3
0

THUNDERDOME- Don't Enter If YOU Are a Pussy or an Idiot: The U.S. Should Go To A Single-Payer, Everyone Gets Medical Care, System, PERIOD


 invite response                
2017 May 5, 9:05pm   2,880 views  50 comments

by AllTruth   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

The U.S. spends twice as much as the next-nearest expensive nation on medical care, yet has more people uninsured as a % of population, MUCH HIGHER doctor visit costs, medication, hospital charges, surgical costs, diagnostic costs, treatment costs EVERYTHING etc. costs (37% to 212% higher).

This is because medical care DOES NOT WORK THE WAY MOST INDUSTRIES DO, whereby TECHNOLOGY TYPICALLY DRIVES DOWN COSTS.

Regarding medical care, technology DRIVES UP COSTS, and in the case of medical innovation, whether diagnostic, pharmaceutical, surgical, immunotherapy, etc., Americans pay for breakthrough technologies that are then stolen, or at least, borrowed (at a much lower cost), y consumers in other nations.

Not only that, but it's certifiably true that a single-payer system whereby the government has negotiating power for 320 million Americans will give the government massive leverage it does not now have (Medicare is a fraction of 320 million, and Medicare still has massive leverage negotiating prices), is the only way to put downward pressure on out-of-control and oligopolostic pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, doctors, hospitals (i.e. Insurance companies, which now own most hospitals and doctors groups), etc.

There is a reason we have an abhorrent system of incredibly expensive, inefficient, and impossible-to-understand medical'care in the U.S., and it's because there's no massive single buyer as in France, Australia, Italy, Japan, etc., etc.

We have 37,000 FUCKING BILLING CODES FOR MEDICAL SERVICES RENDERED!!! IT'S FUCKING INSANE!!! THE INSANE HAVE DESIGNED AND IMPLEMENTED THE SYSTEM BECAUSE THEY WERE HIRED TO BY THE MEDICAL CARE COMPLEX BECAUSE IT CREATES INEFFICIENCIES AND PURE, INSANE PROFIT!!!

The pharmaceutical companies, medical device makers, doctors (particularly specialists), insurance companies, etc., lobby and balkanize and fragment and confuse the entire system, to enrich themselves in ways and by margins not deemed rational or in the public's interest in other advanced, developed, civilized, rational nations.

We're fucked in the U.S. six ways to Sunday because the health care lobby is giant, out-of-control, all-powerful, greedy fucking ass collusory entity that ensures monopoly-like profits and has no real cost-pressures not reasons to modernize and get efficient in the ways HAT OTHER INDUSTRIES ARE FORCED TO.

« First        Comments 29 - 50 of 50        Search these comments

29   Dan8267   2017 May 7, 4:57pm  

bob2356 says

If the government steps in and sets prices across the board then it's not a free market.

It's not a free market if we have drug patents and licenses that limit the number of doctors and clinics. The free market went out the window a long time ago.

30   MisdemeanorRebel   2017 May 7, 6:33pm  

Dan8267 says

It's not a free market if we have drug patents and licenses that limit the number of doctors and clinics. The free market went out the window a long time ago.

Or a blanket ban on imported drugs from developed countries.

31   AllTruth   2017 May 7, 7:12pm  

If we did a theoretical exercise and imagined going to a health care system whereby there was no insurance, and doctors, medications, hospitals, device makers, etc., were all paid in cash, with no middlemen (there are currently LITERALLY DOZENS OR MANY DOZENS OF MIDDLEMEN, that leech monies through bureaucracy, administration, price-fixing, etc., an example of this is 30,000 plus medical billing codes whereby there are dozens if not hundreds of different prices for same services, procedures, medications, etc. based on who is being charged and who is insured and what insurance they do or do not have), we'd get true price-discovery in medical care, with medical schools, doctors, hospitals, drug makers, device makers, etc. all having to completely revolutionize their business models and structures to become as efficient as Amazon or other such companies, and prices would fall dramatically (probably by a factor of 300% to 3,000%, depending of service, medication, device, treatment, procedure, diagnosis, care being provided/furnished).

32   FortWayne   2017 May 7, 8:55pm  

AllTruth says

If we did a theoretical exercise and imagined going to a health care system whereby there was no insurance, and doctors, medications, hospitals, device makers, etc., were all paid in cash, with no middlemen (there are currently LITERALLY DOZENS OR MANY DOZENS OF MIDDLEMEN, that leech monies through bureaucracy, administration, price-fixing, etc., an example of this is 30,000 plus medical billing codes whereby there are dozens if not hundreds of different prices for same services, procedures, medications, etc. based on who is being charged and who is insured and what insurance they do or do not have), we'd get true price-discovery in medical care, with medical schools, doctors, hospitals, drug makers, device makers, etc. all having to completely revolutionize their business models and structures to become as efficient as Amazon or other such companies, and prices would fall dramatically (probably by a factor of 300% to 3,000%, depending of service, medication, device, treatment, proc...

We can reduce our healthcare costs by almost 80% today without changing any of that. All it takes is personal responsibility, which is severely lacking.

33   Dan8267   2017 May 7, 10:10pm  

FortWayne says

We can reduce our healthcare costs by almost 80% today without changing any of that. All it takes is personal responsibility, which is severely lacking.

Yeah, no action is required except praying away sickness.

34   NuttBoxer   2017 May 8, 2:56pm  

AllTruth says

The U.S. Should Go To A Single-Payer, Everyone Gets Medical Care, System, PERIOD

YES!!

Next can we force everyone to only be allowed to shit in their own bathroom, public toilets should be reserved for their rightful use, glory holes, and homo/bi/trans-sexual trysting.

35   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2017 May 8, 5:24pm  

NuttBoxer says

glory holes, and homo/bi/trans-sexual trysting.

I knew you used glory holes for punching nuts.

37   Strategist   2017 May 8, 6:43pm  

Dan8267 says

bob2356 says

If the government steps in and sets prices across the board then it's not a free market.

It's not a free market if we have drug patents

If we don't have drug patents, no company will bother to develop new drugs. Don't tell me governments can do the same job, because they can't, as proven by communist governments.
We probably need a single payer for health care, the ability to buy drugs from anywhere else in the world, and allow outsourcing of medical care to countries that can do the same thing at a fraction of the cost.

38   Strategist   2017 May 8, 6:46pm  

AllTruth says

If we did a theoretical exercise and imagined going to a health care system whereby there was no insurance, and doctors, medications, hospitals, device makers, etc., were all paid in cash, with no middlemen (there are currently LITERALLY DOZENS OR MANY DOZENS OF MIDDLEMEN, that leech monies through bureaucracy, administration, price-fixing, etc., an example of this is 30,000 plus medical billing codes whereby there are dozens if not hundreds of different prices for same services, procedures, medications, etc. based on who is being charged and who is insured and what insurance they do or do not have), we'd get true price-discovery in medical care, with medical schools, doctors, hospitals, drug makers, device makers, etc. all having to completely revolutionize their business models and structures to become as efficient as Amazon or other such companies, and prices would fall dramatically (probably by a factor of 300% to 3,000%, depending of service, medication, device, treatment, procedu...

Most people who get a major illness would end up dying.

39   FortWayne   2017 May 8, 6:47pm  

Strategist says

Dan8267 says

bob2356 says

If the government steps in and sets prices across the board then it's not a free market.

It's not a free market if we have drug patents

If we don't have drug patents, no company will bother to develop new drugs. Don't tell me governments can do the same job, because they can't, as proven by communist governments.

We probably need a single payer for health care, the ability to buy drugs from anywhere else in the world, and allow outsourcing of medical care to countries that can do the same thing at a fraction of the cost.

If people are free to screw up their health consciously, others shouldn't be responsible. Bad outcomes are the only real deterrent to unhealthy choices.

40   Strategist   2017 May 8, 6:53pm  

FortWayne says

If people are free to screw up their health consciously, others shouldn't be responsible. Bad outcomes are the only real deterrent to unhealthy choices.

Those who smoke, drink too much, eat garbage would be examples, but there is no practical way to exclude them from healthcare.
What might work is tax the hell out of cigarettes, alcohol, and fattening food, and use that tax towards healthcare. So irresponsible really end up paying for their stupidity.

41   RealEstateIsBetterThanStocks   2017 May 8, 9:25pm  

i fail to see the connection from "Medical Care Complex is ripping everyone off" to "therefore, you should pay for some losers' medical bills."

42   missing   2017 May 8, 9:34pm  

RealEstateIsBetterThanStocks says

i fail to see the connection from "Medical Care Complex is ripping everyone off" to "therefore, you should pay for some losers' medical bills."

Simple. Some folks (like the Jesus lover above) would rather have the Med. Complex ripping them and everyone off, than pay a dollar for somebody else's health care.

43   bob2356   2017 May 8, 9:48pm  

Dan8267 says

bob2356 says

If the government steps in and sets prices across the board then it's not a free market.

It's not a free market if we have drug patents and licenses that limit the number of doctors and clinics. The free market went out the window a long time ago.

I didn't say there was a free market. I said free market advocates have painted themselves in a corner. Read the whole post next time.

44   Dan8267   2017 May 8, 10:01pm  

Sorry for not being a expert on goat anuses like you, piggy. At least I know how to recharge #rechargableBatteriesDumbass so to keep electronics working.

45   bob2356   2017 May 8, 10:06pm  

Strategist says

and allow outsourcing of medical care to countries that can do the same thing at a fraction of the cost.

We have that now, it's called medical tourism. Considering only something like 20% of Americans even have a passport and there are only about 11 million people a year that go overseas it's not going to be a big option. Very few Americans go abroad.

The down side is that in most of these countries if it goes bad you don't have any legal recourse. It's strictly buyer beware. You can get very good care, but you need to do your homework.

46   FortWayne   2017 May 9, 7:10am  

Strategist says

FortWayne says

If people are free to screw up their health consciously, others shouldn't be responsible. Bad outcomes are the only real deterrent to unhealthy choices.

Those who smoke, drink too much, eat garbage would be examples, but there is no practical way to exclude them from healthcare.

What might work is tax the hell out of cigarettes, alcohol, and fattening food, and use that tax towards healthcare. So irresponsible really end up paying for their stupidity.

I suppose that would be a good free market solution that would work as a deterrent. But you know how it is, idea might be great but somehow the markets change and twist it somehow in an unpredictable ways. I wonder how this one would work out.

47   Strategist   2017 May 9, 7:33am  

bob2356 says


and allow outsourcing of medical care to countries that can do the same thing at a fraction of the cost.

We have that now, it's called medical tourism. Considering only something like 20% of Americans even have a passport and there are only about 11 million people a year that go overseas it's not going to be a big option. Very few Americans go abroad.

The down side is that in most of these countries if it goes bad you don't have any legal recourse. It's strictly buyer beware. You can get very good care, but you need to do your homework.

We need our insurance companies to allow medical tourism. Follow up care can always be done in the US.
e.g. I had a torn meniscus last year. The total cost was an astounding $15,000 + for the 15 minute surgery. My share was $3,000. My insurance, Aetna PPO should just contract with hospitals in Thailand, Singapore and India where the total cost including airfare would be about $3,000.
Prescription medicine in India costs just 2% of what it costs in the US for the same damn thing. Any way you look at it, our healthcare costs for whatever reason are out of control. We need a drastic change.

48   bob2356   2017 May 9, 8:51am  

Strategist says

We need our insurance companies to allow medical tourism. Follow up care can always be done in the US.

A number of them do. Did you ask? Skip India/Thailand and go for Malaysia. Prince Court Medical Center Kuala Lumpur is ranked the number one hospital for “patients without borders” by the Medical Travel Quality Alliance. Costa RIca is a good choice if you don't want to hump half way around the world, Plus it's an awesome place that I've spent considerable time exploring. If I weren't a very serious skier/boarder I'd really consider living there.

For a brief period you could do medical tourism in NZ until the government figured out the public system would end up backstopping the private system without being paid for it if anything went wrong.

Health care costs are out of control for many reasons but drastic change isn't going to happen. It's just going to get worse and worse.

49   joeyjojojunior   2017 May 9, 11:25am  

"If we don't have drug patents, no company will bother to develop new drugs"

Of course they would. Companies develop new products all the time without getting patents.

50   Tenpoundbass   2017 May 9, 12:06pm  

At the end of the day any plan called "Single Payer" or any plan that will eventually evolve into a "Single Payer"

Simply means you are the single person responsible for paying the out of pocket, the deductibles, the doctor visits and the bulk of any medical work done.
The Liberals and Republicans have been delivering us a Single Payer plan for year, you're just too stupid to ask the right question.

It's called "Government Healthcare" you dickweeds, get used to dismal failure until you can learn what to ask for.

« First        Comments 29 - 50 of 50        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions