by NDrLoR ➕follow (3) 💰tip ignore
Comments 1 - 12 of 12 Search these comments
The ten points of the code were given in the section of the judges' verdict entitled "Permissible Medical Experiments":[6]
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. But they are not getting informed consent from the public.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature. The jab is completely unnecessary since the virus is a trivial risk to most people.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. Animal experiments showed that all of the animals developed ADE and then died on next exposure to the virus.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. Millions have been seriously injured, and a minimum of tens of thousands murdered by the jab.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects. The government knows full well that death or disabling injury is extremely likely with the jab.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. The risk of the jab is FAR above the risk from Fauci Flu.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death. No preparations are being made for mass death from the jab.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment. The experiment is on the uninformed public, which is inherently unethical.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible. The pressure to get the jab is daily and relentless.
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Death and disability from the jab widely known by all health care workers, who are instructed to continue anyway.
who fives a fuck what this Kinzinger jackass says?
HunterTits sayswho fives a fuck what this Kinzinger jackass says?
I will apologize for normal, intelligent Illinoian's. He not in my district and I'm not certain why he gets so much attention. I suppose I could look up his committee roles. He seems like a douche from all the local coverage as well. I think he does this to get recognition in some sick way.
For example. AOC is CONSTANTLY brought up, as if she matters at all. Nobody gives a crap what she says, or does, but she's constantly brought up as if she matters.
They told Biden that if he didn't cough up his 70 percent vaccine compliance immediately, they will be administering the REAL mRNA vaccine to him.
They are actually doing it - giving the jab door to door:
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,195,266 comments by 14,009 users - brazil66, mortarmaker, The_Deplorable online now