by MisdemeanorRebel ➕follow (12) 💰tip ignore
Comments 1 - 34 of 34 Search these comments
Yes, becasue we all know that the most far left whacky sjw beliefs out there were imparted to sjws by academic/teacher union driven curricula.
Sure some English teachers are going to somewhat on the sjw spectrum
marcus saysSure some English teachers are going to somewhat on the sjw spectrum
And among these people, that are sympathetic to sjw points of view, most are going to be professional in that they understand that these are their personal political points of view, and not some absolute truths, and therefore not preach their political views to students. Same for very conservative teachers I know. They might bring up questions getting students thinking about issues or even have debates, but they aren't going to preach radical views. Not just becasue they know it's wrong to do this. But also becasue it can get them in big trouble with parents.
That's the reality.
it's funny how everything gets labeled right wing when it's not full blown socialist rag with flying rainbow flags 24/7
Liberals were bemoaning Jordan Peterson for his essay on the growing degeneracy in Music, Movies and Pop Culture.
I believe that such an essay existed, but not that Jordan Peterson wrote it.
Do you even know who Jordan Peterson is?
it's funny how everything gets labeled right wing when it's not full blown socialist rag with flying rainbow flags 24/7 screaming for more ass+penis.
Liberals were bemoaning Jordan Peterson for his essay on the growing degeneracy in Music, Movies and Pop Culture. He said the endgame was to create a Culture in America that would turn America upside down on its head. That's what the Socialist want, and it was how they were going to burn America down.
PragerU, a growing hub of the online right-wing media machine, is using YouTube as a way to circumvent professors — and parents — to reach a new generation of studentshttps://t.co/chu4L5BZCE— The New York Times (@nytimes) January 4, 2020
Sure some English teachers are going to somewhat on the sjw spectrum.. Same probably in Art and special ed, but less so for History. AS for Math and Science ? Pretty much not at all, or close to it.
Quite the opposite
Yes, becasue we all know that the most far left whacky sjw beliefs out there were imparted to sjws by academic/teacher union driven curricula.
We also know that if you reject sjw nonsense about the patriarchy and infinite genders then then you'll fit right in with the alt right or far right.
I think the correct response to bogus accusations of being "racist" or "far right" is to consistently reply with accusations of pedophilia.
FortWayneIndiana saysit's funny how everything gets labeled right wing when it's not full blown socialist rag with flying rainbow flags 24/7
Well I don't like the way you put it, but I agree somewhat.
Because not only do people like NoCoup try to pigeon hole all people to the left of alt right as being sjw extremists. The SJWs do this too, as if I must agree with them or be considered right wing if I don't want to get on board with leftist identity politics.
The obvious example is far leftists railing against Jordan Peterson as being a right winger. One of the reasons I like Peterson so much as that he represents an intelligent middle ground, and he questions left wing identity politics without being right wing about it. I wish he would speak out more about some things, but it's probably intentional to pull people away from the hateful right as much as it may pull others away ...
Because not only do people like NoCoup try to pigeon hole all people to the left of alt right as being sjw extremists. The SJWs do this too, as if I must agree with them or be considered right wing if I don't want to get on board with leftist identity politics.
marcus saysBecause not only do people like NoCoup try to pigeon hole all people to the left of alt right as being sjw extremists. The SJWs do this too, as if I must agree with them or be considered right wing if I don't want to get on board with leftist identity politics.
The diversity (tm) on the right is magnitudes larger than the diversity on the left which is practically non existent. It's not about pigeon holing it's about the dire need of the moderate left to distance themselves as much as possible and as vocal as possible from the nutjobs currently dominating liberal politics.
he has mentioned multiple times how he is for affirmative action
It is simply more challenging to draw a clear line around what is unacceptable to the left.
there are clueless people in humanities depts at colleges advocating for it.
I'm not so much for it as I understand its purpose.
The comment section on the NYT article is pure gold.
His apostasy must be crushed, not simply criticized; one conservative voice is one too many
CBOEtrader says
His apostasy must be crushed, not simply criticized; one conservative voice is one too many
Yep, pure Marcuse
I see. Only if you are 100% removed from schools and teachers do you have an accurate idea of what they are like and their beliefs.It works for atheists in their perspectives on Christians and their churches.
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,194,334 comments by 13,889 users - AmericanKulak, Patrick, RC2006, Tenpoundbass online now