« First « Previous Comments 12 - 41 of 41 Search these comments
Wake me up when you're throwing in $30-40k annually before you spout your mouth off.
No thinking person should want federal taxes. That's why I've always found this topic silly. If you care about it, it's likely that you don't pay any federal taxes and are a loser and burden on our country. Go fucking produce and make some god damn money. Wake me up when you're throwing in $30-40k annually before you spout your mouth off.
ForcedTQ saysConstitutionally speaking, there should be NO federal direct taxation of the people of the several States. All of that was to be paid for through import taxes, which what a fucking coincidence (not) would have helped protect jobs and production of goods in the Several States.
Nope. Direct taxation is allowed. Just has to be done according to apportionment. Exception to that rule is the carve out for income taxes.
Why the precedent, first ever president / major party nominee, so paranoid about keeping the information private? Nothing to be ashamed of, like a balding scalp is nothing to be ashamed of.
Why so paranoid? Nixon, both Bushes, all the rest in his party didn't withhold the information.
Why so paranoid? Nixon, both Bushes, all the rest in his party didn't withhold the information.
Because few people understand business taxes well enough to know that Trump Corp did everything right.
What I don’t understand is even if Trump Corp paid 0, it seems like Trump would need to still pull a salary for himself to pay for personal shit and that would be taxed. Are they not showing that in the Leaked return or is there some way if you own a business to run all your expenses through it?
In all honesty I don't fully understand it, but dividend distributions is my guess. He can pay himself and not owe taxes if he has carryover losses.
What I don’t understand is even if Trump Corp paid 0, it seems like Trump would need to still pull a salary for himself to pay for personal shit and that would be taxed.
Not neccesserily: some tech CEOs have a salary of $1 and live on money borrowed against the stock they own in their company.
This way you can have no income, shitload of debt but live like a fucking king (as long as your company is doing well).
You’d still need to take some income from your company to service the debt.
FuckCCP89 saysNot neccesserily: some tech CEOs have a salary of $1 and live on money borrowed against the stock they own in their company.
You’d still need to take some income from your company to service the debt
Um, no. You service the debt from the money you borrow. When the time comes you roll everything over to a new loan.
FuckCCP89 saysUm, no. You service the debt from the money you borrow. When the time comes you roll everything over to a new loan.
Got it. Live off money borrowed against your company. No taxes, only pay interest. Then when you die, sell off shares to settle the debt. I assume that would be taxed at long term capital gains rates?
There could be some kind of cost base reset for inherited securities
Shaman saysThe NYT tax report
they should do Biden next, but I doubt it will ever happen
Wonder what a civil war will be like with 400,000,000 guns?
I’m going to check out Puerto Rico; if you live there you pay no taxes.
« First « Previous Comments 12 - 41 of 41 Search these comments
Funny how this info gets released at precisely the right time for "maximum effect." And many followup articles will be released with MOAR BOMBSHELLS.
The left will do ANYTHING to make sure Trump doesn't get elected. The law is secondary to the mission.
Carlos Slim was reported as the largest shareholder of NYT in 2015. But it's ok, because:
"And the New York Times said Slim wields no influence over its reporting.
"Carlos Slim is an excellent shareholder who fully respects boundaries regarding the independence of our journalism. He has never sought to influence what we report," New York Times publisher and chairman Arthur Sulzberger, Jr. said in a statement.
Yep, no influence at all here. Riiiight.