patrick.net

Paying people to get the jab not working in Hong Kong. Excess"vaccine" to be thrown out.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210526231213/https://amp.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/country-that-cant-pay-people-to-get-the-jab/news-story/8cf38a8ecb99ece9c0e7436b1e687b4e

The Chinese tend to be a bit smarter than most white people.

WineHorror1 says

Patrick says

The Chinese tend to be a bit smarter than most white people.

I think the Chinese are much more likely to realize their government is corrupt and should not do what they say, if possible.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/

Aims of the study: Patient comprehension is a critical part of meeting medical ethics standards of informed consent in study designs. The aim of the study was to determine if sufficient literature exists to require clinicians to disclose the specific risk that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus.

Methods used to conduct the study: Published literature was reviewed to identify preclinical and clinical evidence that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus. Clinical trial protocols for COVID-19 vaccines were reviewed to determine if risks were properly disclosed.

Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) emerged in China in 2002 and spread to other countries before brought under control. Because of a concern for reemergence or a deliberate release of the SARS coronavirus, vaccine development was initiated. Evaluations of an inactivated whole virus vaccine in ferrets and nonhuman primates and a virus-like-particle vaccine in mice induced protection against infection but challenged animals exhibited an immunopathologic-type lung disease.

Conclusions: These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.

WineHorror1 says

I think the Chinese are much more likely to realize their government is corrupt and should not do what they say, if possible.

Those Africans who jumped off the balcony or into the river to avoid the mandatory jab aren't stupid either.

porkchopexpress says

This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

By design.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/05/26/new-pfizer-study-four-fifths-of-all-vaccinated-children-aged-12-and-over-complain-of-side-effects/

ENJOY YOUR JAB!!!

"DRAPER, Utah (ABC4) – The day after his COVID-19 vaccine shot, 17-year-old Everest Romney felt his neck swelling. In the coming days, he suffered from severe headaches.

His mother, who tells ABC4 the pediatrician initially dismissed the symptoms as a pulled neck muscle, says she was convinced it was something else.

“He could not move his neck without the assistance of his hands,” says mother Cherie Romney."

https://www.abc4.com/news/local-news/draper-teenager-hospitalized-with-blood-clots-after-covid-19-vaccine-shot/

This was Pfizer :)

zzyzzx says

They'll be the first out of business.

RAND PAUL - I AM NOT GETTING "VACCINATED"

"Are they going to tell me I can't have a cheeseburger for lunch"

FRENCH AMBULANCE MAN AND NURSES ALERT MASSIVE INCREASE IN DEATHS FOLLOWING THE SHOT

VAXXX DEATHS ARE THE PANDEMIC

Fear porn. You can tell by the music.

zzyzzx says

zzyzzx says

Why? What's the point? They don't have separate sections for "vaccinated against chickenpox", do they? Why this time it's different?

And whom is this supposed to "protect": vaxxed, unvaxxed, a random bat flying by?

Eric Holder says

Why? What's the point? They don't have separate sections for "vaccinated against chickenpox", do they? Why this time it's different?

And whom is this supposed to "protect": vaxxed, unvaxxed, a random bat flying by?

Are you talking about common sense, justice and human rights again? How old fashioned.

Eric Holder says

zzyzzx says

Why? What's the point? They don't have separate sections for "vaccinated against chickenpox", do they? Why this time it's different?

How about AIDS only sections? Far more dangerous ailment, yet they get special protections to not be outed they have AIDS in the first place. This is/has become a slippery slope for those in charge. I now want to know if someone had AIDS in the house I'm about to buy... oh wait, you can't.

We should treat infectious diseases like AIDS. NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS! Somehow this virus is different.

If you have it and knowingly spread it to someone, then that is a problem. I'm sure I walked around people with AIDS at some point, but they didn't butt fuck me. If I'm sick with Covid, I'll stay home and not sneeze on people or make out with them. Not too complicated.

Fact is a virus is out there. It's not going away. There will ALWAYS be people that aren't responsible. They'll be sick as shit and go out or go out to get to the doctor. This won't vanish. We aret not vaccinating our way out of this. It will mutate negating any vaccination. It's endemic. You'll get it and will need to man/woman up and deal. Fauci is a cunt. CDC/WHO are morons. Fuck them all. 10th graders know this shit and I hated biology in high school.

WookieMan says

How about AIDS only sections?

From now on I'll answer the question "are you vaxxed?" with a question "do you have AIDS?".

WookieMan says

If you have it and knowingly spread it to someone, then that is a problem.

Not in California it isn't. Totally legal to KNOWINGLY spread AIDS to unsuspecting people.

Funny how it became legal to murder someone with that particular disease when gays got power in Sacramento.

Eric Holder says

WookieMan says

If you have it and knowingly spread it to someone, then that is a problem.

Not in California it isn't. Totally legal to KNOWINGLY spread AIDS to unsuspecting people.

I know, you guys have mentioned that. I have no intention of getting butt fucked though or becoming blood brothers with someone. And I don't live in CA. Cost and bat shit crazy laws like this are why I don't/won't move there.

I'm being a bit hyperbolic when I compare AIDS to Covid, but it's still valid. We only have therapeutics to treat AIDS. If the vaccine works, there's no reason to have vaccinated sections anywhere for Covid. Or requirements. Or passports. Otherwise we need it for AIDS, a much more harmful disease.

Vaccinate for Covid at your discretion and move on with your life. Don't dictate mine. (Not saying you are Holder, just finishing the point)

Another message started to pop up in the "press": sure, if you already had Covid you do have immunity against it, but didjaknow that if you get vaxxed now you'll get double-super-kamehameha immunity?!!

Subreddit dedicated to vax side effects:
https://www.reddit.com/r/CovidVaccinated/

Well, my wife just told me that she's getting the Pfizer vaccine. She already made an appointment. She knows I'm vehemently against it and almost didn't tell me, but that she's done her own research and is getting it. I'm so disappointed.

If my wife said she was getting the vaccine, I would tell her that we needed to arrange a divorce and a property settlement ASAP and separate. It's one thing to stay with a partner who has become sick and stay with them out of love and loyalty. It is quite another to watch somebody go downhill because of an optional and unnecessary decision. That would be too much. It would be the same as leaving an unrepentant deteriorating alcoholic or drug addict.

We've seen too many people having bad outcomes already in our hood.

porkchopexpress says

getting the Pfizer vaccine.

I know a number of ppl, who took the Pfizer route, knowing perfectly well that the rogue mRNA was experimental and that in general, no foreign mRNA sneaks into a human cell w/o some warning to the restriction enzymes.

I mean at least they should have taken the J&J "mock" cold virus one, with some blood thinners, if they needed it for their careers but no, they kowtowed to society's BS.

My hairdresser is having brain issues and memory problems after taking the jab. It's sad. But, I don't have to live with her but a couple of hours every few weeks.

porkchopexpress says

Well, my wife just told me that she's getting the Pfizer vaccine. She already made an appointment. She knows I'm vehemently against it and almost didn't tell me, but that she's done her own research and is getting it. I'm so disappointed.

Good luck, I hope it all goes well.

I'm asking her to at least wait until it's FDA-approved. I figure if there's anything I can say to have her delay her decision, more data will come out that might convince her to NOT get it. She hasn't responded to me yet.

She thinks I'm a conspiracy nut.

porkchopexpress says

I'm asking her to at least wait until it's FDA-approved. I figure if there's anything I can say to have her delay her decision, more data will come out that might convince her to NOT get it. She hasn't responded to me yet.

She thinks I'm a conspiracy nut.

Covid is rapidly fading away in the US. It's totally prudent to simply wait it out. If one haven't caught it over the last year the chances of catching it going forward are miniscule.

FuckCCP89 says

ly fading away in the US. It's totally prudent to simply wait it out. If one haven't caught it over the last year the chances of catching it going forward are miniscule.

That's the even crazier part. We both got Covid already in Dec >.<

It's as if she doesn't believe natural immunity exists.

porkchopexpress says

FuckCCP89 says

ly fading away in the US. It's totally prudent to simply wait it out. If one haven't caught it over the last year the chances of catching it going forward are miniscule.

That's the even crazier part. We both got Covid already in Dec >.<

It's as if she doesn't believe natural immunity exists.

Jesus.

porkchopexpress says

FuckCCP89 says

ly fading away in the US. It's totally prudent to simply wait it out. If one haven't caught it over the last year the chances of catching it going forward are miniscule.

That's the even crazier part. We both got Covid already in Dec >.<

It's as if she doesn't believe natural immunity exists.

Wow, it must very difficult to bridge the mental gap you 2 have between each other. I know 2 couples that got divorced over Covid. I wish you well. BTW, the 2 divorces were more over the way they were dealing with their kids combined with Covid.

porkchopexpress says

I'm asking her to at least wait until it's FDA-approved. I figure if there's anything I can say to have her delay her decision, more data will come out that might convince her to NOT get it. She hasn't responded to me yet.

She thinks I'm a conspiracy nut.

That seems like a fair compromise on your end. Best if luck. That's a tough position.

Does she want it because of peer pressure?

If you haven't already, I'd show her the covid vax side effect group on Facebook. That will quickly change her mind. If you need the URL let me know.

Thanks guys. I'll keep you posted on what happens. I don't think she'll admit it but I believe it to be largely peer pressure. All of her family have been vaxxed.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/oklahoma-legislature-passes-bill-banning-mask-mandate-and-covid-19-vaccine-requirements-in-schools_3833272.html?utm_source=patrick.net&utm_medium=patrick.net&utm_campaign=patrick.net

Oklahoma Legislature Passes Bill Banning Mask Mandate, COVID-19 Vaccine Requirements in Schools
BY LI HAI May 27, 2021

The Oklahoma House has passed a bill banning mask mandates in public schools and requirements for students to be vaccinated against COVID-19.

The bill, SB 658, passed the state House by 76–18 and was sent to Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt on May 26. The state Senate had passed the bill by 38–8 a day earlier.

“For the sake of children throughout the state, I’m glad this bill is one step closer to becoming law,” Republican state Sen. Rob Standridge said in a statement. “With this legislation, vaccine passports for Oklahoma students will not exist.”

Standridge is also one of the authors of the bill.

SB 658 (pdf) would prohibit the boards of education of all public school districts and technology center school districts—including those of higher education—from requiring vaccination against COVID-19 as “a condition of admittance to or attendance of the school or institution.” It would also prevent vaccine passports or similar documentation from being required.

Standridge explained during the session that the COVID-19 vaccine is different from other vaccines that are currently required, like those against diphtheria or tetanus, because it’s “still under emergency use authorization,” News9 reported.

SB 658 further forbids implementing a mask mandate for students who haven’t received COVID-19 vaccines.

Exceptions include when the governor declares an emergency or after the boards of education consult with their local county health department, but the mask mandate must be reconsidered at each regularly scheduled board meeting.

Democratic lawmakers oppose the bill.

“This legislation creates a barrier to local control that prevents locally elected school boards from being able to fully protect their students as they and their constituents see fit,” state Rep. Andy Fugate stated in a news release. “This is a clear government overreach meant to strip away the personal freedom of Oklahomans wanting to protect their communities.”

Republican state Rep. Kevin West, who is also an author of the bill, said: “Should the force of government be used to force citizens to do something they don’t want to do, or should it be used to empower the rights of citizens?

“This protects a student’s and a parent’s right to choose for themselves whether a vaccination is appropriate for them for their own personal health reasons or their religious or personal beliefs. This disallows discrimination against students and parents that choose to be exempt from such vaccinations.”

Texas and Iowa banned mask mandates in schools and local governments last week. Utah Gov. Spencer Cox also said earlier this month that schools will remove mask mandates for the upcoming school year. A number of states have banned vaccine passports statewide, either through executive orders or legislation.

SB 658 will take effect on July 1 if Stitt signs it into law. ...

Republicans have the supermajority necessary in both chambers to override a veto by the governor.

I just explained to my wife my concerns about how her decision doesn't just affect her, but me and the kids as well. I talked through all the reasons why it doesn't make sense for her to get vaccinated right now:
- Vaccines are not FDA approved
- No long-term safety data on vaccines
- California case rate is really low right now
- We've already had Covid

She said she'd try my vitamin protocol of Quercetin, Vit D, Vit C, Vit K, Zinc and NAC; I'm also on Ivermectin but I won't push that on her. I'm hoping if she sticks to it and believes it protects her, she won't feel the need to get the vaxx. Good progress but I'm cautiously optimistic.

porkchopexpress says

I just explained to my wife my concerns about how her decision doesn't just affect her, but me and the kids as well. I talked through all the reasons why it doesn't make sense for her to get vaccinated right now:
- Vaccines are not FDA approved
- No long-term safety data on vaccines
- California case rate is really low right now
- We've already had Covid

She said she'd try my vitamin protocol of Quercetin, Vit D, Vit C, Vit K, Zinc and NAC; I'm also on Ivermectin but I won't push that on her. I'm hoping if she sticks to it and believes it protects her, she won't feel the need to get the vaxx. Good progress but I'm cautiously optimistic.

America has reached herd immunity. Fact.