Comments 1 - 40 of 48 Next » Last » Search these comments
“There’s a famous scientist in the Wuhan lab, her name is Dr. Shi [Zhengli], and she published a paper a couple years ago which has been reviewed by MIT, and says that it’s a gain-of-function research,” Paul said. “But in the byline, she has to list the sponsors. She lists Dr. Fauci and the NIAID as a sponsor of her research, which everybody acknowledges [is] gain-of-function research, juicing up these superviruses. So, I don’t know how you get around this.”
My first thought when I heard about the virus in 2020 was "Well, the impeachment failed, so now they are desperate enough to release their secret weapon against Trump no matter what the cost to ordinary people."
And now I believe even more that that's exactly what happened.
Dr. Anthony Fauci May Be More Conniving Than We Thought
Rebecca Downs|Posted: May 13, 2021 3:45 PM
... When asked why more people aren't speaking up about this, Rep. Gallagher brought up the moniker Dr. Fauci has as the "godfather" of gain-of-function research. He also pointed to a 2011 op-ed co-authored by Dr. Fauci, which was published in the Washington Post, "A flu virus risk worth taking." The piece shows a favorable view toward gain-of-function.
The congressman suggested that people in the scientific community are hesitant to speak up because Fauci and the NIH controls the money and the grants, and that this could "have a chilling effect and torch your career."
Remember how at first they were all trying to do everything to make the shit spread? "Go to the Chinatown" they said. "Go join a protest against Trump banning flights from China, gather in big group and scream your heads off" they said. "Don't you dare telling us to close NY subway" they said.
Top researchers are calling for a real investigation into the origin of covid-19
A group of prominent biologists say there needs to be a “safe space” for asking whether the coronavirus came out of a lab.
by Rowan Jacobsenarchive page
May 13, 2021
A year ago, the idea that the covid-19 pandemic could have been caused by a laboratory accident was denounced as a conspiracy theory by the world’s leading journals, scientists, and news organizations.
But the origin of the virus that has killed millions remains a mystery, and the chance that it came from a lab has become the theory that cannot be put to rest.
Now, in a letter in the journal Science, 18 prominent biologists—including the world’s foremost coronavirus researcher—are lending their weight to calls for a new investigation of all possible origins of the virus, and calling on China’s laboratories and agencies to “open their records” to independent analysis. ...
The new letter also gains extra gravitas from its publication in Science, one of the world’s most prestigious journals. That choice of venue, says Relman, was important. “Some of our coauthors said to us, ‘I’ll participate, but I don’t want to be a part of an open letter to the world, or an op-ed in the New York Times. That’s not how I see my role in this. I’m a scientist. I would much rather be addressing fellow scientists in a scientific journal.’”
ChauvinsKnee saysRemember how at first they were all trying to do everything to make the shit spread? "Go to the Chinatown" they said. "Go join a protest against Trump banning flights from China, gather in big group and scream your heads off" they said. "Don't you dare telling us to close NY subway" they said.
The walls may be starting to close in on Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, who is now facing questions over his role in approving funding of research at the Chinese lab that the coronavirus may have escaped from.
Despite the narrative that COVID was the product of a bat in a “wet market”, the theory that the virus actually originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology has gained increasing support including a bombshell article by a renowned former New York Times science reporter.
Seriously, I think the dropping of mask requirements is exactly to try to deflect attention from FAUCI'S GENOCIDE FOR PROFIT.
This was a crime against humanity, and we need a Nuremberg-type trial.
This was a crime against humanity, and we need a Nuremberg-type trial.
Why would Fauci fund a “gain of function” virus that’s no worse than the common cold?Ask Fauci. My theory is that this whole pandemic was a trial run to see how the world responded, test out mRNA vaccine technology on the masses, and kick Trump out of office. Remember, these vaccines have been likened unto software updates they can perform on you via booster shots. Bill Gates has even said that more pandemics are coming; how does he know that? Pure evil.
Bill Gates has even said that more pandemics are coming
But wait I thought the numbers were all inflated and no one was actually dying of covid... just old age and other ailments? Why would Fauci fund a “gain of function” virus that’s no worse than the common cold?
You guys like to change your thesis like the wind... it’s comical.
. Bill Gates has even said that more pandemics are coming; how does he know that? Pure evil.
And seismologists are evil to say more quakes are coming in the future?
porkchopexpress saysIs Bill Gates a virologist?. Bill Gates has even said that more pandemics are coming; how does he know that? Pure evil.
And seismologists are evil to say more quakes are coming in the future?
BoomAndBustCycle saysporkchopexpress saysIs Bill Gates a virologist?. Bill Gates has even said that more pandemics are coming; how does he know that? Pure evil.
And seismologists are evil to say more quakes are coming in the future?
A group of international researchers are pushing for a “proper investigation” into the origins of COVID-19, including examining the lab accident theory that a World Health Organization (WHO) probe previously dismissed.
The WHO-led mission in Wuhan, which released its findings in late March, did not give “balanced consideration” to the theory that the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus came from a laboratory accident, rather giving more weight to the natural spillover hypothesis—the event that the virus spread to humans through an animal host, the scientists argued in a letter published May 14 in Science, a peer-reviewed academic journal.
The letter was signed by 18 medical experts who specialize in virology, biology, immunology, and epidemiology.
The WHO team assessed the animal origin theory as “likely to very likely” and the other as “extremely unlikely,” despite having “no findings in clear support of either,” they wrote, noting that of 313 pages total, the report only dedicated four pages to addressing a possible lab accident.
“We must take hypotheses about both natural and laboratory spillovers seriously until we have sufficient data,” the authors said. “A proper investigation should be transparent, objective, data-driven … and responsibly managed to minimize the impact of conflicts of interest.”
CDC Director Says Change on Mask Guidelines Not Due to Political Pressure
BY GQ PAN May 16, 2021
Rochelle Walensky, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), said Sunday morning that the latest update to the agency’s mask guidelines has nothing to do with political pressure.
Christine Grady is the Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. She also serves as Head of the Department’s Section on Human Subjects Research. Her research focuses on research subject recruitment, incentives, vulnerability, and international research ethics.
Comments 1 - 40 of 48 Next » Last » Search these comments
It would also enable profiteers to create a virus and a vaccine for it at the same time.