patrick.net

https://twitter.com/Not_the_Bee/status/1391748194401456128

Women have the right to be bricklayers, so how come almost everyone who does that is a man?

Patrick says

Women have the right to be bricklayers, so how come almost everyone who does that is a man?

More profitable, easier, and less time consuming to be a bricklayer layer.

Wow, pretty sick burn here:

The big question

In light of all the above, the big question is fairly simple to answer. Women want to know - where are all the good men? Where are all the stable men? Where are all the responsible men? Where are all the chivalrous men? Where are all the men who will treat me like a lady? Where oh where have they gone?!?!?!?!?!

The answer - you torched all the good men, you incinerated them and now they're ashes. Your nagging was like a sledgehammer, wracking at the walls. Your criticizing drilled holes in the foundation. Your tantrums set the whole thing ablaze and your starfish sex poured cold water on the remaining embers within the ashes.

You removed male authority and replaced it with female empowerment. You rewarded bad asshole behavior with hot monkey sex while shaming good responsible behavior with the friendzone and shaming language. You torched men on a societal level through alimony, child custody and support, false rape accusations and diversity hires. You ensured that men could not rebuild the home after you finished with its destruction. Men gave you privileges because they loved you, you turned around and made life worse and worse for men with each passing year, decade and generation of feminism.

You were banking on the infinite male sex drive. You thought that men will always come crawling back no matter how outlandish your demands. You manipulated the collective male love for you to exploit men and burn the whole structure to the ground. You wanna know where all the good men went?

They went away from your toxic dumpster fire!

https://www.reddit.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/comments/9zkx7z/consistency_is_a_tool_of_the_patriarchy_fickle/

Line up fellas! This is your last chance at Real Love! But be prepared to give up your belief in GPS.

Man's requirement: 1. Must have a REAL cunt and tits, an able bodied mouth, know how to use them, and weigh less than 130 pounds. I can't think of the rest of the requirements.

That's about it, really.

But seriously, intelligence is also good. Otherwise, you have nothing to talk about.

Hi, I'm a man in my mid 40s, I don't have a STEM degree, and my eyesight is deteriorating. Haven't been to the gym in a year. I don't have millions to buy a ride on a Soyuz.

NASA should recognize my personality and preferences and send me up on the next ISS Crewed Mission.

Anything less proves we live in an oppressive society that keeps people like me down.

Patrick says

The answer - you torched all the good men, you incinerated them and now they're ashes. Your nagging was like a sledgehammer, wracking at the walls. Your criticizing drilled holes in the foundation. Your tantrums set the whole thing ablaze and your starfish sex poured cold water on the remaining embers within the ashes.

You removed male authority and replaced it with female empowerment. You rewarded bad asshole behavior with hot monkey sex while shaming good responsible behavior with the friendzone and shaming language. You torched men on a societal level through alimony, child custody and support, false rape accusations and diversity hires. You ensured that men could not rebuild the home after you finished with its destruction. Men gave you privileges because they loved you, you turned around and made life worse and worse for men with each passing year, decade and generation of feminism.

You were banking on the infinite male sex drive. You thought that men will always com...

Some of that was always there - "bad boys" have always been attractive to womyn. What is different these days is that aberrant (in some ways) behavior is not shamed by society, and while it SEEMS that this lack of shaming benefits womyn, in reality it benefits men more. A hundred years ago, couple married and they had to conform to local village expectations - do not fuck around too obviously, stay married, provide for kids, etc. While it was not universally successful, most people were OK in that system. Now they can bang their brains out. And while shaming womyn for that has gone away, due to our biological programming it actually benefits men. Screw as many womyn as you want and then if you want to have a stable relationship when you are in your late 30's or 40's or even later, catch a much younger one. Womyn on other hand are not that marketable in late 30's to 40's. Another way how a woman can be single into 40's is focus on career, which is supposedly good for them these days. I have seen bars in Boston area full of "professional" womyn in 35-45 yr age group who can not catch a male - younger females are much preferred.

Women go downhill fast once they hit 30s. For men its like 60s and then we die. Women have to exist a lot longer ugly.

That is one hard 29.



Pic is like the promo pic of an Author who just wrote "Finding your True Love at 49".

Been through all the 'single mom' 'pimp knock up' dramas over the years with the myriad female office help. Gets boring and predictable after a while. What never ceased to amaze me is they they would always keep some insane, stalking male loser on the hook while they tried to shop for something better. These glaring male bozos would often show up at the offices to make sure their lovey doveys weren't being co-opted.

RC2006 says

Women go downhill fast once they hit 30s. For men its like 60s and then we die. Women have to exist a lot longer ugly.

Do not kid yourself - plenty of dudes have thoroughly gone to seed by 45 by becoming flabby, pot-bellied, and bald. Also bad complexion from cigs and booze. I will agree that a man with healthy habits can stay trim and healthy looking into his 60s.

HeadSet says

Do not kid yourself - plenty of dudes have thoroughly gone to seed by 45 by becoming flabby, pot-bellied, and bald. Also bad complexion from cigs and booze. I will agree that a man with healthy habits can stay trim and healthy looking into his 60s.

Yes, but here's the difference. No guy, much less one over 30, would write an OLD Profile like this:

(Picture of self in underpants, perfectly angled to hide the Paunch)

Hi, I'm a 35 year old single father with two kids from two different babymamas and my last partner is pregnant with my 3rd child.

They are the most important to me, and nobody will equal them.

I'm not into hook ups.

My favorite pastime is Netflix and Chill, and buying Expensive Items.

You: Have a B to C Cup, between 5'6 and 5'9" and take care of yourself with bikini Model Abs. Must have a professional income ($100k+!) and No Kids. I don't want any more kids myself. No Flat Chested or BBWs or beggars. No Scruffs! And no FAKE TITS.

I am your Prince Charming, though with all the child support payments, you will have to keep me in the style I want to get accustomed to.

Every one of my last three Wives or Girlfriends were abusive; they failed to do exactly what I told them and the first two cheated on me because I'm such a wonderful person with amazing sex skills. The last one I was forced to cheat on because my last wife worked 60 hours a week to satisfy my demands, but didn't have enough time to romance me constantly with fine dinners and expensive thoughtful gifts.

Will YOU be my Princess Charming that rescues me from my disappointment with Womyn?

Swipe Left if you can't take a strong, independent Man of the Future like me.

(Or Right, I've never used a smartphone dating app)

Wow, that is quite the profile. Only thing missing is "must be open minded enough to ignore chancers on dick."

RC2006 says

Women go downhill fast once they hit 30s. For men its like 60s and then we die. Women have to exist a lot longer ugly.

I've heard this put as "Women age like milk, while men age like wine."

There is some truth in that no matter how much it stings women.

Rb6d says

Some of that was always there - "bad boys" have always been attractive to womyn. What is different these days is that aberrant (in some ways) behavior is not shamed by society, and while it SEEMS that this lack of shaming benefits womyn, in reality it benefits men more.

Yes, women have been tuned by evolution to prefer men who seem confident, dominant, and independent. They can't turn that off, because it is literally how they came to exist. It's hard-wired into their brains. Women who preferred such men simply had more surviving descendants.

But it's not all men who benefit from the lack of shaming. It's those very men who have that confidence, and those who can fake it for a few hours.

Patrick says

But it's not all men who benefit from the lack of shaming. It's those very men who have that confidence, and those who can fake it for a few hours.

Which is the whole motive behind shit testing: Who is the real Alpha, and who was just "on" that night. However, being aware of the shittest is 90% of the battle.

> Patrick says
> I've heard this put as "Women age like milk, while men age like wine." There is some truth in that no matter how much it stings women.

It shouldn't sting from the rational point of view (lol, how common is "rational"?). Women in their girlie prime are the most desired and the most selfish beings out there (to be clear: this is statistical, not individual perspective, some girls may be outliers) That's how nature works. Milk/wine allegory speaks to nature's way to keep things in equilibrium - statistically, yet again. Desirability between genders is a zero-sum game, so something has to give: desirability of a woman in her prime comes at direct expense of the lack of such desirability at a different point in her life. Men and women simply have different challenges throughout their lifetimes.

And men are fucking lucky not to be at their most desireable when at their most inexperienced, unwise, and ignorant. That is a huge male advantage.

All of the fertility rituals aside, a truly wise, supportive and appreciative woman at any age is welcome by men, even if compromised by age or looks. Women who like men and are willing to engage femininity and charm will have men. The colder and more selfish a woman, the better looking she has to be to get away with it.

MisdemeanorRebellionNoCoupForYou says

And men are fucking lucky not to be at their most desireable when at their most inexperienced, unwise, and ignorant. That is a huge male advantage.

Sure, being most desirable when at most inexperienced is girls curse. Boys curse is being horndogs at a very wrong time in their lives.
Seeing how nature built us, giving species a chance and making individuals of the species happy are apparently conflicting objectives.

"As a single mother of 3, my children come first. (High Angle photo of cleavage). No Hookups"

"Hi, welcome to The Wall Restaurant, where our service always puts you 4th. Sir, why are you oogling the buffet? Can't you think of anything besides food when you visit a restaurant? Where have all the Good Customers gone"

Patrick says

But it's not all men who benefit from the lack of shaming. It's those very men who have that confidence, and those who can fake it for a few hours.

you are behind the times, @Patrick. With Tinder, nearly any man can get laid.

Rb6d says

you are behind the times, @Patrick. With Tinder, nearly any man can get laid.

Oh, how it would stink to be a man testing that theory, and end up being the outlier that comes up dry.

HeadSet says

Oh, how it would stink to be a man testing that theory, and end up being the outlier that comes up dry.

I've seen soyboys female students here go out with...you would not believe your eyes.

Rb6d says

you are behind the times, @Patrick. With Tinder, nearly any man can get laid.

I will assume that you are being sarcastic..
Family Guy - Tinder makes you gross
https://youtu.be/5ZUeFbU0T08

Booger says

I will assume that you are being sarcastic..
Family Guy - Tinder makes you gross
https://youtu.be/5ZUeFbU0T08

Sadly, no. Younger generation thinks in a different way and for (many or most) of them tinder and similar things are not gross. Times have changed, gentlepersons...

If sluts didn't leave descendants, there wouldn't be any sluts. Nature doesn't regard us as thinking souls, it regards us as fungible reproductive utilities. We either survive through it or we don't.

Higher thinking and higher levels of social organization are only useful to the extent that they promote the species. The Darwinian tailings are tough shit.

Patrick says

So we have an epidemic of sluts, probably no different than during the late Roman empire. In the long run, the sluts will leave few surviving descendants and be replaced by the descendants of devout Mormons, Amish, and Orthodox Jews.

I believe a huge part of this is social conditioning, not genetics.

Ceffer says

If sluts didn't leave descendants, there wouldn't be any sluts. Nature doesn't regard us as thinking souls, it regards us as fungible reproductive utilities. We either survive through it or we don't.

Right, but there are different kinds of selection, called r and K selection I think. There are societies as in sub-saharan Africa where the women are slutty and have to depend on their own grandmothers for help in raising the child. (Which is also very much like black culture in the US, at least nowadays.) But they are weak societies exactly because of the lack of paternal certainty and therefore the lack of paternal investment in the children and the societies.

I'm not saying that sluttery will be eliminated by evolution. I'm saying that cultures that give in to women's demand for shameless sluttery will be replaced by cultures that do not.

Traditions and cultures themselves are selected for over centuries, far quicker than biological evolution. Feminists and leftists are actively trying to destroy the mostly-monogamous culture that brought us down to the present day. In the end, they will just destroy themselves, but other cultures will live and take their place - cultures with more respect for tradition like the three I mentioned.

Rb6d says

I believe a huge part of this is social conditioning, not genetics.

Agreed. One red pill is that the #1 enforcer of women's virtues were... other women. Starting with family members and expanding out to all females.

Women were happy to call out sluts because it removed competitors from the Battle of the Sexes.

Our two major problems is that the Matriarchy endorses "Go wild, then settle later" and that Weak Men can't say No to Pussy. The age differential plays a major role in this. The Matriarchal laws don't help either. And possibly worst of all is the pastors who cave to the Female False Prerogative and don't kick sluts out until they repent.

The feminism stuff, like critical race theory, are subversive designs to weaken society from the inside. Destroy faith and family, demoralize etc. They are vectors of the psychopathic parasites. We are experiencing the predator prey phenomenon from our species predators trying to control us as prey.

Sluts are prone to disease, since pelvic inflammatory disease more often than not results in sterility.

The standard model of pair bonding exists because it is effective in raising viable offspring. Nature also creates a spread spectrum of variable desire complexes that keep a few sluts and satyrs around and active, too, however it may compromise their lives and fortunes as individuals. I guess you could call them the tailings of the evolutionary chisels.

Ceffer says

The standard model of pair bonding exists because it is effective in raising viable offspring.

+ less social upheaval, as you don't have violent hordes of young males with no chance of getting a female and creating a family roaming around. That might have been the reason for initial introduction of monogamy, or something close to it. Most "pagan" cultures of Northern Europe allowed for only one wife, and man could take (or more precisely, HAD to take) the second one only when his married brother died.

Another great reason Women called out Sluts and Female Adulteresses is that their expulsion/execution/divorce allowed proven Males, as Father/Providers, to get back on the market, so other women could sink their claws into them.

It's been said a thousand times, so let's make it a thousand and one: Politics is downstream from Culture. The divorce laws are what they are because of the shift in cultural values to Matriarchy.

Rb6d says

social upheaval, as you don't have violent hordes of young males with no chance of getting a female and creating a family roaming around

I've read that a major cause of the rapid expansion of early Islam was that the men who were taking four wives (or eight-ish if you're Mohammed) were not leaving enough fertile women around for other 3/4 of men.

Solution: Tell them that Allah wants them to own all the women that they can steal from non-Muslims. So you get a bunch of frustrated young men attacking and stealing women from neighboring areas, and turning them into Muslim areas. When the kids from those unions grow up, they do it again, outward in another wave.

https://reclaimthenet.org/law-student-in-scotland-faces-disciplinary-action-for-saying-women-not-as-strong-as-men/

Law student in Scotland faces disciplinary action for saying women “not as strong as men” and have vaginas
She was reported to the university's authorities. ...

“I thought it was a joke. I thought there was no way that the university would pursue me for utilizing my legal right to freedom of speech,” Keogh told The Times (paywall).

“I didn’t intend to be offensive but I did take part in a debate and outlined my sincerely held views. I wasn’t being mean, transphobic, or offensive. I was stating a basic biological fact,” she continued.

Facts are being censored. People are being fired for stating objective provable obvious facts.

Another one:

https://reclaimthenet.org/john-staddon-listserv/

Duke neuroscience professor banned from discussion forum for saying there are two sexes
Professor John Staddon was removed.

A psychology and neuroscience expert has been banned from a discussion by the American Psychological Association (APA) for suggesting there are only two sexes in an email discussion with colleagues.

John Staddon, an emeritus professor of neuroscience and psychology at Duke University, was kicked off the APA’s Society for Behavioral Neuroscience and Comparative Psychology Division 6 listserv.

Speaking to The College Fix, Staddon said he was probably kicked out for writing:

“Hmm… Binary view of sex false? What is the evidence? Is there a Z chromosome?”

Staddon was told he was kicked out for breaking the division’s code of conduct...