Comments 1 - 15 of 15 Search these comments
Dr. Mann defied the judge presiding over the case and refused to surrender his data for “open court examination”.
Dr. Mann defied the judge presiding over the case and refused to surrender his data for “open court examination”. This is routine practice for scientific study to determine if the results will stand up against examination. But Dr. Mann refused to turn over his data.
refused to surrender his data for “open court examination”
If Mann is found guilty of crimes lock him up.
Can deniers now prove all the other AGW scientists wrong.
Tenpoundbass saysrefused to surrender his data for “open court examination”
His research was very likely funded by US and/or Canadian government. As such, not providing his research data should bar him from receiving funding from gov't entities.
Except they don't care about truth either. They care about rationalizing power grabs.
CBOEtrader saysExcept they don't care about truth either. They care about rationalizing power grabs.
My observation - the bureaucrats do not care about anything other than doing as little as possible. Even in cases of well-established research fraud they try to pretend that nothing happened.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/hockey-stick-broken-scientist-michael-mann-loses-in-court-forced-to-pay-court-costs-global-warming-hoax-hit-the-hardest/
Dr. Mann defied the judge presiding over the case and refused to surrender his data for “open court examination”. This is routine practice for scientific study to determine if the results will stand up against examination. But Dr. Mann refused to turn over his data.