patrick.net

Which begs the off topic question, when to bail out of the stock market if it becomes apparent trump might lose.
I see the fucker dropping 5000 points in the first few weeks of a libbyfuck presidency...

Patrick says

Again, COMPLETELY FALSE. The truth is that it is liberals who are driving DOWN wages for the poor with mass imports of illegal aliens to accomplish it.

Libbies never learn from the past.
The majority of Trump supporters will always declare allegiance to the libbyfucks when polled.
It's a gargantuan setup to enjoy the gargantuan letdown come election day...


jazz_music says

TRUMP LOSING 2016 SUPPORTERS

check out Eric Holders hair turning white in real time!

BlueSardine says

Which begs the off topic question, when to bail out of the stock market if it becomes apparent trump might lose.

Not off topic. Until they find an actual crime or there's some flash crash of the economy (not sure what part of the economy could break before the election), Trump will have a 2nd term. The left constantly creating hysteria where none exists is the topic. They "think" it's going to make him lose. All it's doing is converting more people to Trump.

The other thing we now know is you cannot trust polls. If it looks like the Dem. nominee is going to overtake Trump, be careful with any stock moves. He gets a 2nd term the thing is likely to bounce again. Depending on the candidate of the Dems, and if they were to win, there for sure would be a drop. Some could make it tank massively, whereas someone like Bloomberg, if he gets in, would mitigate the damage as he's pro Wall Street.

Bernie or Warren could destroy the economy overnight though, hence why I say be careful. The morning after election day could see a 5-10% sell off with one of those two, with investors having a wait and see approach. Trump would probably get another 2-3% relatively quickly after a win. Continuity in government is important for investors regardless of the politics. They'll like to know what DC is doing.

GLOBO!HOMO!PEDO! CONSPIRACY!!!

Onvacation says

From the article:
"Russia’s got our POTUS in their pocket now."

jazz_music says

And you tell me “Is that all you got?”

Really? Because you had to deliberately mischaracterize their statement there to even have anything at all to defend your bullshit about “the entire thing”

LOL

LOL

OH puh-LEEEEZE

I didn't spend a lot of time reading your propaganda.

What a terrible fail lol

Heraclitusstudent says

This generation must have inferior genes.

Genes have nothing to do with these peoples problems. If you shovel cancer inducing food-like substances into your mouth, expect to get sick.

HEYYOU says

" Spiking health problems in US millennials may make them poorer"

This is why you should play the long game and spend more money up front to eat real food. Organic's got nothing on sickcare when it comes to overall cost.

I saw a starkly different poll of Trump supporters. 10 out of 10 voting for him again. The media seems very concerned, as all of the little rules of thumb, they can come up with, indicate that Trump will be reelected. He is surprisingly popular with black segments who are actually doing pretty well by him.

A FIGHT! A FIGHT! The Deep State blight.
If Trump don't win we'll jump in!

NuttBoxer says

If you shovel cancer inducing food-like substances

Drugs?

Quigley says

Kinda sad when the best support this guy can find for his rampant TDS is an almost three year old article written by a college senior.

What's particularly sad is that is now the standard at the Washington Post and NY Times. IE Sarah Jeong.

Very weak article. Pretty much seven straw men standing in a row.

When I was at the various UC's in the day, there were ALWAYS guys masturbating, soaping off their junk in front of everybody, cruising etc. in the lockers around the athletes and young men. This included recognizable professors. At UCLA, there was one jock guy who would always position himself so that you were staring up his junk from the back while he was doing push ups naked when you came around the corner of the lockers. Some of these guys must have lived in the showers. One guy at Berkley was always there looking to make eye contact, smiling while he beat off. I would see him run by naked with an erection sometimes, escaping from some authority or angry user. It seemed to be part of the thrill for him.

I noticed AF's icon (Sara Palin) in the comments section of the Uyghur article above.

Those shared beds are usually concealed in a closet adjacent to the main bedroom.
That's where the "Stop fuckin around in the china closet!" phrase originated...

HEYYOU says

"China is reportedly sending men to sleep in the same beds as Uighur Muslim women while their husbands are in prison camps"

Just provoke India and China to have all out war.

That'll rid the planet of a couple of billion.

Same with Sanders. Tulsi also backs this preposterous idea. Open borders, baby, so bend over and pay.

America needs to grow more men,there aren't any left.

Likely written by someone bathed in mediocrity, looking for imperfections in the masses of people more accomplished than the author can ever hope to be.

Why not have US taxpayers cover healthcare of Andaman islanders and Chukcha people of Siberia as well. They at least have not broken any US laws.

HeadSet says

Don't wanna hear about how the Vietnamese would kick their asses

Didn't China sack Hanoi soon after the Vietnam War? And this was when Vietnam had a 650,000 man battle hardened army.

They did not get as far as Hanoi if you are talking about 1979 conflict. Soviets mobilized troops on China border and sent a fair amount of weapons to Vietnamese. Tactically, Chinese got may be 30 km into Vietnam; strategically, Vietnamese destroyed Khmer Rouge regime which was a Chinese client and because of VN attack on them China invaded Vietnam.

Militarily, Russia is just a shadow of the former USSR, this hardly matters.

6rdB says

Why not have US taxpayers cover healthcare of Andaman islanders and Chukcha people of Siberia as well. They at least have not broken any US laws.

Don't give them ideas!

That’s funny. An opinion piece that purports to be based on science while advocating ignoring the use of the scientific method.

So are we all gonna die from the Wet Bulb in 5 years or 10 years, yet again?

You really want to fight “climate change?” Stop buying shit from and supporting the economies of China, India, and Korea. Then conquer both China and India and reduce their population density to what the average is in USA.

Eric Ciaramella's name banned from Facebook, Twitter, Youtube.

Nick Sandmann's name was never banned, despite being a minor and not involved in an impeachment inquiry held by Congress.

ForcedTQ says

You really want to fight “climate change?” Stop buying shit from and supporting the economies of China, India, and Korea. Then conquer both China and India and reduce their population density to what the average is in USA.

Harsh, but this is the reality that most climate change proponents don't understand. It is the ONLY way to fix the problem if you truly believe climate change is caused by CO2. Less people is the solution and not one politician will dare mention it.

https://babylonbee.com/news/abc-asks-viewers-to-send-in-evidence-on-epstein-so-they-can-destroy-it-and-then-murder-you

https://babylonbee.com/news/we-are-not-the-enemy-of-the-people-says-media-thats-intentionally-deceiving-the-people-to-protect-the-political-elites

Global Warming is happening so fast, trannies are wearing speedos to class show-n-tells.

The environment is deteriorating so quickly, soylent green has become soylent smudge-brown.

NoCoupForYou says

So are we all gonna die from the Wet Bulb in 5 years or 10 years, yet again?

3 years.

Onvacation says

NoCoupForYou says

So are we all gonna die from the Wet Bulb in 5 years or 10 years, yet again?

3 years.

Starting in India because they don't have air conditioning.

Tim Aurora says

For decades, most scientists saw climate change as a distant prospect.

Remember a couple of decades ago when they said the temperature was going to "hockey stick" up by multiple degrees? What happened?

Sorry, but no. Earth temperature has fallen by .4C degrees over the last 3 years. Storms and hurricanes are not getting worse. Crop harvests are in surplus. I'm still waiting for an actual picture showing sea level change, no one can seem to produce one. Polar bear populations have tripled since the 70s. Every doom and gloom prediction has fallen flat on its face, even more than random chance would allow. Climate change science is bunk.

Malcolm says

Every doom and gloom prediction has fallen flat on its face, even more than random chance would allow.

There you go again, confusing facts with THE TRUTH!

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2019/11/07/cbs-reportedly-fires-employee-after-abc-news-rats-him-out-for-leaked-epstein-clip-n2556084

https://www.foxnews.com/media/abc-epstein-cnn-mainstream-media

Mainstream media outlets have largely ignored the Project Veritas bombshell that ABC News killed a story that would have exposed the now-deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein three years ago, with some having themselves been recently embarrassed by Project Veritas, and others still smarting from their own alleged #MeToo coverups.

Fox News found no coverage on CNN, MSNBC, CBS News, or NBC News from noon through midnight ET on Tuesday while the story was lighting up social media. During that same time frame, Fox News covered the scandal on five different programs, including its entire primetime lineup.

“That there has been so little coverage about ABC avoiding the Epstein story demonstrates again that mainstream media too often make news judgment based on sociocultural or political implications rather than journalistic values,” DePauw University professor and media critic Jeffrey McCall told Fox News.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/books/article-7662051/How-Saudi-hit-squad-butchered-regimes-brave-critic-Jamal-Khashoggi.html

But that outrage was tempered by self-interest. Lucrative arms deals were at stake. So too were strategic alliances and power plays in the volatile Middle East.

Trump was caught on the hop, condemning the killing one minute while trying to steer culpability away from the Crown Prince the next, despite the insistence of his own investigators at the CIA that MBS was in it up to his neck.

Added to that was (and is) the complication of son-in-law Kushner being a close friend of the Crown Prince and with his own agenda to pursue.

Could be true that Jared approved at least the arrest of Khashoggi. But we should not assume it until there is some real evidence, given the comical levels of invented slander directed at Trump by Democrats with no evidence every single day.

He (the father of Hatice) was right to be suspicious. It later turned out that — unknown to everyone else — a month after he met Hatice, he had secretly married an Egyptian air stewardess in an Islamic wedding ceremony near his Washington home. He was still in touch with her by telephone shortly before his death.

The only way Khashoggi could get the papers he needed to satisfy his prospective father-in-law was to go to the Saudi consulate.

Khashoggi was no saint either. But that doesn't justify cutting him into little pieces.