« First « Previous Comments 6 - 45 of 48 Next » Last » Search these comments
Remember how at first they were all trying to do everything to make the shit spread? "Go to the Chinatown" they said. "Go join a protest against Trump banning flights from China, gather in big group and scream your heads off" they said. "Don't you dare telling us to close NY subway" they said.
Top researchers are calling for a real investigation into the origin of covid-19
A group of prominent biologists say there needs to be a “safe space” for asking whether the coronavirus came out of a lab.
by Rowan Jacobsenarchive page
May 13, 2021
A year ago, the idea that the covid-19 pandemic could have been caused by a laboratory accident was denounced as a conspiracy theory by the world’s leading journals, scientists, and news organizations.
But the origin of the virus that has killed millions remains a mystery, and the chance that it came from a lab has become the theory that cannot be put to rest.
Now, in a letter in the journal Science, 18 prominent biologists—including the world’s foremost coronavirus researcher—are lending their weight to calls for a new investigation of all possible origins of the virus, and calling on China’s laboratories and agencies to “open their records” to independent analysis. ...
The new letter also gains extra gravitas from its publication in Science, one of the world’s most prestigious journals. That choice of venue, says Relman, was important. “Some of our coauthors said to us, ‘I’ll participate, but I don’t want to be a part of an open letter to the world, or an op-ed in the New York Times. That’s not how I see my role in this. I’m a scientist. I would much rather be addressing fellow scientists in a scientific journal.’”
ChauvinsKnee saysRemember how at first they were all trying to do everything to make the shit spread? "Go to the Chinatown" they said. "Go join a protest against Trump banning flights from China, gather in big group and scream your heads off" they said. "Don't you dare telling us to close NY subway" they said.
The walls may be starting to close in on Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, who is now facing questions over his role in approving funding of research at the Chinese lab that the coronavirus may have escaped from.
Despite the narrative that COVID was the product of a bat in a “wet market”, the theory that the virus actually originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology has gained increasing support including a bombshell article by a renowned former New York Times science reporter.
Seriously, I think the dropping of mask requirements is exactly to try to deflect attention from FAUCI'S GENOCIDE FOR PROFIT.
This was a crime against humanity, and we need a Nuremberg-type trial.
This was a crime against humanity, and we need a Nuremberg-type trial.
Why would Fauci fund a “gain of function” virus that’s no worse than the common cold?Ask Fauci. My theory is that this whole pandemic was a trial run to see how the world responded, test out mRNA vaccine technology on the masses, and kick Trump out of office. Remember, these vaccines have been likened unto software updates they can perform on you via booster shots. Bill Gates has even said that more pandemics are coming; how does he know that? Pure evil.
Bill Gates has even said that more pandemics are coming
But wait I thought the numbers were all inflated and no one was actually dying of covid... just old age and other ailments? Why would Fauci fund a “gain of function” virus that’s no worse than the common cold?
You guys like to change your thesis like the wind... it’s comical.
. Bill Gates has even said that more pandemics are coming; how does he know that? Pure evil.
And seismologists are evil to say more quakes are coming in the future?
porkchopexpress saysIs Bill Gates a virologist?. Bill Gates has even said that more pandemics are coming; how does he know that? Pure evil.
And seismologists are evil to say more quakes are coming in the future?
BoomAndBustCycle saysporkchopexpress saysIs Bill Gates a virologist?. Bill Gates has even said that more pandemics are coming; how does he know that? Pure evil.
And seismologists are evil to say more quakes are coming in the future?
A group of international researchers are pushing for a “proper investigation” into the origins of COVID-19, including examining the lab accident theory that a World Health Organization (WHO) probe previously dismissed.
The WHO-led mission in Wuhan, which released its findings in late March, did not give “balanced consideration” to the theory that the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus came from a laboratory accident, rather giving more weight to the natural spillover hypothesis—the event that the virus spread to humans through an animal host, the scientists argued in a letter published May 14 in Science, a peer-reviewed academic journal.
The letter was signed by 18 medical experts who specialize in virology, biology, immunology, and epidemiology.
The WHO team assessed the animal origin theory as “likely to very likely” and the other as “extremely unlikely,” despite having “no findings in clear support of either,” they wrote, noting that of 313 pages total, the report only dedicated four pages to addressing a possible lab accident.
“We must take hypotheses about both natural and laboratory spillovers seriously until we have sufficient data,” the authors said. “A proper investigation should be transparent, objective, data-driven … and responsibly managed to minimize the impact of conflicts of interest.”
CDC Director Says Change on Mask Guidelines Not Due to Political Pressure
BY GQ PAN May 16, 2021
Rochelle Walensky, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), said Sunday morning that the latest update to the agency’s mask guidelines has nothing to do with political pressure.
Christine Grady is the Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. She also serves as Head of the Department’s Section on Human Subjects Research. Her research focuses on research subject recruitment, incentives, vulnerability, and international research ethics.
How Team Biden ended COVID Mania overnight
Due to several crises, they flipped the switch on the Safety Regime.
Jordan Schachtel
6 hr ago
How was the Biden Administration able to flip the switch on COVID Mania and turn off the Safety Regime virtually overnight, after 15 months of a ruthless propaganda and fear campaign claiming that America was in the midst of a perpetual pandemic of endless death and destruction? Luckily for Team Biden, the current White House are beneficiaries of Democrat, or D.C. insider privilege. And because they are part of the insider’s club, they have the ability to control and manipulate the power centers in D.C. at a moment’s notice. To make sense of this rapid, perplexing change of events, you have to understand how our institutions in Washington, D.C. actually work.
It’s understandable for the average American citizen to have a difficult time grasping how the CDC and other Government Health institutions have gone from projecting a “sense of impending doom” to “your health is in your hands” in a matter of days.
Twitter avatar for @CDCDirector
Rochelle Walensky, MD, MPH
@CDCDirector
Your health is in your hands. If you are unvaccinated, please get vaccinated as soon as you can to decrease your risk to #COVID19. If you choose not to be vaccinated, continue to wear a mask and practice all mitigation strategies to protect yourself from the virus.
Maddow Blog @MaddowBlog
Maddow: Is it safe for a vaccinated person to sit indoors unmasked at work next to a maskless unvaccinated person?
CDC Director Dr. Walensky: Safe for the vaccinated person. Not safe for the unvaccinated person. https://t.co/J0JxEtPuqI
May 14th 2021
Understanding the real formatting of the D.C. beltway means being familiar with the de facto power structure in Washington, and being able to identify the people who are actually in charge. Contrary to what is being reported in the press, political appointees like CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and her colleagues on the same hierarchical level are not in fact in charge of much at all. Sure, Dr. Walensky may have a powerful, respected title and some lofty credentials, but that doesn’t mean she has the independent authority to make executive-level decisions. She and her colleagues were appointed to these positions with the understanding that they would dutifully take orders from the White House, no questions asked. Dr. Walensky and others in Government Health were vetted prior to their appointments to make sure that they would be loyal to the real power structure in D.C. The powerful individuals in town are policy officials who work directly with the White House, and not at CDC headquarters in Atlanta. Had she publicly dissented from the White House talking points, Walensky would be sent packing the next day. She and her colleagues choose to partake in this system because embracing its practices offers tremendous upside and prestige to their careers.
Now, the somewhat level-headed individuals in the Biden Administration have been seeking a way out of COVID Mania for quite some time. While the power grabs related to “the pandemic” have helped the people in charge accumulate power (particularly maniacal state governors) and install an authoritarian Safety Regime, the pandemic policies have also manifested several crises. The Biden Administration is dealing with countless domestic and international upheavals, in addition to a sinking economy, among many other impending bubbles and catastrophes. They needed a way out as soon as humanly possible. COVID Mania had so many residual effects that it began to threaten the integrity of the entire system. They needed an exit strategy, so they simply asserted their insider privilege, moved the political appointees and the federal bureaucracy into order, and switched off COVID Mania like it was no big deal.
Could Donald Trump have pulled this off in the same way? I’m not so sure. It’s important to understand how Washington works when someone who threatens the administrative state comes into town, as opposed to someone who is supported by the federal bureaucracy.
The federal bureaucracy is overwhelmingly liberal and conformist when it comes to supporting the power centers in Washington. In the 2016 elections, 95 percent of political donations went to Hillary Clinton, who, like Joe Biden, is very much the ultimate D.C. insider.
When an insider White House like the Biden Administration is in charge of the executive branch, the civil service acts in solidarity with the administration. They rightly do not perceive the Biden Administration as a threat to The System. When an outsider like Donald Trump comes into town, the civil service makes it their mission to make the outsider’s job as difficult as possible. From 2016-2020, we saw the extremes of this phenomenon on display, as the federal bureaucracy made it their mission to not only undermine the president, but to attempt to remove him from office by any means possible.
If a term two Trump Administration had decided to make this sudden move, it would almost have certainly been met with complete outrage, a federal bureaucracy in complete revolt, mass resignations, the corporate press accusing the president of committing mass murder, and woke corporations perhaps making mask and vaccine requirements even more stringent upon entry.
Would Trump have been able to eventually curb Anthony Fauci’s daily adversarial TV appearances? That remains unclear. Yet observe how expeditiously the Biden Administration has been able to tame the rabid animal in the spotlight-seeking Fauci, who has fallen in line with the talking points regarding masks and school openings. Make no mistake, a dissenting Fauci will be thrown under the bus multiple times if he acts out of line, and the political scientist in the NIAID chief is careful not to overstep his portfolio.
« First « Previous Comments 6 - 45 of 48 Next » Last » Search these comments
It would also enable profiteers to create a virus and a vaccine for it at the same time.