4
0

Flynn - not guilty


 invite response                
2020 May 7, 4:05pm   1,749 views  38 comments

by FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden   ➕follow (3)   💰tip   ignore  

Case dropped. Nothing there. But this witch-hunt did hurt him a lot and his family.

That’s how rich use legal system to hurt little guys, legal system that only rich assholes can afford. Really fucked up what they did to him. For me it’s more of a gripe against our fubar legal system.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/drops-doj-case-against-michael-flynn-in-wake-of-internal-memo-release

« First        Comments 14 - 38 of 38        Search these comments

14   rdm   2020 May 8, 12:09pm  

covid_shmovid says
till don't like that RT-paid cheap fuck.


He plead guilty twice. did the FBI play nice with him ? No, do they ever? And he plead guilty to lying and was not charged with other crimes he admitted to...in writing, like failing to register as a foreign agent. He was/is a fucking 3 star gen and in army intelligence and claims he got rolled by the FBI. What a cheap ass schmuck. This is a disgrace and example of Buttlicker Barr being Trumps lapdog. Special dispensation if you be one of Trump's boys, Stone and Flynn if you are an average joe, fuck you.
15   socal2   2020 May 8, 12:13pm  

rdm says
He plead guilty twice. did the FBI play nice with him ? No, do they ever? And he plead guilty to lying and was not charged with other crimes he admitted to...in writing, like failing to register as a foreign agent. He was/is a fucking 3 star gen and in army intelligence and claims he got rolled by the FBI. What a cheap ass schmuck. This is a disgrace and example of Buttlicker Barr being Trumps lapdog. Special dispensation if you be one of Trump's boys, Stone and Flynn if you are an average joe, fuck you.



You don't get it - if there was no underlying crime to investigate (we now know there wasn't), the FBI had no business interrogating Flynn in the first place.

The biggest disgrace was the abuse of our Justice system, re-writing 302's and threatening family members to go after political opponents.
16   Patrick   2020 May 8, 12:20pm  

https://spectator.us/flynnocent-michael-flynn-justice-served/

Flynnocent: why the general has a long way to go before justice is served

It’s being blared about the internet that now, finally, at last, the 30-year military veteran has got justice. Not yet he hasn’t

Donald Trump Liberty Politics US Politics
Flynnocent: why the general has a long way to go before justice is served
It’s being blared about the internet that now, finally, at last, the 30-year military veteran has got justice. Not yet he hasn’t

Just moments ago, the news came in that Department of, um, Justice has dropped its — ‘um’ again — Gen. Michael Flynn, President Trump’s first national security adviser. ‘The Government has determined,’ the Court filing read, ‘pursuant to the Principles of Federal Prosecution and based on an extensive review and careful consideration of the circumstances, that continued prosecution of this case would not serve the interests of justice.’

You think?

It’s being blared about the internet that now, finally, at last, the 30-year military veteran has got justice.

Not yet he hasn’t.

The disgusting people running the FBI — big boy James Comey, and Peter Strzok, and former head of counterintelligence Bill Priestap, among others — pursued a vendetta against Flynn, manufacturing a bogus case against him in order, first, to destroy someone that Barack Obama and his intelligence operatives detested and, second, to pursue ‘Crossfire Hurricane’, the ‘umbrella’ investigation whose goal was to destroy Donald Trump.

They were pretty successful at the first job. They smeared Flynn, then they set him up, sending Strzok and another agent to have a friendly chat with him at the White House which they weaponized into a bogus ‘you lied to the FBI’ charge. They got him fired from his position as NSA, bankrupted him through ‘the-process-is-the-punishment’ legal feels, and forced him to plead guilty to a felony by threatening his son with another bogus charge.


The FBI has been forever disgraced. They cannot be trusted. They abuse their power for political reasons.
17   Ceffer   2020 May 8, 12:23pm  

What has or government come to when politically motivated, Selective Justice has not prevailed?
18   rdm   2020 May 8, 3:58pm  

socal2 says
You don't get it - if there was no underlying crime to investigate (we now know there wasn't), the FBI had no business interrogating Flynn in the first place


The crime and investigation was Russian Interference in the 2016 election; Trump or no Trump involvement. There was a on going intelligence investigation he was a part of it, he lied to Pence and the FBI and the Russians knew he lied to Pence, they had to interview him. How can you investigate if people lie? That is the basis of the statute. But why the fuck did he lie to Pence and the FBI in the first place, that is the unanswered question. He is either an imbecile (not hardly) or covering for something'someone as what he personally did, talking to the Russian Ambassador was never going to be prosecuted.

Not relevant to this but he for sure he committed a crime by not registering as a foreign agent.
19   AD   2020 May 8, 4:06pm  

Patrick says
The FBI has been forever disgraced. They cannot be trusted. They abuse their power for political reasons.


I think Comey and the FBI were taking orders from Obama via drama queen Sally Yates.

It was purely political as Obama was using pretext to go after anyone who could damage the work done by his neoMarxist and globalist agenda.

That meant he wanted to go after Flynn, for starters, since Flynn was a vocal critical from his administration of the Iran deal.

That meant Obama thought that an investigation could discredit Trump and therefore politically weaken Trump such as stop Trump from securing the border and from stopping the Iran deal.
20   socal2   2020 May 8, 4:26pm  

rdm says
But why the fuck did he lie to Pence and the FBI in the first place, that is the unanswered question.


I would like that clarified too. I expect Flynn to clear this up now that he will be free to do interviews.

It is my understanding that the FBI officials already had all of the transcripts of Flynn's calls with the Russians and the calls were perfectly fine pushing pro-American policy telling the Russians to cool it and not escalate with the recent sanctions the Obama Admin imposed. So there is nothing in the calls themselves that was bad and worth lying about.

This FBI meeting was not billed as an interrogation - just a friendly get to know you meeting with Flynn as was transitioning to his new job.

Was the lie something as small as Flynn thinking he didn't have to tell these FBI guys about every call he has ever made and then they pressed him with the transcripts with Russian what's-his-nuts and he panicked and dug in his heals?
21   RWSGFY   2020 May 8, 5:06pm  

socal2 says
he panicked and dug in his heals?


Sheesh, one would expect a general to have some balls. If he panicks in front of couple FBI fucks, what would he do under enemy fire, shit himself?
22   RWSGFY   2020 May 8, 5:07pm  

socal2 says

I think that is a bit harsh. Not a fan of Turkey or RT, but there is much worse than being a lobbyist for a NATO ally.


Ally-shmally, RT is fucking propaganda arm of a fucking enemy. Nothing to do with Turkey, everything to do with Russia.
23   rocketjoe79   2020 May 8, 5:09pm  

covid_shmovid says
socal2 says
he panicked and dug in his heals?


Sheesh, one would expect a general to have some balls. If he panicks in front of couple FBI fucks, what would he do under enemy fire, shit himself?


Neither He nor Martha Stewart panicked. FBI drones are skilled in interrogation and getting people to say things. sS soon as you begin speaking, you're at risk. You only EVER speak THROUGH a lawyer. Never directly to anyone in the government. The only asnwer is "I decline to be interviewed." Then Lawyer up.
24   RWSGFY   2020 May 8, 5:12pm  

rocketjoe79 says
covid_shmovid says
socal2 says
he panicked and dug in his heals?


Sheesh, one would expect a general to have some balls. If he panicks in front of couple FBI fucks, what would he do under enemy fire, shit himself?


Neither He nor Martha Stewart panicked. FBI drones are skilled in interrogation and getting people to say things. sS soon as you begin speaking, you're at risk. You only EVER speak THROUGH a lawyer. Never directly to anyone in the government. The only asnwer is "I decline to be interviewed." Then Lawyer up.


So he didn't even have a lawyer with him? No brains in addition to no balls. Jeeezus-effin-Christ, some generals we have.
25   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 May 8, 5:15pm  

Flynn was running an op, a sting. Admiral Rodgers took the insurance policy plans to trump n all the way back in Nov 2016.
26   Onvacation   2020 May 8, 5:27pm  

rdm says
The crime and investigation was Russian Interference in the 2016 election; Trump or no Trump involvement.

It was Hillary.
28   AD   2020 May 8, 6:39pm  

HEYYOU says
Flynn plead guilty. He's guilty or a stupid RepCon.
Lock him up! The judge needs to throw a maximum sentence at him.Let him appeal.

Get an attorney & keep your mouth shut. Yep! He's a stupid RepCon.


That is why whenever a police officer or federal law enforcement wants to speak with you, ask if you are being detained and if you are the subject of an investigation.

They have to answer those questions.

If you are not being detained, then you are free to go.

I wonder what did FBI agent Strzok tell Flynn when he "interviewed" him. What did Strzok state was the reason for wanting to talk with Flynn ?
29   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 May 8, 6:43pm  

They presented it as a routine getting to know you type situation.
30   Patrick   2020 May 8, 10:02pm  

We have the FBI deliberately trying to entrap someone for political puposes.

Not good.
31   Patrick   2020 May 9, 1:53pm  

https://nypost.com/2020/05/07/michael-flynn-case-collapse-latest-sign-russiagate-was-a-complete-fraud/

Yet both Strzok and the other agent in the interview left agreeing that Flynn hadn’t attempted any deception at all. It was months later that prosecutors working under Mueller decided that he had lied — and proceeded to nearly bankrupt Flynn with legal fees, then threaten to prosecute his son, before the general finally agreed to plead guilty.

And this is hardly the only recent eye-opener: Soon-to-be-released transcripts of 2017-18 House Intelligence Committee interviews reportedly show that the FBI’s Russia investigation had come up empty all across the board before President Trump even took office.

Ironically, current Intel Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) has apparently been pushing to prevent the release — perhaps because he for years has claimed he saw “direct evidence” of Trump-Russia collusion that neither the FBI nor even Mueller’s endless probe ever found.

It seems that none of the 53 witnesses interviewed by the committee — including Obama officials Jim Clapper, Loretta Lynch, Sam Power, Susan Rice, Sally Yates and Andrew McCabe — said they’d seen any evidence of collusion.
32   HeadSet   2020 May 9, 2:38pm  

So he didn't even have a lawyer with him? No brains in addition to no balls. Jeeezus-effin-Christ, some generals we have.

No, this was a betrayal of trust. Flynn did not expect to be set up by members of his own government. He did not have a lawyer because he did not do anything remotely criminal, and thought the conversation was about setting up a new administration. What happened to Flynn is like a Quarterback being tackled by his own offence because his team members want to maintain a point spread.

Do you also see that by claiming Flynn being "naive" by not having a lawyer, you are saying his real problem is not understanding just how corrupt the holdover Obama FBI really is?
33   rdm   2020 May 9, 7:06pm  

Patrick says
It seems that none of the 53 witnesses interviewed by the committee — including Obama officials Jim Clapper, Loretta Lynch, Sam Power, Susan Rice, Sally Yates and Andrew McCabe — said they’d seen any evidence of collusion.


Read this sentence itr is meaningless...it seems.
34   Patrick   2020 May 9, 7:13pm  

It looks pretty damn clear.

Flynn was set up. He did nothing wrong, but was targeted by corrupt FBI agents simply for being on Trump's side.
36   Patrick   2020 May 10, 10:42am  

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/05/flynn-and-the-anatomy-of-a-political-narrative/

Obama officials and FBI collaborated to invent the ‘Russian collusion’ narrative

The FBI coordinated very closely with the Obama White House on the investigation of Michael Flynn, while the Obama Justice Department was asleep at the switch. That is among the most revealing takeaways from Thursday’s decision by Attorney General Bill Barr to pull the plug on the prosecution of Flynn, who fleetingly served as President Trump’s first National Security Advisor. Flynn had been seeking to withdraw his guilty plea to a false-statements charge brought in late 2017 by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
38   Patrick   2020 May 10, 11:19am  

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/495366-something-seems-rotten-in-flynns-case-and-maybe-others-too

Powell and other champions of Flynn’s cause have long claimed he did not lie to investigators -- a claim supported by the interviewing FBI agents, who concluded that Flynn had not made intentional misstatements, just failures of recollection, which are common. Instead, they maintain that Flynn was coerced into pleading guilty nearly a year later by special counsel Robert Mueller’s team of hyper-aggressive prosecutors. Prosecutors did this, Powell argues, by threatening that if he refused to plead, they would prosecute his son. The son, also named Michael Flynn, worked in Gen. Flynn’s private intelligence firm, which Team Mueller was scrutinizing over its alleged failure to register with the government as a foreign agent — a dubious allegation that was rarely handled as a criminal offense before Mueller’s probe.

After DOJ’s revelations last Friday, Powell filed a submission with the court, asserting that the new disclosures demonstrate that Mueller’s prosecutors not only pressured Flynn with the possibility of indicting his son; they also secretly assured Flynn’s former counsel, the well-connected Washington firm of Covington & Burling (C&B), that Flynn’s son would not be prosecuted if Flynn pleaded guilty. This “side deal” (a) was not explicitly memorialized in the formal plea agreement, (b) was not otherwise disclosed to the court as federal law requires, and (c) was designed to enable prosecutors to evade their due process obligations in future cases. ...

Needless to say, Flynn’s plea agreement makes no mention of any commitment by prosecutors to refrain from charging Flynn’s son with a crime, notwithstanding how central that commitment appears to have been to the plea bargain.

Not only does this appear to be a willful misrepresentation to the sentencing judge; it laid the groundwork for deceiving future juries and judges. Mueller’s prosecutors gave Flynn a cooperation agreement because they anticipated calling him to testify in other cases. He would be expected to testify that his written plea agreement stated the totality of his understandings with prosecutors. By doing so, he would mislead juries and judges about what promises (or threats) prosecutors made to induce him to plead guilty and cooperate; jurors would not learn that Mueller’s prosecutors had exploited Flynn’s love for his son to squeeze him into a guilty plea.


So Flynn was forced to plead guilty to protect his own son from the same "process as punishment" that Flynn was forced to endure, and then was not even allowed to explain this deal to the judge.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions