8
0

Climate change hoax COLLAPSES as new science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on global temperatures


 invite response                
2019 Dec 4, 5:49am   12,193 views  240 comments

by Onvacation   ➕follow (4)   💰tip   ignore  

The “war on carbon” is derived from sheer stupidity, arrogance and scientific illiteracy
The extreme alarmism of climate change lunatics — best personified by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’ insistence that humanity will be destroyed in 12 years if we don’t stop burning fossil fuels — is all based on nothing but fearmongering media propaganda and faked science. (The IPCC and NOAA both routinely fudge temperature data to try to create a warming “trend” where none exists.)

It’s all a massive, coordinated fraud, and the mainstream media deliberately lies to the public about climate change to push anti-free market schemes that would destroy the U.S. economy while transferring literally trillions of dollars into the pockets of wealthy globalists as part of a “carbon tax” scheme.

Yet carbon isn’t the problem at all. And the “war on carbon” is a stupid, senseless policy created by idiots, given that humans are carbon-based lifeforms, meaning that any “war on carbon” is a war on humanity.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-07-12-climate-change-hoax-collapses-new-science-cloud-cover.html?fbclid=IwAR1YBhLRbjz72RoT9foEI4nkXq9XsDhe0dQAtuJrm2UJkPOxuCxFlKd9h1w

« First        Comments 112 - 151 of 240       Last »     Search these comments

112   Shaman   2019 Dec 21, 1:05pm  

Onvacation says
Heraclitusstudent says
The ice age was great for nature

Tell that to the flash frozen mammoths.


Flash frozen mammoth 🤤
Toss that sucker in the flash fryer!
113   Shaman   2019 Dec 21, 1:15pm  

Ok you want to decrease the average temperature of the planet fast?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahara_Sea

Dig a channel through some sand bars to the Mediterranean Sea, let the ocean water flood the low lying parts of the Sahara desert, bringing humidity and lowering temperatures in the region which should promote rainfall and (with desalination plants) provide for agricultural development of the region. Right now it’s lifeless empty desert where it never fucking rains. You could turn that into an oasis with this one little move.
It would cut down on sand storms in the area, which stretch far west over the Atlantic even influencing rainfall in Brazil. The incredibly hot temperatures of the Sahara also provide the seeds of hurricanes which annually batter the East cost of the USA and the Caribbean. Reducing these temps would reduce the power of hurricanes, and reduce their number. It would reduce global temperature averages as well through cloud formation and precipitation, as well as just reflection off the surface of the new inland sea.

If you’re serious about global warming, this is a serious first step.
114   Ceffer   2019 Dec 21, 1:35pm  

NoCoupForYou says
I swear, I don't wish this on that dorky girl, but wouldn't the funniest thing be for her to be groped by a Muslim Gang on a security camera that gets leaked to the Public before Swedish Authorities can conceal it?


She should be grateful. If it weren't for Global Warming, they would be groping her with cold fingers.
115   Y   2019 Dec 21, 5:17pm  

The 400 threads on reddit were a little rough on this topic but the 800 threads on Twitter gave a much smoother transitional argument...
Misc says
When the ice sheets that connected Asia with North America melted, now that was global warming.
116   CBOEtrader   2019 Dec 21, 5:31pm  

Shaman says
If you’re serious about global warming, this is a serious first step.


Wait, a functional, measureable theory? How dare you!
117   Bd6r   2019 Dec 21, 5:50pm  

Shaman says
If you’re serious about global warming, this is a serious first step.

Or telling Cat Ladies Passionate about Global Warming that buying MORE stuff on Amazon means more global warming....consume less = less global warming.

Do not use AC in summer, do not heat house to more than 50F in winter etc.
118   Onvacation   2019 Dec 21, 10:39pm  

rd6B says
Cat Ladies Passionate about Global Warming

Now there's a name for a band!
119   just_passing_through   2019 Dec 21, 11:01pm  

Think about all that new water front Real Estate! Someone should tell Trump to buy the Sahara!
120   mell   2019 Dec 22, 7:10pm  

CBOEtrader says
Shaman says
If you’re serious about global warming, this is a serious first step.


Wait, a functional, measureable theory? How dare you!


That's the thing. In nearly all scifi movies mankind has invented one or more technologies to deal with such potential issues but in reality the politicians aren't looking for solutions because then they couldn't subjugate their people to globull warming bs carbon tax measures and that would loosen their chokehold on what should be free people.
122   RC2006   2020 Jan 8, 3:43pm  

More bs. Listening to reporter and Zimbabweans talk about how climate change causing starvation. Not overpopulation or deforestation which they themselves bring up.

What are we going on half a century of starving people in Africa commercials. Enough the only fault we have is that we keep sending food.
123   RC2006   2020 Jan 8, 6:16pm  

At least 24 charged with arson for fires in Australia, but climate change is problem.
124   Onvacation   2020 Jan 8, 6:26pm  

Has anyone seen the "global average temperature anomaly" for 2019?
125   Shaman   2020 Jan 8, 6:41pm  

RC2006 says
Listening to reporter and Zimbabweans talk about how climate change causing starvation. Not overpopulation or deforestation which they themselves bring up.


Zimbabwe was considered the breadbasket of Africa, back when it was called Rhodesia and white peoples ran things. The black revolution came and took over and pushed out the white farmers and now the people own the land and starve in an agricultural paradise.
Serves them fucking right.
127   georgeliberte   2020 Jan 9, 3:19pm  

And has Greta taken volcanic events into her no doubt meticulous calculations
https://getpocket.com/explore/item/would-a-supervolcano-eruption-wipe-us-out?utm_source=pocket-newtab
128   Heraclitusstudent   2020 Jan 9, 4:21pm  

georgeliberte says
And has Greta taken volcanic events into her no doubt meticulous calculations

The people running the simulation have to keep things interesting.
130   Onvacation   2020 Jan 17, 5:58am  

HEYYOU says
The amount of heat being added to the oceans is equivalent to every person on the planet running 100 microwave ovens all day and all night."

Next time an alarmist squawks like chicken little, ask them, " how much has the temperature risen in the last century?"

"No amount of evidence will persuade an idiot"
Mark Twain
131   Onvacation   2020 Jan 23, 9:16am  





Co2 and warming are clearly disconnected.
132   Heraclitusstudent   2020 Jan 23, 10:55am  

Yeaaaaahhhh.... clearly

133   Heraclitusstudent   2020 Jan 23, 10:56am  

Total collapse of the "hoax"....
134   Heraclitusstudent   2020 Jan 23, 10:58am  

Onvacation says

"No amount of evidence will persuade an idiot"
Mark Twain


135   Onvacation   2020 Jan 23, 11:46am  

Heraclitusstudent says
Total collapse of the "hoax"....

So how much do you think the temperature has gone up in the last century?

The evidence, co2 rising temperature is not, is clear that manmade industrial co2 does not cause out of control global warming climate change.
136   Onvacation   2020 Jan 23, 11:47am  

Heraclitusstudent says



Yep.

How much will the temperature have to fall before you admit you have been scammed?
137   Heraclitusstudent   2020 Jan 23, 11:50am  

Onvacation says
How much will the temperature have to fall before you admit you have been scammed?

You've been saying the same for how long? A decade? two?
How much do they have to rise before you admit you were scammed?
138   Onvacation   2020 Jan 23, 1:26pm  

Heraclitusstudent says
You've been saying the same for how long? A decade? two?

A couple of years, from before the temperature peaked.Heraclitusstudent says
How much do they have to rise before you admit you were scammed?

At least a couple of degrees. Ever wonder why the alarmists don't display the hockey stick graph anymore?
139   Onvacation   2020 Jan 23, 1:32pm  

Heraclitusstudent says

The people running the simulation have to keep things interesting.

@heraclitusstudent

You seem so sane on many topics. How did you become an alarmist? What triggered you to believe the hype over a one degree/century (if you BELIEVE the adjusted data) anomaly?
140   Heraclitusstudent   2020 Jan 23, 2:30pm  

Onvacation says
the hype over a one degree/century

More like 2 degrees Fahrenheit in 50 years and from a time when far less carbon was being added to the atmosphere than today.

And you've got a few things like
www.youtube.com/embed/FLCgybStZ4g
that make me go "hummm".

I personally don't care either way. It's not my life that will most affected.

But what matters is not the next 50 yrs of my life. Humanity hopefully will extend for hundreds and thousands of years. I don't know on what planet 1 degree a century is acceptable.

But how easy to believe that there is a world wide conspiracy of most climate scientists, in all countries, in many regimes, lying for decades.... for what exactly??? To prevent you from driving a SUV? Why? It makes absolutely 0 sense.

Whereas, political idealists, driven by big money from relevant industries... that's a normal part of the scenery.
141   socal2   2020 Jan 23, 2:59pm  

Heraclitusstudent says
But how easy to believe that there is a world wide conspiracy of most climate scientists, in all countries, in many regimes, lying for decades.... for what exactly??? To prevent you from driving a SUV? Why? It makes absolutely 0 sense.


I wouldn't say they are purposefully lying, but there is alot of group-think going on. Any scientist that shows skepticism about the hyperbolic predictions of the Climate doom-mongers is basically shunned and run out of academia. Just like trying to be a Conservative Professor at any US college is nearly impossible these days.

How many "smart people" fell for all of the other hyperbolic predictions of the last 30 years - predicting mass starvation, unlivable cities, overpopulation, peak oil, new ice age etc? I trust these people had humanity's best interest at heart and were scientific leaders in their fields - but they were all spectacularly wrong.

That said, there are definitely some Marxists and America haters like Russia and OPEC that are using Climate Change to try and knock us down a peg because we are now such a massive energy producer reducing their international power.

At the end of the day, until they come up with solutions that aren't worse than the disease, nothing meaningful will be done.
142   Onvacation   2020 Jan 23, 3:04pm  

Heraclitusstudent says

But how easy to believe that there is a world wide conspiracy of most climate scientists, in all countries, in many regimes, lying for decades.... for what exactly??? To prevent you from driving a SUV? Why? It makes absolutely 0 sense.

It's mostly politicians who are spreading the alarm. Real scientists don't care about consensus.

100 Authors Against Einstein - Scientific 'Consensus' and Scepticism
"Why 100 authors? If I were wrong, then one would have been enough!" - Albert Einstein
143   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Jan 23, 4:42pm  

It's very simple:

Experiental Knowledge and Observing Actual Data in Real Life trumps Computer Models/Theories.
144   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Jan 23, 4:47pm  

Heraclitusstudent says
But how easy to believe that there is a world wide conspiracy of most climate scientists, in all countries, in many regimes, lying for decades.... for what exactly??? To prevent you from driving a SUV? Why? It makes absolutely 0 sense.


What changed in the past 10 years that caused large numbers of the Medical Profession to suddenly declare Transgenderism wasn't a mental illness?

WHO just changed it in 2018
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/06/20/transgender-not-mental-illness-world-health-organization/717758002/

In fact this "news" article itself only gives one side of the story by repeating activist group tweets.

Not one datapoint changed: The link with child abuse, the link with high rates of suicide (regardless of familial/social acceptance), etc.

Skull measuring was hot for decades before real science prevailed: Those who thought cranial measurements were daft were a loud minority that didn't prevail until POLITICAL attitudes changed.

The Scientific Consensus is not perfect.
145   Heraclitusstudent   2020 Jan 23, 5:04pm  

NoCoupForYou says
What changed in the past 10 years that caused large numbers of the Medical Profession to suddenly declare Transgenderism wasn't a mental illness?

It's not the medical profession that changed. It's the lobbies, the trans lobby just like the oil industry lobby. It's the politicians who exhausted their gay agenda. The only science so far that is almost complete BS and largely devoid on empirical facts is gender studies. With psychology a mixed basket.
The global warming story started way before the rise of SJW and woke culture.
I've people like onVacations on the Internet for like 20yrs.
Under Bush, these were the same people that didn't believe in evolution, for similar (tribal) reasons. Science is their out-group. End of argument.
Tons of evidence accumulated from all sides, but they haven't changed their tune by a iota.
146   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Jan 23, 5:11pm  

Heraclitusstudent says

It's not the medical profession that changed. It's the lobbies, the trans lobby just like the oil industry lobby.


Here's what I need from the Global Warming Advocates:

Explain exactly what was wrong with your previous models of a decade/two decades/three decades ago, and demonstrate (not assert) that the problem has been fixed and the current modelling is accurate.

In other words, SHOW (with math and open data) why the sea level hasn't risen X inches and the temps haven't increased 2C

Simply pushing the effects down another decade is not an answer to valid questions about the proven inaccuracy of the model, which was off by a huge degree.

Claiming that something will grow 200 feet in two decades, but it only grows 40 feet, is a major fail.
147   Heraclitusstudent   2020 Jan 23, 5:16pm  

Nothing was wrong with the models. They predicted a rise of temperatures and we saw a rise of temperatures. Models are never perfect but they ballparked efficiently what is happening. I.e. a problem that will be unacceptable in 100yrs unless we do something about it.

Plus it's no longer a question of model. We have now an empirical trend.
148   Heraclitusstudent   2020 Jan 23, 5:18pm  

If you believe AGW is a hoax, explain how and why we can have a conspiracy of most climate scientists, in all countries, in many regimes, lying for decades???
For what reasons?
149   Onvacation   2020 Jan 23, 5:35pm  

Heraclitusstudent says
I've people like onVacations on the Internet for like 20yrs


20 years and still no hockey stick. By now we were supposed to be several degrees warmer. The poles were supposed to melt. Manhattan and Florida were to be flooded. The Maldives and many other low elevation locations were to be underwater. Droughts and a desert California with year round snow free Sierras would be the new norm. Wet-bulb death was to be widespread..

None of this has happened.

The alarmists say, "Not yet. If we don't stop using carbon right now the temperature will rise a couple of degrees by the end of the century and our children will face all of the above".

The Malthusians always underestimate the ingenuity of humans.
150   Onvacation   2020 Jan 23, 5:42pm  

Heraclitusstudent says
If you believe AGW is a hoax, explain how and why we can have a conspiracy of most climate scientists, in all countries, in many regimes, lying for decades???
For what reasons?


Name the top climate scientist in the world who you believe understands why we're going to fry if we don't cut back on our co2 emissions.

I was looking for a better word than fry to explain all of the fear and loathing of the future our indoctrination system has instilled in our youth. We will see more and more pathetic cases of Greta until we expose these pseudo-scientists for the frauds they are.

So who's the top guy so we can look more closely into his models and data?
151   theoakman   2020 Jan 23, 8:08pm  

Climatology is a fledgling field that has hardly been developed. The problem with most science and other fields of academia is that they try to piggy back on the reputations of fields like Physics, where we can put together 20 textbooks on various fields within the subject, 1000 pages long, and it will never have to change...because we know the subject in and out. Climatology is not like that...and likely never will be.

The very few that are out there are suffering from massive groupthink and stepping beyond their bounds. This idea that warming creates substandard living conditions hardly has any basis in reality.

Here's some scientific facts:

1. More people die from extreme cold than extreme heat....a lot more...like 17 times
2. Food production and industrial production has been positively correlated with warming the past 100 years.
3. Population growth has been positively correlated with warming the past 100 years.
4. The planet is actually greening due to climate change....which was confirmed by a group that studied satellites at the Liberal UC Berkeley.
5. People don't flee warmer climates...they flock to them.

« First        Comments 112 - 151 of 240       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions