 executive orders in hist first 10 days was abuse of power by an imperial president now say trump issuing 20 executive orders in his first 10 days is a decisive leader getting things accomplished.

Dickheads one and all.

If enough Liberals says it loud enough.

But I thought judges are supposed to be objective and not political?

Yeah, kinna like Santa Cruz, where everybody involved with a school becomes a pork barrel union thug, spouting all the usual self serving platitudes and virtue broadcasting for their useless jobs. Vomit.

Go the health club, ask them to put FOX news on the monitor, and watch the tatted IHLs come out of the mist to stomp you.

If he didn't chain them to the deep fryers, it's MAGA!

What a waste of manpower. He could have had them hawking meth and heroin in the parking lot during slow times, and laundering the profits through the restaurant.

Ironman says

That seems to be your theme here.

Do you love america haters?

Expect more of the same.
"You can't fix stupid."
Some just die dumb.

WHO GIVES A FUCK ABOUT WORKERS? WHEN MILO IS BEING DISSED BY CAMPUS CUNTS, THE PRECEDENT HAS TO DO TRIAGE!! MILO DOESN'T EAT SHIT FAST FOOD! MILO SUCKS OFF FAST FOOD WORKERS AND ONLY THE LATTER HAS TO DO WITH MAGA! DO YOUR RESEARCH!!!!!!!

What a surprise.

When Ironman offers himself to a goat it's...

Ironman says

Just another day, and I just can't stop having sex with animals no matter how hard I try. I'm so lonely, so lonely.

Johnson notes that this decision might actually represent a setback for victims' rights organizations, since it incentivizes accused students to sue their accusers in addition to their colleges:

Ironically, whatever minor assistance the ruling might have to frustrating the Amherst student's quest for justice, the victory might be a Pyrrhic one for the accusers' rights movement as a whole. Judge Robart sent a message that the only way an accused student can obtain relevant evidence involving his accuser is—as a handful of accused students have done—to sue his accuser as well as the college. Expect more accusers to be added to future lawsuits as a result.

Johnson is a co-author of The Campus Rape Frenzy, a new book about the death of due process on college campuses. He calls the Amherst case "perhaps the most egregiously unfair" one he has covered. Who could disagree?

He has not sued Jones, although maybe he should have. As part of his case against Amherst, Doe's legal team subpoenaed Jones to testify at the trial and turn over certain documents and records of statements she made about the alleged assault. Jones refused to cooperate.

And, according to Judge Robart's ruling, she doesn't have to:

An in-person deposition of boundless scope would impose a substantial burden on Ms. Jones. (Subpoena at 1; see also Resp. at 7 ("Until a deposition begins, it is very difficult to know where it will lead and impossible to predict all the topics that may be explored with a witness.").) The deposition would force Ms. Jones to relive a night in which she asserts Mr. Doe sexually assaulted her. (See, e.g., Clune Decl. ¶ 3, Ex. 4; Resp. at 6-7.) It would also reraise the subsequent investigation, hearing, and period of publicity that Ms. Jones has endured. (Id. ¶ 3, Ex. 5 at 11-12; Am. Compl. ¶¶ 54, 56.) It takes no leap of logic to reason that a live deposition would impose emotional and psychological trauma upon Ms. Jones.

Robart essentially argues that since Doe isn't suing Jones directly, he has no right to involve her in his case against Amherst. He also argues that Amherst is in possession of the relevant documents, and thus Jones's involvement is unnecessary. But, as KC Johnson explains, that isn't quite right:

Yet much of the requested material couldn't come from Amherst employees. For instance, a critical aspect of the accused student's case is the basic unfairness of an adjudication that went forward under the false premise that A.S. had not reduced anything about the incident to writing. So the subpoena asked A.S. for "all communications, including text messages or emails, between you and anyone else on February 5, 2012." The only conceivable source of this material would be A.S., not any Amherst employees.

Interesting segment on Tucker Carlson on Fox that you will never see on left wing media outlets.

www.youtube.com/embed/eMA1SCaqgE0

ESPN2 = FAKE NEWS
None of the scores are correct.
They numbers were made up last week.

Resist the Liberal Filth